logo
Washington County teacher facing sexual assault charges, accused of having sexual relationship with student

Washington County teacher facing sexual assault charges, accused of having sexual relationship with student

CBS News15-07-2025
A Washington County teacher is facing several sexual assault charges and is accused of having a sexual relationship with a student.
North Strabane Township police have charged Justin White, 48, of Canonsburg, with 13 counts of institutional sexual assault and criminal use of a communication device.
White has served as a teacher at Canon-McMillan High School.
The student's father found "concerning messages and images" on his daughter's cell phone last month that "suggested a sexual relationship between his daughter and her teacher," according to a media release from District Attorney Jason Walsh.
The student was interviewed and said that while she was a student, she engaged in a sexual relationship with White. The alleged acts occurred in various locations, including White's classroom.
Through an investigation, police also uncovered over 8,000 messages, 14,000 emails and a document with daily interactions between the victim and White "that were of a sexual and romantic nature," the media release adds.
North Strabane police also executed search warrants on the Canon-McMillan School District and found video footage of the student and White entering the school on two separate occasions on Sundays in April 2025.
A preliminary hearing date for White has not been set.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The surprising details of fashion entrepreneur Christine Hunsicker's fraud indictment
The surprising details of fashion entrepreneur Christine Hunsicker's fraud indictment

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The surprising details of fashion entrepreneur Christine Hunsicker's fraud indictment

Clothing tech entrepreneur and CaaStle founder Christine Hunsicker is out on $1 million bail after she was charged on six counts of cheating customers out of more than $300 million over the past six years in a complex fraud scheme that inlcuded wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, making false statements to a financial institution, and aggravated identity theft. Southwest Airlines' open seating is ending: Here's what the new 8-group boarding process will look like Here's exactly how much you'll save on your 2026 taxes, by income bracket: Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill benefits Why Third Amendment memes are suddenly taking over social media Hunsicker pleaded not guilty in a Manhattan federal court on Friday, after she turned herself in to authorities, and could face decades in prison if convicted, according to CNBC, who reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a related civil lawsuit. Here's what to know about the indictment. Why was Hunsicker indicted? Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, who was working with the FBI, announced on Friday that Hunsicker is charged with forging documents, fabricating audits, and making material misrepresentations about her company's financial condition in an alleged scheme to defraud investors in her clothing technology companies CaaStle Inc. and P180. The documents allege she continued to solicit millions of dollars in investments for both companies and 'persisted in her scheme' even after law enforcement agents approached her about the fraud. 'The promise of pre-IPO technology companies can be fertile ground for fraudsters who play on investor euphoria,' Clayton said in a statement. According to the statement, the fashion tech entrepreneur and founder of CaaStle, a 'clothing-as-a-service' business that enabled clothing brands to rent inventory to consumers, promoted the company 'as a rapidly growing business valued at more than $1.4 billion, [although she] knew that CaaStle was in financial distress with limited cash and significant expenses.' To raise the capital for CaaStle's operations, she 'provided investors with falsified income statements, fake audited financial statements, fictitious bank records, and sham corporate documents that grossly overstated CaaStle's operating profit, revenue, and available cash.' Surprising details in Hunsicker's indictment The indictment alleges, among other things, that Hunsicker provided two fabricated audits to investors and conducted internet searches for the terms 'fraud,' 'created an audit firm fake,' and 'JP morgan 4m records faked,' an apparent reference to fraud charges related to JPMorgan Chase's acquisition of the college financial aid startup called Frank, which resulted in the federal prosecution of its founder Charlie Javice. (Javice was convicted in March of defrauding JPMorgan Chase of $175 million by exaggerating her customer base tenfold, according to National Public Radio.) It also accuses Hunsicker of fabricating the existence of CaaStle shareholders, falsely claiming that the shareholders needed money for a 'family health emergency' or due to the FTX cryptocurrency exchange collapse. She allegedly then used investors' money to raise new capital for CaaStle, while concealing that the company needed cash. And to 'maintain the fiction,' she issued fake capitalization tables to the investors in order to demonstrate that they had purchased existing CaaStle shares. According to the documents, Hunsicker's scheme also allegedly involved providing an investor with a fake screenshot of CaaStle's bank accounts showing nearly $200 million in available cash, although the company had less than $200,000 in available cash at the time, in or around September 2024. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Obama blasts 'bizarre' Trump claim of 2016 election 'treason'
Obama blasts 'bizarre' Trump claim of 2016 election 'treason'

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Obama blasts 'bizarre' Trump claim of 2016 election 'treason'

Donald Trump has accused Barack Obama of "treason", claiming he plotted to sabotage his first presidency by linking him to alleged Russian election meddling. "They tried to steal the election," Trump said at the White House as he claimed Obama had sought to undermine his 2016 victory over Hillary Clinton. A spokesman for Obama issued a rare retort, calling Trump's attack "a weak attempt at distraction". Trump was referring to a report from US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard last week that accused Obama and his national security team of a "years-long coup against President Trump" - findings that Democrats have branded false. Trump's comments on Tuesday came as he faced questions from reporters about late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial. The president's administration has been under pressure to release more information about the well-connected convicted paedophile. US House speaker shuts down chamber to block Epstein vote "The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold," Trump told reporters. "It's time to go after people, Obama's been caught directly," he added. "He's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of," Trump said. His comments came as he hosted Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr in the Oval Office. Obama spokesman Patrick Rodenbush said: "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." Friday's report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified emails between Obama aides, and argued they had suppressed intelligence findings that Russia had failed in probing attempts to hack US election databases. A declassified copy of the president's daily briefing prepared by US security service chiefs for Obama weeks after Trump beat Clinton and dated 8 December 2016 said: "We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure." But the FBI dissented from the findings it had initially co-authored, and a meeting was held at the White House a day later with top officials, according to the report. Afterwards an aide to then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper emailed intelligence chiefs asking them to create a new assessment "per the president's request" detailing the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election". Gabbard argued the emails showed evidence of a "treasonous conspiracy" to harm Trump, and she threatened to refer Obama administration officials to the justice department for prosecution. But Obama's spokesman said in his statement on Tuesday: "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." The US intelligence community published an assessment in January 2017 concluding that Russia had sought to damage Clinton's campaign and boost Trump in the vote three months earlier. US officials found this effort had included Russian bot farms on social media and hacking of Democratic emails, but they ultimately concluded the impact was probably limited and did not actually change the election result. A 2020 bipartisan report by the Senate intelligence committee also found that Russia had tried to help Trump's 2016 campaign. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was a senator at the time, was among the Republicans who co-signed that report. The first two years of Trump's first presidency were overshadowed by an investigation from his own justice department into whether he had conspired with Russia to sway the 2016 outcome. The resulting Mueller report found a lack of evidence that Trump or his campaign co-ordinated with the Kremlin, and no-one was ever charged with such crimes. A subsequent special counsel inquiry, the Durham report, found the original FBI probe had lacked "analytical rigor" and relied on "raw, unanalysed and uncorroborated intelligence".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store