
Milei eyes legislative win to push second wave of reforms
Argentine President Javier Milei, pictured here at the United Nations Headquarters in 2024, plans to introduce a new package of state and economic reforms to Congress. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo
June 17 (UPI) -- Argentine President Javier Milei plans to introduce a new package of state and economic reforms to Congress after the country's legislative elections in October.
Milei hopes the vote will strengthen his party, La Libertad Avanza, which holds limited representation in Congress. He aims to win control of the Senate with allies, unseat the Peronist-Kirchnerist bloc and push his reform agenda through quickly.
Recent polls show Milei's party leading voter preferences by a wide margin, polling between 37% and 43%. The left-leaning coalition Unión por la Patria trails with support between 30% and 33%, while other parties lag far behind.
If Milei wins big in October, he plans to launch a broader reform program targeting Argentina's government, judiciary and public security system.
On fiscal policy, Milei says he wants to cut consolidated public spending to no more than 25% of GDP by 2027. "The national government, provinces and municipalities will all have to do their part," he said.
The administration plans to eliminate 90% of national taxes, keeping only six, in a bid to dismantle Argentina's complex tax system and shrink the state bureaucracy.
Milei has pledged to give Argentines "greater economic freedom," including lifting price controls and opening up foreign trade.
On security, the government wants to lower the age of criminal responsibility, raise penalties under the penal code and pass a national security law. The measure would expand powers for the state, intelligence services and law enforcement to combat crime.
The proposed justice reform seeks to address the country's public safety crisis by curbing what the government sees as excessive political influence over the judiciary.
Milei has said he will nominate candidates this year to fill all vacancies in the federal justice system. That includes top judgeships, federal courts, prosecutors and public defenders -- positions that account for about 40% of Argentina's federal bench.
On the economic front, the government plans to end controls on foreign currency transactions, expand deregulation, downsize overlapping agencies and speed up privatizations. Officials have not ruled out including Aerolíneas Argentinas.
On immigration, Milei wants to tighten citizenship rules, restrict free access to public healthcare -- particularly along the Bolivian border -- and limit enrollment of foreign students in national universities. He also aims to authorize expedited deportation procedures.
In labor policy, the government aims to curb union power. The plan would require 75% of normal operations to continue during strikes in essential services such as healthcare, education, security and telecommunications. For sectors deemed critically important -- including food production, banking, exports and construction -- a minimum service level of 50% would be required.
Milei's first reform package included deep fiscal austerity, cutting public investment, halting money printing by the Central Bank, closing state agencies and laying off about 43,000 public employees.
The government also launched privatization efforts for eight state-owned companies.
The measures triggered a drop in consumption and wages, affecting employment and private sector output.
Still, the administration points to falling inflation -- down to 1.5% in May -- along with rising imports and exports, climbing stock values for Argentine companies and a new agreement with the International Monetary Fund as key achievements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Lawmakers call for more safety measures after Minnesota shooting
Lawmakers call for more safety measures after Minnesota shooting Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are pressing for more detailed security briefings and calling on leadership to do more to protect their members. Show Caption Hide Caption Killed, wounded Minnesota state lawmakers honored at vigil Neighbors gathered to honor state Rep. Melissa Hortman and state Sen. John Hoffman. Hortman was killed and Hoffman was wounded in separate shootings. WASHINGTON - Lawmakers are clamoring for more security funding and around-the-clock safety measures after the assassination of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband has left Democrats and Republicans on edge. State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot and killed in their suburban Minneapolis home on June 14. The man accused of carrying out the crime, Vance Boelter, was reportedly targeting other lawmakers, including Reps. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio, and Hillary Scholten, D-Michigan. The incident is the latest in a string of political violence aimed at public officials and their families, including a hammer-wielding assailant who broke into former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's house and attacked her spouse, and fire set at Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's home. Back in Washington, lawmakers on the Hill are pressing for more detailed security briefings and calling on leadership to do more to protect their members. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and New York Democrat Rep. Joe Morelle urged House Speaker Mike Johnson in a June 16 letter to increase lawmakers' office budgets to 'support additional safety and security measures.' That allowance is meant to pay for costs incurred as part of a member's "official and representational duties," which may include travel, rent, printing or supplies. The amount each member receives varies. The Democrats also called on Johnson to direct the House's chief law enforcement officer to 'take all necessary steps' to protect members across the country. "Too many other patriotic public servants have left Congress because they no longer felt safe carrying out their duty as elected officials," they wrote. "We must act to protect each other and preserve this great American institution." The Minnesota shooting has led some lawmakers to change their daily schedules. Scholten, for example, canceled a June 16 town hall meeting in her western Michigan district 'out of an abundance of caution,' according to a statement. Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee is planning to send to a letter later this week to a critical House panel responsible for authorizing lawmakers' security spending that says he and his colleagues are "publicly identifiable at all times" and need 'around-the-clock security services,' according to a draft obtained by USA TODAY. Data from the U.S. Capitol Police shows that threats against members of Congress, their family and staff have significantly risen in the past few years, with 3,939 'concerning statements and direct threats' in 2017 to 9,474 in 2024. On June 16, a 25-year-old man was arraigned on federal charges after sending messages threatening sexual violence against Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz and Nebraska Republican Sen. Deb Fischer. House Administration Committee Chairman Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wisconsin, and Morelle, the committee's ranking member, noted the escalation of threats in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi on June 17. They requested Bondi assign federal prosecutors across the country who would work on at least a part-time basis to investigate and prosecute threats against members of Congress. 'We are concerned that the current lack of prosecutorial capacity will allow threat behavior to persist unabated,' they wrote. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the lawmakers' request.


Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
Cities sue DHS over frozen anti-terrorism funds
Five major U.S. cities are suing the Trump administration over funding to prevent nuclear attacks and terrorism that they argue has been illegally withheld by the Department of Homeland Security. The lawsuit filed by Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver and Boston alleges that the administration has not reimbursed cities for relevant security expenses since February and has failed to award funding for 2025. 'Even by Trump standards, this action is astonishing,' Denver Mayor Mike Johnston told POLITICO on Tuesday. 'You are willfully putting Americans at risk of terror attacks.' The Securing the Cities program was created to help cities prepare for the possibility of nuclear or terrorist attacks. It began first as a pilot program in the New York City region in 2006 and expanded over time to 13 cities. In 2018, the program was formally authorized by Congress. 'DHS cannot override Congress's judgment by freezing congressionally appropriated funding,' the lawsuit argues. The lawsuit was initially filed by Chicago in May; the other four cities signed on Tuesday. DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit. 'There's a pretty big irony between the rhetoric we're hearing from D.C. on the need to have safe and secure cities,' Seattle Deputy Mayor Greg Wong told POLITICO Tuesday, 'and what's happening here — where the actual dollars that go to support that at the city level are being held up.' It's the latest in a series of lawsuits brought against the Trump administration by cities and states since January over the withholding or freezing of federal funds. Some of those lawsuits have already found success: A federal judge in Boston on Monday ruled that the elimination of certain NIH grants was illegal — calling their termination 'government racial discrimination.' The lawsuit alleges that, since February, DHS has not reimbursed cities, even for security expenses that were already approved. Denver, for example, is still waiting on more than $300,000, according to Johnston's office. Securing the Cities funds in Denver have been used in the past for security for visits by both President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden, as well as for major sporting and music events that could be targets. 'It's one thing to say you're going to disagree about the use of FEMA funds for migrant services, or to say you disagree about transportation contracting with DEI priorities,' Johnston said. 'But to say you're going to cut anti-terrorist protections in American cities, I think, is way beyond the pale of debates about social policy.' In the lawsuit, plaintiffs said they intend to use the money to help protect major sporting events taking place next year, like the Super Bowl in San Francisco and FIFA World Cup events in multiple cities. In Seattle, for example, the city planned to spend this year's grant on 1,000 radiation detection devices that can catch terrorism devices like dirty bombs which could be detonated in a crowd. The equipment is expected to be part of the city's preparation to host World Cup matches in 2026, Wong told POLITICO. 'The Trump administration ordered us to pause on that purchase of equipment,' Wong said. $300 million was distributed to cities in the program between 2007 and 2023, according to the Government Accountability Office, and annual funding for the program is estimated to be around $29 million. San Francisco and Chicago both said Tuesday they expected to receive about $1 million from the grant program. The program has received scrutiny from lawmakers in the past. A bipartisan bill introduced by Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.) in 2024 would have required the program to establish performance metrics and reach specific milestones. The bill passed the House in March 2024 and made it through one Senate committee but failed to make it over the finish line. The GAO in 2024 also made five recommendations for DHS to make the program more effective. GAO eventually found the Biden administration either partially or fully addressed all five. 'This is one where all of our regional leaders, Republican and Democrat alike, are shocked that this is where we are,' Johnston said. 'We think this is a perfect reason why you go to court.' Shia Kapos contributed to this report


Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump to delay ban on TikTok again
The youth can rejoice. President Trump will yet again extend the deadline for a ban on TikTok, the White House said Tuesday. Why it matters: The wildly popular video app lives to fight another day. It's so far outlasted the terms of a bipartisan law that would have banned it over national security risks because of its ties to China. That legislation passed last year, which was upheld by the Supreme Court, had required that ByteDance divest TikTok by mid-January or else stop operating in the U.S. Trump has extended the deadline multiple times since he took office in January, most recently until June 19. Driving the news: Trump will sign an additional executive order this week to keep TikTok up and running for another 90 days, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. "As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark," she added. During the extension period, the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," Leavitt, said. Zoom in: Patience on the Hill has been wearing thin as Trump prepares to delay a ban on TikTok for the third time. Each time the White House delays enforcement of the TikTok ban, Republicans' national security concerns are undermined, Axios' Maria Curi reports. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) told reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday that Congress passed the law "so that the Chinese government no longer has the ability to use TikTok to conduct espionage and propaganda." He added, "It is my hope and expectation that that's exactly what the Trump administration is fighting to achieve. And as long as that happens, I expect Congress will be happy." Cruz noted, "If it doesn't happen, I expect Congress will be very honest." Catch up quick: The app briefly went dark in January after ByteDance failed to divest from TikTok.