NM Legislative Recap March 11: Where things stand with 12 days left
The Seal of the State of New Mexico inside the Roundhouse on Jan. 10, 2024. (Photo by Anna Padilla for Source NM)
The chart above illustrates how the 2025 legislative session compares to the last five 60-day sessions in New Mexico. If the prior sessions serve as any indication, right now constitutes the calm before the storm in terms of bills passing both chambers in the session's home stretch.
It's day 48, and the House and Senate have so far passed three bills, excluding the 'Feed Bill' that pays for the Legislature and typically passes in each session's opening days.
That's a smaller number of bills passed at this point during recent previous sessions, but not by much: The Legislature had passed five bills by this point in 2023; five bills in 2021; 12 in 2017; and three in 2015.
The year 2019 counts as the biggest outlier, the year of the so-called 'rocket docket,' during which lawmakers fought back against a slew of vetoes from then-Gov. Susana Martinez by re-passing several dozen bills they'd passed the previous year in the first month of the legislative session. By day 48 that year, both chambers had signed off on 42 bills.
And, as Democratic leaders of both chambers are quick to point out, not all bills are the same. The bills passed so far this year are actually omnibus bills — representing months of work by both chambers and parties — to tackle the state's behavioral health and criminal justice challenges in multi-faceted legislation.
'We've made great progress in this year's session,' said Sen. Peter Wirth (D-Santa Fe), the Senate Majority Leader, in an emailed statement to Source NM. 'We hit the ground running and met our commitment to deliver a comprehensive behavioral health and public safety package to the Governor in 30 days, and those bills are now signed into law. There hasn't been early action like that since the 'rocket docket back' in 2019.'
The Senate's next priorities include reform of the Children, Youth and Families Department, passing the budget and taking up more public safety bills, Wirth said. He's confident that the Legislature will, come closing day March 22, have 'delivered meaningful results for the people of New Mexico.'
Speaker Javier Martínez (D-Albuquerque) echoed the sentiments that lawmakers are 'well on track to deliver results,' noting the passage of the behavioral health and public safety packages.
'We will continue at a strong, steady pace in the final days of the session, as many more bills move through the final steps of the legislative process up to the Governor's desk,' Martínez said in a written statement.
Still, Republican leaders this week criticized the Democratic majority for delays and refusing to hear bills they sponsored, a tactic that is preventing real anti-crime measures from getting a fair shake.
Late Tuesday afternoon, the House considered a rare amendment to a memorial, which, as non-binding statements used to express the House's agreement that something should be honored or memorialized, typically aren't amended.
House Memorial 37, titled 'Mount Taylor as Cultural Property,' seeks to honor the mountain's cultural significance and decry the impact uranium mining in the area has had on land, water and communities, particularly Indigenous communities, in the decades since uranium was extracted there.
The memorial from Rep. Michelle Abeyta (D-To'hajilee) reads, in part: 'Whereas, uranium mining operations create environmental hazards through the transport and storage of uranium ore, increasing the risk of contamination of land, air and water resources and exacerbating the health threats already faced by Indian and non-Indian communities alike.'
Rep. John Block (R-Carlsbad) sought to strike that language from the memorial, which he said stigmatized the uranium industry, noting that it was written in the present tense. The industry is much safer now, he said, and could serve a vital source of energy for America and revenue for the state.
'I find it to be offensive to the great people of this state because we're speaking on behalf of them, and what we're saying is we don't want these kinds of industries,' Block said.
Long-stalled NM uranium mines now 'priority projects' at Cibola Forest, leader tells employees
Block also said he was unaware of any pending mining activity on the mountain, which is one of four sacred to Navajo people. In fact, two long-stalled mine proposals in the area are now 'priority projects,' the Cibola National Forest Supervisor told staff in a meeting last month, according to a recording obtained by Source New Mexico.
Block's unusual attempt to amend drew more than an hour of debate, including from Republicans lauding the uranium industry and Democrats recounting its long legacy of harm here.
'Given the legacy of unreclaimed lands in not only tribal lands but in New Mexico that has devastated the people, the land, the air, the water, it is unconscionable to strip the intent of this memorial,' said Rep. Derrick Lente (D-Sandia Pueblo).
Block's amendment failed by a vote of 38-23. At 6 p.m., the House passed the memorial by a similar vote.
A similar Senate memorial passed the Senate earlier Tuesday. Senate Memorial 14 expresses New Mexico's opposition to new uranium projects at Mount Taylor that would threaten its cultural and environmental integrity.
The House bounced a bill aiming to phase out products with intentionally added PFAS back to committee Monday, after no Republicans expressed willingness to sponsor floor amendments.
Rep. Joanne Ferrary (D-Las Cruces), a co-sponsor of House Bill 212, told Source NM Tuesday the House Judiciary scheduled HB 212 for a Friday hearing to amend the bill.
If the committee accepts amendments, the bill would return to the House Floor, leaving it little time to clear committees and the floor in the Senate. 'This is going to be a nail-biter,' Ferrary said.
Per-and-polyfluoroalkyl substances, shortened to PFAS are a class of toxic chemicals manufactured to withstand breaking down in water, heat or other environmental conditions and are used in everyday items from cookware to carpets to firefighting foams. PFAS exposure has been linked to certain cancers, fertility issues, low birth weights or fetal development issues, hormonal imbalances and limiting vaccine effectiveness. PFAS contamination caused the euthanization of more than 3,600 dairy cows and impacted water sources around New Mexico.
HB 212, if adopted, would ban the sale of items with added PFAS and carve out exceptions for essential uses, including in pharmaceuticals, electronics and cars.
Two PFAS bills scheduled for Saturday House Energy and Natural Resources committee
The amendments update some of the definitions and updates some of the product exemptions, similar to previous amendments, said New Mexico Environment Department Secretary James Kenney.
'We've worked hard during this session to turn HB 212 into a bill every legislator can get behind, because it affects every single New Mexican,' Kenney said in a written statement. 'The committee substitute we're presenting to the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday is, we hope, the final step to achieve that goal.'
The Senate Conservation Committee passed House Bill 93, which would allow public utilities to include advanced power grid technology projects in their grid modernization plans; House Bill 284, which would allow fertility control, relocation and adoption of free-roaming horses; and Senate Memorial 3, which would ask three state agencies to come up with a beaver management plan by October.
The Senate Health and Public Affairs Committee passed Senate Bill 146, which would fix language in the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children; Senate Bill 247, which would require the Public Education Department to publish annually statewide testing results and break them down by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and special education status; Senate Bill 315, which would make tortillas the official bread of New Mexico; and Senate Bill 404, which would create greater protections for health records related to reproductive health care, gender-affirming care, mental health care, and alcohol or substance use disorder treatment.
The Senate Judiciary Committee passed Senate Bill 66, which would prohibit criminal convictions from automatically barring an applicant from public employment or a professional license; a substitute version of Senate Bill 166, which redefines defining 'harm to self' and
'harm to others,' in state law; Senate Bill 259, which would make third-party vendors helping a charitable organization raise money subject to state regulation; Senate Bill 357, which would create a framework for the state to help local government infrastructure projects; Senate Bill 364, which would allow people with work authorizations from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to work as police officers; Senate Bill 488, which would strengthen the powers of and make permanent the interim Legislative Health and Human Services Committee; House Bill 47, which would create property tax exemptions for veterans approved by voters in November; and House Bill 214, which would establish a voluntary credentialing process for doulas, allowing them to enroll as Medicaid providers.
The Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee passed House Bill 11, which would create a state-administered paid leave program.
The Senate Finance Committee passed Senate Bill 327, which would create a special 'lowrider capital of the world' license plate; Senate Bill 377 which would create a special New Mexico United license plate; and Senate Bill 434, which would require schools to notify parents if their student has having math or reading deficiency.
The Senate passed Senate Bill 376, which would cut health care premiums paid by more than 60,000 state and local public sector workers while fixing a budget shortfall in their insurance plan; and Senate Memorial 19, which would ask two state agencies to ensure that at least half of the beef, cheese and milk served in public schools is locally sourced.
The Senate unanimously passed Senate Bill 105, which would allow licensed social workers to practice in 22 other states in a licensure compact, and for those from other states to practice here; Senate Bill 159, which would allow independent theater owners to obtain a special wine and beer license; and Senate Memorial 2, which would require the Legislative Council to study and recommend policies for avoiding and mitigating wildfires.
Without debate, senators unanimously passed Senate Bill 213, which would require motorists to yield to public buses when they merge into traffic from a designated bus stop, or face a $25 fine; Senate Bill 118, which would require the Motor Vehicle Division to distribute to other state agencies' organ donor application materials; and Senate Bill 221, which would prohibit insurance companies from requiring insured people to obtain a denial of coverage letter from an insurer in order to claim federal benefits, like they did during recent wildfires and floods.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids
Washington — Three Democratic governors are defending their responses to the migrant crisis and dispute claims of failing to cooperate with federal authorities, according to prepared remarks that will be delivered Thursday before a House oversight panel. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are among the witnesses scheduled to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on so-called "sanctuary policies". "Let me be clear: Sanctuary policies don't protect Americans. They protect criminal illegal aliens," Oversight Chair James Comer, a Kentucky Republican will say in his opening statement. The governors' appearances come as President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom remain embroiled in a legal and political standoff over the deployment of the National Guard troops and Marines to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles. Demonstrations have spread to other U.S. cities, including New York and Chicago following a series of deportation raids. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz will tell lawmakers. "It is ridiculous to suggest that Minnesota — a state that is over 1,500 miles away from the Southern border and a thousand miles from lawmakers in Washington, D.C. who decide and implement border policy is somehow responsible for a failure of immigration enforcement." The former vice presidential candidate has drawn intense scrutiny not only over immigration policy but also for his handling of social justice protests that broke out in Minneapolis following the death of George Floyd in 2020. Trump administration officials have cited Walz' actions to justify the president's decision to federalize troops in California. While Walz does not appear to directly address the controversy in his testimony, he says he is "disappointed" in the federal government's overall approach. "As governor of Minnesota, it is incumbent on me to use the state's resources to help Minnesota families—not turn those resources over to the administration so they can stage another photo-op in tactical gear or accidentally deport more children without observing due process," Walz is set to say. Ahead of the hearing, the GOP-led panel released a video compilation of various news clips accusing the governors of "shielding" undocumented immigrants and "causing chaos" in their states. A memo from Hochul's office suggested the hearing could be "derailed by wild accusations" and "twisted characterizations" but noted the governor's position is "clear" when it comes to supporting strong borders and comprehensive immigration reform. "New York state cooperates with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in criminal cases," Hochul says. "And our values as New Yorkers demand that we treat those who arrive here in search of a better life with dignity and reject policies that tear law-abiding families apart." Hochul also addresses the influx of more than 220,000 migrants to New York City since early 2022, many of whom were bussed from border states, calling it "an unprecedented humanitarian crisis." "We have responded to this crisis with both compassion and pragmatism," Hochul states."And as a result, we largely prevented what could have become an additional crisis — one of street homelessness and tent cities." Pritzker says Illinois also stepped up to the challenge, and blamed the lack of federal intervention and cooperation from border states for exacerbating the problem. "As governor, my responsibility is to ensure that all Illinoisans feel safe in their homes, their businesses, and their communities," Pritzker is prepared to say. "That is why my administration continued to make significant investments in public safety, even as our resources were strained because of the lack of federal support during the crisis — expanding our state police force and investing in efforts to reduce gun violence." Thursday's session follows a March hearing on sanctuary cities with four Democratic mayors: Eric Adams, of New York, Mike Johnston of Denver, Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Michelle Wu of Boston. Comer launched an investigation in January into "sanctuary jurisdictions", including states, counties or cities, to examine their impact on public safety and federal immigration enforcement. President Trump has vowed to crack down on localities that don't back his immigration agenda. Earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security removed its list of sanctuary jurisdictions after several cities challenged the findings.

Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, ___ Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The $11 trillion gap between White House and economists on Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill
An array of economists — from the Congressional Budget Office to the Tax Foundation to the Penn-Wharton Budget Model — have reached a similar conclusion: Trump's signature legislation comes with a price tag in the neighborhood of $3 trillion over the next decade. They're all wrong, the White House says. And not just by a little. President Trump and his aides have instead offered claims that the bill will make money and that the final tally for both the tax-cutting legislation and other parts of the Trump agenda will usher in a new golden age not just for the US economy but also for government debt. The claims from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue go as high as $8 trillion in black ink (an $11 trillion chasm with the experts) in claims that go beyond what even Capitol Hill Republicans are projecting. As for reconciling the two, some economists essentially throw up their hands. "You can't square it because it's ridiculous," Erica York of the Tax Foundation said. "The bill unambiguously will increase deficits, it will not contribute that much to economic growth," she added, noting that the bill is largely focused on extending current tax rates that would not be expected to push the economy significantly upward from current levels. Yet the White House has remained steadfast even as this gap has led to increased tensions as the bill goes through another round of adjustments on Capitol Hill. A Wednesday appearance before Congress by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was marked by lawmakers — mostly Democratic, but some Republicans as well — raising the debt issue. In one colorful moment, Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson of California asked Bessent to point to an independent expert "not on the payroll of this administration" who says this bill will not add to our debt. Bessent then cited Arthur Laffer, the former Reagan official and longtime Trump supporter who received the Presidential Medal of Freedom during the president's first term. The comment led to laughter in the chamber, with Thompson shooting back, "I don't think that one counts." It was a hearing where Bessent declined to repeat some of the administration's most aggressive claims, saying instead that "it remains to be seen" whether the bill will add to the national debt. Others have not been so restrained about the impact of Trump's overall agenda. "We're going to cut the deficit by $8 trillion over the next 10 years," press secretary Karoline Leavitt offered recently on Fox News. And a recent White House memo offered a slightly lower figure of about $6.7 trillion to $6.9 trillion in deficit reductions over the coming decade. One issue is that White House projections rely on a set of assumptions that are often internally contradictory, such as taking credit for taxes spurring economic growth while simultaneously saying they have no cost. Other parts of the bill would enact temporary tax cuts — and then take credit for lower costs there — while also claiming other permanent cuts are free. That's in addition to an overriding assumption at the White House that, essentially, things break historically right for the US economy and sustained 3% economic growth is in the offing. That's above even what House Republicans are projecting, as lawmakers there have rallied behind a lower (but still very aggressive) assumption of 2.6% growth. Both projections are unlikely, Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said. "Some people are at 2%, some people are at 1.6% ... that is the neighborhood," he said of a series of projections for growth that hover around 1.8%. He added in an interview that even if sustained 3% growth were to happen, "it would have very little to do with this tax bill." Yet the White House has repeatedly dismissed the experts. Trump budget chief Russ Vought recently told reporters that everything "is part of a coherent fiscal agenda" and that the combination of tax cuts, tariffs, additional promised spending cuts, and "reforms we can do ourselves" to programs like Medicaid will lead to good outcomes for the US bottom line. White House projections also fully embrace recent CBO projections of $2.8 trillion in tariff revenues over the coming decade. But that embrace appears to ignore a prediction in the same report that tariffs will "reduce the size of the U.S. economy" and also lead to a potential inflation increase of 0.4 percentage points in 2025 and 2026. York has calculated that even two seemingly minor adjustments — taking the slightly lower but still very aggressive House estimate of 2.6% economic growth and factoring in the economic costs of tariffs — means the bill "is basically a wash or even negative for GDP." "They're picking and choosing," she added. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet And few are expecting tariffs to stay steady in the coming months, not to mention the coming years. Tariff levels are under active negotiation — two fronts this week are duties on goods from China and India — as the CBO report assumed rates remain steady not just during Trump's term, but also years after he is scheduled to leave office. The tariffs are also under a considerable cloud of legal uncertainty, with an appeals court ruling on Tuesday that Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs could stay in force for now while it considers whether they are legal. "Even if they are upheld by the courts, it still seems like the Trump administration is willing to negotiate them down somewhat," York noted, "and then what happens in four years when a new administration comes in?" Ben Werschkul is Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. David Foster is a graphic artist for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data