logo
Russian aerial bomb hits city in Kharkiv Oblast, injuring three civilians

Russian aerial bomb hits city in Kharkiv Oblast, injuring three civilians

Yahoo18-05-2025
Russia carried out an airstrike on a residential area in the city of Kupiansk in Kharkiv Oblast on the morning of Sunday 18 May, injuring three civilians.
Source: Kharkiv Oblast Prosecutor's Office
Details: The explosion is reported to have occurred near a residential building at around 09:30, with a guided bomb hitting the road nearby. As a result:
A 55-year-old man sustained a blast injury.
Two women, aged 75 and 55, suffered acute stress reactions.
The aftermath of the attack.
Photo: Kharkiv Oblast Prosecutor's Office
The strike also damaged houses and outbuildings.
The aftermath of the attack.
Photo: Kharkiv Oblast Prosecutor's Office
Early reports indicate that the Russians used a FAB-500 aerial bomb equipped with a Unified Gliding and Correction Module (UMPK) for converting unguided bombs into precision-guided munitions.
Quote from the Prosecutor's Office: "A pre-trial investigation has been launched into the commission of a war crime (Article 438.1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)."
The aftermath of the attack.
Photo: Kharkiv Oblast Prosecutor's Office
Background: On the night of Sunday 17-18 May, Russia launched a record 273 drones on Ukraine. Ukrainian air defence units destroyed nearly a third of them, while a further 128 disappeared from radar.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury
Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury

The Hill

time7 days ago

  • The Hill

Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury

The Trump administration's launch of a grand jury probe into Obama-era officials marks an escalation in its use of the justice system to go after political adversaries, amid mounting pressure to release the Epstein files. It's the first sign the Justice Department is acting on criminal referrals made by Trump intelligence officials, including after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused officials of a 'treasonous conspiracy' related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The documents released by her office, however, do not appear to back that claim, instead largely showing officials discussing what they acknowledged shortly after the election — that Russia was never able to manipulate vote totals. Nonetheless, the White House broke with the practice of maintaining secrecy around grand jury proceedings, confirming the probe in pointing to 'the compelling case' outlined by Gabbard, which they argue 'exposed clear and blatant weaponization by corrupt intelligence officials acting at the behest of the Democrat Party and likely former President Obama.' The White House further argues the Obama officials 'worked to sabotage the Trump administration.' 'It doesn't get more serious than this. This is a criminal conspiracy. The evidence is clear there's a criminal conspiracy here and nobody is above the law,' Mike Davis, an ally of President Trump who runs The Article III Project, said on Fox News. The administration's attempts to focus attention on the Russia findings come as Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi face pressure, including from many Republicans, to release more information related to the case of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Among the possible targets are former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who in a joint op-ed blasted the accusations against them as 'patently false' while falsely minimizing Russia's 2016 efforts. 'Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election,' the two wrote. 'Contrary to the Trump administration's wild and baseless claims, there was no mention of 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the assessment,' they added. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said beyond Clapper and Brennan, he also made referrals for former FBI Director James Comey as well as Hillary Clinton. Critics argue that launching a grand jury probe is yet another instance of Trump weaponizing the government against his political foes. He has previously revoked security details from those he disagrees with, targeted universities that do not align with his administration's policies and gone after law firms with ties to Democrats. And over the weekend, the Office of the Special Counsel acknowledged a probe into former special counsel Jack Smith. The court action quickly prompted criticism that the Trump administration was abusing the Justice Department. 'Trump – 'the hunted' – has indeed become the hunter – facts and law, be damned. These folks are using the court of law to shape the court of public opinion. They're also making a mockery of grand jury secrecy rules, which are in part designed to protect uncharged individuals,' Anthony Coley, who served as a spokesman for the Obama Justice Department, wrote on X. The probe comes after Bondi announced the creation of a 'Strike Force' to investigate claims related to the 2016 election. It's not clear where the grand jury has been empaneled — a detail that could matter in the Democrat-heavy jury pool of Washington, D.C., which might be skeptical of claims of wrongdoing in an election Trump won. It's also not clear what conduct it might be exploring. Republicans have, at turns, accused intelligence officials of lying to Congress in the prior reviews of Russia's interference in the 2016 election and the intelligence community response. But the documents supplied by Gabbard — which accuse leaders of 'suppression of intelligence' — largely show figures like Clapper discussing how Russia was not able to manipulate the vote even as the adversary tried to sow chaos in the 2016 election. Gabbard also released a previously classified House Intelligence Committee Republican assessment that called into question whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump win; however, all assessments found the country was seeking to impact the election. Trump on Tuesday denied that he had any involvement in the Justice Department's decision to open a grand jury investigation, though he has not hidden his approval of the move. 'Pam is doing a great job,' Trump said on CNBC of Attorney General Pam Bondi. 'I have nothing to do with it. I will tell you this, they deserve it. I was happy to hear it.' Davis, who runs the conservative advocacy group the Article III Project, argued those being investigated could face potential perjury charges related to their previous testimony about Russian interference in the 2016 election. He also pointed to potential conspiracy charges, arguing that the alleged ongoing 'cover-up' would mean that the statute of limitations has not expired. 'I would say to these lawfare Democrats, lawyer up,' Davis said on Fox News. 'Because justice is definitely coming.' Some lawmakers have said any eventual charges could actually be fruitful in fighting the claims forwarded by Gabbard and others. 'The reason I want her to bring charges is that there is not a court in the United States that will do anything other than to laugh hysterically over the bulls‑‑‑ that Tulsi Gabbard is peddling right now,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told The Hill last month when the DNI first began releasing documents. 'They're not dumping documents. They're making up lies,' Himes added. The issue of Russian interference in the 2016 election has been a fixation for Trump for roughly eight years, as he has repeatedly claimed he was the victim of 'spying' and politically motivated probes around Russia's influence campaigns. Gabbard's findings, and the decision to launch a grand jury investigation, also carry political ramifications for the White House. Some Democrats, including a spokesperson for Obama, have dismissed the Russia claims as an attempt at distracting from the Epstein controversy. 'The real politicization is the calculated distortion of intelligence by administration officials, notably Mr. Trump's directors of national intelligence and the C.I.A., positions that should be apolitical,' Brennan and Clapper wrote in their op-ed. 'We find it deeply regrettable that the administration continues to perpetuate the fictitious narrative that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election.'

What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?
What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?

Atlantic

time7 days ago

  • Atlantic

What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?

Trump's use of pardons may have induced some of his confederates—including Stone and Manafort—to not cooperate with prosecutors, or to only partly cooperate, thus depriving the public of a chance at receiving a full accounting. This was a kind of legalized obstruction of justice. Plenty of authorities have pointed out that Trump's claim of a hoax is nonsense. In 2017, PolitiFact named that its lie of the year. In 2018, The Washington Post reported: 'Trump's Russia 'Hoax' Turns Out to Be Real.' In 2019, a report by the Justice Department's inspector general concluded that, as my colleague Adam Serwer put it, 'the 'Russia hoax' defense is itself a hoax, and a highly successful one, aimed at reassuring Trump supporters who might otherwise be troubled by the president's behavior.' Still, the idea that the whole thing was a chimera has taken hold even within some precincts of the mainstream press, where the whole thing is treated as a weird passing obsession. The journalist Ben Smith, who made the decision to publish the Steele dossier, now contends, vaguely and in passive voice, that ' Trump was in retrospect treated unfairly.' Meanwhile, Trump world continues to cook up new iterations of the hoax claim. The most recent ones are driven by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who has a history of weaponizing intelligence, to use a term he's a fan of, and Gabbard, who has for years repeated Kremlin talking points. Last month, Ratcliffe alleged that in 2016, three of the nation's top intelligence officials 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals—all to get Trump,' but as my colleague Shane Harris reported, he didn't have evidence to back that up. Gabbard has released a dribble of documents intended to bolster it, but still nothing that matches the claims. In recent days, MAGA allies have pushed a new and shocking allegation: that emails show Clinton actually approved a plan to smear Trump by claiming he was colluding with Russia. The problem is that, once again, investigations have debunked it. A special counsel appointed by Barr during Trump's first term, with the goal of ferreting out political skulduggery in the Russia investigation, found that messages about Clinton being treated as a smoking gun were, in fact, likely concocted by the Russians. As The New York Times reported, 'The special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.' Durham's finding of a Russian forgery is ironic: Someone has finally turned up a real Russia hoax. Rather than working to fight it, however, Trump's aides are once more colluding with Russia to mislead the American people and further Trump's political fortunes.

Kyiv buries soldier's wife and daughters killed in Russian attack
Kyiv buries soldier's wife and daughters killed in Russian attack

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Kyiv buries soldier's wife and daughters killed in Russian attack

Men in military uniform shouldered the three white coffins out of a schoolyard in Kyiv on Tuesday, carrying a Ukrainian mother and her two children killed by the Russians to be buried. Residents held each other and wept as they bid a final farewell to their neighbours, who died at dawn on Friday, when a barrage of Russian drones and missiles pounded the Ukrainian capital for hours. Across a leafy park next to the school, flowers, toys, and portraits of those killed were laid beneath the remains of a nine-storey residential building gutted in the attack, which killed at least 31 people. "It is difficult to imagine the grief of our brother, who lost two little daughters and his beloved wife in an instant," said the military unit of Igor Gumeniuk, the serviceman whose family was buried. Local media reported that Irina and her children Anastassia, 13, and Alina, 10, had fled the fighting in the eastern Donetsk region -- where Russia has concentrated its firepower -- before settling in Kyiv. "Alina and Nastya were sincere, kind and bright girls. We will remember their smiles, their kind hearts, their desire to live and learn," the girls' school that held the ceremony wrote on Facebook. One of Irina's final social media posts from last month showed the family meeting in eastern Ukraine with Igor, an active serviceman. "We were happy together all day for the first time in eight months," she wrote on Facebook, alongside pictures of the family relaxing by a river. Russia has stepped up its long-range drone and missile attacks on Ukraine over recent months as US-led efforts to end the more than three-year invasion appear to stall. Thirty-nine-year-old doctor Roman Moskalenko, whose body was found beneath the rubble in Kyiv, also received a farewell from his fellow medics. "His colleagues remember him as attentive, caring, and professional," Kyiv's Vechirniy media outlet reported. A day earlier, six-year-old boy Matviy Marchenko was buried outside the capital in his father's native village, according to local media. bur-jbr/asy/sbk

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store