logo
Mrs Warren's Profession

Mrs Warren's Profession

Time Out23-05-2025

For a script penned in 1893, Mrs Warren's Profession still feels remarkably fresh. Absence has probably made the heart grow fonder when it comes to George Bernard Shaw's problem play. From the very beginning, it's had a fraught staging history. In Victorian England there was general social outcry over its subject matter, and you can understand why: its attitude towards sex work as a functioning product of the capitalist labour market feels bracingly current even today.
Yet upon first glance, director Dominic Cooke's production is as traditional as they come; Chloe Lamford's costumes are all lace and ruffles, and 'by Jove!' is exclaimed ad nauseum. But something darker bubbles beneath the surface, hinted at by the ghostly chorus of white-clad women who circle the stage. The words 'prostitute' or 'brothel madam' are never uttered – doing so in polite society would, of course, be wrong – not even by the titular Mrs Warren (Imelda Staunton) whose profession it is. Yet Staunton, as one would expect, is able to create a character rich with contradiction in this vivid production. There's nothing ahistorical in her performance, yet Mrs Warren's monologues could be quoted verbatim by anti-criminalisation campaigners today without the batting of an eyelid.
The version of England that greets us, however, is worlds away from Mrs Warren's seedy life. In fact, it's her daughter Vivie (Bessie Carter, Staunton's real-life offspring) who greets us from the revolve stage, which Lamford decked out in hyper-realistic green and pink blossoms. The woman perched amid this pastoral vision is no delicate flower, however. No, Vivie is strong-willed, clear-headed and a little forthright. Having just graduated with honours in mathematics at Cambridge, she's the original woman in STEM; desired by many, but with no interest in such frivolities as romance or art.
Initially, her mother hangs in the air through clipped memories and whispers. Vivie knows very little about Mrs Warren, who she spends only a few days with every year on such unannounced visits as the one taking place today. But from discussions with the visiting Mr Praed (Sid Sagar) and other bumbling men who circle Vivie, it's clear there's something big she doesn't know about her mother. All she does know is that there will be a 'battle royale' when her mother arrives, and she will 'win' it.
Carter's Vivie is the centre of the play, and Carter imbues this unconventional woman with the appropriate mix of modern and traditional sensibilities, even when Cooke's direction does call on her to spend an awful lot of time just sitting down. But let's be real; it's Staunton we're all here to see, and who draws the eye from the moment she strides onto stage in her striped frock coat.
Of course, Staunton is too smart, too empathetic an actor to aim to overpower her fellow actors. Her Mrs Warren is a walking contradiction rather than a larger than life archetype. She holds herself with poise, but the accent – clipped RP on the surface, but with an unmissable east London twang no amount of elocution training can disguise – suggests it's not a status that comes inherently to her.
Around the pair zip and weave a cast of male comedy characters, the highlight being Gardner as Vivie's gold-digging sometime love interest Frank. Their collective presence brings a farcical feeling to the show's lighter moments, and serve in direct contrast to the silent, tragic Greek chorus of women who lurk around the edge of the revolve stage and gaze at Vivie, a steely reminder of what she could have been. Between scenes, they slowly strip away the flowers and roll back the grass, so that when mother and daughter finally face off, there are no distractions.
These two-hander scenes are where the real mastery of Staunton's performance is made apparent. There is so much subtle pain in her voice when she talks about the circumstances that led her to her, well, profession, and when it does bubble over that raised voice carries real heft. Somehow, the audience can't help but admire Mrs Warren's lack of shame (at least initially), to the point where I found myself nodding in agreement that of all the jobs on offer to her as a poor woman, this was somehow the least degrading. 'What's a woman's worth? What's life worth without self-respect?' she roars, and sells us that she's speaking the truth.
Despite clocking in at close to two hours without an interval, this one-act play rarely drags. Tension is created and held even in the frothier in-between scenes. After all the twists and turns along the way, you don't leave with clear answers about Mrs Warren or even her profession. I did, however, leave unexpectedly entertained, and with further confirmation that they don't make actors as interesting as Staunton anymore.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Meghan Markle's twerking video backfires: Duchess deliberately released clip to debunk claims she had fake baby bump - but has instead reignited conspiracy theories over her pregnancy, expert claims
EXCLUSIVE Meghan Markle's twerking video backfires: Duchess deliberately released clip to debunk claims she had fake baby bump - but has instead reignited conspiracy theories over her pregnancy, expert claims

Daily Mail​

time13 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Meghan Markle's twerking video backfires: Duchess deliberately released clip to debunk claims she had fake baby bump - but has instead reignited conspiracy theories over her pregnancy, expert claims

Meghan Markle may have deliberately released the video of her twerking with Prince Harry before giving birth to Lilibet to celebrate her daughter and also shut up conspiracy theorists - but it backfired, a leading British academic suggested today. Trolls have weaponised the film to spread wild and groundless speculation that the Duchess of Sussex wasn't pregnant at all and was wearing a 'moonbump'. A group of Twitter critics of the Sussexes have even made the extraordinary claim that the dancing video was faked and made on a film set - or could be AI-generated. Sander van der Linden, professor of social psychology at the University of Cambridge, has said that the video may have been, in part, an attempt by Meghan to debunk baseless claims that have lingered in the dark corners of the web for years. But he warned: 'In an age where all videos are suspect in terms of being AI-manipulated, it creates an extra cloud of confusion'. Last month Meghan also shared an Instagram mood board posted to millions of followers to mark her seventh wedding anniversary to Harry. Many quickly noted that on it was an ultrasound picture - plus a photo of her bare pregnancy bump. Prof van der Linden claims the idea Meghan wore a 'moonbump' and used a surrogate were cooked up in 2019, when she was pregnant with Archie, by a minority of people who 'hated' her. 'Generally, the more you try and refute a conspiracy theory, the more you fuel the idea that there's something to it', he said. 'It legitimises it – why would you respond unless it's something credible? There are some exceptions, where people can successfully dismiss conspiracy theories with humour and sarcasm, which is maybe what [Meghan] was attempting to do here'. But the Cambridge professor says it it has not helped. 'It provides lots of material for people to cling onto, saying, "Look, she's wearing a prosthetic bump," or suggesting videos are deepfakes', van der Linden told the Telegraph. The conspiracy frenzy began when Meghan posted a video of her and Prince Harry twerking in a hospital room in an attempt to induce Lilibet's birth. The Duchess of Sussex shared the throwback clip on her Instagram to mark her daughter's fourth birthday saying 'there was only one thing left to do' when the princess was overdue and spicy food, walking and acupuncture failed to kickstart labour. But conspiracy theorists pored over the film in order to make wild and even unhinged claims about her including that her pregnancy was faked. Several claimed, without credible evidence, that her bump was too high or the wrong shape to be real. Others said her ability to dance that way at nine months meant she was either 'superhuman' or not pregnant at all. Others have sought to back the incredible and baseless claim that the Sussexes used a surrogate by claiming the equipment in the background suggested it was not on a labour ward. The video has sparked baseless claims on social media that it was faked Trolls have also claimed that Meghan would have been wearing a gown and would have had her jewellery removed. Others have questioned why she wasn't hooked up to an IV drip containing induction medication. One person claiming to be a nurse said that she should have had a canula in her hand. Another alleged that she would not have one fitted while in her own clothes. Some Twitter users crudely marked the pictures with what they considered inaccuracies, using child-like scribbles. MailOnline has asked a spokesman for the Sussexes to comment. The video has sparked a social media frenzy. In it, Harry is seen coming into view of the camera as Starrkeisha's viral Baby Mama song begins to play. A heavily pregnant Meghan then starts twerking in front of a hospital bed before she gyrates around the room. 'Four years ago today, this also happened. Both of our children were a week past their due dates… so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work - there was only one thing left to do!,' Meghan wrote on her Instagram. The Baby Mama dance was a social media craze in 2018 with celebs Shay Mitchell, and Chloe and Lauryn Goodman all previously posting videos of themselves taking part in the trend. Meghan had earlier shared two previously unseen photos of Lilibet with Harry. One of the pictures showed the Duke of Sussex holding his daughter's hand as they walked along a sandy road barefoot in the sunshine, while he held his shoes and a cap. The other image was of Harry holding Lilibet as a baby while they looked at each other. Meghan wrote in a post accompanying the pictures: 'The sweetest bond to watch unfold. Daddy's little girl and favorite adventurer. Happy birthday Lili!' The post was made at 7.40am California time (3.40pm UK), just under eight hours after Meghan earlier posted two other intimate family photos of her with Lilibet. In that post, the Duchess shared a black-and-white snap of herself cuddling Lili, who was sat on her lap, with the pair both sporting windswept hair, seemingly on a boat. The second image in the first post showed Meghan tenderly cradling newborn Lilibet as she enjoyed skin-to-skin time with the new addition to her family in 2021. Meghan wrote in the first post: 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl! Four years ago today she came into our lives - and each day is brighter and better because of it. 'Thanks to all of those sending love and celebrating her special day!' The duchess usually only shares photos of her daughter pictured from behind to protect her privacy. But in the more recent photo, Lili's eyes and the top half of her face could be seen, with her nose and mouth and the rest of her face covered by Meghan's arms as she hugged the princess. Lili - the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's youngest child - was born on June 4 2021 and was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. She only became entitled to be a princess when her grandfather the King acceded to the throne, because of rules set out by King George V in 1917. Harry and Meghan started using prince and princess for Archie and Lili after the princess's christening in 2023, following correspondence with Charles about the matter. Yesterday, Meghan expressed her dream of launching a future business with Lili as she chatted to Beyonce's mother Tina Knowles on her podcast. 'I wonder if one day I'll be in business with Lili and we'll be building something,' the duchess said, with Knowles adding: 'That's the best.' Last week, the Duchess shared a clip of her and her daughter beekeeping in matching protective suits, writing: 'Harvesting honey with my little honey. (Like mother, like daughter; she's even wearing my gloves).' Lilibet is named after her great-grandmother Queen Elizabeth II. Princess Elizabeth had difficultly pronouncing her own name as a toddler and her grandfather George V would affectionately call her Lilibet, imitating her own attempts to say Elizabeth. The sweet nickname stuck and she became known as Lilibet to her family from then on. But the late Queen was reportedly 'as angry as I'd ever seen her ' after Harry and Meghan claimed they had her blessing to use the name for their daughter Lilibet, a royal aide said. Royal author Robert Hardman, in his biography of the King, told how a member of staff recounted Elizabeth II's fury following Harry and Meghan's announcement in 2021 over the use of her childhood family nickname. The BBC later reported a Palace source said the Queen was not asked by the Sussexes whether they could use Lilibet. But the Sussexes' lawyers fired off legal letters to the broadcaster and other publishers, saying the claim was false and defamatory. A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan insisted at the time that the duke spoke to his grandmother in advance and would not have used the name had the monarch not been supportive. Hardman wrote however: 'One privately recalled that Elizabeth II had been 'as angry as I'd ever seen her' in 2021 after the Sussexes announced that she had given them her blessing to call their baby daughter 'Lilibet', the Queen's childhood nickname.'

Photograph: Kristoffer Paulsen
Photograph: Kristoffer Paulsen

Time Out

time21 hours ago

  • Time Out

Photograph: Kristoffer Paulsen

June 2025 update: This winter, head chef Lorcán Kan is dishing up one of his all-time comfort dishes: steaming hot bowls of coconut curry laksa. Kan's take is an intensely fragrant broth of lemongrass, garlic, makrut lime, galangal and chilli, generously loaded with a mix egg and rice noodles, housemade golden tofu (Etta fans know), fresh herbs and a lusciously loud Nonya sambal. And that's not even the end of it. Each god-level soup will be served with a stick of deep-fried dip-it-yourself school prawns, inspired by the Malaysian street-food vendors known as skewer aunties – who make the steamboat-style skewered meats and seafood known as lok-lok. Additional lok-lok of housemade fish balls and satay grilled chicken will also be available for $8 a pop. The laksa is available for $30 and will be served from Etta's front bar every Wednesday night until the end of August. Move fast, though; there are only 20 serves available a week and your best bet is to book ahead. - Lauren Dinse The below review was originally written in December 2023. Please note that chef Rosheen Kaul (whom this review references) departed the restaurant in April 2024, with new head chef Lorcan Kan now steering the ship. We have since re-visited the restaurant and believe the quality of its offering continues to warrant a five-star rating. ***** Time Out Melbourne never writes starred reviews from hosted experiences – Time Out covers restaurant and bar bills for reviews so that readers can trust our critique. Etta has been hot on everyone's lips since it entered the Brunswick East dining scene –particularly since head chef Rosheen Kaul joined the kitchen in 2020. In the culinary world, countless awards and glowing reviews often breed scepticism but a recent Tuesday evening dinner proved the praise is just as warranted as ever. We were seated in a cosy corner nook decked out with decorative pillows, ideal for soaking up the scene (to the left, the bar and open kitchen; the right, Lygon street passersby; and to the front, a solo diner in for an early drink and snacks followed by a couple on date night – both common finds at this venue). Though Etta is a restaurant, strictly speaking, it's frequently mistaken as a wine bar. Perhaps because it has a list to stand up among the best of Melbourne's wine bars. Bottles range in price, region and style with a largely Victorian focus. Whether you want old-world or new-age, there's something for everyone. But it pays to look past the vino as the sake offering is equally thoughtful (albeit less extensive) with a few hard-to-find drops from around Japan. Fitting in with a trend many restaurants and bars seem to be following as of late, the food menu is snack-heavy and designed to share. We start strong with a crab masala-stuffed zucchini flower – its thin, nearly translucent batter and bold spice putting cheese-filled numbers to shame. It's large enough to split between two while the quail egg is a one-bite wonder, served on a skewer with fried tofu, pickled radish, feferoni and a generous drizzle of Sichuan chilli oil. Momentum is maintained as larger dishes begin to grace the table. The red curry rice and herb salad, an Etta mainstay, has been reimaged for the current menu with smoky grilled octopus and crumbled pieces of otak-otak, a spiced woodfired fish cake that's almost like goats cheese in texture and just as savoury. The golden tofu, served under a pile of charred spring greens and wild garlic, looks deceptively simple but shows the outstanding potential of beancurd when well prepared. And the shiitake-filled wombok cabbage rolls with tempura enoki, another perennial favourite, achieves the elusive goal of meatless main that doesn't skimp on substance. Flame-licked and full of flavour, both dishes are unmissable, vegetarian or not. The savoury dishes were faultless so we decide to try dessert – a pandan and amaretto frangipane tart with palm sugar ice cream that reads extremely well but unfortunately falls flat. It's not bad by any stretch but lacks dimension, particularly after the last few courses. A bit of citrus zest or even a touch of burnt sugar would go a long way but the pairing of sweet, nutty Kameman Shuzo Genmaishu sake means the meal ends on a high note. In a sea of great restaurants, it's tough to be truly exceptional but Etta straddles the line. A continuous reinvention of their classics seems key to the venue's success – and if it continues on this trajectory, one can only assume great things are to come. But regardless of Etta's future, it's clear its stripes are well-deserved. While you're in the neighbourhood, here's why Brunswick East was voted the sixth coolest neighbourhood in the world. Looking for more great restaurants?

Period drama fans have just days to watch 'emotional' film before it's axed
Period drama fans have just days to watch 'emotional' film before it's axed

Daily Record

time2 days ago

  • Daily Record

Period drama fans have just days to watch 'emotional' film before it's axed

The British biographical drama film stars Felicity Jones, Kristin Scott Thomas, and Tom Hollander A highly praised period drama directed by and featuring Ralph Fiennes is ready to depart from BBC iPlayer soon. The biographic film, The Invisible Woman (2013), is set in the Victorian era and centres around an important cultural figure. ‌ Adapted from a 1990 novel bearing the same title, it unfolds the tale of Charles Dickens's clandestine affair with Nelly Ternan, played out over 13 years with a budding young actress. ‌ Haunted by memories, an older Nelly, now a teacher and a wife, grapples with her concealed past involving the illustrious author, as flashbacks unravel their complex connection. The movie delves into Charles Dickens's mental landscape, the societal dilemmas presented by their relationship, and Nelly's trials following their separation. It provides insight into the difficulties faced by someone entangled with a renowned personality through the lens of Nelly, as the drama investigates themes of love, individuality, and the ramifications of keeping secrets, reports the Express. Regarding his dual role as actor and director for the piece, Fiennes confessed his initial unfamiliarity with Charles Dickens' body of work to Vulture, stating: "I was ignorant. "I had only read Little Dorrit. I knew his obvious ones - Nicholas Nickleby, Oliver Twist, Great Expectations - through adaptations. And Christmas Carol. I didn't know much about the man." ‌ Nevertheless, Fiennes's portrayal earned widespread acclaim, with many reviews commending his and Felicity Jones's acting prowess. The film has garnered a positive consensus on Rotten Tomatoes, where it boasts a rating of 76%, reflecting the viewers' commendations. Critics have praised the film, with one saying: "This is everything a period drama almost never is: underplayed, witty, poignant and, above all, real". Another reviewer simply put: "Beautiful to watch. Acting perfect. Based on truth". ‌ Other viewers have also shared their thoughts, with one commenting: "This is a slow and emotional watch, ideal for fans of period drama. I found it quite engrossing and intriguing to get to know Charles' love interest at the time its set." The cast's performances have also been commended, with one viewer noting: "The cast do well giving good performances and the dialogue was quite thoughtful at times, although at other times it's more a case of what isn't said, than what is. "And indeed I enjoyed the dialogue-free scenes as they had an almost dream-like quality to them and allowed the viewer to contemplate what the characters on screen may be thinking." Upon its release in 2013, The Invisible Woman was not only well-received by critics but also achieved box office success, grossing £2,380,130.78 worldwide. The Invisible Woman (2013) will no longer be available on BBC iPlayer after June 7.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store