'Worse than death': Journalist Ekaterina Barabash who fled house arrest in Russia resurfaces in Paris
Veteran
and film critic
was spotted in Paris this week after secretly fleeing house arrest in Moscow, where she faced a potential 10-year prison sentence over social media posts condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Barabash, 63, fled the country in April, helped by
(RSF). The organization revealed that she removed her electronic monitoring tag and traveled more than 2,800 kilometers (some 1,700 miles) via 'secret' routes to reach France.
'Her escape was one of the most perilous operations RSF has been involved in since Russia's draconian laws of March 2022,' said the group's director, Thibaut Bruttin, during a press conference with Barabash at RSF's Paris headquarters.
'At one point, we thought she might be dead.'
Barabash, who was born in Kharkiv, Ukraine, had been arrested in February 2022 after returning from the Berlinale film festival. Russian authorities charged her with spreading 'false information' about the military and labeled her a 'foreign agent' due to Facebook posts between 2022 and 2023 that criticized Russia's war efforts. One post denounced the bombing of Ukrainian cities and the suffering inflicted on civilians.
'There is no culture in Russia… there is no politics… It's only war,' she said in Paris. Barabash said the very concept of a 'Russian journalist' no longer made sense. 'Journalism cannot exist under totalitarianism.'
'So you (expletive) bombed the country, razed entire cities to the ground, killed a hundred children, shot civilians for no reason, blockaded Mariupol, deprived millions of people of a normal life and forced them to leave for foreign countries? All for the sake of friendship with Ukraine?' one of Barabash's posts read.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Her escape route took her through multiple borders, and she spent two weeks in hiding before arriving in France on April 26, her birthday. The most painful part, she said, was leaving behind her 96-year-old mother. 'I just understood that I'd never see her,' Barabash said, adding they both decided that not seeing her while being free was better than a Russian prison.
Barabash's son and grandson remain in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv.
She hasn't been able to see them since the war began, saying, 'I have a Russian passport.'
According to RSF, over 90 media organizations have relocated to the EU and neighboring countries since the war began. Russia, ranks 171st out of 180 in RSF's 2025 World Press Freedom Index.
'Prison in Russia is worse than death,' Barabash told the Associated Press. 'If you want to stay a journalist, you must leave.'
At least 38 journalists remain imprisoned in Russia, and over 1,200 individuals have faced charges for expressing anti-war views. Of these, 389 are currently in custody, according to the human rights group OVD-Info.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
From New York to Washington, D.C., Los Angeles like protests over immigration raids spreading throughout United States
Protests Intensify Nationwide ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT More Protests Planned What began as a wave of protest in Los Angeles is now spreading across the United States, with growing demonstrations against federal immigration enforcement operations. According to the Associated Press, protests have already erupted in cities including Seattle, Austin, Chicago, New York, and Washington, D.C., and more are expected in the days coast to coast, demonstrators have marched through city centers, blocked roads, and gathered outside immigration courts and federal buildings, chanting slogans and carrying signs opposing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. While most protests have remained peaceful, several cities have reported violent clashes, vandalism, and about 200 people rallied outside the city's immigration court on Tuesday following multiple arrests earlier in the week. Weekend protests swelled to thousands, with over 150 people arrested. Police reported vandalism, damaged vehicles, and injuries to two officers. Authorities stressed that peaceful protest is protected, but violence will not be around 50 people demonstrate outside the downtown immigration court. Protesters chanted 'Free Them All' and 'Abolish ICE,' placing scooters at entrances before police arrived. Legal observers and media were barred from entering the a mass rally unfolded in lower Manhattan. Demonstrators marched from two immigration court buildings, holding signs like 'ICE out of New York' while chanting at police. Authorities confirmed multiple arrests but no immediate gathered outside the city's immigration court, opposing both ICE raids and military deployment in California. The peaceful demonstration grew to about 1,000 participants by Tuesday demonstrators rallied at the Colorado state capitol, holding signs with anti-ICE slogans. The crowd eventually split into two marching groups, disrupting traffic. Police later blocked nearby streets but did not initially near Los Angeles, authorities deployed armored vehicles and National Guard troops to secure the Civic Center, where ICE and other agencies are based. Protesters clashed with a handful of counter-protesters, and cleanup crews were seen erasing graffiti and clearing debris left from the previous one of the more violent escalations. On Monday night, four officers were injured as police deployed tear gas and pepper spray balls to disperse a crowd of several hundred. Protesters attempted to spray paint the federal building and threw rocks and bottles at law enforcement. Police arrested a total of 13 individuals. Officials warned they are bracing for larger demonstrations planned for hundreds protested on a city bridge before police declared the event an 'unlawful assembly.' Officers used pepper spray and smoke to clear the area after objects were thrown. One protester was arrested. Texas Governor Greg Abbott reiterated on social media that while peaceful protest is allowed, crossing the line will result in saw major mobilization on Monday as hundreds rallied in City Hall Plaza to demand the release of union leader David Huerta, detained during ICE operations in Los Angeles. Huerta was released later on a $50,000 bond. Protesters held signs declaring solidarity with Los Angeles and denounced anti-immigrant labor unions and activists held rallies outside the Department of Justice. Among them was U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal, who condemned the ICE raids and law enforcement's use of force. 'Enough of these mass ICE raids that are sweeping up innocent people,' she said. 'People exercising their rights are being met with tear gas and rubber bullets.'Activists are planning nationwide "No Kings" protests on Saturday, designed to coincide with President Donald Trump 's scheduled military parade in Washington, D.C. Organizers hope to turn out larger crowds in response to what they describe as an unconstitutional crackdown on immigrant tensions rise and protests spread, officials across the country are preparing for a volatile weekend that may define the public's response to the Trump administration's immigration policies.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump admin can keep collecting 'sweeping tariffs' for now, says US court
A federal appeals court on Tuesday (local time) agreed to let US President Donald Trump's administration keep collecting the 'sweeping tariffs' for now. The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extends a similar order it made after another federal court struck down the ' sweeping tariffs ' on May 28, stating that Trump has overstepped his authority, Associated Press reported. The Justice Department previously argued that the concerns raised by the US officials regarding the ongoing trade negotiations outweighed the economic harm mentioned by the small businesses that sued the Trump administration, Bloomberg reported. The appeals court is expediting the case and has set July 31 as the next date for a hearing in the matter. This came after the court noted that the challenges that Trump's tariffs raise "issues of exceptional importance". These tariffs are likely to remain in effect for at least a month or possibly longer until the petitioners seek the intervention of the US Supreme Court, since the legal proceedings continue in the Washington appeals court. The case pertains to the 10 per cent base tariffs that Trump imposed on more than 100 countries in April, along with the additional tariffs that were imposed on countries with which the US runs trade deficits. However, Trump soon paused the additional tariffs imposed for 90 days. The ruling in favour of Trump comes at a time when trade negotiators for the US and China reached a 'preliminary agreement' to de-escalate trade tensions. Trump administration fights tariff battle The Trump administration asked the appeals court to step in after a ruling by the US Court of International Trade blocked Trump from imposing the 'Liberation Day' tariffs, citing the misuse of an emergency law by the US President. A day after this, senior officials of the administration informed the appeals court that they were 'undeterred' by the trade court's ruling, adding that they expected to either prevail on appeal or use other presidential powers to ensure the tariffs remain in effect. Several companies filed a lawsuit against the sweeping tariffs imposed by the administration, which, according to Trump, are crucial to level the playing field for American businesses and workers. The companies alleged that these tariffs on goods imported from other countries would result in higher costs and lower sales, and could lead some of them to bankruptcy. Several Democratic-led states also sued the administration over the imposition of these tariffs.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nuclear war! US intel chief warns world is on the edge of annihilation
Tulsi Gabbard , the US director of national intelligence, on Tuesday released a video warning that the world is closer to nuclear war than ever before, and accused unnamed political elites of stoking tensions between nuclear-armed powers. Without naming specific countries, Gabbard's remarks reflected long-standing claims by Russian officials and, more recently, far-right US commentators who say that Ukraine's drone strike on Russia's strategic bomber fleet earlier this month has increased the risk of nuclear conflict . 'Closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation' 'As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers ,' Gabbard said in the video, which was posted on X. 'Perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to. It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness,' she added. Live Events You Might Also Like: World War 3: Will Ukraine's drone strike inside Russia raise the risk of a global nuclear war? — TulsiGabbard (@TulsiGabbard) The video followed Gabbard's recent visit to Hiroshima, Japan, where she visited the epicentre of the city destroyed by an atomic bomb in 1945. Foreboding music played throughout the clip as black-and-white archival footage showed the aftermath and victims of the nuclear attack . 'A single nuclear weapon today could kill millions in just minutes, just one of these nuclear bombs would vaporize everything at its core,' Gabbard said in the video. A mock simulation then depicted a nuclear strike on San Francisco, showing the Golden Gate Bridge reduced to rubble. Gabbard also posted: 'I recently visited Hiroshima, and stood at the epicenter of a city scarred by the unimaginable horror caused by a single nuclear bomb dropped in 1945. What I saw, the stories I heard, and the haunting sadness that remains, will stay with me forever.' Deputy backs Trump peace plan You Might Also Like: Stopped war between India and Pakistan, it could have gone nuclear: Trump Her deputy chief of staff, Alexa Henning, issued a statement on Tuesday evening saying: 'Acknowledging the past is critical to inform the future. DNI Gabbard supports President Trump's clearly stated objectives of bringing about lasting peace and stability and preventing war.' US President Donald Trump has claimed that his administration 'stopped a nuclear conflict' through its role in de-escalating recent clashes between India and Pakistan. The US has also been seeking to dismantle Iran's nuclear programme amid rising fears that Israel could strike Tehran's nuclear sites. Trump had warned that he will bomb Iran if it does not reach a deal with Washington over its nuclear programme. However, in April, Trump reportedly stopped a planned Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear sites and chose instead to push for a negotiated agreement with Tehran. India denies any US role in ceasefire Meanwhile, India has repeatedly denied that any foreign country played a role in bringing about the ceasefire with Pakistan, which came after fatal terror strikes in India's Kashmir in late April. New Delhi had launched Operation Sindoor in retaliation, targeting terror camps in Pakistan and other locations. Indian strikes also damaged key military assets of Pakistan, including an air base. You Might Also Like: EAM Jaishankar asked if US deserves credit for India-Pak ceasefire and how close world came to nuclear war: His reply says it all The terror attack in Pahalgam had killed 26 people, mostly civilians. India blamed Pakistan for the attack, but Islamabad denied the charges. India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said the credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan must go entirely to the Indian military, and not the United States. When asked in an interview how close India and Pakistan came to a nuclear confrontation, Jaishankar replied, 'Very, very far away. I'm frankly astonished by your question. We had terrorist targets. Our actions were measured, careful, and non-escalatory. After that, Pakistan opened fire. We responded by showing we could disable their air defence systems. Then the firing stopped, at their request.' Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
