
Should VAT on hospitality be reduced? A cafe owner and an economist debate
There has been much recent speculation recently about the planned decrease in
VAT
for
hospitality
. The
cost to the exchequer
would be €545 million, assuming the reduction is applied only to
food
and not to
accommodation
.
Many commentators have been asking where is the evidence that a decrease is needed.
Firstly, I firmly believe the reduced rate should not apply to accommodation, as hotels use a dynamic pricing model which allows them to increase prices when they are busy.
One argument against the reduction is that business systems could not cope with splitting accommodation from food to have two different rates, 9 per cent and 13.5 per cent. To me that is laughable: some hotels are already dealing with four rates: 0 per cent (for example, on takeaway coffee bags); 9 per cent; 13.5 per cent and 23 per cent (on alcohol and juices). Their powerful point of sale (POS) systems are well able to cope.
READ MORE
I own and have run a cafe in Dún Laoghaire for the past 21 years. My business model is nearly broken. To underline this point, my books show the increases we have had to deal with in 2024 and 2025. When customers say the costs of rent, rates and energy must be an issue, I explain they're not really the problem.
My hourly employee costs annually are €220,000 for five to six staff on a day, including €25,000 of employers' Pay Related Social Insurance (PRSI). Materials costs are €125,000. VAT is €54,000. Rent is €33,000. Energy is €18,000. Rates are €6,000. Our sales prices are at the high end and we have over 1,000 customers each week, so it shouldn't be so onerous.
By the end of 2025, material inflation will have increased by 10 per cent (an increase of €12,000 over two years); living wage by 20 per cent (€40,000 over two years); VAT by 50 per cent (€44,000 or €22,000 in each of the two years) and sick pay is up €4,000. All of this amounts to a total of €100,000.
The last three items contributed €88,000 or 88 per cent of the increases, and were set by the Government. Now, while any increase in employee benefits is very laudable, there does need to be joined up thinking around whether this is sustainable, along with the other increases we face. Part of that thinking requires Government departments to work together to assess the implications.
[
Does Ireland's hospitality sector really need a VAT cut?
Opens in new window
]
It appears that was not done, and as a consequence, the next planned increase in living wage is delayed, as is auto pension enrolment, which will add €5,000 annually. These delays have been welcomed in the industry. But there is an elephant in the room which no one involved in the process appears to have considered: Covid tax warehousing.
My business made a loss during Covid. The only reason we survived Covid was the Government's support programme, including tax warehousing, which left me with a sum of €58,000 to pay over five years, starting in May 2024. That arrangement in the two years for which I have broken down figures will amount to €18,000, and will be €12,000 for each of the following three years.
How are small, community-based hospitality businesses supposed to deal with that on top of the increases outlined above?
So now I am paying an overall extra of €118,000 – which has been partly offset by a price increase to my customers of €18,000. Therefore, in the two years of 2024 and 2025, my final extra costs amount to €100,000.
There are many small businesses across Ireland facing this situation. That, to me, is the justification for a return to a lower VAT rate on food.
We need innovative thinking – for example, exploring the possibility of focusing the VAT reduction on small hospitality businesses with net sales of up to €750,000, thereby excluding hotels, international chains, and large businesses. The €545 million cost to the exchequer would significantly reduce and, according to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request I submitted, over 3,000 businesses would benefit.
Derek Bennett is the owner of Harry's Cafe Bar in Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin
Barra Roantree: Cutting VAT would be expensive and economically illiterate
The last few weeks have seen warnings about darkening skies on the economic horizon. We are told that deteriorating prospects and the possibility of a trade war instigated by the United States mean that the Government will deliver a '
much more cautious and restrained budget'
this year than previously planned.
Yet, an expensive and economically illiterate election pledge to reinstate a reduced 9 per cent rate of VAT on hospitality appears to remain on the table, recently elevated to a
'solemn commitment' by the Tánaiste Simon Harris.
VAT is already levied on guest accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent rather than the standard rate of 23 per cent that applies to most goods and services.
Figures from Revenue
suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year and that lowering the rate to 9 per cent – as was temporarily the case from 2011 to 2019, and then again during the pandemic – would cost an extra €810 million per year.
Excluding guest accommodation from the cut would slightly lower the cost (to less than €600 million), though it is not clear how feasible this would be. What rate would apply, for example, to a hotel package including dinner, bed and breakfast?
The Irish Hotels Federation has renewed calls on the Government for a 'permanent restoration' of the 9 per cent VAT rate on the hospitality food services sector. Photograph: Getty Images
Either cut would be expensive – costing more, for example, than lifting 55,000 children out of poverty; indexing tax credits and bands by forecast inflation; or extending the full-rate of Carer's Allowance to those currently receiving a partial payment or Domiciliary Care Allowance.
The economic case for prioritising a VAT cut over these other commitments in the Programme for Government is exceptionally weak.
This is reflected in the constantly shifting rationale provided by the sector for the cut: an evergreen response to whatever the issue of the day is.
Previously it was to stimulate demand by reducing prices. However, both
Irish
and international evidence suggests that such cuts were pocketed by business owners with subsequent increases passed onto consumers in the form of higher restaurant and hotel prices.
Now lobbyists for the sector claim a reduction in VAT is needed to preserve or increase profit margins, otherwise warning of 'another catastrophic year of shutdowns and job losses'. This is despite the fact the latest figures show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector, and that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier.
Even if the sector wasn't booming, cutting VAT is a terrible way of supporting any businesses that may be struggling.
That's because the largest share of the gains from a VAT cut go to businesses with the highest turnover: those selling at high volume and/or high prices. In other words, a VAT cut benefits owners of McDonald's and Michelin star restaurants more than a small cafe or restaurant.
[
VAT rate cut for hospitality is back on the table - but will it be enough?
Opens in new window
]
If the Government and sector really believes that some smaller cafes and restaurants are struggling and deserve support, there are countless better ways to provide this.
For example, the Government has previously paid a grant aimed at smaller hospitality businesses based on the size of their commercial rates bills, while long-delayed reforms to reduce litigation costs would help reduce insurance premiums.
Given the availability of superior alternatives, competing priorities, and the worsening economic outlook, all that cutting VAT would achieve is to recklessly erode our already fragile tax base.
Doing so would be the final nail in the coffin of this Government's claim to be responsible stewards of the public finances.
Dr Barra Roantree is Assistant Professor in Economics and Programme Director of the MSc in Economic Policy at Trinity College Dublin
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
14 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Fine Gael significantly outspent Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin on elections last year
Fine Gael spent significantly more than either Fianna Fáil or Sinn Féin on elections last year, according to party accounts provided to the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo). Fine Gael was the biggest spender overall on elections in 2024 and also the highest spender on the general election, according to the consolidated accounts of the parties. The accounts, published by Sipo, show Sinn Féin is the richest of the three big parties, with more income, stronger cash balances and an unmatched reserve of €8.7 million at the end of 2024. Sinn Féin, like the other parties, ran a significant deficit last year, in its case amounting to €1.6 million. However, it still finished the year with €4.6 million in cash, down from €5.3 million at the beginning of the year. READ MORE By contrast, Fianna Fáil had just €470,000 in cash at the end of the year. Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil appear to have funded some of their election expenditure through loans, which the two parties will pay back over the coming years as they prepare for the next election, though Fine Gael is in a significantly better financial position than Fianna Fáil. The days when Fianna Fáil outspent everyone at election time are long gone, the figures suggest. This time, the consolidated spending shows Fine Gael spent €3.22 million on elections last year, substantially ahead of Sinn Féin on €1.7 million and Fianna Fáil on €1.69 million. Fine Gael spent more than €2 million on the general election, more than twice as much as Fianna Fáil, which spent less than €950,000, according to the consolidated accounts of both parties. Despite being outspent, Fianna Fáil won 10 more seats than Fine Gael in the general election. Sinn Féin also beat Fine Gael by one seat. [ Three constituencies that show why Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin outperformed Fine Gael Opens in new window ] [ Expect the unexpected: What the 2024 local and European elections have taught us Opens in new window ] Sinn Féin and Fine Gael each spent about €600,000 on the European elections, according to the accounts, with Fianna Fáil's figure much lower at about €320,000. Fine Gael also outspent its rivals at the local elections, with the accounts showing expenditure of €512,000. Fianna Fáil reported spending of €289,000, while Sinn Féin's accounts show it spent just €77,000 on the local elections. All three parties received more than €5 million in State funding last year, while the accounts of all three parties show they are also reliant on fundraising among their members. Sinn Féin has the highest income from donations, with €182,000 raised from individual donations and €52,000 from corporate donations. The party's organisation in Northern Ireland is not governed by the strict rules on political donations that are in place in the South. [ Who is the American who left €535,000 to Sinn Féin's US fundraising group in her trust? Opens in new window ] But it is Sinn Féin's cash pile – likely linked to a mysterious bequest from a reclusive Englishman, William Hampton, who left more than €4 million to the party in 2019 – that sets it apart from its rivals. Along with a substantial property portfolio, it means the party can record 'reserves' of some €8.7 million in its accounts. This is the first year Sipo rules have required the parties to produce consolidated accounts that show the financial dealings of all units of the organisations above a certain size. In a statement, Fine Gael cautioned against comparing the election spend of the different parties in the accounts. [ William Hampton: The life and extraordinary times of Sinn Féin's million-euro donor Opens in new window ] 'It would be inaccurate to use the published annual accounts of political parties without context to compare election expenditure by political parties,' the party said in a statement. It said there 'appears to be significant divergence in the approach to Electoral Act compliance by different political parties ... The extent to which election expenditure is funded by the Party HQ, by party subsidiaries that are required to be reported under the Electoral Act, or by party subsidiaries that are not required to be reported under the Electoral Act, varies for each party and candidate. This also has a bearing on the figures reported.'


Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Worker forced to retire at 65 awarded €18,000 by Labour Court
A factory worker who was forced to retire at 65 has been awarded €18,000 by the Labour Court . Liam Murphy had worked as a general operative at Deepak Fasteners in Shannon, Co Clare for 45 years. When he turned 65 in February 2022, he asked to continue working but this was rejected by the company. While Mr Murphy did not appeal that decision at the time, he lodged a claim in July of that year with the Workplace Relations Commission claiming he had been discriminated against on the grounds of age. When the WRC found that his complaint was not well founded, he appealed the decision to the Labour Court. READ MORE Company chief executive Seamus McGiff told the court the company was concerned about the age profile of his workforce and the need to make new hires with specific skills as the loss-making business tried to pivot in a new direction. However, given that there was no mandatory retirement age in Mr Murphy's contract of employment and there had been no issues with his performance, concentration or health and safety concerns, the court found in his favour. It found the company 'did not engage in any meaningful way with the complainant's request' and concluded 'that there was no objective justification' the company could rely on to support its decision to force him to retire simply because he reached the age of 65. Welcoming the decision, Rachel Hartery of trade union Siptu 's Workers Rights Centre, which represented Mr Murphy, said: 'Our member was simply discarded by this employer after 45 years of loyal service, as was evidenced by the complete lack of consideration given to his requests to work on for one year beyond age 65.' Siptu said there appeared to be no urgency in Government to advance legislation introduced earlier this year to allow but not compel workers to remain in their employment until they reach the State pension age.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Wall Street boosted by string of upbeat corporate earnings
Global shares were mixed on Wednesday, with most big Wall Street equity indices nudging higher and European shares retreating. Dublin The picture at home was reasonably positive as Euronext Dublin outperformed European peers to finish the day up 0.7 per cent. However, food group Glanbia had a day to forget as it sank 4.7 per cent. A trader suggested the move was rooted in a number of negative reports for peer groups rather than any stock specific news for the company itself. 'One of them was Bellring in the US, which published third quarter results that disappointed the market,' he said. 'They were down a whopping 32 per cent on Tuesday and recovered about 5 per cent today.' READ MORE In the same sector, food giant Kerry Group finished down 1 per cent. Among the home builders, Glenveagh Properties was up 0.8 per cent, while Cairn Homes climbed 0.4 per cent. It was a good day for the banks as Bank of Ireland and AIB climbed 4 per cent and 3 per cent respectively. London British equities closed marginally higher as investors assessed a slew of corporate earnings and awaited an expected Bank of England rate cut on Thursday. The blue-chip FTSE 100 was up 0.2 per cent, rising for a third consecutive session after touching a four-month low on Friday. The domestically focused midcap FTSE 250 rose 0.1 per cent. Heavyweights Shell and BP boosted the benchmark index, up 1.3 per cent and 3.1 per cent respectively. Shares of miner Fresnillo continued gains from the previous session with an 8.9 per cent rise. Conversely, British healthcare stocks slipped 1.4 per cent after Trump said on Tuesday that Washington would initially place a 'small tariff' on pharmaceutical imports, eventually increasing it to 250 per cent. AstraZeneca and GSK were down 1.5 per cent and 1.7 per cent respectively. Europe Shares in European pharmaceutical companies sank to a four-month low after Trump repeated his threats to introduce tariffs on drug imports 'within the next week or so'. Europe's Stoxx Healthcare index slid by 2.8 per cent, falling to its lowest level since mid-April, shortly after the US president's initial 'liberation day' tariff announcements. Bayer, the German maker of products including aspirin, was one of the top fallers in Europe. Its shares slumped 9.9 per cent after the company reported a 5 per cent drop in pretax profit, excluding one-off items, for the first half of the year. The Cac 40 in Paris edged up 0.2 per cent, while the Dax 40 in Frankfurt rose 0.3 per cent. New York Wall Street gained, boosted by a string of largely upbeat corporate earnings, while growing expectations for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut provided additional support. At 11.18am eastern time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was 0.22 per cent ahead; the S&P 500 advanced 0.54 per cent; and the Nasdaq Composite was up 0.72 per cent. Arista Networks was a standout, soaring 17.5 per cent to an all-time high after the cloud networking company projected current-quarter revenue above estimates. McDonald's was 2.8 per cent higher after the fast-food giant's affordable menu drove global sales past expectations. Global Payments also advanced 5.2 per cent after topping second-quarter profit forecasts, while Match Group, the parent of Tinder, jumped 14.1 per cent after surpassing revenue expectations for the same quarter. Apple jumped 5.2 per cent, providing the biggest boost to the S&P 500 index, as a White House official said the company would announce a $100 billion domestic manufacturing pledge. The stock was on track for its biggest single-day jump in nearly three months. In contrast, Advanced Micro Devices tumbled 7.7 per cent as its data centre chip revenue disappointed. Super Micro Computer plunged 20.7 per cent after missing fourth-quarter sales estimates, dragging rival Dell down 2.4 per cent. – Additional reporting: Agencies