OPEN// Egypt, Turkey hold political talks in Cairo
CAIRO, June 23 (MENA) - Egypt and Turkey held political consultations at the foreign ministry's headquarters in the New Administrative Capital on Monday.
Assistant Foreign Minister for European Affairs Wael Hamed chaired the Egyptian side, while the Turkish side was led by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey Burhanettin Duran, according to a press release.
The two sides discussed ways to promote cooperation at various levels and preparations for the first meeting of a joint planning group headed by the foreign ministers of both countries, which is tasked with following up on all aspects of bilateral cooperation.
They also shared views on a raft of international and regional issues and how to attract more Turkish investments to Egypt, especially in the textile and home appliance industries, and how to increase bilateral trade to $15 billion over the next five years.
The two sides also discussed bilateral cooperation in the energy, transport, manufacturing, civil aviation, and culture sectors.
Hamed highlighted Egypt's business-friendly environment, given the government's incentives for investors and the competitive advantages Egypt offers, such as the incentives offered for investors in the Suez Canal Economic Zone (SCZone).
He said a Cabinet working group had been formed to follow up on Turkish investments in Egypt.
The two sides also discussed regulating the movement of Egyptian workers to Turkey, as well as reviewing some draft joint agreements under negotiation between both countries.
The talks also covered a number of regional and international issues of common concern, especially the ongoing developments in the Middle East, including the Iranian nuclear file and the Russian-Ukrainian crisis.
Hamed briefed the Turkish side on Egypt's role in achieving a ceasefire in Gaza and the Egyptian plan for Gaza reconstruction. He outlined Egypt's stance on the situations in Libya, the Sahel, the Horn of Africa, Sudan, and Red Sea security, including the implications for Suez Canal navigation and international trade.
Meanwhile, the Turkish side praised Egypt's pivotal role in various issues, which directly contributes to maintaining regional stability.
Finally, the two sides agreed to continue exchanging high-level visits to go forward with what was agreed during the talks, push bilateral cooperation forward, and coordinate on various regional and international issues of mutual interest. (MENA)
M A A/R G E
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
See - Sada Elbalad
2 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
ICESCO, Arab Towns Organization Sign MoU on Shaping Future Cities
Mohamed Mandour The Islamic World Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ICESCO) and the Arab Towns Organization (ATO) signed a memorandum of understanding to cooperate in areas of shared interest, primarily artificial intelligence and strategic foresight for future cities. The agreement was signed via videoconference by Dr. Salim M. AlMalik, ICESCO Director-General, and Eng. Abdulrahman Hisham Al-Asfour, Secretary-General of the Arab Towns Organization, in the presence of senior officials from both organizations. Speaking during the signing ceremony, Dr. AlMalik said that cooperation with the Arab Towns Organization is an important step toward developing urban policies focused on heritage protection, building resilient and smart cities, and enhancing community partnerships. Dr. AlMalik noted that the partnership reflects a shared commitment to more sustainable and human-centered cities. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean
Al-Ahram Weekly
3 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Iran confirms its military commander Ali Shadmani was killed in Israeli strikes - Region
The military's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, which Shadmani led, vowed "severe revenge" for what it called the "criminal act" by Israeli forces, announcing the commander had died from injuries sustained in the attack, according to the IRNA state news agency. The Israeli military said on June 17 that it had killed Shadmani in a strike on a "command centre in the heart of Tehran". Israel described him as "the most senior military commander" and "the closest figure to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei". The confirmation of his death came a day after a US-announced ceasefire ended 12 days of open conflict between Israel and Iran. Shadmani died just days after he took over the role from Gholam Ali Rashid, who was killed in the first days of Israel's attacks. On June 13, Israel launched a major bombing campaign targeting Iranian nuclear facilities and senior military figures. The United States joined the operation later with strikes on the Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. Iran responded with waves of missile attacks on Israel and one targeting a US base in Qatar, prompting President Donald Trump to call for de-escalation and announce a ceasefire that took effect on Tuesday. The war killed 627 civilians in Iran and 28 people in Israel, according to official figures. Iran will hold on Saturday state funerals for senior military commanders, including Shadmani, and top scientists killed during the war with Israel.
Al-Ahram Weekly
3 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
The non-existent bomb - World - Al-Ahram Weekly
Attacking Iran on a presumption that it is developing a nuclear bomb bears many similarities to what happened in Iraq and Libya, argues Ahmed Mustafa It is not clear if this weekend's American attack on three Iranian nuclear sites has ended Iran's nuclear programme permanently. The US bombed those sites a week after Israel started attacking Iran, targeting nuclear sites, energy infrastructure and military positions. It all took place on the pretext that Iran was 'very close' to producing a nuclear bomb; an Israeli claim Tehran categorically denies. Even though Iran started enriching uranium to 60 per cent purity after America withdrew from the 2015 agreement, at least ninety per cent is required to produce warheads. Many around the world are thinking, 'we've seen this before,' drawing analogies with false pretexts for the attack on Iraq. Analysts and commentators are revisiting the fabrications spread regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and the infamous intelligence dossier Tony Blair used in misguiding British Parliament into war in 2003. The then UK prime minister repeated that Iraq can make a bomb in 45 minutes. That was proven to be an outright lie. Others reminded the world of the shameful show by the US secretary of state at that time, Collin Powell, exhibiting fabricated images at the UN to justify the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Later, Powell, a decorated soldier, regretted what he had done and blamed others in the George W. Bush administration for tarnishing his military career by making a joke of him. Ironically, almost the same happened this week with the director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. When she briefed President Donald Trump that their information and analysis conclude that Iran is years away from producing a bomb, should they choose to do so, Trump said she was wrong and adopted the Israeli claim that the bomb is within a day's reach. In 2002, Benjamin Netanyahu testified before Congress, making a case for attacking Iraq. He was not in power then, but his testimony was influential. He bragged this week that he told then-US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld that 'you will finish this very quickly. But your primary goal is the Iranian regime. And the Iranian regime is trying to develop a nuclear weapon.' This week, iPaper (published by the Daily Mail and National Trust) quoted the famous former chief UN weapons inspector Dr Hans Blix drawing comparisons between the targeting of Iran and the case of Iraq. Blix told the paper, 'The US risks repeating the 'awful' results of the Iraq War if it joins Israel in trying to destroy the Iranian regime.' Though Iran started enriching uranium far above the 3.67 per cent needed to generate electricity, it is still far below the purity required to produce a nuclear weapon. Blix doubted 'the regime in Tehran intended to go ahead in building a bomb before it was attacked'. In 2017, media reports carried leaked emails by Collin Powell, including one he sent to a colleague in 2015 refuting what Netanyahu – then opposition leader – told Congress in an attempt to push for the US to not join the accord with Iran on its nuclear programme. Powell wrote: 'They [the Iranians] say, correctly, that they have every right to enrich [uranium] for energy. Russians helped build a power reactor at Busher. Can't get enough sanctions to break them. Lots of bs around about their progress. Bibi [Netanyahu] likes to say 'a year away' as do our intel guys. They say it every year. [It] ain't that easy to do.' He concluded, 'anyway, Iranians can't use one [a nuclear weapon] if they finally make one. The boys in Tehran know Israel has 200, all targeted on Tehran, and we have thousands.' Collin Powell was referring to the Israeli arsenal of nuclear warheads, estimated by some to be about 400 bombs. Israel is not part of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or subject to any inspection from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The latter provided a pretext to the Israeli attack last week by declaring Iran in violation of its commitments by increasing enrichment. The IAEA didn't mention any bomb-making; it was the Israeli assumption that Washington acted on. This goes back to the early 1980s. Looking into the archives, the Israeli daily Maariv carried a front-page headline saying that producing Iranian nuclear bombs is at its 'final stage' with the help of Germany. A veteran Western diplomat stressed the fact that the Americans rely heavily on the Israelis in their information and analysis of the region. Though some agencies would still gather intelligence without Israeli involvement, decision-makers always take the Israeli view into account. 'Even as President Trump might look like he is acting on a gut instinct he still needs justifications within the administration's traditions,' the former diplomat told Al- Ahram Weekly. The buildup to invading and occupying Iraq in 2003 was mainly based on such falsifications. Not only Iraq but Libya had to announce ending its WMD programme, which nobody proved it was there in the first place. In a BBC interview in 2012, the late Libyan prime minister Shukri Ghanem denied all Western accusations against his country and said his government accepted to 'settle' the issues by paying billions of dollars to lift sanctions imposed on the country. He literally said: 'We thought it was easier for us to buy peace.' He was later found dead in a small canal in Vienna, a suspected assassination by Western intelligence agency operatives, with some reports accusing former French president Francois Sarkozy of commissioning the hit out of the fear Ghanem would disclose what he knew of the millions he received from Gaddafi as a political bribe. Before that, Ghanem confided to close friends that all that was said about a Libyan nuclear programme was not true, but again Gaddafi announced dismantling non-existent weapons programmes. So far, the Iranian official position is that its doctrine does not include producing a nuclear bomb. It seemed increasing enrichment to a higher level was a retaliatory measure since America's withdrawal in 2018 from the 2015 deal. It might have done that to improve its negotiating stance with world powers in a bid to seek lifting sanctions. Whatever the damage to its nuclear facilities, and whether it managed to move what is supposed to be a half tonne of highly enriched uranium from the targeted site before the strike, the consequences of the US involvement in the war on Iran are still to come. Some analysts are suggesting that Iran is not Iraq or Libya, but no one can clearly prophesy what will happen. British political commentator Owen Jones wrote in the Guardian: 'The warmongers were wrong about Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. Now watch them make the same mistake about Iran… Israel is the main source of terror and instability in the Middle East. But the West continually turns away from this reality.' Even in the Israeli media, many are questioning the logic of repeating the mistakes of Iraq and Libya. John Spencer, the executive director of the Urban Warfare Institute, wrote in the Jerusalem Post this week that 'Iran is not Libya. And it is not Iraq either'. He was following the notion that the Israeli-American mission is confined to the destruction of the nuclear programme. Though the US didn't discuss regime change publicly, Israel was not too shy to suggest it. * A version of this article appears in print in the 26 June, 2025 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
