Europe's top human rights court says Russia responsible for 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines flight
The European Court of Human Rights, part of the Council of Europe rights body, is tasked with implementing the European human rights convention in signatory countries.
Wednesday's largely symbolic ruling comes after the Council of Europe excluded Russia following its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Moscow dropped out of the European rights convention in September that year.
The ECHR however still handles cases against Russia that were brought before that date.
A panel of 17 judges found Russia violated the convention through "extrajudicial killing of civilians and Ukrainian military personnel" outside of combat, "torture", "forced labour", "unlawful and arbitrary detention of civilians" as well as looting.
The judges also ruled that Russia had violated the European rights convention through "the transfer to Russia and, in many cases, the adoption there of Ukrainian children".
The court said Russia "must without delay release or safely return all persons who were deprived of liberty on Ukrainian territory under occupation by the Russian and Russian-controlled forces."
It added that Moscow should cooperate in the establishment of an international and independent mechanism to help identify "all children transferred from Ukraine to Russia and Russian-controlled territory" before September 2022 to restore contact between them and their families, and enable their safe reunification.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Wednesday said Russia had no intention of complying with the decision of the court, whose rulings it considered to be "null and void".
"HISTORIC"
The court issued its verdict in response to four complaints.
Ukraine had filed three of these over events from 2014 to 2022, and the Netherlands had filed a fourth over the downing over eastern Ukraine of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur on July 17, 2014.
The UN's aviation agency has blamed Moscow for the tragedy that killed all 298 on board.
The ECHR found that "the suffering of the next of kin of the victims of the downing of flight MH17" violated the right to freedom from torture and punishment.
Ukraine celebrated what it said was a "historic decision".
Its justice ministry said the court's recognition of "systematic and widespread human rights violations committed by Russia" was a "victory on the international stage".
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said it was "an important step toward justice".
"The court has designated Russia as responsible for the downing of MH17 and the death of its passengers, including 196 Dutch nationals," he said.
Piet Ploeg, who lost his brother, step-sister and nephew in the tragedy, said it was an "important day".
"I don't think Russia will pay anything but it is not about money today," he said.
"It is about getting justice and recognition and maybe getting apologies... You never know."
Usually individuals file cases at Europe's top human rights court, appealing to it as a last resort in cases where they have exhausted all domestic legal avenues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
20 minutes ago
- CNA
EU, US strike biggest trade deal
TURNBERRY, United Kingdom: The United States and European Union on Sunday (Jul 27) clinched what President Donald Trump described as the "biggest-ever" deal to resolve a transatlantic tariff stand-off that threatened to explode into a full-blown trade war. Trump emerged from a high-stakes meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf resort in Scotland to announce that a baseline tariff of 15 per cent would be levied on EU exports to the US. The deal, which the leaders struck in around an hour, came as the clock ticked down on an Aug 1 deadline to avoid an across-the-board US levy of 30 per cent on European goods. "We've reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody. This is probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity," said Trump. Trump said the 15 per cent tariff would apply across the board, including for Europe's crucial automobile sector, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. As part of the deal, Trump said the 27-nation EU bloc had agreed to purchase "US$750 billion worth of energy" from the US, as well as make US$600 billion in additional investments. Von der Leyen said the "significant" purchases of US liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels would come over three years, as part of the bloc's bid to diversify away from Russian sources. Negotiating on behalf of the EU's 27 countries, von der Leyen had been pushing hard to salvage a trading relationship worth an annual US$1.9 trillion in goods and services. "It's a good deal," the EU chief told reporters. "It will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," she said. She said bilateral tariff exemptions had been agreed on a number of "strategic products", notably aircraft, certain chemicals, some agricultural products and critical raw materials. Von der Leyen said the EU still hoped to secure further so-called "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be "sorted out" in coming days. Trump also said EU countries, which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within NATO, would be purchasing "hundreds of billions of dollars worth of military equipment". "BEST WE COULD GET" The EU has been hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House. It is currently subject to a 25 per cent levy on cars, 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 per cent, which Washington threatened to hike to 30 per cent in a no-deal scenario. The bloc had been pushing hard for tariff carve-outs for critical industries from aircraft to spirits, and its auto industry, crucial for France and Germany, is already reeling from the levies imposed so far. "Fifteen percent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get," acknowledged von der Leyen. Any deal will need to be approved by EU member states, whose ambassadors, on a visit to Greenland, were updated by the commission Sunday morning. They were set to meet again after the deal struck in Scotland. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz rapidly hailed the deal, saying it avoided "needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations". The EU had pushed for a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the US before tariffs would apply. Trump appeared to rule that out, saying steel was "staying the way it is", but the EU chief insisted later that "tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place" for steel. "THE BIG ONE" While 15 per cent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods, which average around 4.8 per cent, it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 per cent. Had the talks failed, EU states had greenlit counter tariffs on US$109 billion of US goods including aircraft and cars to take effect in stages from Aug 7. Trump has embarked on a campaign to reshape US trade with the world, and has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariffs if they do not reach a pact with Washington by Aug 1.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Truth in the age of AI
AI is causing seismic changes in how we understand what is true and what is not. It can have serious implications for important events such as elections. In today's world, artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the way we live, work and play. Algorithms power our social media feeds, and bots can make our work more efficient. AI is the ability of machines to think and act like humans by learning, solving problems, and making decisions. With its ability to process and analyse vast amounts of data in seconds, AI has become a powerful tool in sectors like healthcare, finance and banking, manufacturing and supply chains. But as AI proliferates, it is also silently causing seismic changes in how we understand what is true and what is not. The digital world is seeing an explosion of synthetic content that muddies the line between truth and fiction, which can have serious implications for important events such as elections. Deepfakes – hyper-realistic videos created using deep learning – are perhaps the most high-profile example of this. A 2022 deepfake video of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky urging his troops to surrender during the Russia-Ukraine war was widely circulated before being debunked. The minute-long video briefly sowed confusion and panic. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole Asia Singapore-only car washes will get business licences revoked, says Johor govt World Food airdropped into Gaza as Israel opens aid routes Sport Arsenal beat Newcastle in five-goal thriller to bring Singapore Festival of Football to a close Singapore Benchmark barrier: Six of her homeschooled kids had to retake the PSLE Asia S'porean trainee doctor in Melbourne arrested for allegedly filming colleagues in toilets since 2021 In 2024 during India's general election, political parties 'resurrected' deceased leaders and used deepfake avatars to influence voters . For instance, the former Tamil Nadu chief minister M. Karunanidhi, who died in 2018, appeared in AI-generated videos endorsing his son's political run. In Britain, more than 100 deepfake videos featuring then British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak ran as ads on Facebook before the 2024 election. The ads appeared to be viewed by 400,000 in a month, and payments for the ads originated overseas. When voters see such manipulated videos making controversial or false statements, it can damage reputations or sway opinions – even after the deepfake is debunked. The threat is not just about altering individual votes – it is about eroding trust in the electoral process altogether. When voters begin to doubt everything they see or hear, apathy and cynicism can take hold, weakening democratic institutions. With its ability to blur the distinction between what is real or not, AI's impact on truth is more insidious than being able to tell black from white, fact from fiction. NewsGuard, a media literacy tool that rates the reliability of online sources, found that by May 2025, more than 1,200 AI-generated news and information sites were operating with little to no human oversight, a number that had increased by more than 20 times in two years. Many of these websites even appeared to be credible. Reliable media organisations have also come under fire for using AI-generated news summaries that are sometimes inaccurate. Apple faced calls earlier in 2025 to remove its AI-generated news alerts on iPhones that were in some instances completely false and 'hallucinated'. In its Global Risks Report 2024, the World Economic Forum said: 'Emerging as the most severe global risk anticipated over the next two years, foreign and domestic actors alike will leverage misinformation and disinformation to further widen societal and political divides.' AI will serve only to amplify those divides through its widespread use by bad actors to spread misinformation that appears to be credible, using algorithms that emphasise engagement, even to those adept at navigating news sites. He heard what sounded like his son crying and fell for the scam Beyond elections and political influence, AI is also being used by scammers to target individuals. Voice cloning technology is increasingly being deployed by fraudsters in impersonation scams. With just a short sample of someone's voice – easily sourced from a TikTok video, a podcast clip, or even a voicemail – AI tools can convincingly replicate it. In India, Mr Himanshu Shekhar Singh fell prey to an elaborate scheme after receiving a phone call from a purported police officer, who claimed that his 18-year-old son had been caught with a gang of rapists and needed 30,000 rupees (S$444) before his name could be cleared. He heard what sounded like his son crying over the phone, and made an initial payment of 10,000 rupees, only to find out that his son was unharmed, and he had been duped. In Hong Kong, the police said that an unnamed multinational company was scammed of HK$200 million (S$32.6 million) after an employee attended a video conference call with deepfake recreations of the company's Britain-based chief financial officer and other employees. The employee was duped into making the transfers following instructions from the scammers. Scammers are also using generative AI to produce phishing e-mails and scam messages that are far more convincing than traditional spam, which is more likely to contain incorrect grammar and suspicious-looking links. Cyber-security firm Barracuda, together with researchers from Columbia University and the University of Chicago, found in a study published on June 18 that 51 per cent of malicious and spam e-mails are now generated using AI tools. The research team examined a dataset of spam e-mails flagged by Barracuda between February 2022 and April 2025. Using trained detection tools, they assessed whether each malicious or unwanted message had been produced by AI. Their analysis revealed a consistent increase in the share of AI-generated spam e-mails starting from November 2022 and continuing until early 2024. Notably, November 2022 marked the public release of ChatGPT. Can AI be a force for good? But just as AI is being used to deceive, it is also being used to defend the truth. For example, newsrooms around the world are increasingly turning to AI to enhance their fact-checking capabilities and stay ahead of misinformation. Reuters, for example, has developed News Tracer, a tool powered by machine learning and natural language processing that monitors social media platforms like X to detect and assess the credibility of breaking news stories in real time. It assigns credibility scores to emerging narratives, helping journalists filter out false leads quickly. Meanwhile, major news organisations like the BBC and The New York Times have collaborated with partners like Microsoft and Media City Bergen under an initiative called Project Origin to use AI to track the provenance of digital content and verify its authenticity. Tech companies are also contributing to efforts to combat the rise of misinformation. Google's Jigsaw unit has developed tools such as 'About this image', which helps users trace an image's origin, and detect whether it was AI-generated or manipulated. Microsoft has also contributed to the fight against deception with its Video Authenticator tool, which detects deepfakes by identifying giveaway signs invisible to the human eye that an image has been artificially generated. For example, in a video where someone's face has been mapped on another person's body, this includes subtle fading or greyscale pixels at the boundary of where the images have been merged. Social media companies are slowly stepping up too. Meta has introduced labels for AI-generated political ads, and YouTube has rolled out a new tool that requires creators to disclose to viewers when realistic content is made with altered or synthetic media. The rise of AI has undeniably made it harder to distinguish fact from fiction, but it has also opened new frontiers for safeguarding the truth. Legislation can establish protective guard rails Whether AI becomes a conduit for clarity or confusion will also be shaped by the guard rails and regulations that governments and societies put in place. To that end, the European Union is a front runner in AI regulation. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act was first proposed in 2021, and approved in August 2024. The legislation classifies AI by risk and places strict rules on systems that affect public rights and democracy. For example, AI such as social scoring systems and manipulative AI is prohibited because of its unacceptable risk. High-risk systems include those that profile individuals to assess their work performance or economic situation, for example. High-risk AI providers need to establish a risk management system and conduct data governance to ensure that testing data sets are relevant and free of errors as much as possible. This helps to address risks that AI poses to truth, especially around misinformation and algorithmic manipulation. Countries such as Singapore, Canada, and Britain have also published governance frameworks or set up regulatory sandboxes to guide ethical AI use. Societies must be equipped to navigate the AI era. Public education on how deepfakes, bot-generated content, and algorithms can skew perception would be essential. When citizens understand how AI-generated misinformation works, they are less likely to be misled. In the EU, media literacy is a core pillar of the Digital Services Act, which requires major online platforms to support educational campaigns that help users recognise disinformation and manipulative content. Finland has integrated AI literacy into its 2025 school curriculum from early childhood to vocational training. The aim is to prepare students for a future where AI is increasingly prevalent and to help them build critical thinking skills and expose them to ethical considerations around AI. But mitigating the impact of AI is not just the job of governments and tech companies – individuals can also take steps to protect themselves from deception. Take care to verify the source of information, especially when it comes through social media. Be wary of sensational photos or videos and the likelihood that the content could have been manipulated. When in doubt, consult trusted news sources or channels. Individuals themselves can also play their part by using AI responsibly – such as avoiding the sharing of unverified content generated by chatbots or image tools. By staying cautious and curious, people can push back against AI-powered misinformation and create a safer digital space. How Singapore tackles AI risks Singapore was among the first few countries to introduce a national AI strategy in 2019, with projects in areas like border clearance operations and chronic disease prediction. But with the rapid development of generative AI that saw the public roll-out of large language models like ChatGPT, the nation updated its strategy in 2023. The National AI Strategy 2.0 focuses on nurturing talent, promoting a thriving AI industry and sustaining it with world-leading infrastructure and research that ensures AI serves the public good. To nurture talent here, Singapore aims to triple its number of AI practitioners to 15,000 by training locals and hiring from overseas. While the nation is eager to harness the benefits of AI to boost its digital economy, it is also wary of the manipulation, misinformation, and ethical risks involved with the technology. To mitigate such risks, the country launched the first edition of the Model AI Governance Framework in January 2019. The voluntary framework is a guide for private sector organisations to address key ethical and governance issues when deploying traditional AI. The framework explains how AI systems work, and how to build good data accountability practices, and create open and transparent communication. The framework was updated in 2020 and then again in May 2024, when the Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI was rolled out, building on the initial frameworks to take into account new risks posed by generative AI. This includes things like hallucinations, where an AI model generates information that is incorrect or not based in reality; and concerns around copyright infringement. To combat such challenges, the framework encourages industry players to offer transparency around the safety and hygiene measures taken when developing the AI tool. This can include bias correction techniques, for instance. The framework also touches on the need for transparency around how AI-generated content is created to enable users to consume content in an informed manner, and how companies and communities should come together on digital literacy initiatives. In the country's recent general election held in May 2025, a new law banning fake or digitally altered online material that misrepresents candidates during the election period was put in place for the first time. In passing the Elections (Integrity of Online Advertising) (Amendment) Bill in October 2024, Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo said that it does not matter if the content is favourable or unfavourable to any candidate. The publication of misinformation generated using AI during the election, and the boosting, sharing and reposting of existing content, was made an offence. While it was not used during the recent general election, the legal instrument provides a lever to ensure electoral integrity in Singapore. Overall, Singapore is eager to use AI as a driver of growth. In regulating the technology, it prefers an incremental approach, developing and updating voluntary governance frameworks, and drawing sector-specific guidelines instead of an overall mandate. But where there is a risk of AI being used to misinform and manipulate the public, it will not hesitate to pass laws against this happening, as it did ahead of the 2025 General Election. Singapore's governance approach combines strong ethical foundations, industry collaboration, and global engagement to ensure AI is used safely and fairly.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
EU, US strike 'biggest-ever' trade deal
TURNBERRY, United Kingdom: The United States and European Union on Sunday (Jul 27) clinched what President Donald Trump described as the "biggest-ever" deal to resolve a transatlantic tariff stand-off that threatened to explode into a full-blown trade war. Trump emerged from a high-stakes meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf resort in Scotland to announce that a baseline tariff of 15 percent would be levied on EU exports to the US. The deal, which the leaders struck in around an hour, came as the clock ticked down on an Aug 1 deadline to avoid an across-the-board US levy of 30 percent on European goods. "We've reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody. This is probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity," said Trump. Trump said the 15-percent tariff would apply across the board, including for Europe's crucial automobile sector, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. As part of the deal, Trump said the 27-nation EU bloc had agreed to purchase "US$750 billion worth of energy" from the United States, as well as make US$600 billion in additional investments. Von der Leyen said the "significant" purchases of US liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels would come over three years, as part of the bloc's bid to diversify away from Russian sources. Negotiating on behalf of the EU's 27 countries, von der Leyen had been pushing hard to salvage a trading relationship worth an annual US$1.9 trillion in goods and services. "It's a good deal," the EU chief told reporters. "It will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," she said. She said bilateral tariff exemptions had been agreed on a number of "strategic products," notably aircraft, certain chemicals, some agricultural products and critical raw materials. Von der Leyen said the EU still hoped to secure further so-called "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be "sorted out" in coming days. Trump also said EU countries, which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within NATO, would be purchasing "hundreds of billions of dollars worth of military equipment." 'Best we could get' The EU has been hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House. It is currently subject to a 25-percent levy on cars, 50 percent on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 percent, which Washington threatened to hike to 30 percent in a no-deal scenario. The bloc had been pushing hard for tariff carve-outs for critical industries from aircraft to spirits, and its auto industry, crucial for France and Germany, is already reeling from the levies imposed so far. "Fifteen percent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get," acknowledged von der Leyen. Any deal will need to be approved by EU member states, whose ambassadors, on a visit to Greenland, were updated by the commission Sunday morning. They were set to meet again after the deal struck in Scotland. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz rapidly hailed the deal, saying it avoided "needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations". The EU had pushed for a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the United States before tariffs would apply. Trump appeared to rule that out, saying steel was "staying the way it is", but the EU chief insisted later that "tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place" for steel. 'The big one' While 15 percent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods, which average around 4.8 percent, it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 percent. Had the talks failed, EU states had greenlit counter tariffs on US$109 billion of US goods including aircraft and cars to take effect in stages from Aug 7. Trump has embarked on a campaign to reshape US trade with the world, and has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariffs if they do not reach a pact with Washington by Aug 1.
