logo
Countries make fresh attempt at $200 billion nature finance deal

Countries make fresh attempt at $200 billion nature finance deal

Reuters24-02-2025

ROME, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Countries gather in Rome this week for a second crack at figuring out how to generate $200 billion a year to help preserve the world's biodiversity - and give a shot in the arm to global cooperation as the United States draws back.
Moves by Donald Trump since his inauguration in January to nix development funding have cast a shadow over the discussions and heap pressure on attendees, even though the world's biggest economy was not a formal signatory to the efforts.
After striking a landmark deal in 2022 to stop nature loss by 2030 - the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework - countries met in the Colombian city of Cali last October to hammer out how to pay for it.
While they agreed to set up a fund to collect money from companies that profit from the genetic data contained in nature - the 'Cali Fund' - negotiators failed to agree on who else should pay and how the money should be managed.
The need for action is acute, with vertebrate wildlife populations down 73% since 1970, the non-profit WWF has said.
Among the stickiest questions to answer is how to get richer countries in Europe and elsewhere to pay up to help their poorer peers when willingness to give grants or low-interest loans has been falling amid a wider cost-of-living crisis.
By the time the gavel fell in Cali, just $163 million had been pledged, a far cry from the $30 billion a year sought by the end of the decade. Major public finance pledges are not expected in Rome, but observers want more transparency about who is paying towards nature and how much.
The potential for a collapse of the Feb. 25-27 talks in Rome remains high, and would hamper efforts by Brazil to further integrate nature into the world's efforts to stop climate change when it hosts the next round of global climate talks in the Brazilian city of Belem in November.
While the United States is not a party to the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity, the scale of recent policy changes could have a chilling effect on the willingness of countries to pledge money and support nature-friendly policies.
Oscar Soria, co-CEO of NGO The Common Initiative, a think tank focussed on global economic and environmental policy, said countries had to rise above the political tensions and that biodiversity finance had been ignored for too long.
"This could be a historic moment, if they choose ambition," he said. "The question is whether they will fight for the future like gladiators or let this opportunity slip away."
NEW SOURCES OF FUNDING
Poor nations say it is the countries and companies who contribute most to biodiversity loss in the Global North who should pay the bulk, whereas rich countries including in Europe want growing middle-income countries such as those in the Gulf States and sovereign wealth funds to pay more.
Given the reluctance to give money away in the form of grants, pressure is rising to bring in other sources of funding, for example through development bank lending, domestic resources and the private sector.
At the same time, countries will also discuss how to divert $500 billion a year they estimate is spent on subsidies and other incentives that help fund projects that harm nature, into nature-friendly activities.
Nations must also decide where any money raised should be housed, with the potential for a new fund to be created or for countries to use an existing fund, such as the Global Biodiversity Framework Fund, run by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).
While Europe is happy for any money to be managed by the GEF, countries including the Democratic Republic of Congo, Brazil and others have argued for a fresh system over which they could have more say.
With no side events at this week's conference, fewer businesses are likely to attend. The Cali Fund, however, is expected to be formally launched although it is unclear if the first financial commitments will be announced.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People in Los Angeles: share your reaction to the protests and military mobilization
People in Los Angeles: share your reaction to the protests and military mobilization

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

People in Los Angeles: share your reaction to the protests and military mobilization

Los Angeles is reeling after a series of immigration raids led to widespread protests over the weekend and Donald Trump took the extraordinary step of ordering thousands of US military troops to descend on the city, a move that California leaders have decried as 'inflammatory'. Raids on Friday in areas of the city with large Latino populations led to mainly peaceful demonstrations, but the protests turned violent when federal immigration authorities used flashbang grenades and teargas against demonstrators. Over the weekend, fiery and chaotic scenes played out in downtown LA, Compton and Paramount, with dozens of people arrested. Donald Trump has been accused of intentionally fanning the flames with his decision on Monday to send in 700 marines and another 2,000 national guard troops to LA, adding to 2,000 already sent to the city on Saturday. While Trump has said the deployment was essential for maintaining order, the Los Angeles mayor, Karen Bass, accused the administration of using the city as an 'experiment', while Gavin Newsom, California's governor, called the decision to send in troops without his permission 'purposefully inflammatory'. We would like to hear from people living in LA about the latest events in the city. How do you feel about the immigration raids? What is your reaction to the national guard and marines being deployed? You can send us your thoughts on recent events in LA using this form. Please share your story if you are 18 or over, anonymously if you wish. For more information, please see our terms of service and privacy policy. Your responses, which can be anonymous, are secure as the form is encrypted and only the Guardian has access to your contributions. We will only use the data you provide us for the purpose of the feature and we will delete any personal data when we no longer require it for this purpose. For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead. If you're having trouble using the form, click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.

Trump warns protests at Army parade will be met with 'very big force'
Trump warns protests at Army parade will be met with 'very big force'

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump warns protests at Army parade will be met with 'very big force'

WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump warned people on Tuesday against protesting at the weekend military parade in Washington marking the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. "For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force," Trump told reporters in the White House's Oval Office. Law enforcement agencies are preparing for hundreds of thousands of people to attend Saturday's parade, U.S. Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Matt McCool said on Monday. McCool said thousands of agents, officers and specialists will be deployed from law enforcement agencies from across the country. The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have said there are no credible threats to the event. In unscheduled Oval Office remarks, Trump discussed his decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles after protests erupted in response to federal immigration raids at workplaces there. He defended his decision to take that rare step and said troops were necessary to contain the unrest, despite objections from local and state officials that they were needed.

Gay MAGA power duo's friendship explodes into nasty online spat
Gay MAGA power duo's friendship explodes into nasty online spat

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Gay MAGA power duo's friendship explodes into nasty online spat

Nearly a week after the dramatic breakup between President Donald Trump and his former 'first buddy' Elon Musk, another bitter spat has erupted in the MAGA world. Gay right-wing influencers Scott Presler and Brandon Straka were once comrades proud to take on the 'battlefield' alongside each other, but last month everything changed, according to a new report by The Wall Street Journal. Straka, who previously went viral after he was arrested in connection with the January 6 riots, took to social media last month in a bombshell 14-minute video blasting Presler for allegedly faking his voter registration totals and running a 'massive propaganda campaign.' He was pardoned by Trump earlier this year. Presler, 37, is a GOP activist credited for winning Pennsylvania in the recent election through his Early Vote Action committee. He has also been praised for his work by the president's daughter-in-law Lara Trump and scored a $1 million donation from Musk to help win the battleground state. Meanwhile, Straka, who claims to have 'bent over backwards' for Presler, grew to stardom after launching the #WalkAway campaign - a group that encourages disgruntled Democrats to follow in his footsteps and join the MAGA world. The pair worked together to build the Republican party, but a sharp turn derailed their relationship and caused a rift in the MAGA community. 'I can honestly say I have no idea who or what the real Scott Presler is,' Straka said in the clip. 'But what I know for certain is the public persona he's created bears little resemblance to who he is in reality. He's not brave, he's not kind, he's not grateful and he's not honest,' Straka claimed. In the video, Straka showed a series of posts made by Presler and others praising his efforts before explaining why his supporters need to take a deeper look into his work. 'Some of you may even believe he registered hundreds of thousands of voters, and some of you believe Scott Presler registered and transported nearly 200,000 Amish people to vote in 2024 which is incredible as there aren't even 90,000 Amish people in Pennsylvania, including children' Straka said. He went on to say that he doesn't 'blame' people for believing what Presler has done, adding: 'As they were all part of a massive propaganda campaign leading up to the 2024 election. 'Because so many of you have been made to believe these falsehoods from seeing them repeated over and over again on social media, you might feel protective of Scott. 'And I can understand that too. I can understand all of it because I used to feel protective of Scott Presler too, so much so that I bent over backwards to help him in every way that I could because I believed he really was the person he portrayed himself to be. 'The greatest lie ever told is that we're all on the same side…I'm here to tell you, folks, that there are a lot of people who support Trump and support MAGA who are totally out for themselves,' the MAGA ally continued. He specifically attacked Presler for claiming that his political action committee registered 10,000 new voters in the Keystone State prior to the election, and just a little over a week later, made it to 50,000. Straka also hit out on Presler's ties to the Amish community as their turnout in Lancaster - a predominantly Amish county - only increased by three percent from 2020-2024, the outlet reported. After the video surged online, Straka told the Wall Street Journal: 'I'm not asking anything of Scott that I don't expect from myself.' In response, Presler said: 'I don't do drama' and provided proof that he claims shows he always told the truth about the number of voters he recruited in Pennsylvania. He told the outlet that the 50,000 voter figure was correct and that the original 10,000 was mistakenly reported by a staff member. In relation to his role in getting the Amish community to get out and vote in the 2024 election, Presler said he never claimed that 180,000 came out to do so. Presler pointed to the Amish population outside of Lancaster, adding: 'Brandon is claiming we haven't registered thousands of Amish to vote - we have.' Presler has also been praised for his work by the president's daughter-in-law Lara Trump (pictured together in March 2024) and scored a $1 million donation from Musk to help win the battleground state He noted that documenting the population's voting efforts was not easy to do because 'this is a community that isn't cool being filmed.' Presler told the outlet he believes the feud and attacks against him really has to do with those in the Republican party who are against mail-in and early voting that he has pushed for. Straka's online rant sparked a slew of online responses, as many appear to be divided on who they should root for. 'Scott Presler NOT the man you think he is! Great statement by Brandon Straka - learn who your friends are and the ones that abuse the friendship,' one user wrote. Another took Presler's side, writing: 'Wow! Brandon Straka Is Your Typical Jealous Gay Queen. Team Scott Presler All The Way.' Others appeared to be frustrated by the feud, with some urging them to put their differences aside for the sake of the Republican party. 'First Elon and Trump. Now Scott Presler and Brandon Straka...,' a user wrote. 'The clash between Scott Presler and Brandon Straka is bigger than personalities. It's about the fevered world of right-wing influencers seeking to position themselves as key to the party's future,' another suggested. 'Both Brandon Straka and Scott Presler are terrible. Let them fight,' said another.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store