Work to begin on £59m that will connect Paisley and Glasgow Airport
In addition, a new road from Renfrew Road to the bridge crossing will be created which will connect into the new Paisley Grammar School Community Campus, as will dedicated walking and cycling routes.
A safe access route from Gallowhill using the underpass on the former railway line will be constructed using £1.5million provided by Transport Scotland.
READ MORE: Thug climbed drainpipe to brutally stab man in Lanarkshire home
Economic projections have estimated the project could boost the local economy by an additional £136million in private sector investment and cut carbon emissions by 21,700 tonnes, while creating new job opportunities and helping existing and new companies to grow and expand.
Renfrewshire Council Leader Iain Nicolson said: 'AMIDS is one of the most significant developments in Renfrewshire's recent history as it will bring high-quality jobs, world-leading industry and provide a significant boost to the area's economy so it is important that we provide the appropriate access to Scotland's home of manufacturing innovation.
'This project will not only provide infrastructure to better connect communities to education and employment opportunities, but it will also significantly improve the offer to organisations looking to locate here with enhanced access to the airport and the fourth-busiest train station in Scotland.
'This will be another flagship project for Renfrewshire following the completion of the Clyde Waterfront and Renfrew Riverside project, which included the new Renfrew Bridge, and will be further proof of the Council's ability to successfully deliver nationally significant infrastructure projects which bring substantial benefits now and for generations to come.'
The new infrastructure will complement the recently constructed Renfrew Bridge which was part-funded by the UK Government and links Renfrew with Clydebank, Yoker and the wider Glasgow City Region.
Local Transport Minister Simon Lightwood said: 'Backed by over £38million in Government funding, this flagship project will deliver a major boost for Paisley and for Scotland as a whole.
"It's exactly the kind of investment behind last month's announcement of nearly £340 million from our Levelling Up Fund to communities across the UK.
"The new bridge will provide safer, better-connected transport links for local people, businesses and schools, while driving economic growth and creating thousands of new jobs – a key part of our Plan for Change.'
Farrans Construction have been appointed to deliver the project with construction planning underway, with the full project expected to be complete and open in 2028.
Patrick Murray, Scotland's regional director for Farrans, adde: "AMIDS South is a project which will deliver major economic and connectivity benefits for the town of Paisley and wider Renfrewshire, and we are looking forward to getting work started on site.
'Our experienced team has recently completed the highly-successful Govan to Partick Bridge in Glasgow and we have a long history of projects in the transportation sector in Scotland including Edinburgh Trams to Newhaven in joint venture as SFN, M80 Stepps to Haggs and the A737 Dalry Bypass in Ayrshire.
"We are working through the final stages of preparation with our client Renfrewshire Council and will be engaging on the ground with local stakeholders shortly."
AMIDS South is the next step in the Council's ongoing capital investment programme which has already delivered the award-winning refurbishment of Paisley Town Hall, Paisley Arts Centre's renovation, the creation of the Learning and Cultural Hub on the High Street, and the transformation of Paisley Museum is almost complete as culture is put at the forefront of the area's ambitions.
In addition, the council recently made the largest-ever, long-term investments in Renfrewshire's roads and pathways and school learning estate, with a ten-year, £90million investment in roads and up to £170million unlocked over future years for major investment in education establishments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Manchester United are importing a sinister US tactic: Public money for stadiums
In March, Manchester United officially unveiled images and plans for a new 100,000-seater stadium to replace their aging home, Old Trafford. While the grandiosity of the circus-tent-like structure attracted widespread attention, something else did, too: as part of this project, United are planning to secure land not by paying for it themselves – but by having the UK government do it for them. In order to clear the site that the club wants to use, a rail freight hub will need to be moved to out near St Helens, between Manchester and Liverpool. The cost of moving the hub is estimated to be between £200m and 300m ($270-405m), but that may be an optimistic appraisal; in the past, the project budget was estimated at closer to £1bn ($1.35bn). Politicians supporting United's plan, like Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, have stressed that no public money will be used to build the stadium. But that appears to be a bit of verbal trickery: United's new stadium cannot be built as planned without moving the freight rail hub; if the government pays to move the hub, they save United from having to do so themselves. (Manchester United declined to respond to a request for comment.) The plan's proponents back it by promising it would confer grand economic benefits to Greater Manchester – 92,000 new jobs! 17,000 new homes! 1.8 million additional tourists! – and would be worth over £7bn annually to the UK economy. Sebastian Coe, the chair of the Old Trafford Regeneration Taskforce and a key organizer behind the 2012 London Olympics, has said 'I don't think I'm overstating when I say this actually has the potential to be, not only a bigger project than London 2012 but, in terms of European scope and scale, probably the biggest thing that's ever really been undertaken.' If United do secure hundreds of millions of pounds of public money as an ancillary part of the stadium project, the club, knowingly or otherwise, would be continuing a long and ignoble tradition that has become commonplace in America. In the UK, it's relatively rare for big sports teams to benefit from public money. In the US, however, it's such a common practice that the record for the largest public subsidy given to a team has been repeatedly shattered in recent years. The Las Vegas Raiders received $750m (£555m) in 2016. The Buffalo Bills got $850m (£629m) in 2022. The Washington Commanders are now in the process of landing over $1bn (£740m). And all that has happened despite a consensus among American academics that massive injections of public money towards major stadium projects have not led to the widespread economic benefits they promised. 'That's the story they tell to get the public money, but it's the big lie' of the stadium funding debate, says Pat Garofalo of the American Economic Liberties Project, 'We [in the US] export a lot of problematic things. And I really hope that we don't export that big lie.' Adds Geoffrey Propheter, a professor at the University of Colorado-Denver: 'In the US, my colleagues and I have the benefit of [decades] worth of examples. We have gotten to see how government intervention in sports facilities has evolved into this monster.' According to Propheter, out of the approximately 125 major league sports facilities across five major men's leagues – MLB, NBA, NHL, NFL, and MLS – only about 10% do not or have not received public money in some form. In the UK, West Ham and Manchester City play in stadiums built with public money, but in both cases the facilities were built for one-off sporting events (the 2012 Olympics and the 2002 Commonwealth Games, respectively) and then repurposed. According to research by the University of Michigan professor Stefan Szymanski, smaller clubs lower down the pyramid – such as Swansea City and Colchester United – have received some public money, but that spending was seen more as an investment into a community asset like a library or a school rather than as an economic generator. 'In the US it is almost taken as a given now that any new facility will receive taxpayer funding,' says Garofalo. 'It's the ones that don't that stand out as oddballs.' The story that Manchester United are telling now is the same one that American sports owners have told, again and again, despite a voluminous and still-growing body of proof that the story isn't real. 'I stress to my friends in the UK – all the evidence here shows that it's not true,' Garofalo says. 'You are setting this money on fire. And you are doing this to support a massive private business that prints money.' In 2024, the Portland Sea Dogs – a minor league baseball team in Maine – received a $2m tax break. While the sums of money and the size of the teams being discussed vary widely, there is a parallel between the Sea Dogs and Manchester United: both effectively disguised their solicitations for public money. Just as United aren't asking for hundreds of millions of pounds to go into their stadium construction budget, the Sea Dogs didn't ask for $2m to be put in their bank account. But by not having to pay $2m in taxes, that's effectively what the Sea Dogs got. Maura Pillsbury of the Maine Center For Economic Policy was part of a network of locals and legislators who pushed back on the Sea Dogs' tax break, ultimately unsuccessfully. When imagining what she would share with folks in Manchester as they contemplated United's plan, she says, 'Everybody here loves the Sea Dogs and I'm sure everybody there loves Manchester United' (City fans aside, of course) 'so it's hard to say no to. But I would encourage them to think about what they're sacrificing. Other people are going to have to pay for that. Something is gonna get cut.' Sign up to Soccer with Jonathan Wilson Jonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccer after newsletter promotion Donald Trump recently signed into law a massive federal budget bill that will slash social programs across the US and directly impact vulnerable populations in Maine. Meanwhile, the Sea Dogs recently unveiled the results of the renovation paid for in part by their tax break. 'That was another dagger,' Pillsbury says. 'Giving the Sea Dogs $2m – that was a policy choice. Where could have this money gone instead? That's childcare subsidies, that's healthcare, that's food on kids' plates. The emotional, feelgood nature of these proposals belie the actual reality – there's a cost and a consequence to making these decisions.' Propheter says that to 'get to where we are now' – where American pro teams have received billions in public money payouts – 'it took about 50 years of these stadium messes. I wonder if across the pond, folks are like: 'Hey, we can get to where America is because we can learn from the NFL, MLB – we can get to ballooning subsidies even faster.'' One thing standing in the way of this dangerous precedent blossoming in the UK may be the agency of the fans. As United seeks to benefit from public money, will fans – imagining where else their tax pounds could go – push back? American fans 'live in a world of fear,' says the University of Michigan's Stefan Syzmanski, 'because of what terrible thing might happen to them' – namely, their team being taken away. When a team owner in the US asks for public money, there is the implicit or explicit threat of the owner moving the team if the municipality doesn't cough up the dough. 'As a matter of rote reflex,' Garofalo says, 'they threaten to move the team. They have all the leverage to demand these subsidies' lest they have to rip up the team and move away – as, for example, happened when the NFL's Chargers left San Diego for Los Angeles. 'The fans treat the team as a community asset and the owners treat it as a private business.' But while American sports fans seem to respect team owners' legal right to manipulate them by threatening to leave, in the UK, Szymanski says, the thinking is different. Relocating your team is 'a borderline criminal activity.' And in general, fans don't think the owners of their teams should get to do whatever they want. 'Manchester United fans do not actually believe' that its proprietors, the Glazer family and Jim Ratcliffe, 'own Manchester United,' Szymanski says. 'That might be the legal position but the reality' is that they, the club's supporters, are 'the true owners' and that the Glazers and Ratcliffe are 'temporary stewards – and pretty shitty ones, at that.'
North Wales Live
3 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Council statement over asylum seekers 'misinformation' as bids to buy student halls
A council has released a statement to address "misinformation" over its bid to buy up a block of student halls in Bangor. Cyngor Gwynedd is in negotiations about purchasing the Ty Glyn building in the city. The property was once a tax office but later became student halls. The 60 bedroom site has been on the market for £4.5m. It is currently marked as 'Sold STC' (subject to contract) although remains student accommodation at this time. Cyngor Gwynedd are reportedly the ones buying the site which has triggered rumours about their plans. This has led to social media reports that asylum seekers could be housed in the building in the future by the council. It comes at a time when UK Government is under intense pressure to reduce the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. Join the North Wales Live WhatsApp community group where you can get the latest stories delivered straight to your phone In a statement Cyngor Gwynedd said: "Cyngor Gwynedd is in negotiations to buy the Tŷ Glyn building in Bangor for the purpose of meeting the housing needs of Gwynedd residents. The Council has no intention of housing asylum seekers or refugees in this building. "We appreciate the questions residents have raised and remain committed to ensuring open and transparent communication. However, it is important not to speculate or spread misinformation in the community." About 200 hotels were housing more than 30,000 asylum seekers in England and Wales at the end of March 2025, although it is understood less than 100 of those migrants are housed in Wales. This compares to a peak of 56,000 asylum seekers in 400 hotels back in 2023 under the last Conservative government.
STV News
7 hours ago
- STV News
Work to begin on bridge connecting Paisley with Glasgow Airport
Work is set to begin on a road bridge connecting Paisley with Glasgow Airport as part of a £59m transport project. The transport project will create the link across Paisley Harbour, a 1.7km gateway route along the White Cart river and a network of roads, cycling and walking links from the town centre train station and bus interchange to Advanced Manufacturing Innovation District Scotland (AMIDS), Glasgow Airport and Inchinnan. A new road from Renfrew Road to the bridge crossing will be created, connecting into the new Paisley Grammar School community campus, alongside dedicated walking and cycling routes. A safe access route from Garrowhill using the underpass on the former railway line will be constructed using £1.5m provided by Transport Scotland. It is estimated that the project could boost the local economy by an additional £136m in private sector investment and cut carbon emissions by 21,700 tonnes. Renfrewshire Council East-West link route from Renfrew Road to road bridge visualisation Renfrewshire Council Farrans Construction have been appointed to deliver the project with construction planning under way, with the full project expected to be complete and open by 2028. Renfrewshire Council's AMIDS South project has received £38.7m from the UK Government's Levelling Up Fund, with the council committing a further £18.8m. Renfrewshire Council leader Iain Nicolson said: 'AMIDS is one of the most significant developments in Renfrewshire's recent history as it will bring high-quality jobs, world-leading industry and provide a significant boost to the area's economy so it is important that we provide the appropriate access to Scotland's home of manufacturing innovation. Renfrewshire Council Harbour Road visualisation Renfrewshire Council 'This project will not only provide infrastructure to better connect communities to education and employment opportunities, but it will also significantly improve the offer to organisations looking to locate here with enhanced access to the airport and the fourth-busiest train station in Scotland. 'This will be another flagship project for Renfrewshire following the completion of the Clyde Waterfront and Renfrew Riverside project, which included the new Renfrew Bridge, and will be further proof of the Council's ability to successfully deliver nationally significant infrastructure projects which bring substantial benefits now and for generations to come.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
