Undertrial killed by inmates: What Delhi High Court has said in the past on security in courts
Two assailants, dressed up as lawyers, had shot at Jitender alias Gogi, who was also a high-risk prisoner, in September 2021. Gogi was being produced in court with the police. Responding to the firing, the police fired back at the assailants. The incident left Gogi and the two assailants dead.
Here is an overview of the HC's remarks in recent years on security in courts.
September 2021
A division bench of the High Court, on September 30, 2021, took suo motu cognisance of a firing incident at the Rohini court complex on September 24, 2021, with three lives lost, and recorded that 'there is an imminent and urgent need to take effective measures to ensure that such incidents do not recur' and to ensure 'safety and security' of the 'advocates, litigants, court staff, witnesses as well as the judges and judicial officers.' The court had immediately suggested interim measures such as the deployment of sufficient police personnel in all court complexes, installation of CCTVs at all strategic points for round-the-clock vigilance in district court complexes as well as the High Court complex.
Among other measures, the court suggested the installation of high-tech metal detectors and baggage scanners, provision of UVSS (Under Vehicle Surveillance System), efficient frisking mechanism, regular meetings with stakeholders concerned about the security arrangements, and specialised training for the police personnel deployed at the HC and district court complexes.
It had sought responses from a slew of stakeholders, including the Delhi government, the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Ministry of Home Affairs, Bar Council of India, the Coordination Committees of all district courts, and the Delhi High Court Bar Association, along with the bar associations of all the district courts.
Subsequently, in October 2021, the Delhi Police had told the HC that security of all seven district courts in the city was taken over by the Security Unit, a specialised unit, and that necessary security arrangements were being made, and more police personnel were being deployed. It had also told the court that it is conducting 'a detailed joint security review of all seven District Courts by seven Security Unit team headed by an Officer at the level of ACP.'
The police had also told the court that it is taking several measures such as deployment of a higher number of security police personnel for access control in all the Courts with extra support by the Central Paramilitary Forces ('CPMF'), apart from measures such as installing different security gadgets such as door frame and hand-held metal detectors, X-ray scanners, CCTVs etc.
In November 2021, the HC had issued directions to the Delhi Police Commissioner to constitute a team of experts to undertake a security audit of complexes of the High Court as well as all the district courts, which would factor in the various factors peculiar to each of the complexes. Based on the audit, the Delhi police chief was also directed to undertake a 'periodical review' of the security arrangements.
The November 24, 2021, order further records that concerning high-risk Under Trial Prisoners (UTPs), 'as far as possible, their appearance may be secured through virtual mode. Wherever or whenever there is a necessity to produce such UTPs, physically abundant care and precautions shall be taken in terms of providing adequate police escort and checking/frisking etc,' adding that 'the directions shall be scrupulously followed by all concerned'.
April 2023
In April 2023, another shooting took place at the Saket District Court complex, where an advocate had shot at a woman and injured her. Taking note of the incident, on April 26, 2023, the HC recorded that 'security personnel deployed in various court premises, including the High Court, are facing some resistance in the matter of frisking and checking of cars.'
The court had then suggested that joint meetings be held between bar associations and senior police officers while counsels for the Delhi government and the union government had assured the court that they would ensure 'proper security arrangements are in place to avoid any such incident in the future.'
July 2023
On July 5, 2023, another firing incident between two groups of lawyers took place at the Tis Hazari court complex.
Taking note of the incident, Delhi Police's Sandeep Byala, DCP, Security Courts, had told HC that frisking of lawyers and litigants and those who are entering the court building is 'being rigorously done in all the court complexes' and at the time, Byala had told HC that the Delhi Police 'is beefing up the security arrangements in all the Court complexes, including the High court of Delhi.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
High court upholds 6-month jail term in cheque bounce case
Chennai: Noting that a borrower cannot evade repayment merely on the ground that the loan amount was unaccounted for in the lender's income tax returns, Madras high court upheld the conviction of a man in a cheque bounce case. Justice G K Ilanthiraiyan dismissed a revision petition filed by E Dhatchinamoorthy, who challenged his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution said, Dhatchinamoorthy borrowed 3 lakh from complainant S Seenuvasan and issued a cheque towards repayment. The cheque was returned dishonoured for 'funds insufficient'. Despite a statutory notice, he failed to repay. The Tindivanam judicial magistrate sentenced him to six months of simple imprisonment and directed him to pay compensation equal to the cheque amount. The conviction was later confirmed by the II additional district judge, Tindivanam, in appeal. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai | Gold Rates Today in Chennai | Silver Rates Today in Chennai Before the HC, the petitioner argued that the loan was not accounted for in the complainant's tax returns and hence could not be considered a legally enforceable debt. He also questioned the admissibility of a photocopy of the cheque marked before the trial court. The court noted that the borrower admitted to taking the money and issuing the cheque. "Whether the loan amount is accounted or not is not the concern of the borrower. Once the money is borrowed, it has to be repaid," Justice G K Ilanthiraiyan said. Holding that both the trial and appellate courts rightly convicted him, the HC said the conviction 'does not require any interference' and dismissed the revision. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Merely crying of woman cannot make out case of dowry harassment: Delhi HC
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has held that mere fact that a woman was crying, cannot per se make out any case of dowry harassment. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna made this observation while dismissing a petition challenging the discharge of a husband and his family from charges of cruelty and dowry harassment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to the prosecution, the woman, who married in December 2010, allegedly faced harassment and dowry demands from her husband and in-laws. Her family claimed to have spent nearly Rs 4 lakh on the wedding and later alleged that her husband and in-laws demanded a motorcycle, cash, and a gold bracelet. The woman, a mother of two daughters, passed away on 31 March 2014. "Statement of the sister of the deceased under Section 161 Cr.P.C. was recorded wherein she also stated that on the occasion of Holi, she had called her sister and found her crying. However, merely because the deceased was crying, cannot per se make out any case of dowry harassment," the high court said. The trial court had discharged the accused, noting that the woman's death was due to pneumonia, a natural cause. The High Court also highlighted that the post-mortem report confirmed pneumonia as the cause of death, with no evidence of cruelty. "In the present case, to bring in the clause of cruelty leading to the death of the woman, it may be noted that the deceased had died not because of any act of cruelty but for natural reasons... Therefore, Clause (a) to the Explanation annexed to Section 498A IPC is not attracted," the Court said. It also observed that the father of the woman neither mentioned specific incidents nor did he provide proof of giving money to the accused. "Such bald assertions, in the given situation, cannot be held to be even making out a prima facie case of harassment," the judge added. (With inputs from agencies)
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
High Court orders Andhra Pradesh Government to strictly adhere to IRC guidelines related to speed-breakers
The Andhra Pradesh High Court (HC) directed the State of Andhra Pradesh (A.P.), represented by Chief Secretary, A.P. Road Development Corporation (A.P.-RDC), Municipal Administration and PR & RD Departments and the Director General of Police, to strictly adhere to the guidelines laid down by the Union Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Indian Road Congress (IRC) on the construction of speed-breakers. Judiciary a strong pillar of democracy, says Andhra Pradesh High Court Chief Justice The judges ordered the respondents to ensure that the existing speed-breakers are brought in conformity to the latest guidelines and new speed-breakers are also constructed accordingly. They were hearing a PIL filed by advocate Thandava Yogesh, who argued that the guidelines prescribed by the IRC for constructing speed-breakers are not being followed, moreover, there are a large number of illegal speed-breakers. As per the extant specifications, the speed-breakers should be of 3.70 metres width and 10 centimetres height with bumps of 17 centimeter radius. Four sworn-in permanent judges of Andhra Pradesh High Court He contended that no action has been taken even after the Chief Engineer (R&B - State Highways) & Managing Director of APRDC filed a memo in February apprising the court that all the Superintending Engineers, Executive Engineers and others were instructed to identify and remove the illegal speed-breakers on all State Highways, major district roads and other district roads and to remove the defective speed-breakers or rectify them to the IRC standards. Mr. Yogesh had also appealed to the court to order that the speed-breakers should be built with white and yellow reflective paint to enhance visibility, especially at night, and that signage boards be put up 40 metres ahead (of the speed-breakers) for the sake of safety. Justice Battu Devanand takes oath as Andhra Pradesh High Court Judge The petitioner noted that numerous studies revealed that speed-breakers not only cause accidents but also lead to serious damages such as compression of the spinal cord and vertebrae, disk-prolapse, neck pain, slip-disk, spine injuries and back pain if they are not constructed scientifically. Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice Ravi Cheemalapati noted on their order that the special government pleader S. Pranathi submitted to the court that there have been some changes in the relevant IRC guidelines and the same would be placed on record.
