
Internal rift deepens in 'Israel' over Gaza concentration camp plans
Under the plan, approved by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and pushed forward by Security Minister Israel Katz, up to 600,000 Palestinians would be confined to a heavily restricted zone near the Egyptian border. Movement in and out of the area would be virtually impossible, with only third-country departures permitted, effectively stripping displaced Palestinians of their right of return.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, breaking ranks with the far-right government, described the plan bluntly, "It is a concentration camp. I am sorry." He added, "If Palestinians were forced to move to the camp, it would create a concentration camp... This is part of an ethnic cleansing."
Israeli ministers responded not with reflection but with personal attacks. "Heritage" Minister Amichai Eliyahu smeared Olmert by invoking his past imprisonment, seeking to delegitimize his warnings rather than address the crimes being planned.
The initiative has also sparked an internal rebellion within the Israeli military. According to reports from Channel 12, IOF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir voiced opposition to the plan in a closed-door security cabinet meeting. He warned that the displacement scheme would drain vital resources from military operations and captives recovery missions and could amount to a war crime. Zamir's office reportedly reiterated that the mass displacement of civilians is not part of the army's role, especially amid legal challenges from Israeli and international human rights advocates.
Despite warnings from his military leadership, Netanyahu doubled down, reportedly rejecting the army's proposed timeline and budget. "I asked for a realistic plan," he said, pushing for an expedited displacement operation, one that finance officials say could cost taxpayers 15 billion shekels a year, draining public funds from health, education, and welfare.
The political, legal, and economic opposition to the plan is further compounded by its role in sabotaging ceasefire talks. Hamas officials have rejected the "humanitarian city" as a deceptive euphemism for forced ghettoization. "This is utterly unacceptable and no Palestinian would agree to this," said senior Hamas official Husam Badran, who called the proposal a "deliberately obstructive demand" designed to collapse negotiations.
Even Israeli officials acknowledge the plan's potential to derail diplomacy. Broadcaster Kan revealed that senior leadership privately admits that Hamas would never accept such terms, even with so-called "modifications."
Meanwhile, Israeli war crimes continue unabated. On Sunday, airstrikes across Gaza killed at least 31 civilians, including children and families gathered near aid distribution points. A July 13 Reuters report confirmed that Israeli missiles killed eight children in the Nuseirat while they were collecting water, an act the military dismissed as a "technical malfunction."
In reality, this strike is part of a broader campaign of collective punishment. According to the UN, over 798 Palestinians have been killed while trying to access food or aid. Entire neighborhoods have been obliterated, more than 900 health facilities destroyed, and Gaza's water, sanitation, and energy systems have collapsed. Over 58,000 Palestinians have been killed, and more than 1.7 million displaced, many multiple times.
Despite this devastation, "Israel" continues to cloak its military objectives in humanitarian rhetoric. But as Olmert starkly put it, "When they build a camp where they 'clean' more than half of Gaza, then the inevitable understanding is that it is not to save [Palestinians]. It is to deport them, to push them, and to throw them away."
Read more: Gaza aid line targeted: Dozens killed, UN confirms 798 dead at sites
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


LBCI
2 hours ago
- LBCI
From Gaza to Ukraine: Are global trade corridors fueling deeper rivalries?
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Do you know what's behind the war in Gaza? Or the reason for the conflict between Ukraine and Russia? Some observers trace these wars back to a global rivalry between two competing trade initiatives: one led by China—the 'Silk Road'—and the other backed by the United States—the 'India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor.' At first glance, this analysis may seem unconventional. But some argue that many of the wars and conflicts unfolding around the world today are tied to a deeper struggle over trade routes and economic influence among major powers. To break it down: there are two key global trade projects. The first is China's Silk Road, formally launched in 2013 as the Belt and Road Initiative. It's a vast economic and strategic plan aimed at linking China to Europe via Asia and the Middle East. The second is the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor, which was formally introduced during the 2023 G20 summit. This initiative seeks to establish a trade corridor connecting India to the Gulf and Europe through the Middle East. But is it accurate to say that many of today's wars are connected to the rivalry between these two trade routes? Take Gaza, for example. The war didn't erupt directly because of this rivalry, but the conflict became an indirect factor in Israel's military campaign. Put another way, the war in Gaza effectively froze progress on the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor. It became nearly impossible for Saudi Arabia to move forward with normalization or economic cooperation with Israel under current conditions. More broadly, the rivalry between the Chinese and Indian trade corridors helps explain why some countries have backed different sides in the conflict. India supported Israel, a position interpreted as an effort to protect its trade project from derailment. In contrast, China expressed support for the Palestinians—seen by some as an attempt to undermine the Indian corridor in favor of its own Belt and Road Initiative. Another example is the war in Ukraine, which has also disrupted China's Silk Road. The conflict weakened the initiative and forced China to alter its routes. Prior to the war, some Chinese goods passed through Ukraine en route to Europe. That route has been completely halted due to military operations and instability. This disruption created new space for competing projects, including the Indian corridor, to gain ground. Ultimately, when a war breaks out, the geopolitical dimensions—especially those tied to global trade routes—should not be overlooked.


LBCI
7 hours ago
- LBCI
Iran says it replaced air defenses damaged in Israel war
Iran has replaced air defenses damaged during last month's conflict with Israel, Iran's Defah Press news agency reported on Sunday, quoting Mahmoud Mousavi, the regular army's deputy for operations. During the conflict in June, Israel's air force dominated Iran's airspace and dealt a heavy blow to the country's air defenses while Iranian armed forces launched successive barrages of missiles and drones on Israeli territory. "Some of our air defenses were damaged; this is not something we can hide, but our colleagues have used domestic resources and replaced them with pre-arranged systems that were stored in suitable locations in order to keep the airspace secure," Mousavi said. Reuters


LBCI
8 hours ago
- LBCI
Pope Leo calls for end to 'barbarity of war' after strike on Gaza church
Pope Leo called for an end to the 'barbarity of war' on Sunday as he spoke of his profound pain over an Israeli strike on the sole Catholic church in Gaza. Three people died and several were injured, including the parish priest, in the strike on the Holy Family Church compound in Gaza City on Thursday. Photos show its roof has been hit close to the main cross, scorching the stone facade, and shattering windows. "I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, of indiscriminate use of force and forced displacement of the population," he said. Reuters