Pending criminal case costs applicant top court position in the Eastern Cape
Image: File
The failure to disclose a pending criminal case when asked to do so during a job application can have dire consequences, as an applicant who applied for the position of a court manager discovered.
Siphephelo Luthuli applied for two posts in the Eastern Cape as court manager. He was recommended as he was deemed the best candidate. He denied on his application form that he had a criminal record or any pending cases against him.
But it was later discovered that there was a pending case relating to alleged driving under the influence of alcohol. The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) then withdrew its recommendation that Luthuli get the job.
Luthuli took the matter on review before an arbitrator, who ruled in his favour and found that the OCJ was guilty of unlawful labour practice. The OCJ was ordered to compensate him by paying him R61,000, but the office took the matter on review to the Gqeberha Labour Court.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The court was told that in 2019, the OCJ advertised two positions for court managers at the Bhisho and Mthatha High Courts. Luthuli applied, and he was required to indicate if he had ever been convicted of a criminal offence or whether any cases were pending, and his response was 'no'.
The OCJ, however, subsequently established that he was arrested in respect of a case of driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Luthuli conceded that he knew about the matter but relied on the fact that the matter was not enrolled by the prosecutor's office. According to the police, the matter was still under investigation.
The panel that interviewed him considered the matter and felt he had to disclose that the matter was still pending. As a result, they withdrew their recommendation for his appointment.
The arbitrator found this to be irrational, arbitrary, and capricious and ordered that the OCJ compensate Luthuli. The arbitrator found that the definition of 'pending case' or 'pending' was not informed by an objective definition either provided for in legislation or policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
One murder, two court cases: chaos at Cape Town court
Five people are facing charges related to the murder of a retired teacher. The brutal kidnapping and murder of a retired teacher has caused confusion at the Cape Town Magistrates' Court. On 27 October 2024, Alison Dewar's body was found, stabbed to death, outside Philadelphia. Five people are facing charges related to the crime. But they are being tried in two separate cases, by different prosecutors, and investigated by different police units. There appears to be no communication between the teams. GroundUp has established that the current prosecutors in each case were unaware of the other case. Four people are charged with kidnapping, murder, theft of the victim's car, and defeating the ends of justice. But a fifth person has been charged with theft in a separate case. In November 2024, the state told the court it wanted to merge the two cases. ALSO READ: 'I was terrified' – Joburg woman recounts chilling driveway hijacking and kidnapping (VIDEO) But nine months later, this has not happened, and both cases have continued in parallel, and the merging of the cases has not been mentioned again. The police investigations have been beset by delays and inefficiencies, including delays in obtaining a postmortem report. The investigating officer in the murder case was reassigned to a less senior sergeant, with no explanation provided. In the car theft case, the accused appeared in court twice before an investigating officer was finally assigned and a docket was produced. Both cases have been postponed several times and will need to proceed to trial soon or risk being struck off. Dewar was a retired teacher who volunteered as a maths tutor at Rainbow of Hope, a non-profit organisation. A teacher at the organisation who worked with her, Shayner-Lee Wiese, told GroundUp she has little confidence in the state. 'This case is being handled as if it's not serious,' said Wiese, who has been attending the court hearings. 'Alison was someone who was committed to helping and caring for children. Does her death mean nothing?' Murdered for R5 000 Four days after her body was found, the police recovered Dewar's vehicle, a red 2024 Hyundai Creta, from the house of second-hand car salesman Obina Ugwuoke, who was arrested. Police then arrested Chukwudi Stanley and Isaac Okeowo, who were allegedly involved in stealing the car and selling it to Ugwuoke. Another person was also arrested, but charges against him were later withdrawn. A couple from Bellville, Marlon and Riani Macalagh, was also arrested. It is alleged that Dewar was murdered by the Macalaghs, who sold her car to a man called CJ for R3 000 in cash plus R2 000 worth of drugs. CJ is alleged to have sold the car to Ugwuoke for R20,000. Stanley apparently acted as a middleman for CJ, and Okeowo negotiated the price on behalf of Ugwuoke. CJ is said to have fled to Johannesburg and is still at large. It is unclear whether any attempts have been made to arrest him. First court appearance On 4 November 2024, the suspects appeared in court for the first time. Five of the accused – Stanley, Okeowo, the Macalaghs and the fifth man against whom charges were later withdrawn – were taken to the Atlantis Magistrates' Court. This was because the murder case was opened at the Philadelphia police station, which falls under Atlantis. They were charged with kidnapping, murder, theft and defeating the ends of justice. The court ruled that the case should be transferred to the Cape Town Magistrates' Court because the investigation was being led by the provincial Serious and Violent Crimes unit based in Cape Town. READ MORE: Three men found guilty for murder of would-be state witness Meanwhile, Ugwuoke was enrolled in a separate case from the other accused, and he was taken to the Cape Town Magistrates' Court, where he was charged with theft of the car. It emerged in court that no investigating officer had been assigned to the case. It was only at his third court appearance that an investigating officer was assigned, and the docket was finally disclosed to the court. Neither the Saps nor the NPA answered questions from GroundUp on why there were two separate cases for the same crime. Chaos in the court Both cases appeared before Magistrate Theart in the Cape Town Magistrates' (District) Court on 11 November. When Ugwuoke appeared in court, prosecutor Oliver Bulana told the court that his case would be added to the main murder case with the other suspects (but nine months later, this has not happened). There was still no docket, and no investigating officer had been assigned. Nonetheless, the court proceeded with bail proceedings, and Ugwuoke was released on bail for R10000. When the five accused in the murder case appeared later in the day, chaos ensued. The prosecutor told the court he was not sure what the next steps were in the case and that he would have to take instructions from a senior prosecutor. Senior prosecutor Johan Swart then came to address the court. READ MORE: DA accuses Saps of 'dismissive attitude, rudeness and lack of empathy' at police stations It emerged that the magistrate in Atlantis had used the wrong forms to transfer the case to the Cape Town Magistrates' Court – the forms said the matter was transferred to the regional court rather than the district court. So Magistrate Theart adjourned the matter, saying that the case could not appear before her in the district court. Late in the afternoon, the matter appeared in the Cape Town Regional Court before Magistrate Amori Graf, and the case was postponed. Two court appearances later, a bail hearing was held on 28 November, by which time charges against the fifth accused had been withdrawn. The Macalaghs decided not to apply for bail, but Stanley and Okeowo did apply, and they were released on R5 000 bail each. After the bail hearing, the senior investigating officer was reassigned and replaced by a junior colleague – a sergeant at the serious and violent crimes unit. Several postponements In the following months, there was a series of postponements in both cases. In the Ugwuoke car theft case, the matter was postponed five times between January and August this year. In March, the state said they were waiting for cellphone records to be analysed, and in June, the state said further evidence had to be obtained because there was a USB drive that had become corrupted. At the most recent court appearance, on 14 July, the trial was set down to begin in the regional court on 28 August. In the murder, kidnapping and theft case where the other four stand accused, the matter was postponed four times between February and August. READ MORE: Police can't say why they let an alleged rapist off the hook In April, the prosecutor told the court that they were still waiting for the postmortem report, about six months after the murder. Marlon Macalagh also applied for a bed at Valkenburg Psychiatric Hospital to be assessed to determine if he is mentally fit to stand trial. On 22 July, he was still on the waiting list. Only after his medical report is received will the trial be able to go ahead. This reporter asked the prosecutors in each case if they were aware of the other case. Both answered no. Neither the NPA nor Saps responded to GroundUp's questions. This article was republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Twins denied bail in Durban court for the murder of Prasa manager Jacob Khoaele
The Durban Magistrate's Court has refused bail for twins accused of killing a Prasa boss. Image: File Twin brothers, who are accused of killing Jacob Khoaele, the regional manager of Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), over a tender, had their bail application denied by the Durban Magistrate's Court on Friday afternoon. The court found that the twins failed to provide exceptional circumstances warranting their release. Khoaele was shot dead on January 22, 2025, at La Lucia, while returning from his grandchild's school meeting. Vukani Mchunu, Vukile Mchunu, Sandile Sakhile Ngcobo, and Mthandeni Cele are charged with his murder. On Friday, the twins, Vukani and Vukile, applied for bail while Ngcobo and Cele decided to abandon it. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In their application, the twins from Ngonyameni in Mlazi said they are 35 years old and co-own a company, Masoloma Trading. Their lawyer, Musawenkosi Mkhize, said the twins are married, with Vukani having six children and Vukile having five. He said they also co-own a property worth R700,000 and cars, which include a Ford Ranger bakkie and a Mercedes-Benz. They both stated that they are breadwinners who earn approximately R35,000 a month. He said their employees were not paid their salaries due to their incarceration, and that is why they should get bail. Mkhize said it was an exceptional circumstance that his clients were running a company. Additionally, he said his clients were traditional healers who also ran a church. Mkhize said his clients should get bail because the State has a weak case against them. 'How are the two applicants linked? The incident occurred around January this year. The number of months has lapsed, arrests were only made in July,' he said. Mkhize said, judging by what the investigating officer is saying in his affidavit, the State relied on one witness, Shange. As he was arguing, Magistrate Siyanda Mlaba asked Mkhize to tell him about the exceptional circumstances of his clients. Senior State prosecutor, Calvin Govender, said it is the onus of the applicants to prove that they have exceptional circumstances, and they have failed to do so. He reminded the court that this was a bail application and that all evidence would be led during the trial. Govender said the police wanted to get their ducks in a row before making an arrest. 'That is why there was a delay,' he explained. He submitted that the State is of the view that there would be interference with the witnesses should the twins get bail. He said the previous manager from Prasa had to resign because of the twins, who wanted to be paid for work that Prasa was not satisfied with. He said Khoale paid with his life because he also refused to pay the twins for work that Prasa was not satisfied with. 'Everyone at Prasa is afraid of the applicants due to the known fact that they threatened their colleague and killed the other,' Govender added. Delivering his ruling, Magistrate Mlaba reminded that the bail was under Schedule 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. He said the accused were facing serious allegations, and further emphasised that this was not a trial but a bail application. Mlaba criticised Mkhize, saying that he said a lot of things but failed to tell the court why his clients should get bail. 'I remember asking him to hit the nail in the hand. I even asked him the definition of exceptional circumstances. But the attorney was not giving what I was expecting. I ended up just keeping quiet,' he said. He said the worst part was that there was no alternative address for the twins should they receive bail. He said the defence failed to tell the court those exceptional circumstances. The matter has been postponed to September 29 for further investigation.
TimesLIVE
16 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Former attorney accused of theft, fraud released on R10,000 bail
Former attorney Catherine Wilheminah Papenfus appeared in the Johannesburg specialised commercial crimes court on Thursday on theft and fraud charges. Papenfus, 54, was arrested in Hermanus in the Western Cape on Saturday and was released on bail of R10,000. Between September 2010 and July 2013, Papenfus, who was an admitted attorney and conveyancer, allegedly received instructions from clients for legal assistance. 'The clients, intending to purchase properties, paid money into the attorney's trust account,' Hawks spokesperson W/O Thatohatsi Mavimbela said. 'However the suspect failed to pay the sellers and did not refund the clients.' When the clients failed to trace the attorney they lodged complaints with the Fidelity Fund for a refund and Papenfus was struck off the roll of attorneys. Her case was postponed to September 16.
