logo
Trump promises to hike steel and aluminium tariffs to 50% starting Wednesday. Here's what we know

Trump promises to hike steel and aluminium tariffs to 50% starting Wednesday. Here's what we know

Time of India2 days ago

US President
Donald Trump
has promised to hike nearly all of his tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium to a punishing 50% on Wednesday, a move that would hammer businesses from automakers to home builders, and likely push up prices for consumers.
Foreign-made steel and aluminium is used in household products like soup cans and paper clips as well as big-ticket items like a stainless-steel refrigerators and cars. Economists warn that the latest tariffs will significantly squeeze the wallets of both companies and shoppers alike.
Here's what we know.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
What's the tariff rate on imported steel and aluminium now? Steel and aluminium imports are currently taxed at 25% - a rate that both metals have faced across the board since March 12 when Trump's order to remove steel exemptions and raise aluminium's levy from his previously-imposed 2018 import taxes went into effect.
That's about to double. In a proclamation issued Tuesday,
Trump
confirmed that the U.S. will begin taxing nearly all steel and aluminium imports at 50% after the clock strikes midnight Wednesday. Steel and aluminium from the U.K., meanwhile, will continue to be levied at 25% due to a recent trade deal.
Live Events
Why is Trump raising these tariffs? Trump says it's all about protecting U.S. industries. He reiterated that argument on Friday, when he first announced the 50% tariff during a visit with steelworkers in Pennsylvania, where he also discussed a "planned partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan's
Nippon Steel
.
In his speech at U.S. Steel's Mon Valley Works-Irvin Plant in suburban Pittsburgh, Trump said that the tariff hike would "further secure the steel industry in the U.S." Shortly after, he took the same tone when sharing plans to also raise tariffs on imported aluminium.
In Tuesday's proclamation, Trump also said that the higher tariffs would ensure that imported steel and aluminium would "not threaten to impair the national security."
"In my judgment, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States," he said in the proclamation.
How is the industry responding? While some analysts have credited the tariffs Trump imposed during his first term with strengthening domestic production of steel and aluminium, many others have warned that stark new levies can make it difficult for the industry to adjust.
Some organizations representing metal workers also note that tariffs aren't the only solution needed to boost U.S. manufacturing.
"While tariffs, used strategically, serve as a valuable tool in balancing the scales, it's essential that we also pursue wider reforms of our global trading system," David McCall, international president of the
United Steelworkers
union said in a statement, noting that work must be done "in collaboration with trusted allies" like Canada - the top exporter of steel and aluminium to the U.S. - to help "contain the bad actors."
Matt Meenan
, vice president of external affairs at the
aluminium Association
, added that the trade group "appreciates President Trump's continued focus on strengthening the U.S. aluminium industry," but that "tariffs alone will not increase U.S. primary aluminium production."
"We also need consistent, predictable trade and tariff policy to plan for current and future investment," Meenan said.
What kinds of products could be impacted by heightened steel and aluminium tariffs? A range of businesses that rely on foreign-made steel and aluminium have already begun feeling the impacts of Trump's previously-imposed levies. But the latest anticipated hikes could drive up costs even more.
Steel and aluminium are used in a range of products like washing machines, consumer electronics and cars. Much of the auto industry relies on a global supply chain. And even if you aren't in the market to buy a new vehicle, repairs could involve parts that use imports of either metal, driving up overall maintenance and ownership costs.
In the grocery aisle, steel and aluminium are ubiquitous in the packaging for many foods, including canned tuna, soup and nuts. Experts warn that hiking import taxes on these materials could led to higher grocery prices overall, further straining consumers wallets.
The aluminium and metal tariffs also carry wider implications for construction and transportation as a whole, as many key building parts and materials are made with these metals. Economists further warn of spillover impacts. Even if a product isn't directly packaged in steel or aluminium, there could be higher costs to build the shelf it's sold on, for example, or truck used to transport it to the store. And all of that could trickle down to the consumer down the road.
If foreign competition becomes "priced out" due to these new tariffs, U.S. steel and aluminium producers may also find room to raise their own prices. As a result, even companies that don't buy these foreign metals could end up paying more.
Steel prices have already climbed 16% since Trump became president in mid-January, according to the government's Producer Price Index. And as of March 2025, steel cost $984 a metric ton in the U.S., significantly higher than than in Europe ($690) or China ($392), per the U.S. Commerce Department.
Will there be any exceptions? The new 50% tariff rate will apply to nearly all steel and aluminium coming into the U.S. from other countries. But the U.K., which recently reached a sweeping trade agreement with the U.S., will see an exception.
As part of trade deal reached between the two nations on May 8, the U.K. said that the U.S. had agreed to eliminate its current 25% duties on British steel and aluminium down to zero. That exemption had yet to go into effect in the weeks following - but in his proclamation issued Tuesday, Trump acknowledged that it was "necessary and appropriate" to implement the deal, and would "accordingly provide different treatment" for these metals coming from the U.K.
Per Trump's proclamation, the duty on British steel and aluminium will now stay 25%. But that rates could be adjusted starting on July 9 if the U.S. government determines that Britain has not complied with the framework.
Trump's planned hikes for steel and aluminium tariffs for the rest of the world could spark retaliation from other trading partners. In response to levies imposed on these metals earlier in the year, for example, the
European Union
previously outlined countermeasures.
The 27-nation bloc later delayed those actions until July 14 in efforts to ease negotiations, but said on Monday that was preparing a list of measures to enact if a trade deal with the U.S. crumbles.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SpaceX to decommission Dragon spacecraft, Musk says as feud with Trump escalates
SpaceX to decommission Dragon spacecraft, Musk says as feud with Trump escalates

India Today

time19 minutes ago

  • India Today

SpaceX to decommission Dragon spacecraft, Musk says as feud with Trump escalates

In a tit-for-tat move, Elon Musk said Thursday that SpaceX will begin retiring its flagship Dragon spacecraft following President Donald Trump's threat to cancel government contracts and subsidies tied to Musk's companies."The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!"advertisementThe comment came just hours after Trump told reporters he was "very disappointed" in Musk, a former campaign ally and one-time head of the Department of Government Efficiency, who resigned last week after only 130 days. In a sharp response, Musk didn't hold back — or delay."Effective immediately, we will begin retiring the Dragon program," Musk posted on X. "SpaceX will no longer operate a system at the mercy of politics."The Dragon spacecraft, which played a key role in resupplying the International Space Station and ferrying NASA astronauts to orbit, has become a symbol of American commercial space innovation. Now, it's collateral damage in a rapidly intensifying political reaction follows days of public clashes with Trump over the president's signature "One Big Beautiful Bill," which Musk slammed as a "disgusting abomination" that would "balloon the federal deficit."The Tesla CEO has also bristled at Trump's decision to yank the NASA nomination of Musk ally and billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman, calling the move "vindictive and partisan." Trump defended the reversal, saying Isaacman was "totally a Democrat."The feud marks a dramatic reversal for two men who once appeared aligned in both policy and public image. Musk donated over $250 million to Trump's re-election effort and was seen as one of the administration's most high-profile tech InTrending Reel

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's threat of cutting federal funds
New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's threat of cutting federal funds

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

New York won't rescind Native American mascot ban, despite Trump's threat of cutting federal funds

NEW YORK — New York education officials won't rescind the state's ban on Native American mascots and team names, despite threats from the Trump administration that it risks losing federal funding. Instead, New York officials suggested in a letter to the U.S. Department of Education on Thursday that they could broaden the state ban to include names and mascots derived from other racial or ethnic groups that the department deems offensive. The federal agency last week determined New York violated Title VI of the federal civil rights law by issuing a statewide ban on the use of Native American mascots and logos. The department's civil rights office found the state ban is discriminatory because names and mascots that are still permitted are also derived from other racial or ethnic groups, such as the 'Dutchmen' and the 'Huguenots." New York officials said they're willing to work with federal officials to 'reach a resolution as to the appropriate standard,' wrote Daniel Morton-Bentley, legal counsel for the state education department. Morton-Bentley also noted in his letter that the federal government's current stance in support of keeping Native American team names and mascots runs counter to the agency's previous stance on the issue — not to mention those of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, tribal leaders, state governments, and professional organizations that have long deemed them harmful and offensive. What's more, a federal judge in New York earlier this year dismissed a lawsuit brought by some local districts that have refused to comply with the state mandate to rid their schools of offensive Native American mascots and team names, Morton-Bentley wrote. The education department and its civil rights office, he argued, is 'not a court of last resort for unsuccessful litigants.' Spokespersons for the federal education department didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon last week visited Massapequa, a Long Island town that refuses to get rid of its Native American chief mascot, and was among the local districts that unsuccessfully challenged the state in federal court. McMahon said she would give New York ten days to sign an agreement rescinding the ban and apologizing to Native Americans for having discriminated against them and attempting to 'erase' their history. New York school districts have until June 30 to commit to replacing offensive Native American mascots or team names, or risk losing state funding. They can be exempt from the mandate, however, if they reach an agreement with a local Native American tribe. The state education department said as of Thursday, three districts have sought and received extensions as they work to comply with the mandate. Massapequa was not among them.

Elon Musk challenges Donald Trump amid intensifying feud: ‘Time to create new political party?'
Elon Musk challenges Donald Trump amid intensifying feud: ‘Time to create new political party?'

Mint

time24 minutes ago

  • Mint

Elon Musk challenges Donald Trump amid intensifying feud: ‘Time to create new political party?'

Elon Musk intensified his public spat with President Donald Trump by polling on X, formerly Twitter, it is time to create a new political party to represent the majority of Americans he feels are overlooked by current politics. Musk asked his followers a direct question: "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" The poll reflects Musk's ongoing criticism of both major parties and his call for political change. Responding to a prominent conservative's comment suggesting Republicans might have to choose between Musk and Trump, Musk added a pointed reminder: "Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years..."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store