logo
Reform council agrees plan to share data with savings unit

Reform council agrees plan to share data with savings unit

BBC News17-07-2025
A Reform UK-controlled council in England is the first to approve a proposal to share sensitive financial information with the party's cost-cutting unit.West Northamptonshire Council is exploring options to share data requested by Reform UK's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge).Doge has asked the council to provide records of spending on IT systems, social care services and hotels housing asylum seekers.The team of unelected volunteers - led by former Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf - is aiming to enter into similar data-sharing agreements with all the councils controlled by the party.
The BBC has been told Doge has submitted requests to access sensitive information to other councils, including those in Kent and Worcestershire.So far, Doge has focused on drawing attention to publicly available information about council spending, such as money spent on net-zero initiatives and asylum seekers.The party insists it needs access to council records that are not public to make sure taxpayers are getting value for money."It's not a very well kept secret at council level that a lot of money is wasted on procurement," a party source said.But opposition councillors have questioned the need for a team of outside auditors and have expressed concerns about how sensitive data would be handled by Doge.Jonathan Harris, the Liberal Democrat group leader on West Northamptonshire Council, said he was sceptical of Doge's claims and argued it should be up to elected councillors to identify opportunities for saving money."They've said they're going to get fantastic data engineers in and use AI," Harris said. "That appears to be all smoke and mirrors."Harris said he had "lots of uncomfortable concerns about it because it's a PR exercise"."It's a promotional tool for Reform," he added.
The council has not shared any data with Doge so far.But the council said arrangements signed off by the cabinet on Wednesday establish "the framework under which information may possibly be shared in the future, including strict legal protections and confidentiality safeguards".Mark Arnull, the Reform UK leader of the council, said the proposed data-sharing arrangement would comply with the law.He said: "I am confident the team will be able to support the council in identifying further efficiencies and potential future savings whilst continuing to protect and deliver services for residents across West Northamptonshire."The council said that since its creation in 2021, it had already saved around £115m by working more efficiently.But the finances of this council and others across the country are under massive strain, with many facing budget shortfalls because of rising costs and increasing demand for services.
Doge was launched in June this year after Reform UK took control of 10 local authorities in May's local elections.Reform UK said a team of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors would "visit and analyse" local authorities to find "waste and inefficiencies" in budgets.The unit is made up of about 15 volunteers and is run by Yusuf, who quit as party chairman in June, before returning to Reform to head up Doge days later.The party has not revealed the names of any of the volunteers working with Yusuf on Doge.It is modelled on the cost-cutting department set up by US President Donald Trump and previously led by billionaire Elon Musk.Doge in the US has been hampered by legal challenges to its efforts to access the personal financial data of Americans.Reform UK said Kent County Council - which it controls - would be the first local authority to be audited by its Doge team.Officers - effectively civil servants - at the council are deciding how to respond to Doge's request for information.A Kent County Council (KCC) spokesperson said: "Officers at KCC are working closely and positively with the new administration to ensure that they achieve their policy aims, whilst doing so within the appropriate legal and governance frameworks."This collaboration with our newly elected members will ensure that any decisions taken are lawful, reasonable and proportionate, and we will be heading towards key decisions in due course through the governance process."When asked if there had been resistance to Doge's requests for information, a Reform UK source "I don't think there's been pushback as such"."It's more being wary and making sure that everything is legal," the source said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five tricks to stop your pension falling short: Experts warn HALF of workers over 60 don't have enough money for retirement – but here's how YOU can catch up fast
Five tricks to stop your pension falling short: Experts warn HALF of workers over 60 don't have enough money for retirement – but here's how YOU can catch up fast

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Five tricks to stop your pension falling short: Experts warn HALF of workers over 60 don't have enough money for retirement – but here's how YOU can catch up fast

Baby boomers face a financial crunch, with figures revealing almost half of workers over 60 won't have enough money to fund the lifestyle they want in retirement. As many as 49 per cent of the still-employed generation aged 60 to 80 are not expected to reach their retirement goals, according to research for The Mail on Sunday.

Iceland under pressure as supermarket price war intensifies
Iceland under pressure as supermarket price war intensifies

Telegraph

time5 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Iceland under pressure as supermarket price war intensifies

Rapid growth at Iceland has ground to a halt as the frozen food chain comes under mounting pressure in the face of an intensifying supermarket price war. The retailer has told bondholders that underlying profits rose just 0.6pc to £317.6m in the year to the end of March, compared to a 24pc jump the prior year. Revenues were largely flat at £4.2bn over the year, although its 2024 financial year – when sales jumped 6.6pc – was boosted by an additional trading week. Stripping these figures out, sales were up 3pc this year on prior year. The slowdown is understood to have come as Iceland pushes to keep prices lower as supermarkets battle to attract and retain shoppers. Earlier this year, Asda kicked off a price war in an attempt to stem years of declines. Its new chairman, Allan Leighton, has vowed to use a 'war chest' to fund price cuts, improve availability of products and refresh tired stores. The company said this would mean profits would take a 'material hit'. Tesco responded by saying its profits would fall as much as 14pc this year with plans to invest £400m in price cuts. To avoid losing shoppers to rivals, Iceland has been stepping up its programme of multibuy promotions, where customers can buy bundles of products for less than if they bought them separately. This meant that while the number of items it sold last year increased by 5.3pc, it did not see an rise in the value of its sales. Credit rating agency, Fitch, said shoppers continued to turn to Iceland for value 'despite heightened competition'. Its market share has remained flat at between 2.3pc and 2.4pc over the past five years. Fitch added: 'We expect Iceland's product offering to remain competitive for UK food consumers with weaker spending power.' However, the credit ratings agency raised concerns over Iceland's profitability, suggesting the supermarket chain would have to invest in price cuts this year at a time when it is battling higher costs. It said the supermarket, which employs more than 30,000 people, would face 'momentary profit pressure', publishing forecasts suggesting underlying profits could dip this year. Fitch said: 'The company, along with other UK-based retailers, will be hit by the rise in National Insurance and minimum living wage contributions from [this year], which we estimate will result in an additional cost of £50m.' Iceland chairman, Richard Walker, said earlier this year the National Insurance raid had 'added greatly to the cost of business', ranking the Labour government a 'six out of 10' for its performance in office. It followed earlier efforts to downplay the hit. Last year, after Rachel Reeves's Budget, Mr Walker said companies should stop 'wallowing' and 'complaining' about the tax raid. Mr Walker, who had been a donor to the Tory party before switching allegiance to Labour, said last December: 'The Government isn't going to change its mind. It was a tough Budget, but we adapt.' The expected profit crunch comes after Iceland's chief executive, Tarsem Dhaliwal, in April said the company was bracing for surging food costs. Speaking to industry publication. The Grocer, Mr Dhaliwal said his biggest concern was rising prices being imposed by its suppliers. He said: 'The reality is that we have to be conscious of the fact our suppliers are going to pass the costs onto us, literally straight away. We can't absorb all that, I don't think any retailer can, so there's going to be food inflation.' At the time, Mr Dhaliwal said that Iceland would be battling to 'remain competitive', adding: 'Consumers might end up with less items in their basket, still spending £10 but on less items.' Already, food inflation is running at around 4pc, according to figures from the British Retail Consortium, with increases in the price of staples such as meat and tea fuelling the higher level.

I'm a bouncer – policing what people say in pubs is a step too far
I'm a bouncer – policing what people say in pubs is a step too far

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

I'm a bouncer – policing what people say in pubs is a step too far

'The death of the Great British pub,' screamed a recent headline. The story underneath was referring to the idea of so-called 'banter bouncers': card-carrying heavies who go from table to table in licensed venues, ensuring all spoken language is kept strictly PG. As an actual bouncer (or an SIA level 2 licensed door supervisor, to use my official job title), this smells like clickbait. In a time where six pubs and three clubs are going under every week in the UK, the notion of hiring an extra set of size elevens to prowl the carpet and make sure no one's talking out of line seems like blue-sky thinking. Yet the government's Employment Rights Bill, back on the table when MPs return from recess next month, includes provisions to require employers to 'take all reasonable steps' to prevent harassment at work by third parties. A TUC poll found that three in five women have experienced sexual harassment, bullying or verbal abuse at work. The TUC also clarified that shopworkers, NHS workers and many other public-facing staff experience abuse from customers. Yet this clause leaves employers to interpret it for themselves. Harsh language isn't something I particularly look out for in the job – not unless it's causing someone serious upset. I'm more focused on hands hovering over the top of women's drinks, or underage kids eyeing up barrels in the loading bay. Two of my security colleagues, who guard a residential venue, recently had their hands full trying to get a towel around a naked sleepwalker. Then there's the question of what actually constitutes 'banter.' Everyone's got the right to let off verbal steam when they're out, provided that they're not scalding the next customer's right to do the same. Door staff soon learn the difference between government guidelines, the venue's policy and what counts as unreasonable. Trying to police what people are saying once they've had their first few gulps of loose juice seems not just completely unreasonable, but more like commercial death. Eighteen to 34-year-olds make up the largest single age group of pub clientele (28 per cent), and apparently a quarter of them prefer messaging to voices. Surely serious banter bouncing should be done digitally? Something best left to the billionaires and the algorithms, if you ask me. I can see the small print on the next software update now: 'Any detection of flagged language will result in the darkest secrets from your camera roll being automatically sent to your nan and/or your mother-in-law.' The idea of refereeing private conversations face-to-face seems so far-fetched that I suspect there's a hidden agenda behind the banter bouncer headlines: to wind people up. This year, opposing voices on the political spectrum have been decrying that everything is broken, the elites are taking over, and the only way to feel like you still count is to gang up on the streets and start kicking bins over. As someone who has to keep an eye on the streets and stands the bins back up again, I'm yet to see the threats to my way of life that I'm being warned about. But I have seen those in power taking notes: the prime minister is pledging a 'strengthened crackdown' on potential rioters. Anyone facing a spell inside could also find themselves being shot by the new tasers being issued to prison staff. Hopefully, us door crew won't be made to carry extra tools if we're put on language patrol. I got into the job to stop trouble – not to ignite it. High prices and lagging wages can leave a lot of people just one rude word or indiscretion away from blowing up. If you want to know whether your own choice of banter counts as one of those trigger words, I advise going to an expert: Countdown 's lexicographer, Susie Dent. She recently shared the term 'lalochezia': 'the use of swearing to relieve stress, anger, pain or frustration.' Before that, she dropped 'circumlocutionist': 'one who consistently speaks in a roundabout way'. Lalochezia is okay – but don't be a circumlocutionist. And if that last one's too much of a mouthful? Swap it for a more versatile C-word with fewer syllables.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store