Trump promised to lower gas prices. His tariffs could have the opposite effect.
Trump said he's planning tariffs on Canada and Mexico, which could risk higher gas prices.
Most of US crude oil imports come from those two countries.
Economists don't expect US drillers to boost production in order to keep prices down.
President Donald Trump's plan to slap tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as February 1 threatens to undercut one of his key campaign promises: lowering prices at the pump.
The US imports around 40% of the crude oil it refines into gas for your car and other vehicles. In 2024, about half of that came from Canada and 11% from Mexico. Economists told Business Insider that slapping those imports with tariffs could strain consumers' wallets at the gas station and have ripple effects across industries.
"Tariffs on crude oil is going to flow right through to the US consumer," Ed Hirs, a lecturer on energy economics at the University of Houston, said. "Canada may absorb some of the cost, but the US will absorb a lot of it, too."
Shortly after taking office, Trump said he could impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada on February 1 as a way to push those countries to crack down on illegal immigration and drugs entering the US. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday said the plan "still holds."
Trump told reporters on Thursday in the Oval Office that he's still considering whether to include oil from Canada and Mexico in his tariffs.
Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, told Fox Business on Thursday that consumers in the Great Lakes and Midwest regions would likely experience some of the largest impacts of tariffs. He said gas prices there could rise by more than 20 cents within days of the tariffs taking effect.
The US is producing record amounts of crude oil with domestic production amounting to about 60% of crude refined in the US, per the Energy Information Administration. But many refineries aren't equipped to process the light crude from US shale basins, Hirs said. Refineries in states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Indiana rely on heavy crude from Canadian oil sands and it would be costly and time-consuming to convert the technology.
Hirs said it's difficult to predict how much prices will rise, in part because it depends on what OPEC+ does. The oil cartel has been postponing production increases to boost global prices. Trump has called on OPEC+ to slash prices, and ministers meet on February 3 to discuss his demands.
Even if crude prices rise, Hirs said the signal won't be strong enough for US drillers to boost production. US refineries that handle domestic crude already have more than enough supply.
"Tariffs that increase costs but lower revenue are going to be poisonous for the US oil industry right now," Hirs said.
The American Petroleum Institute, which lobbies on behalf of the US oil and gas industry, is opposed to additional tariffs. The group in December asked the Trump administration's top trade official to exempt crude oil and natural gas from levies because they would "directly undermine energy affordability and availability for consumers while eroding the U.S. oil and natural gas industry's competitiveness both domestically and globally."
Higher gas prices would have knock-on effects in other industries, too, such as fresh fruit and vegetables that are trucked into the US and construction projects that need fuel to power heavy equipment.
While economists predict tariffs would cause a short-term spike in gas prices, they also said broader economic instability may lead to longer-term price drops.
Officials in Canada, Mexico, and China have warned that they will retaliate if Trump implements new tariffs. A trade war may slow down the global economy and depress prices, Hirs said.
"It doesn't take much to throw the global economy into a recession," Hirs said. "That would help lower the price of gasoline and diesel for everybody because there would be less economic activity and less demand."
Bank of America strategist Francisco Blanch similarly told Business Insider in November that tariffs will likely curb global trade, driving down oil and gas prices.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China could have as many ICBMs as the US or Russia by 2030, weapons watchdog says
China has been adding about 100 nuclear warheads to its arsenal every year since 2023, per SIPRI. The think tank said China could have as many ICBMs as the US or Russia by 2030. Trump said in February that China's nuclear capabilities will match the US' in five or six years. China could achieve parity with the US and Russia in terms of the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles it has by 2030, per an estimate by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. The European think tank said in a report on Monday that China has the world's fastest-growing nuclear arsenal. It added that the country has at least 600 nuclear warheads and has been adding about 100 warheads to its arsenal every year since 2023. Last year, SIPRI said China increased its number of nuclear warheads from 410 in 2023 to 500 at the start of 2024. SIPRI's estimate is similar to that of the Pentagon's, which said in its China Military Power Report last year that China has over 600 operational nuclear warheads. The Defense Department said China is on track to grow its arsenal to 1,000 warheads by 2030. SIPRI said in its report on Monday that China could have as many ICBMs as the US or Russia by 2030, but will lag behind in the number of warheads. It estimates that China will have a maximum number of 1,500 warheads by 2035. In comparison, the US has 5,177 warheads while Russia has 5,459, per SIPRI estimates. The countries' combined stockpile makes up almost 90% of the world's nuclear weapons. In February, President Donald Trump said he wanted to engage Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in denuclearization talks in the "not too distant future." "China is trying to catch up because they're very substantially behind, but within five or six years, they'll be even," Trump said of China's burgeoning nuclear arsenal. Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry, said in a press briefing in February that China's nuclear strategy "focuses on self-defense" and it "always keeps its nuclear strength at the minimum level required by national security." The US and Russia should "make drastic and substantive cuts to their nuclear arsenals, and create necessary conditions for other nuclear-weapon states to join in the nuclear disarmament process," Guo said. China's foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold Steady Near Record High as Mideast War Drives Haven Bids
(Bloomberg) -- Gold was steady near a record high as an escalating conflict between Israel and Iran drove investors toward haven assets. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space Do World's Fairs Still Matter? NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban As American Architects Gather in Boston, Retrofits Are All the Rage The precious metal erased gains made earlier on Monday to trade close to $3,430 an ounce, about $70 short of an all-time peak set in April. The two countries continued to hit each other with barrages of missile and drones, with the hostilities pushing up energy prices on the threat to energy infrastructure and transport in the region. The sudden upsurge of geopolitical risk has added more impetus to a rally that's primarily been driven by the threat to global economic growth from President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff agenda. Gold has rallied more than 30% in 2025, with central banks seeking to diversify away from the dollar being another significant driver. 'Prices are still very close to the record, and given the geopolitical situation any further escalation will push them higher,' said John Feeney, an analyst at Guardian Gold Australia. 'Gold has performed very well as a haven recently, and it seems a lot of investors are moving funds out of US bonds and into the metal over the longer term.' A 1.4% jump in the precious metal on Friday came after a two-day gain as weak US inflation and jobs data fueled bets the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates later this year. Lower rates tend to benefit bullion as it doesn't pay any interest. Spot gold dipped 0.2% to $3,427.25 an ounce as of 12:59 p.m. in Singapore. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index added 0.1% after dropping 0.8% last week. Silver edged lower, while platinum and palladium advanced. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tom Cotton pressed on 'language' used in 'send in the troops' op-ed, National Guard presence
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., doubled down on Sunday when pressed by CBS host Margaret Brennan on whether he wanted to use the language he did in his call for President Donald Trump to send in troops to help quell the rioting in Los Angeles. "You wrote an op-ed supporting President Trump's decision to send in federalized national guard troops and active-duty marines to California. You referred to it as the threat from the radical left, a show of force to end the right and talked about communities being terrorized. Given the amount of tension in the country right now, is that really the language to use?" Cotton wrote an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, a parallel to his infamous 2020 guest essay in the New York Times, saying, "At the risk of again sending liberals to their fainting couches, it may indeed be time to send in the troops." "Yes. When you see left-wing militias throwing bricks and frozen water bottles at police officers and shooting them with fireworks. And unfortunately, you have mayors and governors in some places that won't allow police to maintain order," Cotton responded to the CBS host. "If the governor won't call in the national guard, then the president has to federalize them. We always hope the local police are allowed to do their job and have sufficient numbers to do their job to maintain order and protect innocent life and property. If they can't, or they are not allowed to, the National Guard has to be on scene to restore civil order," Cotton added. Cotton's op-ed came as Trump's decision to send in the National Guard and eventually a group of U.S. Marines was met with pushback from Democrats. Read On The Fox News App The Arkansas Republican wrote in support of Trump's deployment of National Guard and Marine soldiers to Los Angeles over the weekend after anti-ICE riots escalated beyond local police control. His comments echoed similar arguments he made in the wake of the Black Lives Matter riots plaguing major cities in the summer of 2020. Brennan pushed back and said the Los Angeles Police chief insisted they had the rioting under control, as Cotton argued that the chief said last weekend they were stretched thin. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Cotton wrote that he was also planning on introducing new legislation that would "stiffen penalties for rioters who attack law enforcement" and "make riot-related crimes a deportable offense." He added the current Republican budget bill provides additional funding for immigration authorities to deport criminal illegal immigrants. "These ideas are basic common sense, but as was the case five years ago, the Democrats haven't learned. It isn't 'inflammatory,' as [California Gov. Gavin] Newsom claimed, to enforce federal law, stand with law enforcement and protect civilians. It's necessary to keep the peace." Cotton wrote. Fox News' Lindsay Kornick contributed to this article source: Tom Cotton pressed on 'language' used in 'send in the troops' op-ed, National Guard presence