Casey hits out at ‘politicisation' of grooming gang report
As Westminster continues to dissect the truly troubling findings laid out by Baroness Casey's report into Britain's grooming gang scandal, the crossbench peer has now given her thoughts on the political reaction to the review. Speaking to the BBC's Newnsight programme on Monday, Casey hit out at parliamentarians for how they'd responded to the project, saying she was 'disappointed' with the way it had been used for political point-scoring. Ouch.
When quizzed on the 'politicisation' of her review, Baroness Casey remarked:
I'm disappointed by it, to put it mildly. I really hoped – and hope still – that the report is so clear, it's so straightforward. We need to change some laws. We need to do a national criminal investigation. We need to get on with the national inquiry with local footprint in it. And ideally, wouldn't it be great if everybody came behind that and just backed it and got on with it?
On the Commons session yesterday, the crossbench peer took aim at the Tories in particular. She told the Beeb:
I just felt, dare I say it, I felt the opposition could have just been a bit: 'Yes, we will all come together behind you.' Maybe there's still time to do that. I think it's just so important that they do. It almost doesn't matter right now what political party people are part of. We've identified there's a problem, it's been a problem there for a long time, and it's about time we drew a line in the sand.
Her remarks were made just hours before the Leader of the Opposition's press conference on Tuesday morning. It seems likely Badenoch will celebrate the initiation of a full national statutory inquiry as a 'victory' and, if her tweets are anything to go by, slam Labour for the party's reluctance to have another probe in the first place. Will Casey's comments persuade Badenoch to soften her tone in today's speech? Stay tuned…
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Casey tells public to 'keep calm' over ethnicity of offenders after grooming gangs report
The author of a report into grooming gangs has urged the public to 'keep calm' over the ethnicity of offenders, pointing out that police data suggests the race of child abuse suspects is in proportion with the local population. Louise Casey's comments come a day after the release of her report that found evidence of 'over-representation' of Asian and Pakistani heritage men among suspects, according to local data from three police forces. Casey told MPs she was concerned that the limited data available on the race and ethnicity of offenders was not being used responsibly as part of the public debate on grooming gangs
Spectator
31 minutes ago
- Spectator
Poll: three per cent of women back Stella Creasy's amendment
It is a big week for big Commons moments. On Monday, we had the long-awaited announcement of an inquiry into grooming gangs; today it is the battle of the abortion amendments. This afternoon Lindsay Hoyle will choose whether to call Tonia Antoniazzi or Stella Creasy's amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. Antoniazzi's measure would allow abortion for any reason up to birth while maintaining criminal sanctions for doctors performing late-term or sex-selective procedures. Creasy, however, has adopted the more hard-line position of full decriminalisation in all circumstances. Now, Mr S has got his hands on some polling – and it is bad news for Stella. More than 2,100 adults were polled by Whitestone Insight between 2nd and 3rd June. When asked 'What do you think the time limit should be in Britain?' just three per cent of women believe that 'it should be extended to birth'. That, incidentally, is the same percentage of Labour voters who agree with the Hon. Member for Walthamstow. The polling also shows that the public ranked introducing 'abortion up to birth' at the bottom of a list of twenty possible priorities they want the the House of Commons to pursue over the next 12 months, with only 1 in 50 people listing it as a preferred area of focus. And when asked the following question: In recent years, a few prosecutions have taken place for illegal abortions after the 24-week time limit and as late as eight months into pregnancy. Where do you think the blame should mainly lie for this? Only eight per cent blamed 'The law which does not permit abortions of healthy babies beyond 24 weeks gestation, on the basis that this is considered to be the point after which most babies are able to survive outside the womb'. So much for the political mainstream…
Spectator
31 minutes ago
- Spectator
Kemi Badenoch defends the Tories' record on grooming gangs
Kemi Badenoch said that 'survivors and their families' have been 'ignored for far too long' as she appeared alongside those affected by the grooming gangs' scandal. 'What this morning is about is not the politics, but giving…(victims) a platform to say what they want to see from a national inquiry,' the Tory leader said at a press conference in Westminster. The Tory leader was on less safe turf when she claimed, slightly implausibly, that she wanted to 'take the politics out of' the issue Marlon West, the father of grooming gangs' victim Scarlett, asked about local-led inquiries and whether 'local authorities are going to be answering their own homework.' Fiona Goddard, a survivor who waived her anonymity, urged law enforcement to continue. 'Work cannot stop on tackling crime in the here and now,' she said. Then there was Teresa, whose son was abused by grooming gangs. She raised the question of help for the survivors. 'We're just left with nothing', she said. 'We're here to pick up the pieces.' Finally, there was Lucia, a campaigner for survivors. She raised the case of a Manchester charity, who took a survivor to the police, who told her she 'won't get a court hearing until 2028.' Each of the four offered a damning indictment of state failure in Britain. But the question for Badenoch and shadow home secretary Chris Philp, who appeared alongside the victims, is: how are you going to fix it? Philp offered his own criteria for the inquiry, which, he said, must cover all 50 towns and cities affected. Each of the local inquiries must have statutory powers to compel the production of evidence, he insisted. Philp also said that the probes should be completed within two years and that each one should be 'genuinely independent'. Inevitably, the Q&A focussed on the record of the last Conservative government. Did they do enough to ask the hard questions of state institutions? 'We did a lot and the more we did the more we realised that even more needed to be done', replied Badenoch. 'Apologies are easy, what we need to see is action', she added. 'We can sit here and say sorry all day long but what I actually want to see is an inquiry that actually gets to the bottom of this.' Her remarks were echoed by the survivors' families on the panel, who stressed the need for deeds, not words. The Tory leader was on less safe turf when she claimed, slightly implausibly, that she wanted to 'take the politics out of' the issue – 24 hours after attacking Home Secretary Yvette Cooper vociferously in the Commons. But she could at least point to the Prime Minister's initial ham-fisted response to calls for an inquiry back in January. 'Who was it who said this was 'dog-whistle politics?' It was Keir Starmer and his ministers', she said.
