Family ask attorney general to order an inquest following settlement of High Court case over woman's death
The family of a woman who was allegedly prescribed an excessive dose of blood-thinning medication at University Hospital Waterford and later died have asked the Attorney General to direct a coroner to hold an inquest.
The call came as Esther Flynn's husband Joe settled a High Court action against the HSE over her death.
Lawyers for her family told the court on Tuesday how her death, at the age of 54, was 'totally unnecessary'.
Aidan Walsh SC said Ms Flynn suffered a brain haemorrhage and died on May 26th, 2022.
READ MORE
The claims were denied. The settlement, which was reached after mediation, was without admission of liability.
Mr Walsh said the fact that there was no apology forthcoming caused great upset to the Flynn family.
He said the family's solicitor had asked for an open disclosure meeting and was 'effectively ignored'.
In the proceedings, it was claimed that Ms Flynn had been prescribed an excessive dose of blood-thinning medication and there was an alleged failure to prescribe the woman with a correct dose of the drug in accordance with her weight.
Outside court, the family's solicitor, John Whelan, said the family has made an application to the Attorney General under the Coroners Act, seeking an inquest based on medical evidence including new reports from a consultant physician and a consultant haematologist.
He said the family welcomed progress in their case through mediation, but said they were saddened there was no legal mechanism for the court to require an apology 'even in cases where the emotional and human need for one is clear'.
'They hope this case will serve as a reminder of the importance of patient safety, full disclosures and dignity for families. They also hope that this will not happen again to another family,' he said.
He said Ms Flynn was a devoted wife, mother, grandmother, sister and daughter to a close and loving family.
Her family, he said, remained deeply distressed by the absence of 'any meaningful explanation or acknowledgment the hospital since her passing'.
Joe Flynn, of New Ross, Co Wexford, had sued the HSE over the death of his wife.
Ms Flynn had been admitted to University Hospital Waterford on April 29th, 2022, following a seizure and facial droop.
She had a CAT scan and an MRI scan of her brain and which were noted as unremarkable, but investigations revealed lymphoma, a cancer.
She was discharged on May 16th, but was readmitted two days later due to her health condition.
On May 22nd, 2022, it was noted she had not been started on blood-thinning medication since her admission, but due to her immobility and previous deep vein thrombosis a decision was made that she was at high risk of a pulmonary embolism, a blood clot.
A prescription was decided upon. On May 24th she had a reduced level of consciousness, and a CAT scan showed an acute cranial bleed. Her condition deteriorated and she died on May 26th.
In the proceedings it was claimed Ms Flynn had been prescribed an incorrect dosage of the blood-thinning medication and was allegedly prescribed an excessive dose.
It was further alleged Ms Flynn had not been weighed and an alleged unsubstantiated prescription of the drug had been based on an estimate of her weight.
All the claims were denied.
Noting the settlement and the division of the €35,000 statutory mental distress payment, Mr Justice Paul Coffey conveyed his deepest sympathy to the family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
An Irish team training combat medics in Kyiv: ‘No one thinks the war will end soon'
At the start of each trauma course run by the UCD Ukraine Trauma Project, the participants stand to attention for a minute's silence for fallen comrades – heads bowed, hands by their sides, or with hand on chest. When the speaker says 'Slava Ukraini' they answer 'Heroyam Slava' in unison. On the wall of the training centre in Kyiv there's a Ukrainian and an Irish flag, side by side. In advance of our arrival, three volunteer drivers have driven trucks packed with specialised clinical and training materials from UCD in Dublin to Kyiv. The trauma course is intensive: eight hours per day for two days. We run three courses over the course of a week – and an extra half-day cardiac resuscitation course. The project was established in 2022 to provide training in pre-hospital emergency care of trauma-related casualties. We've a team of nine – plus interpreters – for 146 participants. We get to know them well. We break into small groups. We mix at coffee breaks and at lunch. READ MORE Participants from previous courses drop in to see us if they happen to be in Kyiv. Some of the participants are referred by colleagues who have attended previous courses; this is our seventh trip to Ukraine. Most of the course participants are in their 20s and 30s; a third are women. Many have distinctive tattoos. 'It'll be easier to identify me if I'm killed,' a young combat medic tells me. They're a mix of civilian and military first responders and trainers. Many have come from the front line. Most had no medical experience before the war. I meet a computer programmer, an IT consultant, a plumber, people from all walks of life. Some have more than one job; a business consultant and a psychiatrist both also work as volunteer combat medics. Some are injured or undergoing medical treatment. An obstetrician/gynaecologist who does regular night shifts on air defence has a large gash on his leg from a recent drone attack. A woman hooked up to an IV drip says it's the last day of her treatment; she takes notes with her free hand. The psychiatrist-combat medic tells me that she herself suffers from PTSD, which, she says, helps her treat the physical and mental trauma of her patients. Some are grieving loved ones. A young woman is wearing a keyring owned by her boyfriend, an army commander who was killed recently. A fitness instructor, she says his death motivated her to train as a combat medic. Some are injured and grieving. A young vet who had a knee replacement is back working after his leg was shattered by shrapnel; his girlfriend, who was 16 weeks pregnant, was killed in a separate attack. Like him, she was a combat medic. His eyes well up with tears when he tells us his story. Ours do too. . Participants at the recent trauma course in Kyiv. A woman with pink hair jokes that she tucks it under her helmet so that the Russian drone operators will not spot her. Her humour is mixed with defiance. One thing that is striking is that no one complains – about the conditions they work under, the geopolitical uncertainty, the fact that combat medics and the injured are targeted by the Russians. They are keen to learn. One of the vets says that human medicine is easier because you only have to know about one species. They come from different backgrounds and, if in the military, from different ranks – but you wouldn't know it. In discussions, each is respectful of what the other has to say. They clap each other when they do presentations or demonstrate the new skills they have learned. [ Irish medics take training course in advanced paramedics to Ukraine to help keep injured soldiers alive Opens in new window ] On the day I read on my phone about toxicity among medical staff in an Irish hospital, a dentist – who is now a medical instructor – compliments the members of our small group teaching session on their skill and courage; the group includes a historian, one of the vets, an electrician, a mechanic and a kindergarten teacher. They know that many Ukrainians have come to Ireland since the start of the war and that the Irish Government stands with Ukraine. I meet no one who thinks the war will end soon. Uliana, a tactical medicine trainer and artist, explains that Ukraine must only negotiate from a position of strength – otherwise, the Russians will come back. She is softly spoken but there is a steely determination in her voice. On the day it is announced that 40 Russian bombers were hit by Ukrainian drones, no one mentions it. They are focused on the job they are doing. An ambulance evacuation medic who works on the front line googles UCD. 'It says UCD is a global university. Is that why you're all here?' he asks me. He's carrying an emergency kit bag with a UCD sticker. I give him a UCD pin badge. It's as good an explanation as any. The UCD Ukraine Trauma Project was set up by Prof Gerard Bury – and is supported by UCD, UCD Foundation, HSE Global Health, the Irish Red Cross, and philanthropy; Prof Chris Fitzpatrick is its vice-chair.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
At a time when the boom is even boomer, this statistic should mortify us
I've written before about Ireland's unknown knowns, our singular talent for wilful absent-mindedness. We have been very good at rendering invisible what is in front of our eyes. And we have not lost the knack. We're doing it now with a reality to which our history should make us especially sensitive: hunger. At the start of this century, one child in every six growing up in Ireland sometimes went to bed hungry because there was not enough food in the house. Now, when (to adopt Bertie Ahern's neologism) the boom is even boomer, this mortifying statistic has changed radically. We've managed to get it up almost to one child in every five. And for children in the poorest third of families, we're closing in on one in four. According to the comprehensive Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study published last week, 15 per cent of Irish kids in the lowest income families sometimes went to bed hungry in 2002. Twenty years later (2022 is the latest year of the analysis), that metric had risen to 24 per cent. If you missed this news, you probably shouldn't blame yourself. The HBSC report got extensive coverage for its findings on whether children were feeling 'low' or drinking alcohol, smoking dope or using condoms if they had sex. The data on hunger was largely ignored, meriting at best a glancing reference. It is not hard to understand why: it induces a kind of cognitive dissonance. It does not fit in the frame of contemporary Irish reality. READ MORE There is something viscerally shaming about the thought of a child going to bed hungry. It reeks of Oliver Twist or, closer to home, of Angela's Ashes, where 'the children slurp the porridge and complain that they didn't get enough, they're starving with the hunger'. We have confined it in public consciousness to misery lit. It is a terrain most of us visit as psychological tourists, slumming it in a dark past to make us feel better about our present state of plenty. By my count, the word 'hungry' has been used 17 times in the Dáil this year. Some of the speakers were using it metaphorically ('Our airports need to be hungry for this business …') Most of the references to human bodily hunger were, entirely justifiably, to the terrible events in Gaza . There was only one real allusion to hunger in Ireland and that was one that placed it firmly in the realm of history. Danny Healy-Rae , summoning the folk memory of his native Kerry, told the Dáil, 'I know what hunger is from my grandfather and grandmother telling me of when people were hungry here, what they went through and what they had to go through when they did not have anything to eat. They were poorer times. Gladly, that is not the case here in Ireland today. There is no one hungry like that, or there need not and should not be.' This last sentence is telling. It is entirely true that no child need or should be hungry in an Ireland awash with money. But it is all too easy to slip from saying that there is no reason for something to be happening to the assumption that it could not be happening. Yet we know it is. In 2022, a study conducted by Amárach Research for Barnardos found that 17 per cent of Irish parents, and 25 per cent of those who were not working outside the home, reported not being able to provide their children 'with a sufficiently nutritious diet, quality and quantity, which you would ideally like' . This is not about parental fecklessness: in the same study, one in five Irish parents reported skipping or skimping on their own meals so they could feed their kids. [ More parents going without to feed their children, say Barnardos Opens in new window ] The last government's Task Force on Food Poverty notes that while 'for some people food skills and a lack of access to shops or equipment play a part', the basic problem is lack of money: 'For most people, the main cause of food poverty is low income in relation to their household costs – not inability to manage money or food.' The Barnardos study also showed that many of us, even if we are not directly suffering food poverty in our own families, know children who are doing so. Asked, 'Do you have any first-hand experience of children where the impact of not having sufficient nutritious food has been evident to you?', almost one in three Irish people said they did. What they noticed in these children were bad impacts on their physical, cognitive, social and educational development. Yet there is no common public language even to name this knowledge. An official study of two areas, one in Dublin, the other in rural Ireland, for the Department of Social Protection in 2023, noted that 'food poverty, as a specific term, is not used in or by the community. Food insecurity is acknowledged but again not a common phrase in conversations'. Ironically, that report has now itself disappeared from the department's website, as has the Action Plan based on it. Under ' The Action Plan on Food Poverty and the associated research report are available ', it now says 'Item was unpublished or removed.' [ 'It's kind of become our daughter's cheat meal': The view on new hot school meals programme Opens in new window ] In spite of this apparently deliberate un-knowing, there has been some real progress in recent years. The Hot School Meals scheme has been gradually rolled out and from this year covers all primary schools. A pilot scheme to continue to provide food to these pupils during the school holidays will start this summer. But there's still a huge gap in provision for older children and young people. The stark fact is that there are students sitting Junior and Leaving Cert exams today who went to bed hungry last night. Much of this injustice could be removed almost instantly if the Government would do what it has been talking about for more than a decade: introduce a second level of child benefit targeted at those most in need. But it won't do that until we decide to know what we know.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
I wrote the Leas Cross report. Two decades on, has anything changed in Irish nursing homes?
Almost the worst aspect of the heartbreaking and horrifying scenes from the nursing home RTÉ Investigates programme was the predictability that these should still occur 20 years after the Leas Cross scandal. The Leas Cross report , which I authored, followed a similar exposé on shocking conditions and work practices in the private Leas Cross Nursing Home in Swords. It led to a range of recommendations and the institution of the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) . Last week's documentary featured scenes of older people allegedly being manhandled, 'forced' down into chairs or left in incontinence pads for so long their clothes were soaked. The persistence of gross institutional abuse of vulnerable older people signals the lack of serious intent and will in the Department of Health and successive governments to address well-signposted problems and proposed solutions to a deeply flawed nursing home system. READ MORE Not only are some of the recommendations from the Leas Cross report as yet unfulfilled, but none of those of significance from the ministerial panel on Irish nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic have been met, and others have been watered down. This is despite Irish nursing home residents experiencing very high death rates in comparison with the rest of the developed world and a torrid experience paralleling that of Amnesty UK's report on nursing homes during the pandemic, As If Expendable . At the heart of the problem is the shift from a largely public nursing home system to a private one without debate, foresight or learning from international experience and research. This occurred in a context of multiple failures by the professions, advocacy and the health system to develop a clear blueprint for the development of a high-quality framework for our future care in nursing homes. Put simply, the health service has no control of care standards in the private sector, and in particular what is known as clinical governance, a clear framework for leadership, responsibility and accountability, both internally and externally, in a complex care environment with vulnerable older people. Added to this is a profit-driven business with large chains, at least one of which, Emeis Ireland, has a deeply tarnished reputation outside this country – as detailed in Victor Castanet's book Les Fossoyeurs: Révélations sur le système qui maltraite nos aînés (The Gravediggers: Revelations about the system that mistreats our elders). In some, profit trumps care and, as we saw with the documentary, cost-cutting erodes care. In addition, this is associated with the building of huge impersonal nursing homes distant from the communities where residents formerly lived. Despite Sláintecare pledging to reverse the ratio of private to public nursing home beds, the reverse has happened with an increase in the proportion of private nursing home beds. [ What is Emeis and where are its Irish care homes located? Opens in new window ] The framework is so rickety and uninformed that there is a misplaced belief in regulation and safeguarding. Standards in hotels, restaurants and hospitals are not high because of regulation or safeguarding, but rather because we, the public and professions, have set high expectations of what we should receive. This has long been accepted in healthcare. The author of the first major medical ethics scandal in the US, where African-Americans were left untreated with syphilis, wrote that regulation, while necessary, would never succeed on its own: what was required was a system that upheld virtuous thought and virtuous action. As was obvious from the RTÉ documentary, and long clear to informed healthcare professionals, Hiqa cannot assure the public of appropriate and dignified care standards in Irish nursing homes, nor respond effectively and in a timely manner to grave concerns reported to it. Instead, we need a radical reset of prioritising informed support to residents in nursing homes and those working in them. We can do this while recognising the many who strive to provide good care – they are not tarnished by critique of lack of policy or the inherent problems of an untrammelled private sector. If anything, all suffer if we do not address the glaring problems of the system. There needs also to be soul-searching among the professions about supporting care in this sector. It would be helpful for the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland to engage proactively on advising how nurses should engage with the challenges of providing high-quality care in a profit-driven nursing home system. The public also need to start pushing their politicians to do better. As things stand – and hard as it is to accept – we have no assurance that the scenes played out in the RTÉ documentary are not occurring elsewhere in the Irish nursing home system. The Ombudsman has already pointed to the lack of dignity and choice in Irish nursing home systems. [ Review of all nursing homes operated by Emeis Ireland requested by Department of Health Opens in new window ] It is not just a question of 'it might be my mother' but actually 'it might be me': men have a one in four, and women a one in three, chance of spending time in a nursing home before we die. We need to clearly signal that we expect a setting where choice will be respected and that we can continue to flourish. We must demand a lower tolerance for uninformed passivity from the Department of Health, HSE and other State bodies, and inclusion of stronger advocacy and gerontological voices (notably absent from the ministerial panel oversight implementation team) in responding to this lingering crisis. Politicians are adept at detecting the priorities of their constituents. If we do not push for a better present and future for those we care for and our future selves, nor will they. Prof Des O'Neill is a consultant geriatrician and author of the Leas Cross report 2005-6
