Pro-Palestine group sends teachers classroom guide challenging ‘Anzac mythology'
Teachers are being urged to draw attention to Australian soldiers' violence in the Middle East ahead of Anzac Day by a pro-Palestine activist group 'frustrated by resources that gloss over historical evidence to glorify war'.
Teachers and School Staff for Palestine Victoria has developed and distributed a new teaching resource – called 'Challenging Anzac Day' – to thousands of teachers nationwide, encouraging them to share with students details of Australian troops' role in the Middle East during the First World War.
The lesson guide urges teachers to tell children that members of an Australian Light Horse brigade raided and patrolled hundreds of villages, killing up to 137 civilians at Sarafand al-'Amar – also known as Surafend – in what was then Palestine.
'The brutal massacre committed by the ANZACs at Sarafand al-'Amar chillingly portended the Nakba, the catastrophic displacement of Palestinians in 1947-1949,' the resource says.
Loading
The Surafend incident, as it became known, was examined in recent years as part of the Australian Defence Force's Brereton report, which found there was a reluctance among military command at the time to hold Australian forces to account for breaching prohibitions against killing civilians.
The pro-Palestine group's resource also encourages teachers to tell students that Australian troops burned a village of 170 dwellings south of Cairo in 1919 and 'arrested and flogged up to 250 seditious agitators'.
A spokesperson for the group, teacher Ohad Kozminsky, said the publication's goal was to 'challenge the dominant and irresponsible Anzac mythology'.
'We are frustrated by resources that gloss over historical evidence to glorify war and close off critical discussion of Australia's role in violence and imperialism. Our students deserve better,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
29 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Senior federal politicians questions US presence in Australia after Pentagon launches formal review into AUKUS partnership
The Albanese government has been urged to reconsider the joint US secretive military base Pine Gap and the presence of US troops in Australia as the Trump administration questions the AUKUS pact. Greens senator and defence spokesman David Shoebridge has called on the Albanese government to 'put a stop' to de facto US territories in Australia amid the AUKUS review. The US announced a formal review of the $300 billion AUKUS arrangement after the Albanese government resisted demands to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Shoebridge told Sky News that Australia should stop 'bankrolling' US defence facilities in Darwin, and the secretive Pine Gap facility. 'Australia has for too long allowed Pine Gap and Defence facilities in Darwin to operate as de facto US territories, it's time we put a stop to that,' he said. 'Labor and the Coalition say having US troops stationed here makes us safer. The Greens say it is a major national security risk. 'Donald Trump is erratic, reckless and careless of America's allies and alliances but he does have one fairly constant trait, he puts US interests first. 'If only Australian decision makers did the same for us.' Mr Shoebridge said the US decision to review AUKUS should be met with Australia's own review. 'It's time for Parliament to launch a full inquiry into this dud deal, and allow critics of AUKUS a seat at the table, not just a nodding bunch of Labor and Coalition members.' Several other federal politicians outside of the major parties have also called into question whether the AUKUS deal served the national interest. Independent Senator David Pocock told Sky News he did not have full confidence in the US administration in relation to the AUKUS agreement. 'I think we should take this as an opportunity to actually do a review ourselves. It's long overdue,' he said on Thursday. Teal MP Monique Ryan also said it was 'not surprising' the Trump administration was considering an end to AUKUS, and suggested Mr Albanese should 'do the same'. 'Nations act in their own best interests. Spending $400 billion on subs which may never arrive might well not be in our best interest,' she said on X. Tasmanian Senator Jacqui Lambie recently called into question the Pine Gap facility and said it should be closed in response to Trump's controversial tariffs. 'We don't owe the United States anything. It's time these leaders stood up … It's about time you started hitting them back where it hurts,' Ms Lambie told the ABC. 'I can tell you, if they do not have access to Pine Gap and the communications there, then they are not gathering any intelligence over this side of the world. 'Tell them they've got seven days to remove their US Marines off Australian soil. That will really hurt .' Ms Lambie said Australia had shown the US 'loyalty and our mateship' in various wars, and it was time to show them 'we mean business'. 'We can no longer trust our US allies … with everything that we've given to them over the years, the loyalty, the mateship, the sacrifice … we don't owe the United States anything,' she said. Mr Shoebridge echoed Ms Lambie's sentiment, saying that despite 'all the mateship talk', Australia was not an equal partner but a 'useful patsy for US power projection'.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Asleep at the wheel': Ben Fordham unleashes on Anthony Albanese for torching housing targets with excessive immigration intake
Ben Fordham has blasted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in a fiery verbal spray, accusing the government of undermining its own housing targets by allowing in record levels of migrants. Sky News uncovered on Wednesday that the Albanese government would fail to reach it's target of constructing 1.2 million new homes over five years, with forecasts putting Australia 260,000 short by the deadline of June 2029. The State of the Housing System 20205 report forecast the government would only build 938,000 new homes by June 2029, well short of the 1.2 million repeatedly touted by the Prime Minister. Speaking to Sky News, Urban Development Institute of Australia President Col Dutton said that the UDIA National analysis found that Australia 'will actually undershoot the Housing Accord target by up to 400,000 homes', and that the accelerated immigration program had only made matters worse. Fordham said the Albanese government was deceiving the Australian public if it continued to tout its promise of constructing 1.2 million homes over five years, and that the current rates of immigration were untenable. 'The Albanese government promised to build more houses, today they're building less. They promised to lower immigration, today, they're bringing in more,' Fordham said on his 2GB breakfast program. 'The PM will tell us he's bringing down the migration numbers,' referencing the government's move to limit international student arrivals and 'building as many homes as he can, but we're not seeing it'. Fordham said Australia's housing build was "going backwards" due to the immigration surge. He said while Australians were not ant-immigration the "speed and the size" of the government's intake had caused angst in the community. Mr Dutton said factoring in immigration, UDIA data projections showed that the net losses in housing had ballooned to more than 1,500 every week. 'We simply can't build the houses fast enough. What we need is a sharp focus on skilled migration and coordination of housing supply policy with immigration numbers.' He also stated that the construction industry was being strangled by a myriad of challenges including rigid regulations and red tape, approval delays and a lack of coordination between all levels of governments on environmental laws. 'Supply is being choked by development approvals processes through councils and state governments, lack of funding for enabling infrastructure to service development ready land and cumbersome environmental approval processes lacking a coordinated approach between all levels of government," he said. ABS dwelling completion data showed that Australia had built only 166,000 homes in 2024, with 446,000 net overseas migrants entering the country that same year. With an average of 2.5 people per household, this created a housing shortage of roughly 12,400 in 2024 alone, separate from the existing shortfall.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Nurse who hid $1.7m drug money under bed spared jail
An assistant nurse caught with almost $2 million in drug money under her bed has been spared jail. Jannine Williams, 35, pleaded guilty in Queensland Supreme Court on Thursday to one count of dealing in the proceeds of crime worth $1 million or more. Crown prosecutor Patrick Wilson told Justice Peter Callaghan that Williams - a pediatric intensive care assistant nurse - was not accused of taking part in drug crimes herself. "Williams possessed just over $1.7 million in a duffle bag under her bed on behalf of her (now former) partner," Mr Wilson said. Mr Wilson said there was evidence of discussions that showed Williams had some knowledge of her former partner's involvement with shipments of cocaine up to 150kg. "There was discussion of $2.2 million, and reference to vacuum sealing the money and storing it somewhere else," Mr Wilson said. "They had a conversation about a very large quantity of drugs: 150kg. "There was talk of the risk of prison, making it abundantly clear this was a serious criminal enterprise." Police found the money on July 22, 2022 in Williams' apartment in the inner-Brisbane suburb of West End. Justice Callaghan heard Williams initially denied knowledge of the money to police. Williams had spoken about having to ignore the $1 million under her bed and needing to lock her apartment every time she left, Mr Wilson said. Defence barrister Mark McCarthy said Williams was an Australian citizen who was born in the UK and had no prior criminal record. "She has had a long career in a pediatric intensive care unit in the local hospital. She is a valued team member," he said. "This was clearly out of character. But for her relationship she would never be involved in anything like this. "She is extremely unlikely to be involved in anything criminal again." Mr McCarthy said Williams had been in a "destructive relationship" and had little choice at the time but to tolerate having the money under her bed. "She received no benefit from the cash," he said. Justice Callaghan said it was incongruous to see someone with Williams' history of working to better the community end up in criminal court and facing the prospect of jail. "The sentence I am about to pass will have an impact on your prospects of employment," Justice Callaghan said. "It is to be hoped there is a discretion to be exercised by those who decide these things, and it will be exercised fairly and responsibly." Williams was sentenced to three years' imprisonment but ordered to be immediately released on a $1000 good behaviour bond. She broke down crying and was comforted by her parents after the sentence was handed down.
