Elis: Disclosure of trading in own shares occured from June 9 to June 13, 2025
from June 9 to June 13, 2025
Saint-Cloud, June 16, 2025
Advertisement
In accordance with the regulations on share buybacks, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/1052, Elis hereby declares the purchases of its own shares made from June 9 to June 13, 2025 under the buyback program authorized by the 24th resolution of the General Shareholders' Meeting of May 22, 2025 and announced on March 6, 2025:
Aggregated presentation:
Issuer name Issuer code
(LEI) Transaction date ISIN Code Daily total Volume (in number of shares) Daily weighted average price of shares acquired (in euros) Platform (MIC Code) ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/09/2025 FR0012435121 14,578 23.4539 XPAR ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/09/2025 FR0012435121 7,525 23.4131 DXE ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/10/2025 FR0012435121 13,651 23.6766 XPAR ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/10/2025 FR0012435121 3,009 23.6516 DXE ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/11/2025 FR0012435121 10,507 23.6189 XPAR ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/11/2025 FR0012435121 6,450 23.6144 DXE ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/12/2025 FR0012435121 3,307 23.8224 XPAR ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/12/2025 FR0012435121 1,669 23.7799 DXE ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/13/2025 FR0012435121 9,729 23.5945 XPAR ELIS SA 969500UX71LCE8MAY492 06/13/2025 FR0012435121 3,271 23.5502 DXE Total 73,696 23.5834
The purpose of the own shares purchase operations is (i) to cover maturing performance share plans and to allocate free shares to employees as part of the contribution to the Elis for All 2025 international employee shareholding plan, and (ii) to be cancelled in accordance with the 26th resolution of the Combined General Meeting of May 22, 2025.
Contacts
Nicolas Buron
Director of Investor Relations, Financing & Treasury
Phone: + 33 (0)1 75 49 98 30 – [email protected]
Charline Lefaucheux
Investor Relations
Phone: + 33 (0)1 75 49 98 15 – [email protected]
Attachment
Elis – Disclosure of trading in own shares occured from June 9 to June 13, 2025
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
2 hours ago
- E&E News
Florida regulators agree to halt utility rate case hearing
TALLAHASSEE, Florida — State regulators on Monday agreed to delay a hearing on Florida Power & Light's $2.5 billion rate hike request after the company and several commercial customer groups announced a preliminary deal last week. Details: The Office of Public Counsel and energy justice groups are not part of the deal and opposed delaying the two-week hearing that was set to start Monday. But those groups appeared to soften their stance after members of the Public Service Commission said they shared legal due process concerns. Settlement details were not released Friday by FPL or the commercial groups joining in, including the Florida Retail Federation, the Florida Industrial Power Users Group and the new Florida Energy for Innovation Association representing data center developers. FPL said the agreement will be filed no later than Aug. 20. Advertisement Lawyers representing the utility and groups involved in the deal said delaying the hearing would avoid awkward or inaccurate sworn testimony this week on details of a rate request that may substantially change.
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Retirements And Businesses Face Risk From Administration Actions
The topic of regulation often sits in the penumbra of companies. Many executives hate them. Some regulation is overdone. Much of it isn't, being instead expressions of restraint when corporations behave recklessly, damaging the public and the balance of the economic system. Large regulatory packages have often enabled greater trust, attention to operations, and ultimately higher profitability overall. As often as regulation is necessary for companies, it is also required through laws and constitutional guarantees for government entities and officials who otherwise would misuse their powers over businesses and the many millions of retirement accounts that require economic success to thrive. Tech Companies And Law Firms Under Attack Donald Trump has established a practice of singling out both individuals and particular companies. Criticism on the part of the nation's chief executives, whether publicly or privately expressed, isn't new. They are people and will act as people do. However, the newest expression of it is unusual. Trump reportedly demanded that U.S. chip companies, Nvidia and AMD, pay the government a percentage of their revenue from sales to China, according to the Financial Times. The two companies agreed so they could get the export licenses necessary to ship products, reportedly admitting it to the newspaper. Also, according to the story, unnamed expert sources said that this type of arrangement was 'unprecedented.' Companies have never before paid commissions for permissions. On August 7y, 20205, Trump called on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign because a Republican senator was concerned about Tan's reported investments in Chinese companies, Business Insider reported. Holding shares in Chinese companies is a common part of investment portfolio diversity. Days later, Trump praised Tan's 'success' online, Business Insider separately wrote. However, in a broader sense, this is not the first attempt by Trump at deals following economic threats. In April, Trump announced a deal with five major law firms for $600 million in free legal work, as The Hill and others reported. The payoff for the firms was that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would withdraw letters asking about hiring practices in an alleged attempt to target diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. 'The EEOC is prepared to root out discrimination anywhere it may rear its head, including in our nation's elite law firms,' acting EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas said in a statement, as The Hill reported in a separate article. Trump had also chosen law firms for their past clients and cases. Banks And Pharma Join The Ranks Trump accused banks in early August of political discrimination, wrote The Wall Street Journal. He wrote an executive order claiming that banks 'have engaged in unacceptable practices to restrict law-abiding individuals' and businesses' access to financial services on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities.' According to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, there can be illegal discrimination if based on 'race, color, religion, national origin, sex or marital status, or age.' Political beliefs are not a protected category. Last week, Trump told major pharmaceutical to lower prices or face punishment, as Agence France-Presse wrote. He wanted the companies to work with the administration to make changes within two months, including a 'most favored nation' policy that would require the companies to sell at the lowest price paid by other countries. Foundational Problems For Commerce And Retirement The efforts to force companies in multiple industries to act one way or another remain highly unusual and speak to the reason why such actions are considered so unusual and undesired. A president can exert enormous power from the bully pulpit alone. Extend efforts to the powers of the state and what a president can do is terrible. It harkens back to Richard Nixon's famous enemies list and his willingness to use such agencies as the IRS and FBI to attack political adversaries. In the present, the actions the Trump administration has taken show the reasons why such activities have been either illegal or considered unacceptable as norms. They can unbalance industries, upend commerce, and disturb complex social and financial mechanisms without consideration of the extent of damage that might happen. All these perturbations, as tariffs on GM profits showed, can effectively become taxes on everyone's retirement funds. With a large aging segment of the population, this ultimately is not good for anyone.
New York Times
16 hours ago
- New York Times
Brazil Kept Tight Rein on Big Tech. Trump's Tariffs Could Change That.
President Trump's use of painful tariffs against Brazil has so far not sprung his political ally Jair Bolsonaro from house arrest as he awaits trial on charges of plotting a coup. But the levies appear to be having more success in opening doors for America's Big Tech companies as they seek to influence the rules governing them. The companies, which have been aggressively courting Mr. Trump, suddenly have new leverage in Brazil's halls of power. Against a backdrop of a 50 percent tax on key Brazilian products, the firms are being welcomed to meetings with Brazilian officials and justices of the Supreme Court, as new regulation is being shaped on everything from online speech to artificial intelligence, according to several people with knowledge of the matter. 'Everything seems to be part of 'the deal,'' said Anupam Chander, a law and technology professor at Georgetown University. 'What might have been seen as Brazilian domestic policy suddenly becomes part of a trade agenda.' Mr. Trump has had less success using a 50 percent tax on key Brazilian products as a bully pulpit to force the judicial branch to drop the case against Mr. Bolsonaro. The former Brazilian president falsely claimed that the last election was rigged to favor his rival, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Brazil has insisted that nobody can meddle in its judicial affairs, and the Supreme Court justice overseeing Mr. Bolsonaro's case, Alexandre de Moraes, has not been swayed, even when the United States imposed on him some of the most drastic sanctions in its arsenal. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
