‘I was doing my job:' Atlanta bar employee recounts fight with APD officer
Investigators say the employee, Rae Penrice, is the current suspect in the case.
Channel 2's Tyisha Fernandes spoke with Penrice on Friday to get his side of the story.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
'It was like something above the law,' he said.
Several witnesses told Channel 2 Action News that the officer, Garrett Rolfe, started the fight and should've been the one to go to jail. Rolfe, the same officer who shot and killed Rayshard Brooks, is currently on leave while police investigate.
'I was doing my job, just greeting customers and cleaning up and making sure the front straight," Penrice described.
He says a female coworker at X in midtown Atlanta told him that Rolfe and a friend had taken photos of her after accusing her of overcharging for drinks.
'I told them, 'I'm Rae, I work here and y'all were asked to leave, so why won't you?' And in the course of me saying those words, I was struck, I was hit. I was hit several times,' he recalled. 'I got hit right here in my temple area, I got hit in my neck, I got hit right here underneath my jaw. And those were the ones that were substantial because those were the ones I felt for a few days. And at that point, I just had to defend myself after the attack.'
RELATED STORIES:
911 calls shed new light on moments before employee, APD officer got into bar fight
Officer who shot, killed Rayshard Brooks in 2020 under investigation after Atlanta bar fight
Former neighbor defends officer charged with shooting Rayshard Brooks
He says he hit the officer to stop the attack.
Penrice called 911 after he says a group of people followed him to the back alley as he took out the trash.
The bar employee was subsequently arrested after police arrived.
Fernandes reached out to police who said they cannot comment until the investigation is over.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Guns are the problem: Four are dead in New York because a gullible public laps up the same toxic myth about guns
This time, the gun death came to New York. The same ridiculous fiction is being sold to a gullible public that was trotted out after Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, Parkland, Buffalo and all the others: Guns don't kill people, people kill people. What's more pathetic than those who keep selling that myth is the ease with which so many Americans buy it. Four New Yorkers, Didarul Islam, Wesley LePatner, Aland Etienne and Julia Hyman, went to work in Midtown on a broiling hot Monday and were murdered. Mental illness didn't kill these four. CTE didn't kill these four. A supposed aggrievement in a suicide note didn't kill these four. A semiautomatic assault rifle, identified as either an AR-15 or an M4, killed these four and wounded a fifth, Craig Clementi. The motive of the dead assailant was not what destroyed four lives and ripped apart surviving families and friends. It was a high-powered rifle rapidly firing bullets. Absent the gun, and the victims would all be alive today. But there was a gun, a big gun, with lots of bullets and we are left with grief and the funerals for the four New Yorkers who were taken from us. But it wasn't only the gun, or the gunmakers, or the politicians who peddle the fatal myth. It's the people across our fraying nation who believe that there is somehow something patriotic about having the power to fire off 45 rounds a minute. The Second Amendment says nothing about unstable or sick people having weapons of war. How is that a constitutional right? New York has strong gun control laws, but we don't search people at the border bringing in guns from other states with more lax regulations. Only federal law can bring this insanity to an end, but politicians will decry the killing and do nothing. And tomorrow more people will die. And the day after that. Again. Again. Again. This time the gun death came to New York. Islam was a cop, a 36-year-old Bangladeshi immigrant, pulling in some extra money for his wife and two boys and another baby on the way in a few weeks on what is called paid detail where a private business pays for off-duty uniformed NYPD officers to provide additional security. His wife is now a widow, his two sons fatherless and his new baby is coming into a world without a dad, because of a gun. The gun then killed LePatner, an executive at the big financial firm Blackstone, who was in the lobby at 6:30 likely heading home to her own husband, teen daughter and seventh grader son. Besides being a business whiz, LePatner was a philanthropist helping her kids' school and other charitable causes. She was on the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Museum of Art for not even six months. Now her life is over at age 43, because of a gun. Also murdered in the lobby was Etienne, one of the building's private security officers, a member of 32BJ, the union that staffs New York's commercial buildings. He was just 46 and had two school-aged children. Etienne went to work on Monday and never came home, because of a gun. Clementi was struck with a bullet, but would survive and help cops identify the man wielding the gun. The killer then took an elevator to the 33rd floor and killed one more victim, Hyman, who only graduated college five years ago. Her whole life was ahead of her. No more. Because of a gun. Monday morning, as the city got back to work, Didarul Islam, Wesley LePatner, Aland Etienne and Julia Hyman all converged at 345 Park Ave, at 52nd St., between St. Bart's and the Seagram Building. They all had a purpose for being there. But as the day ended, the gun arrived. It also had a purpose. Its purpose was to kill people quickly. And only the gun fulfilled its purpose on Monday evening. ___
CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Local leaders to face Texas lawmakers today as questions linger about deadly July 4 flooding
Local leaders in Central Texas will face more tough questions Thursday as state lawmakers – and survivors – press again for information about the responses to July 4 flash flooding that killed at least 136 people. The hearing, at 9:30 a.m. local time, in hard-hit Kerrville follows a 12-hour special hearing last week that saw legislators scrutinize the state's safety preparations – and split over focusing on whether more should have been done before the storm or how efficiently life-saving efforts unfolded. Among those set to testify Thursday is an emergency response official who a colleague has said likely was asleep in the critical hours before the flood, when four months' worth of rain fell and forced the Guadalupe River to rise over 20 feet, sweeping homes, cars, campers and cabins downstream. Three people are still missing as the summer's tragic surge of deadly flash floods across the United States underscores the escalating volatility of the warming planet. Texas' Select Committees on Disaster Preparedness and Flooding are scheduled to hear Thursday from Kerrville Mayor Joe Herring Jr. and City Manager Dalton Rice; and Kerr County Judge Rob Kelly, Sheriff Larry Leitha and Emergency Management Coordinator W.B. 'Dub' Thomas. Thomas was likely asleep in the critical morning hours of the deadly flood, Leitha has told CNN. 'I'm sure he was at home asleep at that time,' said the sheriff, who acknowledged he also then was sleeping. Thomas, also a deputy sheriff, has not responded to CNN's repeated requests for comment and declined other such opportunities since the storm. Lawmakers are also set to hear Thursday from leaders of other affected counties and cities, as well as meteorologists, flooding experts and leaders of two mental health resource centers, followed by public testimony, according to the meeting agenda. Last week's hearing included testimony from officials in charge of managing the rivers of the region's 'Flash Flood Alley,' as well as the head of the state's Division of Emergency Management and members of the state's police force, the Department of Public Safety. CNN's Matthew J. Friedman and Rachel Clarke contributed to this reporting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gabbard Posts Deranged Infographic to ‘Prove' Obama Claims
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard took to social media on Wednesday with a series of bizarre infographics as she doubles down on explosive claims about the 2016 election. President Donald Trump and his team have turned to unsubstantiated conspiracies about Barack Obama when pressed with ongoing questions about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. On Wednesday, Gabbard announced that she had declassified the House Intelligence Committee staff report on the Intelligence Community Assessment of the 2016 election at Trump's direction. She then proceeded to post a new series of highly-produced graphics highlighting what the Trump administration claimed were Obama-era lies about the election. It's the latest in a series of information dumps Gabbard has made while arguing Obama officials manufactured claims that Russia worked to influence the election. However, as Gabbard continues to release documents, she has strategically conflated two separate Russian activities in her messaging. The documents determine Russia did not attack election infrastructure or hack the election, but the intelligence community did find that Russia tried to influence the ballot. While Gabbard claimed the report she released on Wednesday 'exposes how the Obama Administration manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false' and accused officials of 'promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election,' the report itself directly states Russia worked to undermine the election. What was less conclusive in that specific report was Russia's preferred candidate. 'The key judgments found to be credible include: 1) President Putin ordered conventional and cyber influence operations, notably by leaking politically sensitive emails obtained from computer intrusions; 2) Putin's principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process and to weaken what the Russians considered to be an inevitable Clinton presidency,' the declassified report reads. The report was based on an investigation conducted by former Republican House Intel Chair Devin Nunes, who now serves as the CEO of Trump Media. While the House report agreed that Russia did interfere, the GOP report disputed the 2017 intelligence assessment that Putin had a 'clear preference' for Trump and 'aspired to help his chances' in 2016. It accuses the former CIA Director John Brennan of ordering the release of reports containing previously collected but unpublished intelligence, including info of questionable origins, which became the foundation for the intelligence assessment that Putin preferred Trump. As Gabbard claimed publicly in a Fox News interview that an intelligence report said Russia did not attempt to affect the outcome of the election, she conveniently left out details of the document she has cited. The document she points to as evidence Obama officials promoted lies, a Presidential Daily Briefing, specifically addressed one type of influence and stated Russia did not impact the election results 'by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.' Gabbard, who has long been accused by critics of being a Putin apologist for repeating Russian propaganda to the point where she has been praised on Russian state TV before being tapped as Trump's intel chief, has argued the document she has released details 'a treasonous conspiracy' by members of the Obama White House. Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously refuted Gabbard's allegations. Rubio, as then-acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, led the investigation, which resulted in a bipartisan Russia report that found not only did Russia engage in an effort to influence the 2016 election, but that Putin ordered the hack and leak of information damaging to Hillary Clinton and helped the Trump campaign. While the Gabbard information drop and accusations are loaded with holes, MAGA Republicans are seizing on her assessment and are accusing Obama of treason. Her accusations have also been promoted by members of the Trump White House. On Tuesday, Trump pointed directly to her allegations and attacks on Obama officials in response to questions about Epstein in the Oval Office. Obama's office made a rare move on Tuesday and responded to the accusations coming directly from the White House. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.'
