DStv cuts ties with MacG's Podcast and Chill
'To keep our content slate dynamic and engaging, we will continue to make adjustments to our roster.'
Following a controversial statement about one of South Africa's loved celebrities by Podcast and Chill host Macgyver Mukwevho, popularly known as MacG, Dstv has decided to stop airing the show on its platform.
MacG has been in the hot seat after making a comment about media personality Minnie Dlamini's private part in one of the episodes. However, Dstv did not air the episode in question; it was only aired on the Podcast and Chill channel on YouTube.
Dstv's digital distribution partner, Leading Edge Growth, confirmed to Timeslive that Dstv has removed the popular podcast.
End of an era for MacG
Leading Edge Growth CEO Lufuno Maliavusa gave the confirmation that the show has been pulled.
Citing 'To keep our content slate dynamic and engaging, we will continue to make adjustments to our roster. Notably, season one of Podcast and Chill and season one of Awkward Dates are nearing their final episodes in the coming weeks, making way for fresh and exciting content to take their place in these time slots.'
This follows after MultiChoice refused to confirm the news of the show's cancellation. The Group only said it 'licensed a slate of podcasts' from Leading Edge Growth, which was 'responsible for curating the podcast slate, taking into account audience dynamics and content demand.'
However, MacG is reportedly 'unmoved' by the news, as he is 'pursuing other endeavours'.
ALSO READ: MacG's commenting goes beyond the bounds of free speech
Deputy Minister about MacG's show
The episode that spoke about Dlamini received attention from the Deputy Minister of Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities, Mmapaseka Steve Letsike.
She said MacG's comments were nauseating in their vulgarity and must be regarded as an unconstitutional violation of Dlamini's rights to freedom and security of the person, equality, and human dignity as enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa.
Letsike wanted MacG to be referred to the Parliament's Portfolio Committee, however, this was declined.
Parliament declines to summon MacG
'I think the majority of members are not in favour of us proceeding as the honorable minister, deputy minister had requested us to do,' the committee's chairperson Liezl van der Merwe said.
She pointed out that Dlamini had not approached Parliament nor laid a criminal case.
'I think all of you have touched on this point that if we do decide it is our mandate to proceed with hearing one case of cyber-bullying, it would mean that this portfolio committee would have to extend that to every other person because they cannot be selective in choosing one case.'
ALSO READ: Media bullies should not be shielded by popularity
MacG apologises
MacG has since apologised in one his episodes, saying he never intended to offend anyone.
'I want to apologise, first and foremost, to all the female chillers, and women in general in SA, I might have offended with that comment. That was not the intention. We never say things to offend people,' he said.
'I want to extend an invite to Minnie Dlamini to the show. You are more than welcome to come.
'This thing started on the podcast—let's end it on the podcast. She said some things, I said some things. Let's squash it once and for all.'
Dlamini to pursue legal recourse
Dlamini said she was hurt and shocked by the comments made about her body and personal life on the podcast.
'Over the past few weeks, I have watched in disbelief and deep pain as my name, body, and dignity were dragged through the mud of public discourse,' she said.
She described the remarks made by MacG as 'vile, humiliating, and inexcusable'.
Dlamini said she is taking legal action to stand up for herself and the dignity of women.
NOW READ: MacG says his partnership with MultiChoice is 'a natural evolution' despite it being criticised as a lazy move by the broadcaster [VIDEO]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
EFF loses fuel levy court challenge
EFF leader Julius Malema. (X) The The party's application, lodged against Finance Minister The EFF argued that it was unlawful because it was not introduced through a Money Bill, as required by section 77 of the Constitution. The party described the court's ruling as 'a betrayal of the poor and the working class' and accused Godongwana's office of sidestepping democratic procedures in the management of public finances. 'Taxation without representation is arbitrary and unconstitutional,' the party said. The ANC-led government of national unity was doing everything in its power 'to protect the interests of those who continue to benefit from the apartheid economy, while subjecting the masses of our people to economic misery'. Godongwana has insisted that he acted within existing legislation. In his He added that it had been frozen since 2021, and the increase was necessary to preserve the real value of the levy in the face of inflation and declining revenue. He warned that halting the increase would result in a R3.5 billion shortfall for the fiscus, necessitating further borrowing, spending cuts or alternative tax increases. 'The fuel levy is not a new tax. It is a regulatory adjustment falling under existing legislation and its increase does not require a Money Bill,' Godongwana argued in the affidavit, adding that freezing the levy any further would compromise the integrity of the budget and limit the state's ability to deliver services. The court's ruling allowed the increase to proceed and, on Wednesday, fuel prices rose accordingly for the month of June. However, a dip in global oil prices and modest strengthening of the rand brought slight relief for motorists. EFF leader 'It is not the EFF that got rejected; it is the people of South Africa who lost. When you increase fuel, you increase everything, transport, food, the cost of living. Our people are already suffering. This is an extra blow to the working class,' he said. The EFF would not abandon the matter, Malema said, indicating that it was considering further legal avenues, as well as a legislative push in parliament to close loopholes that allow the treasury to act unilaterally. EFF treasurer general Omphile Maotwe, who has led the party's engagements on budget matters, reiterated its position that the matter should have come before parliament. 'The levy seeks to recover revenue after the courts invalidated the unlawful VAT increase proposed earlier this year. By using the Customs and Excise Act to bypass section 77 of the Constitution, the minister is undermining the democratic function of parliament and the people's right to participate in fiscal policy decisions,' she said. Maotwe said the EFF would submit proposals to amend the relevant sections of the Customs and Excise Act and the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act to ensure no future taxation could be implemented without a parliamentary vote. While the EFF's application was dismissed, legal observers say the court did not definitively rule on the constitutional questions raised, which could leave the door open for further challenge. While the government is technically within its rights to use the Customs and Excise Act to amend levies, the broader question of public accountability in tax decisions remains unresolved, constitutional law expert professor Pierre de Vos said. 'There's a grey area here. The Constitution requires that money bills originate in the National Assembly, but there are long-standing statutes like the Customs and Excise Act that give the executive certain powers. Whether those powers are now unconstitutional is a debate we may see return to the courts.' The EFF said it would use all platforms, legal and political, to hold the treasury accountable. 'We will not rest while unelected officials continue to impose taxes behind the back of parliament. The people must have a voice in every cent that is taken from their pockets,' Malema said.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Meyiwa trial judge offside
It is deeply concerning that Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng, presiding over the high-profile Senzo Meyiwa murder trial, made a racially charged remark broadcast live, says the writer. In a country still navigating the painful legacy of racial division, those entrusted with upholding the Constitution must be held to the highest standards of impartiality, professionalism, and respect. It is deeply concerning that Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng, presiding over the high-profile Senzo Meyiwa murder trial, made a racially charged remark broadcast live. The frustrated judge said 'This is what happens in a South Africa run by Blacks. A White advocate will never have the gall to ask me that,' in response to a formal request by Advocate Charles Mnisi, who had advised the court that he would be unavailable on Monday due to participation in Sunday's Comrades Marathon. While the judge's frustration over delays in this long-running and emotionally charged trial may be understandable, resorting to racially divisive language is entirely unacceptable. It undermines the integrity of the judiciary and risks inflaming already fragile race relations in South Africa. Decorum in court is not just about the behaviour of lawyers and attendees, it begins with the conduct of the bench. Judges must embody the fairness and dignity they expect from others. These comments fall far short of that standard. The trial of those accused of murdering Orlando Pirates and Bafana Bafana captain Senzo Meyiwa, a national tragedy, must be conducted with the utmost seriousness and integrity. We call on the Judicial Service Commission to urgently review these remarks and reaffirm the principle that justice must be administered without fear, favour, or prejudice. Brett Herron, GOOD Secretary-General
The South African
7 hours ago
- The South African
Gareth Cliff mocks Fikile's intelligence in shady post
Gareth Cliff has continued his longstanding social media feud with Fikile Mbalula with another shady post. The former shock jock and the politician have often butt heads over their views on trending South African topics. On his X account, Gareth Cliff joined many South Africans who reacted to Floyd Shivambu's resignation from the MK Party. The Secretary-General was forced to leave his post after he bragged about visiting fugitive Shepherd Bushiri at his home in Malawi. Fikile Mbalula – who also has a much-publicised feud with Floyd – threw shade at his political nemesis. Fikile tweeted: 'Zuma uSleg, they made Floyd draft the constitution to only use the same constitution to remove him'. Floyd clapped back: 'Like he decisively used the Constitution to take the 'mighty' ANC to 40% and left you begging for cooperation with the white minority.' He added: 'I respect and will forever respect President Zuma'. Weighing into the fiery face-off, Gareth Cliff responded: 'Floyd is smarter than Fikile.' He cheekily posted a proverb referring to Fikile: 'In the land of the blind, the one-eyed is king.' Over the years, Fikile Mbalula and Gareth Cliff have often taken shots at each other on the X platform [formerly Twitter]. In 2014, Fikile gave the Cliff Central founder a tongue-lashing after he questioned why the late Orlando Pirates goalkeeper Senzo Meyiwa was given a state funeral. Fikile clapped back: 'Who paid for Verwoerd's funeral? And who paid for PW Botha's funeral? It is the state, did they deserve it?… We never asked because we respect the dead. In 2016, the then Minister of Sport threw shade at Gareth Cliff's axing from talent show, Idols South Africa , after the latter seemingly defended convicted racist Penny Sparrow. 'M-Net should tell him to jump over his surname', he posted and deleted. Last year, Gareth Cliff shamed Fikile for driving a multi-million rand G-Wagon during the ANC's election drive in underprivileged areas. Reposting a clip of the ANC Secretary-General, the Gareth tweeted: 'This is like when John Kerry flies in a private jet and criticizes rich people for their carbon footprint; or when every other hypocrite tells you to do as they say, not as they do. 'Fikile loves a G-Wagon and couldn't say no, even though this one was lent to him by a crook. He added: 'These venal, grasping parvenus are always caught trying to become the crass rich people they hate, but we're expected to pretend it's not obvious. 'Tsek'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
