Examining the inclusivity challenges in Ramaphosa's National Dialogue
Image: Simon Majadibodu / IOL
President Cyril Ramaphosa's National Dialogue initiative has taken a step forward with the conclusion of its first convention, but the process continues facing criticism from various sectors of society.
The convention took place at UNISA in Pretoria last weekend, where fewer than 1,000 South African citizens participated.
Ramaphosa, in his weekly newsletter on Monday, announced that the National Dialogue, having adjourned on Saturday afternoon, would now engage citizens at a local and grassroots level to discuss daily issues.
He encouraged individuals to initiate their own local discussions, which will be recorded and deliberated at the next convention early next year.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
He said the convention marked the beginning of a national conversation that will culminate in a second convention in the first half of 2026, aimed at producing a clear vision for the country and adopting a social compact.
Ramaphosa emphasised the importance of inclusivity and participation in the National Dialogue, stating that citizens themselves must determine the issues discussed and use approaches that suit their circumstances.
He also highlighted the need for constructive and honest discussion on the difficult questions facing the country.
He outlined the next steps for the National Dialogue, which include a Steering Committee, consisting of nominees from all sectors of society, that will take the process forward, supported and guided by the Eminent Persons Group.
The outcomes of each dialogue will be recorded and collated through a special digital platform
However, several organisations and political experts have expressed concerns about the legitimacy and effectiveness of the National Dialogue, with some calling it the ANC's election campaign.
The South African Communist Party (SACP), which is aligned with the ANC, has criticised the process for lacking inclusivity, which they believe leads to an apparent legitimacy crisis.
"The process under way at this particular moment is marred by questions of lack of inclusivity, which leads to the apparent illegitimacy crisis for the dialogue process itself," SACP spokesperson Mbulelo Mandlana said.
Another Government of National Unity partner, the GOOD Party's National Youth Chairperson, Kaden Arguile, who participated, said that the dialogue's potential has been undermined by poor planning, inefficiency, and a lack of structure.
"Invitations went missing, communication collapsed, the schedule shifted constantly, and critical discussions were cut short," Arguile said.
Despite the criticisms, some believe that the National Dialogue has the potential to strengthen democracy, amplify grassroots voices, and help unite South Africans around solutions.
Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks said: "We believe citizens will respond to the president's call for a dialogue, in particular at a community level and also at a sectoral level.
"The issues facing society are immense, in particular those affecting working-class communities… They require not only discussions but more importantly solutions and their implementation… The dialogue's commencement last weekend was the beginning of a process. It will now be followed by 4,500 ward meetings plus sectoral engagements where the bulk of discussions with society will take place," Parks said.
Political Analyst Professor Ntsikelelo Breakfast said the National Dialogue was an ambitious attempt to campaign for the upcoming local government elections.
"It's more than being ambitious. Who stands to benefit is not the citizens but the ANC? We must look at the way that it has been framed. It gives me the impression that it's hasty and clumsy… The main discussions that will be held early next year coincide with the local government elections, when the ANC will be campaigning for the elections.
"They (ANC) are not being honest about the whole National Dialogue, and they want to rush because they want to frame a development plan… So the discussions that the president is saying will take place early next year will most probably talk about the elections… it's the ANC that benefits from this,' Breakfast said.
Another political analyst, Sandile Swana, said that the National Dialogue had started on a bad footing because most South Africans misunderstood what would come of it.
"The MK Party, EFF and the DA have not participated in this, and so there is a problem. People were holding rallies in Marikana instead of attending the National Dialogue…so it was not a success at all.
"The ANC under Ramaphosa is attempting to use the National Dialogue to connect with South African citizens for electoral benefits and to divert the attention of the citizens to increase unemployment and economic hardship as if they are doing something about it…Meantime, the National Dialogue was supposed to have been led by the citizens themselves with the facilitation of the State. But it has become an ANC of Ramaphosa event," Swana said.
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
37 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa raises limit for private donations to political parties to R30m a year
Lindsay Dentlinger 19 August 2025 | 7:35 President Cyril Ramaphosa at the Union Buildings in Pretoria on 1 August 2025. Picture: Simphiwe Nkosi/EWN CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa has officially raised the limit for private donations to political parties to R30 million a year. He's acted on a resolution taken by the National Assembly in May after a revision of the limit and the threshold for declaring donations by Parliament's home affairs committee. Like the donation limit, the declaration threshold has also been doubled to R200,000. ALSO READ: • Perfecting the political funding arena still a work in progress - IEC • Symposium thrashes out solutions to strengthening political funding law • Godongwana thinks political parties should be wholly funded from national fiscus After removing the R15 million donation limit private donors could make to political parties and independent candidates just before last year's May elections, the Western Cape High Court forced Parliament to reinstate the limit in August last year and for political parties to backdate their declarations to the Electoral Commission until a new limit was set. The original limits were set in 2018 when the National Assembly passed the Political Party Funding Act. In a proclamation published in the government gazette, President Ramaphosa has now determined the new donation limit to be R30 million. All donations more than R200,000 will now also have to be declared. Speaking in the Western Cape last week, the IEC's manager for political funding, George Mahlangu said no party would be off the hook in declaring its donations, and even if below the declaration threshold, parties are expected to record these in their annual financial statements.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa arrives in Tokyo for African Development Summit
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has arrived in Japan to lead South Africa's high-level delegation participation in the 9th Tokyo International Conference on African Development Summit. The summit will kick off in Yokohama on Wednesday. It's expected to strengthen ties between the African Union and Japan. This includes talks on trade and investment, as well as peace and stability. Ramaphosa said the summit comes when multilateralism and collective solutions to common challenges are crucial. He said the AU's discussions with the government of Japan present an opportunity for the two sides to engage in discussions that seek to foster collective solutions to these challenges. The spokesperson in the presidency, Vincent Magwenya, said, "President Ramaphosa will engage with leading captains of Japanese industry and business. Japan is one of South Africa's major economic partners with sizeable investments in the South African economy, and the potential for further investments exists.'
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Magistrates' salaries fall below those of MPs and mayors, says ARMSA
The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, struck the matter of magistrates' salaries off the roll after President Cyril Ramaphosa filed a responding affidavit on Monday. Image: File Salaries of magistrates' court presiding officers are so low that they are below those of members of parliament, amakhosi, and mayors, the Association of Regional Magistrates of Southern Africa (ARMSA) said. ARMSA approached the The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg division to force President Cyril Ramaphosa to implement the recommendations of the Independent Remuneration Commission (IRC) that magistrates be paid according to their 'Worship' status and the exhausting workload. ARMSA also wanted the court to compel the president to fill the vacant positions in the IRC, which could not convene as it did not have a quorum since November last year. However the matter was moved from the court roll as Ramaphosa filed his responding papers only on Monday in response to ARMSA's application which was filed on July 17. ARMSA president, Magistrate Ian Cox speaking outside court said they had given Ramaphosa's legal team the opportunity and the extension of time to file responding papers. The association took exception to Ramaphosa "according to his affidavit, referring the matter (of salary adjustment) back to the IRC without informing us as litigators", said Cox. 'According to his affidavit, on August 9, he appointed the commissioners without informing us, knowing that we have a court date and knowing that they have not filed the opposing affidavit,' he said. Cox said the president's action cost ARMSA a lot of money 'because high court litigation does not come cheap'. 'The relief we sought was now no longer there because he decided on the major review, even though we don't like what he did. 'Since he also appointed commissioners, there was nothing to litigate about; then the matter was removed from the roll,' he said. When contacted, Ramaphosa's spokesperson said: 'The President will respond accordingly through the court process.' Cox said Ramaphosa asked the IRC to make new input and send him feedback before September 30. He said the association would take the matter back to court if Ramaphosa continues to delay making decisions after having received feedback from the IRC. Cox said ARMSA was demanding that their salaries be increased by 30%. 'People would say 30% is crazy, but they don't realise that for the past 15 years, we have had increases lower than civil servants, and we have had increases below inflation. 'In some years, we received zero percent increases,' said Cox. Cox said magistrates were paid a net salary of between R50,000 to R55,000 while district magistrates get around R45,000. 'For what we do, it is not nice because we are worth more than that,' he said. He said magistrates do not get benefits like other public office bearers. 'We don't get cars and fuel. The judges, for example, have salaries for life after they retire, but we must pay for our pension every month, even though we don't earn as much,' he said. Cox, who works at the Benoni Magistrate's Court, described the magistrates' workload as crazy. He said he knew that all his colleagues had similar issues. He said in his courtroom, like in some courts, he handles both civil and criminal cases. 'You start your day, for example, with civil matters, and then you do criminal matters for the rest of the day. 'In some days you do just civil, and in other days you do criminal,' he said.
