Investors should brace themselves for another 20% stock market correction this summer, veteran strategist warns
A bear market is coming back just in time for summer, according to David Bianco, the chief investment officer of DWS Group Americas.
While the S&P 500 has recovered from its earlier dip on news of trade talks with China and the EU, another steep pullback is in the cards, as Bianco sees a case of "June gloom" on the horizon.
"It's very possible for us to go right back to the lows," Bianco told Business Insider. "A number like 5,200 is a real possibility for a summer correction."
He's concerned about S&P 500 valuations and doesn't believe the ongoing stock market rally is sustainable. Valuations are back to their pre-Liberation Day levels, yet earnings estimates have dropped and tariff rates are elevated. With the S&P 500 trading above 5,900 at 23x earnings, stocks are definitely not cheap.
"Even before Liberation Day, the market was very richly valued," Bianco said. "Valuations are right back to where they were before Liberation Day. The market's just a few percent off from its high, but almost everybody's cut their earnings estimate for the year by at least a few percentage points. We did by 4%."
DWS Group expects tariffs to be 14% on average — significantly higher than the 2.5% rate at the beginning of the year.
With higher tariff rates and economic uncertainty combined with lower earnings, Bianco doesn't feel like the S&P's high valuation is tenable.
The interest rate outlook is further stalling a stock market rally. Many across Wall Street are concerned over rising Treasury yields in response to a growing US fiscal deficit and the recent downgrading of US debt — a development that could signal stagflation.
With a trade war damaging international relations, especially with countries that have historically bought US Treasurys, Bianco believes rates have room to rise.
"Trade and the demand for Treasurys go hand in hand. If there's less trade, there'll be less demand for Treasurys," Bianco said. "If we're going to reduce trade, we need to figure out how we're going to get Americans to buy Treasurys, and that may require a higher yield."
Limited upside
Bianco isn't just warning about near-term correction — the strategist also believes the S&P 500's gains will be capped for the year. In his opinion, the market is trading at valuations closer to year-end expectations.
"The S&P is overshot," Bianco said. "We've already hit our year-end targets in May already, and investors shouldn't get their hopes up that we'll see even more price appreciation."
In Bianco's opinion, if all goes well by the end of the year, meaning that earnings growth is strong and the 10-year Treasury yield stays below 4.5%, investors can expect to see the S&P 500 ending the year around 5,800 to 6,000.
"The summer is going to test some of the areas where the S&P was before and see if investors are still confident in the outlook for the economy," Bianco said.
How to prepare
The stock market volatility won't clear itself up overnight, which is why investors need to have a long-term plan.
In light of the tariff volatility, Bianco is underweight on the consumer discretionary, consumer staples, energy, industrials, and materials sectors, as he believes these will be the hardest hit.
"These tariffs have yet to really kick in, and we'll see to what extent companies try to offset it, how much they pass forward to consumers, and how consumers react to that," Bianco said. "We need at least six months to figure out what's really happening here with inflation and what the cost of goods are going to be at big retailers in the coming months."
Technology may emerge as a bright spot in the economy, as Bianco anticipates the sector will be less rate-sensitive than other parts of the stock market and real estate investments.
Bianco is also overweight on financials, utilities, and healthcare.
Investors can add exposure to these areas of the stock market through funds such as the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU), and iShares US Healthcare ETF (IYH).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Democrats are looking for answers — outside Washington
On the campaign trail, President Trump made a lot of promises. He promised to strengthen our economy. He promised to make our government more efficient. He promised to bring down costs. But after more than 100 days in, our economy is not strengthened, our government is certainly not more efficient, and costs are not down. The president has entangled us in trade wars with some of our closest trading partners — wars that erased $10 trillion from the stock market this spring and threaten to decimate family farms in my district and across the country. And with the help of the Department of Government Efficiency, he has waged an all-out assault on the federal government in an effort to weed out 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' I believe the American people elected Trump because they wanted solutions to pocketbook issues and a government that took action to get things done. But the president's agenda isn't working, and Democrats need to deliver. That's where the New Dem Coalition comes in. Before I explain why, I want to acknowledge that Democrats haven't always gotten everything right. During the election, we saw many working class voters drift away from the party. At times, our emphasis on identity politics or concepts like 'saving democracy' — while undeniably important — overshadowed the core economic issues that affect people's everyday lives. Instead of meeting voters where they are, we sometimes come across as telling them where they should be. That approach can feel out of touch and give the impression that the party is elitist, disconnected from the realities of everyday people. Working class voters are focused on how they'll afford their mortgage, put food on the table, or save for their kids' college — not necessarily on abstract debates about the soul of the nation. Don't get me wrong: the threat to democracy is real and urgent, especially with a president who shows little respect for courts or the Constitution. But if we're truly going to save democracy, we must build a broader coalition and bring more voters along. That means meeting people where they are, rather than telling them what should matter most. We need to address the tangible, kitchen-table issues that keep folks up at night. The New Dem Coalition has always done this. We have prioritized the needs of hard working Americans over the politics of D.C. We understand that we should be finding ways to make our government more efficient. We understand that we have to work across the aisle when we can — without compromising our values. That's why New Dems are crafting a proactive agenda — not only to win the House majority in 2026, but to maintain it for the long term. So, we're getting out of the D.C. bubble for a new series known as 'New Dems On the Road.' We'll be engaging with communities across the country, and gathering the critical feedback we need to guide our work. We're tackling every issue — from improving education outcomes to bolstering our national security — and working to find practical, lasting solutions that reflect the values and priorities of the American people. For our first stop, we zeroed in on immigration. Immigration isn't a problem we're going to solve overnight, but it's one that is consistently top of mind for the American people. We've come close to bipartisan solutions, only for selfish interests to squash our efforts in the 11th hour. That's why New Dem Immigration and Border Security Working Group members Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.) and Lou Correa (D-Calif.) sat down with Arizona leaders to talk about immigration. They met with industry and union representatives, members of the Arizona business community, and DACA recipients to discuss the importance of immigrants to Arizona's economy. The panel addressed the need to secure our border and pass a long-lasting immigration reform policy. It was instructive. And it showed the folks in these communities that we are listening to them. We know we don't have it all figured out — that's why we need real, local voices to help guide our work. Voices on the ground who are living and breathing these problems every single day. Then, it was my turn. I joined my friends Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) and Wesley Bell (D-Mo.) for a conversation around clean energy and potential opportunities for bipartisan cooperation. We discussed the actions the Trump administration has taken to gut clean energy tax credits. There is no way around it — this is going to have a negative impact on people's utility bills. They will feel this. We also discussed what's ahead — like permitting reform, carbon capture and ultimately ways we can lower costs for people trying to keep the lights on, not raise them. Last month, Reps. Sarah McBride (D-Del.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) got together to talk one-on-one with Delawareans about paid family and medical leave for working families. This is just the beginning. In total, we'll be conducting at least nine New Dems On the Road events — across the country. We need to come together, share ideas and forge a new path forward. A path that can address the issues that demand our attention: whether it's a single mom struggling to afford child care, a farmer looking to break into new markets, or a family who wants a good, public school education for their kids. We should all be committed to finding effective ways to achieve our shared goals and ensure that the government serves the people better. This isn't a partisan objective; it's a matter of common sense. However, real progress requires thoughtful strategy and careful action, not reckless cuts. Simply slashing budgets without consideration doesn't eliminate waste — it erodes the very foundation of what our government is meant to do: serve its citizens. New Democrats understand this deeply. We recognize that this moment calls for a meaningful response and an agenda that inspires — not the status quo. Our communities have elected us to take action, to solve problems and to improve lives. Now, more than ever, Democrats need to prove we can deliver Nikki Budzinski represents the 13th District of Illinois and is vice chair for policy for the New Dem Coalition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending review now settled, says Downing Street
The government's latest spending plans are settled, the prime minister's official spokesman has said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence, along with a number of infrastructure projects, when she sets out her day-to-say spending and investment plans for each department in Wednesday's Spending Review. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last to fix a deal on Monday afternoon, following public warnings from police chiefs, calling for more money. Housing Secretary Angela Rayner reached a deal with Reeves and the Treasury on Sunday evening. Reeves has loosened Treasury borrowing rules to free up about £113bn for investment in infrastructure projects, but will need to squeeze budgets elsewhere in order meet her own rules, which include not borrowing to fund day-to-day spending. Last week, she admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back. Ministers seeking to protect their budgets remained locked in budget talks over the weekend. Announcing ministerial negotiations over the government's spending review had been completed, the prime minister's official spokesman said the chancellor would be investing in public services and growth. "The spending review is settled - we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off," he said. "The first job of the government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change." The Home Office had argued privately that police numbers must be maintained for the government to deliver its policy commitments on neighbourhood policing, but that under the spending proposals this would not be possible. Police chiefs including Sir Mark Rowley, the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, had publicly lobbyied the government for more money in recent weeks, and there were suggestions the Treasury might have "imposed" a settlement on the Home Office. Over the weekend, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg the chancellor was facing pressure from all departments for additional funding. Kyle said "every part of society was struggling" and declined to rule out a squeeze on policing. The last-minute talks with Cooper come ahead of what is set to be a highly significant week for every part of government. Reeves has already U-turned on removing Winter Fuel payments from all but the poorest pensioners, and will now give these 75% of pensioners, which will cost an estimated £1.25bn. The government has also pledged to hike defence spending, invest £86bn in science and technology, and give free school meals to half a million more children. To balance the spending, Reeves has announced a £14bn package of savings in March, including £4.8bn of welfare cuts. However, opponents have accused the government of having the wrong priorities. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "They have chosen to prioritise spending on Ed Miliband's mad green projects, on inflation-busting pay rises for their trade union paymasters and spending £100bn a year – five times the police budget – on debt interest payments." Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has urged the chancellor to rule out cuts to social care, which is financed through local councils. He said the government would have "more money in the pot, more growth, more revenue" if it pursued closer trading ties with Europe. Home secretary yet to agree deal days before spending review Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is floating a federal tax boycott
As tensions escalate between California and the Trump administration over immigration, another potential battlefront is emerging over taxes. The spat began with reports that the Trump administration is considering cutting funding for California's university system, the largest higher education system in the nation with about 12% of all U.S. enrolled students. In response, Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote Friday afternoon in a social media post that California provides about $80 billion more in taxes to the federal government than it receives in return. "Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump," Newsom said. What is a donor state? A donor state is one that provides more in taxes to the federal government than they receive in return. The largest one, by far, is California, according to tax data. In 2022, California's residents and businesses provided $692 billion in tax revenue to the federal government. In return, the state received $609 billion in federal funding, leaving a gap of about $83 billion, according to the California Budget and Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank. See which states are the biggest donors California's gap is so large partly due to the large number of high-income residents in the state, who pay a larger share of their income toward federal taxes than lower-income workers, the California Budget and Policy Center says. !function(){"use strict"; 0!== e= t in r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if( d= Overall, 11 U.S. states contribute more in taxes to the federal government than they get back, according to the Rockefeller Institute of Government: California ($83 billion gap)New Jersey ($28.9 billion)Massachusetts ($27 billion)Washington state ($17.8 billion)New York ($7.1 billion)Minnesota ($4.5 billion)Colorada ($2.9 billion)Illinois ($2.6 billion)New Hampshire ($2.4 billion)Connecticut ($1.9 billion)Utah ($709 million) Other states receive more in funding than they provide to the federal government, according to the tax data. The imbalance stems from a mix of reasons, ranging from some states having a larger share of residents on federal aid programs, such as Medicaid, to a larger number of federal facilities, such as military bases, compared with other states, according to the California Budget and Policy Center. What has the Trump administration said? In response to Newsom's post about boycotting federal tax payments, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned in a Sunday social media post that the governor "is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion." "His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes," Bessent wrote. Bessent added, "Instead of committing criminal tax evasion, Governor Newsom should consider a tax plan for California that follows the Trump Tax Cuts model and reduces the onerous state tax burden to allow families to keep more of their hard-earned money." Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater Trump blasts Newsom as "grossly incompetent" as tensions rise over L.A. protests
