logo
Sixteen-year-olds to be allowed to vote as ministers set out reforms

Sixteen-year-olds to be allowed to vote as ministers set out reforms

Labour's manifesto committed the party to lowering the voting age for parliamentary elections to 16, in line with Scottish and Welsh elections.
But plans announced on Thursday go further in an effort to increase participation in elections.
Ministers have proposed introducing automated voter registration, which is already used in Australia and Canada, and making UK-issued bank cards an accepted form of ID at polling stations.
Two dogs wait outside a polling station at the Uffculme Village Hall, in the Tiverton and Honiton by-election (Andrew Matthews/PA)
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said 'far too many people' had been put off voting by the voter ID rules introduced by the previous government, with the Electoral Commission finding around 750,000 people did not vote due to a lack of ID.
The Government has already made the Veteran Card an accepted form of voter ID, and intends to allow digital forms of ID to be used when they become available.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said: 'For too long public trust in our democracy has been damaged and faith in our institutions has been allowed to decline.
'We are taking action to break down barriers to participation that will ensure more people have the opportunity to engage in UK democracy, supporting our plan for change, and delivering on our manifesto commitment to give 16-year-olds the right to vote.'
Sir Keir Starmer said it was 'important' to lower the voting age, as 16-year-olds were old enough to work and 'pay in' through tax, so should 'have the opportunity' to say how they wanted their money spent.
But a poll of 500 16 and 17-year-olds conducted for ITV News by Merlin Strategy found only half said they thought they should be allowed to vote, and only 18% would definitely vote.
Labour stood to gain the most, with 33% saying they would back the party, while 20% said they would choose Reform UK and 18% the Greens.
Naomi Smith, chief executive of campaign group Best for Britain, said the change was 'a brave choice set to benefit generations to come', and urged political parties to 'do more to win the votes of the UK's young people'.
But in the Commons, Conservative shadow communities minister Paul Holmes accused the Government of being 'hopelessly confused' about the age of majority.
He said: 'Why does this Government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?'
Thursday's plans will also see a tightening of the rules on campaign finance aimed at barring 'shell companies' from donating to political parties and requiring more checks on donations to unincorporated associations.
The Electoral Commission will be given the power to levy £500,000 fines on those who break the new rules on donations.
Rushanara Ali, the minister for democracy, said: 'We are modernising our democracy so that it is fit for the 21st century.'
She added: 'By reinforcing safeguards against foreign interference, we will strengthen our democratic institutions and protect them for future generations.'
The proposal follows concern about the vulnerability of UK politics to donations from overseas, which came to prominence amid reports Elon Musk was considering a major donation to Reform UK.
Unincorporated associations have long been another concern of transparency campaigners, who have warned they can obscure the real source of political donations.
It also comes as the Electoral Commission reported spending at last year's general election hit a record high of £94.5 million, including £69.3 million spent by political parties.
Labour outspent its rivals, shelling out £30 million during the campaign, more than twice the amount it spent in 2019, while the Conservatives spent £23.9 million and the Liberal Democrats £5.6 million.
Reform spent £5.5 million, the Greens £1.7 million and the SNP £799,000.
Electoral Commission chief executive Vijay Rangarajan welcomed the changes to rules on voter registration and political donations, saying they would 'improve the resilience and integrity of our electoral system'.
But the commission also warned that allowing people to use bank cards as voter ID had 'risks for security and voter trust'.
Thursday's plan will see the Government bring forward legislation to introduce its new rules, which also include tougher sentences for people who intimidate candidates amid a rise in reports of abuse aimed at those standing for election.
Harry Quilter-Pinner, executive director of the IPPR think tank, said the changes were 'the biggest reform to our electoral system since 1969', when the voting age was lowered to 18.
He said: 'Barely half of people voted in last year's general election.
'Our democracy is in crisis, and we risk reaching a tipping point where politics loses its legitimacy.
'The Government has clearly heard these alarm bells.'
Arguing that lowering the voting age and introducing automated voter registration could bring 9.5 million more people into the democratic process, he said: 'At a time when public trust in politics is at a low ebb, this expansion of our democracy is a vital step toward rebuilding confidence, modernising our institutions and pushing back against the rise of populism.'
Both the Greens and the Liberal Democrats welcomed the decision to lower the voting age to 16.
But Lib Dem Cabinet Office spokeswoman Sarah Olney said the reforms to campaign finance rules left 'an Elon Musk-shaped hole in the Government's proposed changes'.
She said: 'Ministers must go much further to close the door to foreign oligarchs interfering in British politics – anything less undermines our democracy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People 'glamourise' migrant hotels, refugee tells ITV News
People 'glamourise' migrant hotels, refugee tells ITV News

ITV News

time27 minutes ago

  • ITV News

People 'glamourise' migrant hotels, refugee tells ITV News

Sami Gichki was in the asylum system for 12 and a half years. He initially travelled from Balochistan in Pakistan to the UK aged ten with his parents. While he only spent a month in hotel accommodation in 2013, he sympathises with people who are now spending long stints in temporary conditions. "I think often people glamourise the fact that asylum seekers are living in hotels, but it's not the same sense as in a hotel you go to when you're going on holiday," he said. "You are restricted, there are curfews around what time you can be in, what time you can go out, what people can actually visit you, about what you eat. "It's basically just sitting there like a sitting duck, waiting for the Home Office to give you status." The number of asylum seekers living in UK hotels has risen by 8% under Labour, compared to the same point last year, despite falling slightly since March 2025, according to Home Office figures. The data is part of the usual quarterly immigration statistics and covers Labour's first year in office. It shows 32,059 asylum seekers were in UK hotels by the end of June. The new figures come days after a court ruled that more than 100 asylum seekers staying at a hotel in Essex should be removed after the local council brought a legal case. "I think as a society we have become so polarised," Sami told ITV News. "So when I see in the news things around the Epping Hotel and the court saying that asylum seekers should not be housed there, my initial thoughts are, yes, I agree they should not be housed there. "They should be housed in permanent housing with agency and be able to rebuild their lives in a way that is meaningful for them, but also gives them that sense of dignity and purpose and respect that. "These places can be quite isolating and they're very disconnected from services or places. "For example, they don't have access to medical healthcare properly because of the inability to access a GP, because of not having a permanent address, not being able to go to schools in the same way that most people do, just because of not having access to a permanent address. "Things like this become real barriers to people and their livelihoods." 'I ended up being quite suicidal' Sami went to school until he was 18, but then would have needed scholarships to go to university. This left him unable to work but also unable to study, which had a huge impact on his mental health. "I was in the state where after sixth form, I really struggled with my mental health, ended up in the space where I didn't really want to be here, and I ended up being quite suicidal until I started getting support after a year and a half through mental health services," he said. It was only when he ended up in A&E that he was able to get support. He was pointed towards Manchester Cathedral and a running charity, both of which helped him - he then ran in the London Marathon on his 20th birthday. Sami has said that his good English has helped his progress through the asylum system - even though it has still been very long. "The judgement that comes from being in an asylum process is... decreased by a large scale. If someone does not speak English... I have seen how people are treated completely differently in my circumstances," he said. But ultimately, Sami says it is the "imbalance of power" that really affects people arriving in the UK. "Even though there might not be direct consequences for some seekers and refugees, I think just being in the system and waiting for so long and that uncertainty can really affect you and impact your mental health like it did for me," he said. Sami eventually got refugee status earlier this year - he separated his claim from his family's and is allowed to stay in the UK because of his sexuality and the risk of political persecution if he was forced to return to Pakistan. 'Everything fell apart' Abdul has been in the UK for just over three years after travelling from Sierra Leone in 2023. He is staying in shared accommodation in Stockton provided by the Home Office. He has been there for around a year and said he had previously been living elsewhere but was moved because of faults with the building. Abdul is not allowed to work because he does not have a permit. He said this was because of difficulties with his solicitor. "Everything fell apart," he said. "I don't like wasting time without creating anything within yourself, the community, the country." Back in Sierra Leone he had lots of areas of expertise - football, refereeing and athletics coaching, as well as basic knowledge of construction, and health and social care. "With all this knowledge, sitting on the couch, without getting any form of job... It's really, really devastating," he said. While he is not allowed to work he is dependent on the money he receives from the Home Office every week. In the meantime, he is trying to make the most of his time. He described voluntary coaching as his "backbone" now, as it is the only thing he still does that he used to do at home. "There are so many volunteering activities that I've been doing now because that's the only thing that will do to let me... reclaim myself. To increase value, to create more impact within the community." "For my name to be written within the community - I want to feel proud of that," he added. Abdul won an award last year for his volunteering work in the community. It recognised his horticulture work in the area as well as his sports coaching efforts. "That was one of the greatest achievements... I'm happy I got that achievement because it's within the community and based on what I have doing the community," he said. Abdul has no idea how long he might spend in his current accommodation and does not know how long his asylum seeker process will take. 'You feel sad and discouraged' Anti-immigration protests have erupted across England, typically in areas that house asylum seekers in hotels. Abdul said those protests have an impact on asylum seekers. "Of course protests... on that issue are not normally friendly ... All this protesting is not good within the community ... Protesting has some, let me say, negative response on the individual," he said. "You feel sad, you feel a little bit discouraged based on the situation," he added. He asked people to "pardon" those who live in accommodation provided by the Home Office. "You might want to get out of that particular situation, but it's not in your own power to do it, it's in the power of the Home Office to make sure that your pending situation is being amended and you're being moved on to the next level," he said. "So, I would say to them to pardon us, based on our situations. It is not a situation that we created, we don't want to be part of it, but it happened," he added. More people living in hotels Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office, which has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, can move people to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping. Almost 30 councils are considering whether to take legal action or monitoring developments over asylum hotels after the Epping High Court ruling, ITV News understands. Included in the 28 local authorities considering next steps are eight Labour-run councils - placing further pressure on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's government.

What next for social media ‘martyr' Lucy Connolly after leaving prison?
What next for social media ‘martyr' Lucy Connolly after leaving prison?

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

What next for social media ‘martyr' Lucy Connolly after leaving prison?

Lucy Connolly is out of jail. She was one of about 1,800 arrested for offences during riots last summer in the wake of the Southport murders. Connolly, from Northampton, was convicted and jailed for publishing 'threatening or abusive' material on social media including an incitement to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care.' Hers is one of the more high-profile cases and some activists have taken up her cause, claiming she has been a victim of 'two tier' policing, harsh sentencing, and restricted free speech. Her sentence was 31 months; a bid to reduce it was rejected by the Court of Appeal in May. Under current early release rules, she is allowed out on licence for the remainder of her sentence, having served 40 per cent. What did Connolly do wrong? Her supporters mostly concede that what she said was wrong, but many also minimise it as mere 'hurty words' for which nobody should be given a custodial sentence. There is also the suspicion in some quarters that the punishment was heavier because of political pressure; the prime minister said at the time that the full force of the law should be brought down on offenders. But her case was carefully examined at Birmingham Crown Court and at the Court of Appeal. The facts were not in dispute, she pled guilty, and the judges have considered the context and acted within the guidelines approved by ministers. What did she post on social media? The mother-of-three, who was working as a childminder at the time and is the wife of a Tory councillor, wrote a number of messages but attention focused on this X post that was later deleted: ''Mass deportation now. Set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care. While you're at it, take the treacherous government and politicians with them. I feel physically sick knowing what these families will now have to endure. If that makes me racist, so be it.' While visible, it had been viewed 310,000 times and reposted 940 times. Four days earlier, Connolly had responded to a video shared online by Tommy Robinson, showing a black male being tackled to the ground for allegedly masturbating in public. 'Somalian, I guess. Loads of them,' she wrote, adding a vomiting emoji. Five days after the Southport murders Connolly stated on social media, referencing an anti-racism demo: 'Oh good. I take it they will all be in line to sign up to house an illegal boat invader then. Oh sorry, refugee. Maybe sign a waiver to say they don't mind if it's one of their family that gets attacked, butchered, raped etc, by unvetted criminals. Not all heroes wear capes.' Another message, on WhatsApp, read: 'The raging tweet about burning down hotels has bit me on the arse lol.' Another message, sent later, was in response to the furore she'd caused. According to the Court of Appeal, in another message she said she intended to tell authorities she had been the victim of doxing and went on to say that if she got arrested she would 'play the mental health card'. Did she have a defence? According to the Court of Appeal: 'The stabbings of the children in Southport had put her into a rage. She said she felt hatred about the incident and the circumstances, not about race. She said she had taken the post down because she realised it was wrong. Later in the interview she said her tweets were not racial and she had no intention to cause hate or racial issues.' Is she a hero? To some, she is akin to Emmeline Pankhurst or Joan of Arc. Senior members of the Trump administration have raised questions about freedom of speech in the UK as a result of the treatment of those who sent messages and were subsequently convicted of public order offences. Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has lauded her in these terms: 'Welcome to freedom, Lucy Connolly. You are now a symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain.' Kemi Badenoch has attacked the way the courts treated Connolly, going in hard on the two-tier charge: 'Lucy Connolly finally returns home to her family today. At last. Her punishment was harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting… meanwhile, former Labour councillor Ricky Jones called for protestors to have their throats slit. Charged with encouraging violent disorder, he pleaded not guilty and was acquitted by a jury who saw his words as a disgusting remark made in the heat of the moment, not a call to action.' Connolly will have no shortage of media outlets, some highly sympathetic, on which to appear should she wish. What does Keir Starmer think? He thinks politicians should stay out of the courtroom, and has no regrets. He told the Commons in May: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts, and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. I am strongly in favour of free speech … but I am equally against incitement to violence against other people.' What will happen next? Another extended skirmish in Britain's endless and debilitating culture wars. Maybe that chap who took a brick to his testes during the disturbances will be the next contender for martyrdom.

Warning far-right has ‘hijacked' women's safety for political gain
Warning far-right has ‘hijacked' women's safety for political gain

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Warning far-right has ‘hijacked' women's safety for political gain

Leading women's rights groups have warned that the far right movement has 'hijacked' the issue of women's safety for political gain. More than 100 organisations have written to prime minister Sir Keir Starmer to urge the government to stop far-right groups from 'weaponising' violence against women and girls (VAWG) for a 'racist, anti-migrant agenda'. It comes after weeks of far-right protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers across the country, with many participants claiming to be there under the banner of 'protecting' women and girls in their community. The letter states how in recent weeks, the organisations had seen 'vital conversations' about VAWG be 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that 'fuels division' and harms survivors. The groups have expressed concerns that the issue is being 'hijacked by people seeking to use women and girls' pain and trauma – and the threat of it – for political gain'. The letter, co-ordinated by End Violence Against Women Coalition, Women for Refugee Women, Hibiscus and Southall Black Sisters, read: 'Over recent weeks, people claiming to care about the 'safety of women and children' have left families, women and children living in temporary asylum accommodation afraid to leave their front door. 'They follow in the footsteps of the rioters who used the appalling murder of three young girls as an excuse to bring violence to our streets; with targeted attacks against migrant, minoritised and Muslim communities.' The statement was supported by frontline organisations including Rape Crisis England and Wales, Refuge and the Suzy Lamplugh Trust. The groups have joined to 'refuse to let women's safety be turned into hate speech' and have told the government to act urgently to prevent misinformation spreading. They warned that they had seen MPs share false statistics about the nationality of perpetrators, and warned that ministers saying protestors have 'legitimate concerns' risks 'normalising and enabling the spreading of racist narratives by the far-right'. The organisations warn that false narratives reinforce 'damaging myths' about gender-based violence, such as that it primarily comes from strangers. They say the false picture allows perpetrators who harm women and girls 'to hide behind racial stereotypes and scapegoating', while hostile immigration policies put marginalised women and survivors in the UK at an 'even greater risk of harm'. 'The far-right has long exploited the cause of ending violence against women and girls to promote a racist, white supremacist agenda,' Andrea Simon, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said. 'These attacks against migrant and racialised communities are appalling and do nothing to improve women and girls' autonomy, rights and freedoms.' Andrea Vukovic, co-director of Women for Refugee Women, said the organisation had supported women in recent weeks that had fled war and persecution, and have been too afraid to leave their homes due to attacks on migrant and racialised communities. Selma Taha, executive director of Southall Black Sisters said: 'Attempts to weaponize VAWG through racist scapegoating of migrants not only distract from real solutions, but also deepen the marginalisation of Black, minoritised and migrant victim-survivors. 'The government, our public institutions, and the media must take responsibility for shaping an accurate, evidence-based narrative on immigration, and must end the normalisation of far-right misinformation in debates on immigration and VAWG.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'All acts of violence against women and girls are intolerable, so our upcoming VAWG Strategy will set out how we will protect the most vulnerable and halve these crimes in a decade. "At the same time, we know that people are concerned about the impact of illegal migration. That's why we are changing the law to deny registered sex offenders' asylum and we will do everything in our power to deport them from the UK."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store