
UK and France confirm 'one in one out' deal to tackle small boat crossings
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have announced a 'returns deal' between the two countries in an effort to tackle illegal migration and small boats crossings.
In a joint press conference, the prime minister told reporters: 'There is no silver bullet here, but with a united effort, new tactics and a new level of intent, we can finally turn the tables.
'So I am pleased to announce our agreement today on a groundbreaking returns pilot.
'For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France in short order.'
The PM added: 'In exchange for every return, a different individual will be allowed to come here via a safe route – controlled and legal.'
Calling out previous government's inaction, Starmer promised: 'Hard headed aggressive action on all fronts to break the gangs business model, secure our borders and show that attempting to reach the UK by small boat will only end in failure, detention and return.'
'Now I know some people will still ask 'Why should we take anyone in?' So let me address that directly,' said Starmer.
'We accept genuine asylum seekers because it is right that we offer a haven to those in most dire need.'
The prime minister hailed Thursday's deal as 'groundbreaking,' as he told reporters the pilot would be operational in 'a couple of weeks.'
'If it works what it does is break the model and that's the only way in the end to stop this vile trade.'
'Many governments have tried to get this far and have failed to do so.'
Starmer's French counterpart, who has just enjoyed the first state visit by a European leader since Brexit, pointed to the UK's exit from the EU as a major hurdle to overcome: 'We sold a lie to the British people which is that the problem was Europe. The problem has become Brexit,' said Macron.
'For the first time in nine years we are providing a response.'
The prime minister would not be drawn on how the scheme would select the individuals who would be returned to France, although Starmer did not deny the figure of 50 individuals a week reported in Le Monde.
The Home Office has also refused to confirm how many people this deal would see returned.
If the numbers are anything like the 50 reportedly being agreed on, the deal will result in the return of only a fraction of the 21,000 people who have made the Channel crossing so far in 2025, a record for this point in a year.
The deal will also not see the net migration figure fall on its own, but the hope is that it would serve as a deterrent for more people hoping to make the trip by boat.
It nevertheless represents a concession by the French that such returns are possible, after years of MPs on the right of British politics insisting France is a 'safe' country where migrants can be sent back to.
Responding to the announcement, Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the new deal doesn't go far enough.
'Labour's deal will only return one in every 17 illegal immigrants arriving. Allowing 94% of illegal immigrants to stay will make no difference whatsoever and have no deterrent effect,' Chris Philp said.
'Labour promised to 'smash the gangs', but 2025 so far has been the worst year in history for illegal immigrants crossing the channel and 44,000 illegal immigrants have crossed since the election. Returning 50 illegal immigrants a week only represents 6% of these arrivals.
'The Conservatives would restore the Rwanda plan which Starmer cancelled just days before it was due to start. This would see 100% of illegal immigrants being immediately removed without judicial process. The Australian example showed that a 100% removals deterrent works. We will do the same here.'
He finished: 'We've had enough of Starmer's weak and ineffective gimmicks.'
Nuclear Defence
The UK and France also agreed to coordinate their nuclear deterrents, a move designed to act as a warning to Russia.
The move comes as US President Donald Trump called on European allies to step up their contributions to Nato.
The Northwood Declaration, which was signed by both Sir Keir Starmer and President Macron, means that the two nuclear powers would mobilise their deterrent together if threatened.
The prime minister said: 'Now, as Europe's only nuclear powers and as leaders in Nato, we play a vital role in preserving the peace and security on this continent.
Coalition of the Willing
The French president also confirmed that peacekeeping plans to aid Ukraine once the war ends are 'ready to go', once a ceasefire has been agreed.
Under the plans, which are also referred to as the 'coalition of the willing', British and French troops would be placed on the ground in Ukraine.
Other countries would then help provide logistical support to deter further aggression by Russia.
STV News is now on WhatsApp
Get all the latest news from around the country
Follow STV News

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Italy's Giorgia Meloni's side-eye goes viral as she's seated next to Trump during crunch talks
Italian Prime Minister Giorgio Meloni appeared to give side-eye to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday as they attended a high-stakes meeting in the East Room with President Donald Trump. Meloni and Merz were among the European leaders who flew to Washington to back up Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was receiving a debrief from Trump after the president's meeting Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump is attempting to end the war in Ukraine. During his Oval Office meeting with Zelensky, Trump stated that a ceasefire deal wasn't necessary ahead of a broader peace agreement. Afterward, Zelensky and the other European leaders gathered around a table in the East Room for a meeting. Merz - and later French President Emmanuel Macron - pressed Trump on the ceasefire issue. 'Let's try and put pressure on Russia, because the credibility of this effort, these efforts we are undertaking today, are depending on at least a ceasefire from the beginning of the serious negotiations, from next stop on,' Merz told Trump. Between Merz and the American president sat Meloni - who was captured on camera making several odd expressions with her eyes as the German chancellor went on. 'So I would like to emphasize this aspect and would like to see a ceasefire from the next meeting, which should be a trilateral meeting, wherever it takes place,' Merz said. Last month Meloni got called out for dramatically rolling her eyes amid a conversation with Macron at the G7 in Canada. A year before, at the G7, she got caught rolling her eyes after then President Joe Biden was late for the third day in a row. The 48-year-old has served as the prime minister of Italy since October 2022 - a particularly lengthy time for an Italian leader. She came into office as a far-right conservative and thus is more politically aligned with Republican Trump than some of her European counterparts. Going around the table, Trump called Meloni 'a really great leader and an inspiration over there.' 'She's served now, even though she's a very young person, she's served there for a long period of time relative to others,' the president marveled. 'They don't last very long,' he laughed. 'You've lasted a long time. You're going to be there a long time,' Trump said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (left) speaks to the press at the top of a meeting in the East Room Monday hosted by President Donald Trump (right) and attended by European leaders including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (left) and French President Emmanuel Macron (center) The friendly banter continued as the press exited. Finnish President Alexander Stubb watched as reporters shouted questions toward Trump, Zelensky and the leaders as they were ushered out by White House wranglers. 'You do this every day?' Stubb asked Trump. 'All the time,' the U.S. president answered. Meloni then interjected. 'But he loves it, he loves it,' she said dramatically, then adding how she doesn't like engaging with the Italian press. Trump then told Meloni that Stubbs was a 'very good golfer, you know.'

Rhyl Journal
15 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'


South Wales Guardian
15 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'