Tourism violations in Bahrain
Inspectors flagged 224 breaches at tourist establishments across Manama's Fourth Constituency, with 119 cases resulting in closures, licence suspensions or written warnings, according to the Ministry of Tourism.
The figures came in reply to a parliamentary question from MP Hassan Bukhammas, who had asked about the number of tourist facilities operating in the area, how many licence requests had been made and approved, how often inspections were carried out, and how many staff were handling them. Since the start of the current legislative term in 2022, the Ministry said it had carried out 701 inspections in the constituency.
These included regular visits, surprise checks and joint campaigns with other bodies including the Labour Market Regulatory Authority (LMRA), the Ministry of Industry and Commerce, the General Directorate of Traffic and Civil Defence. Inspectors looked into licences, business records, building use, safety, cleanliness and labour conditions. Facilities Tourism-related facilities in the area include 42 hotels, 116 restaurants and 52 furnished flats rented on a daily or weekly basis. Since 2022, the Ministry has received 135 requests for tourism licences from establishments in the constituency.
Of these, 108 were approved. The Ministry currently has 16 inspectors and enforcement officers on its books and plans to add more, working with the Civil Service Bureau. Procedures This follows Decree No. 82 of 2023 which split licensing and inspection work at the Bahrain Tourism and Exhibitions Authority (BTEA) in a bid to tidy up procedures.
Breaches logged by inspectors covered a range of issues including unpaid hotel service charges, failure to submit audited accounts, letting out space without permission, running venues without written approval and altering activities beyond what the licence allows. Some tourist restaurants were also caught ignoring permitted working hours. Once a breach is recorded, the person in charge of the venue is called in to answer questions from enforcement staff.
Findings Depending on the findings, cases are either passed to the Public Prosecution or dealt with by administrative order or both. Action is taken under Decree-Law No. 15 of 1986 which covers tourism rules. The Ministry's response ended with a short note of thanks to the MP and an expression of readiness to continue working with Parliament on the matter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
Saudi Arabia Visit Visa Guide 2025: eVisa, Visa On Arrival And Transit Options, Explained
Saudi Arabia welcomed around 116 million domestic and international tourists in 2024, marking a six per cent increase compared to the previous year, according to the Ministry of Tourism's latest Annual Statistical Report. The growth highlights the Kingdom's rising profile as a global travel destination, supported by its expanding hospitality sector, new attractions, and improved visa policies. To accommodate this surge in visitors, Saudi Arabia offers several types of visit visas depending on nationality, residency, and purpose of travel. Whether you are planning to perform Umrah, reunite with family, explore the country for tourism, or attend business meetings, here is a detailed guide to the visa options available. Travellers from eligible countries can obtain a visa on arrival at Saudi Arabia's airports and land or sea entry points. On arrival, you can either use self-service kiosks or apply directly at the passport control counter. You may qualify for a visa on arrival if you: Hold a valid Schengen, US, or UK visit visa. Are a permanent resident in the US, EU, or UK. For most eligible nationalities, the Saudi eVisa is the most convenient option. Applications can be submitted online through the official eVisa platform. The eVisa is issued electronically and delivered by email once approved. Who can apply for a Saudi eVisa? You may apply if you are: A citizen of an eligible country listed on the Saudi visa platform. A holder of a valid Schengen, US, or UK visit visa. A permanent resident in the US, EU, or UK. A resident in one of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. To confirm whether you qualify for a Saudi eVisa or visa on arrival, visit By selecting 'visit' as your purpose of travel, entering your nationality, and indicating your residency (if applicable), the system will show the visa options available to you. If you are not eligible for an eVisa or visa on arrival, you can still apply for a Saudi visit visa through embassies or authorised service centres. This option caters to tourism, family visits, Umrah, and business purposes. Family and Friends – For family visits, a Saudi resident or citizen must initiate the application by sending an invitation. The guest must have a family relationship with the inviter. Tourism – Visitors from non-eligible countries can apply through visa service centres (if available in their country) or directly through Saudi embassies. Applications are submitted via the KSA Visa platform and finalised at the relevant embassy. Umrah – Eligible travellers may perform Umrah using an eVisa, visa on arrival, or transit visa through Flynas and Saudia Airlines. If none of these options apply, an Umrah visa must be arranged through licensed Umrah agents, visa offices, or Saudi embassies. Business – A business visit visa is issued for meetings, conferences, and commercial activities. Applicants require an invitation letter from a Saudi company, outlining the purpose of the visit. If no letter is available, details about the applicant's business must be provided in the application. Saudi Arabia also issues transit visas for travellers passing through the Kingdom by air, land, or sea. The stopover visa is a special option for passengers flying with Saudia Airlines or Flynas. It allows travellers to stay in the country for up to 96 hours (four days) and can be used to perform Umrah or visit holy sites. The visa is free of charge, with only processing and mandatory medical insurance fees required. Important note – This information is intended as a general guide. Travellers should always verify the latest requirements through Saudi Arabia's official visa platform at or contact the support centre at inside Saudi Arabia – 920011114 and outside Saudi Arabia: +966920011114
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Mobility Unlocked
TDT | Manama LMRA Clarifies Job Transfer Rules The Labour Market Regulatory Authority (LMRA) has issued a clear reminder of how expatriate workers can legally transfer from one employer to another, emphasising transparency and the importance of documented resignation. Transfer process Under the outlined steps, the new employer must initiate the transfer by submitting a work permit request through the Expatriate Management System (EMS). A critical requirement is proof that the current employer has received the employee's resignation, a safeguard to prevent disputes over whether notice has been given. Once filed, the LMRA and relevant entities review the application before electronically forwarding it to the current employer for action. The rules give employers some control, but only within a set framework. If the worker has been with the current employer for less than one year, the employer may approve or reject the transfer request. However, if the worker has completed more than one year, the current employer cannot block the move but is authorised to set the notice period in line with the law, typically 30 days and up to 90 days depending on the contract. Final step After all requirements are fulfilled and approvals processed, the expatriate may join the new employer. The LMRA frames this sequence under its guiding principles of 'Transparency, Responsibility, Stability,' assuring both workers and employers that transfers occur with accountability on all sides. By setting resignation proof and the one-year rule at the heart of the process, the LMRA seeks to balance workplace stability with expatriates' right to mobility. The move is part of its ongoing efforts to keep labour market transitions orderly and dispute-free.
Daily Tribune
4 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Fifth Minor Criminal Court Acquits Asian Employee of Embezzlement Charges
TDT | Manama The Fifth Minor Criminal Court has acquitted a woman in her forties, an Asian employee, of charges of embezzling funds from a company managing a chain of restaurants. The defendant was represented by lawyer Reem Al-Mahari, who argued that the case was maliciously filed by the company, which accused the employee of misappropriating company funds. Al-Mahari explained that her client worked in an administrative role, which included receiving checks to cover routine expenses such as workers' and employees' payments, transfers to the Labour Market Regulatory Authority, social insurance contributions, and petty cash. She submitted evidence showing that the funds in question had indeed been transferred to the relevant authorities. She also presented a labor court judgment indicating an unresolved dispute in which the company had withheld the employee's labor rights. The Public Prosecution had charged the defendant with embezzling BD 1,420 between 2023 and 2024, in Muharraq Governorate, alleging she misappropriated cash belonging to the company that was under her custody by virtue of her job. The accusation was based on an accounting report submitted by the complainant, in addition to his statements. However, the court ruled that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove the charges. It noted that the case documents lacked reliable proof linking the defendant to the alleged crime, and that the accounting report did not conclusively establish embezzlement. The expert's findings only confirmed that the defendant had issued seven checks totaling BD 1,420, without proving any wrongdoing. The court further observed that the existence of labor disputes between the defendant and the complainant company added weight to the possibility of malicious intent behind the case. Based on Article 255 of the Criminal Procedure Law No. 46 of 2002, the court concluded that the charges were unsubstantiated and ruled to acquit the defendant.
