In Pakistan, board sought as Zahir Jaffer on death row for Noor Mukadam's murder preparing mercy plea
ISLAMABAD – Zahir Zakir Jaffer, who was convicted of the gruesome murder of Noor Mukadam and sentenced to death, is preparing for a presidential mercy petition, according to a series of letters seen by Dawn.com as jail authorities have requested the formation of a medical board to evaluate his condition.
Noor, aged 27 years, was found murdered at Zahir's Islamabad residence in July 2021, with the probe revealing she was tortured before being beheaded. Zahir's death sentence by the trial court had been upheld by the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in 2023.
In May, the Supreme Court upheld the death sentence handed by two courts previously over the murder charges under Section 302B (premeditated murder) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). After the ruling by the apex court, a presidential pardon under Article 45 of the Constitution could possibly provide Zahir pardon, or reprieve, or remit, suspend or commute his sentence.
According to the letters, which are addressed to the hospital director at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims) from the superintendent at Adiala Jail, Zahir requires an opinion from a medical or psychiatric board before submitting a presidential mercy petition.
'The appeal of above mentioned Confirmed Condemned Prisoner (Zahir) was pending at [the] Supreme Court of Pakistan and the same has been dismissed,' the letter, dated July 8, read.
'Now the mercy petition of [the] subject cited Confirmed Condemned Prisoner has to be submitted before the Honourable President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. For that, the medical board and psychiatric board opinion is mandatory.'
The letter requested that a time and date be chosen for the medical and psychiatric boards to come to Adiala and examine Zahir.
The superintendent made the same request in another letter dated July 14.
In response to the first letter, Pims stated in a document seen by Dawn.com that Dr Shafqat Nawaz from the psychiatry department and Dr Amir Naveed from the neurology department will comprise the medical board.
Zahir was not only convicted of the murder, but was also sentenced to 25 years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs200,000 under Section 376 (punishment for rape) of the PPC.
In October last year, Noor's father had urged the apex court to take up the murder case pending for more than one and a half years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia News Network
16 hours ago
- Asia News Network
Pakistan's main opposition leaders ‘booted' from parliament
August 6, 2025 ISLAMABAD – Following their conviction by an anti-terrorism court in May 9 cases, the Election Commission of Pakistan on Tuesday disqualified nine lawmakers, including opposition leaders in the National Assembly and the Senate. This latest move, described by a PTI leader as a 'disqualification spree' by the commission, takes the number of lawmakers ousted in less than two weeks to over a dozen. Those sent home on Tuesday included NA Opposition Leader Omar Ayub, Senate Opposition leader Shibli Faraz, MNAs Zartaj Gul, Rai Haider Ali Khan, and Rai Hassan Nawaz Khan. Sunni Ittehad Council chief Hamid Raza — a key PTI ally — was also disqualified, besides three Punjab MPAs Muhammad Ansar Iqbal, Junaid Afzal Sahi, and Rai Muhammad Murtaza Iqbal. One-third of the nine lawmakers disqualified by the ECP hail from Faisalabad. A notification issued by the commission confirmed their disqualification and declared their seats vacant, on which by-elections will likely be held. Last week, an anti-terrorism court in Faisalabad sentenced 108 individuals to 10 years of imprisonment for their involvement in the May 9 riots sparked by the arrest of Imran Khan in a corruption case. On the other hand, PTI parliamentary leader in the Senate Barrister Syed Ali Zafar slammed what he called a 'disqualification spree' and said the recent wave of 'illegal moves' targeting specific PTI lawmakers was without any procedural consistency or final judicial determination. 'This raises the spectre of selective accountability and institutional overreach by the ECP, whose constitutional role is to be an impartial arbiter in electoral matters — not a substitute trial or appellate court,' he said, claiming such actions were 'politically motivated and legally unsustainable'. He was of the opinion that the ECP had violated due process and fair trial guaranteed under Article 10A of the Constitution. According to Senator Zafar, disqualification under Article 63(1)(h) takes place if a person has been convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced to more than two years, unless a period of five years has elapsed since release. 'Clearly, the conviction must be final and not sub judice. A mere trial court conviction does not attain finality if an appeal is pending before a higher court,' he said. He recalled that the Supreme Court in the Mohammad Nawaz Sharif v. ECP case (2018) held that disqualification under Article 63(1)(h) required that the conviction must have attained finality. 'Unless a conviction is upheld by the highest appellate forum, the ECP cannot assume the disqualification has materialised. In addition, Article 10A guarantees fair trial — the essential ingredient of which is that a person retains the presumption of innocence until all remedies are exhausted.' If the ECP begins to disqualify persons based on non-final convictions or FIRs/investigations, it amounts to pre-judging guilt, which is unconstitutional, he said, adding that the election watchdog had no original jurisdiction to determine disqualification. He said the ECP was an administrative/quasi-judicial body under Article 218(3) and relevant statutes and could act only after a final conviction or declaration was passed by a competent court. Barrister Zafar said the 'use of ECP to target politicians before their legal process was complete undermines the democratic order and judicial independence' and puts at risk public confidence in constitutional institutions. According to the senator, 'The legal framework, constitutional interpretation by the Supreme Court, and principles of natural justice all require that convictions must be final (i.e., all appeals decided) and disqualifications under Article 62(1)(f) must be based on a judicial declaration.' It may be noted that before these nine lawmakers, Punjab Assembly Opposition Leader Malik Ahmad Bhachar, MNA Abdul Latif from Chitral, Senator Ejaz Chaudhry, and MNA Mohammad Ahmed Chattha had already been disqualified in the last week of July. On July 15, Jamshed Dasti was also disqualified over 'fake academic credentials'. The commission had also announced a schedule for a by-election on the seat it had declared vacant following his disqualification, which it had to reverse on Tuesday in light of a Lahore High Court order. 'Pursuant to the order dated 30th July, 2025, passed by the Honourable Lahore High Court…the election programme for the conduct of by-election in NA-175 Muzaffargarh-l…is hereby suspended till further order of the Honourable Lahore High Court, Lahore in the above titled case,' a notification issued by the ECP read.
Straits Times
3 days ago
- Straits Times
Nearly 1,500 Singapore drivers fined for entering Johor without VEP tag since July 1
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Most of these drivers said they did not know enforcement had started, said JPJ senior enforcement director Kifli Ma Hassan on Aug 3. Nearly 1,500 summons have been issued to drivers of Singapore-registered vehicles since the enforcement on Vehicle Entry Permits (VEP) kicked in on July 1, said Johor's Road Transport Department (JPJ) on Aug 3. Most of these drivers said they did not know enforcement had started, said JPJ senior enforcement director Kifli Ma Hassan on Aug 3. The summonses came up to more than RM445,000 (S$135,780), amounting to 1,489 drivers being fined around RM300 each. 'We are taking firm action with zero tolerance. No more warnings – summonses are issued immediately, and offenders are required to settle them on the spot,' Mr Kifli said. 'In all the summonses issued, there was only one (driver) who did not cooperate. But when we wanted to seize the vehicle, he finally complied with paying the fine and registering for the VEP,' he said, as cited by Bernama. Mr Kifli was speaking to the media near the exit of the Bangunan Sultan Iskandar (BSI) checkpoint, which connects the Causeway with Woodlands Checkpoint, after conducting an inspection operation on Singapore-registered vehicles driving into Johor Bahru. He also showed reporters the mobile devices his officers use to check the validity status of VEP tags. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Live: Ong Beng Seng pleads guilty in case involving ex-transport minister Singapore ST Explains: What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case? Singapore The past and future of Choa Bungalow, a 'last reminder' of Marine Parade's former shoreline Multimedia How Singapore is rethinking nature in the city Business Are Gen Z-ers in Singapore worried about generative AI coming for their jobs? World Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price Business Buyers take up over 900 condo units at three new launches in Singapore over the weekend At least 14,379 vehicles have been inspected near Johor's two land checkpoints, and other spots within the state over 33 days as at July 2, Mr Kifli said, meaning nearly 90 per cent of cars checked found to have installed and activated their VEP tags. JPJ will continue to conduct inspections at locations frequented by Singaporean drivers, he said, without giving examples. He urged vehicle owners to register and activate their VEP tags to avoid inconvenience when entering or exiting Malaysia. A total of 277,930 tags have been issued to Singaporean drivers as of July 31, Mr Kifli added.
AsiaOne
4 days ago
- AsiaOne
Parents reject $30k settlement from kindergarten in JB after son suffocates to death in school van, Malaysia News
In May, a five-year-old Malaysian boy died after he was trapped in a locked school van in Taman Bukit Indah. His parents have since rejected a RM100,000 (S$30,000) settlement offer from the kindergarten, reported China Press on July 30. Previously, the family had filed a claim of RM2,059,301 (S$626,000) through a pro bono lawyer. In response, the kindergarten proposed a settlement of RM100,000 through a representative lawyer on July 11. In a press conference held on July 30, the boy's parents rejected the settlement money and his mother said the school van driver was hired by the kindergarten, so the school should be held accountable. Speaking in Mandarin, she said: "Can this RM100,000 buy my child's life? I don't want money, I just want my child back. You have no sincerity at all." The deceased's mother also pointed out that the kindergarten claimed there was a roll call on the day of the incident and her child was marked present even when he did not appear in class. "The school director and teacher said they took roll call but when I asked who signed my child in when he didn't show up in class, no one answered," she said, adding that she could not accept that the kindergarten did not admit its negligence. The school van driver was supposed to go to court on June 17 but he, his representative lawyer and guarantor did not appear. The judge scheduled the case for another hearing on July 18 and issued an arrest warrant for the driver. The boy's father said he hopes the Attorney General's Chambers in Putrajaya will review the case and charge not only the driver, but also the kindergarten operator, so that every party involved will be held accountable. Driver charged, but not kindergarten operator The parent's lawyer said that on June 20, he appealed to the Attorney General's Chambers on behalf of the boy's parent's, seeking an explanation as to why only the driver was charged under Malaysia's Section 31 of the Child Act 2001 (negligence causing hurt to a child), but not the kindergarten operator, who should have borne greater responsibility. He pointed out that the kindergarten operator was the driver's employer and failed to fulfill their supervisory responsibilities. The lawyer will file a lawsuit in the Johor Bahru High Court in August and the parties being sued are Tadika Perintis kindergarten, YK Education Group Sdn Bhd, Double Tree Transport Sdn Bhd and the school van driver. "The family believes that the position of the kindergarten operator and the drier is unreasonable, not only lacking in sincerity, but also irresponsible. The party at fault does not need to express sympathy, but rather express remorse and apologise," said the lawyer. He also emphasised that the family is not seeking monetary compensation and just want to see the kindergarten operator take responsibility, express remorse, apologise and provide an explanation for the incident. melissateo@
