$3b money laundering case: S'porean jailed for lying to police about fugitive's luxury cars
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 01 Jul 2025
Author: Nadine Chua
Liew Yik Kit is the first Singaporean to be convicted and sentenced in relation to Singapore's largest money laundering case.
The personal driver of Su Binghai - one of the fugitives in the $3 billion money laundering case – has been dealt with for lying to the police about his boss' luxury cars worth $8.3 million.
Liew Yik Kit, 42, is the first Singaporean to be convicted and sentenced in relation to Singapore's largest money laundering case.
On June 30, Liew was sentenced to three months' jail after pleading guilty to lying to the police.
Another charge of obstructing the course of justice was taken into consideration during sentencing.
The $3 billion money laundering case saw 10 foreign nationals arrested in multiple islandwide raids here on Aug 15, 2023.
The 10 foreigners have been jailed, deported and barred from re-entering Singapore.
Su Binghai was driven by Liew out of Singapore via Tuas Checkpoint on the evening of Aug 15 – the day of the raids.
The pair then stayed at a hotel in Kuala Lumpur before Liew dropped Su off at Kuala Lumpur International Airport on Aug 17, 2023.
Investigations revealed that before Su flew off, he instructed Liew to help him sell his four luxury cars which were parked in his home in Singapore.
These were a Rolls-Royce Phantom, a Rolls-Royce Cullinan, a Ferrari F8 Spider and a Ferrari Stradale worth a total of $8,364,297.
Liew agreed as he expected to get a commission of around 1 per cent – or around $80,000 – for the sale of the cars.
Su then left the four cars and their keys in Liew's possession.
On Aug 18, 2023, after returning to Singapore, Liew went to Su's house and drove the four cars out, one after another, and parked them at a multi-storey carpark in Upper Boon Keng Road.
Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Louis Ngia said Liew did this despite not yet identifying a buyer for the cars as he wanted to quickly take control of the vehicles.
Subsequently, Liew contacted car brokerage company Pro Carz to arrange the sale of the four cars. He then drove all four to Roxy Square on Sept 1, 2023.
The keys to the four cars remained with Liew while the sale was being arranged.
On Sept 11, 2023, Liew was called to give a statement on investigations into Su. He lied to the police that his boss did not leave any valuable properties in his possession.
Worried that the police would find out that he had the keys to Su's four cars, Liew then drove the cars back to the multi-storey carpark in Upper Boon Keng Road.
Liew's acts came to light when the police received information on Oct 5, 2023, that a blue Rolls-Royce, which was in the care of Su Binghai's brother, Su Bingwang, was found parked at Roxy Square's carpark.
It was there because Liew was also arranging for it to be sold by Pro Carz, said DPP Ngia.
This led the police to discover that the Pro Carz dealer had also applied for season parking at Roxy Square for the four other luxury cars – but they could not be found there.
The car dealer later told the police that the four cars were in Liew's possession, and Liew was arrested.
DPP Ngia said Su Binghai has not returned to Singapore since he left on Aug 15, 2023.
In October 2024, Su Binghai and his wife, Wang Manzu, agreed for their assets to be surrendered to the state. These surrendered properties, including the four cars, were valued at more than $316.6 million, said the prosecutor.
Assets worth about $1.85 billion have been surrendered to the state by 15 foreigners who are on the run from the police in relation to this money laundering case. In return, the Interpol Red and Blue Notices against them were withdrawn.
Seeking a jail term of three to four months for Liew, DPP Ngia said Liew lied to the police as he was blinded by greed, trying to sell the cars to get a commission.
Because he gave false information to the police, the cars were recovered almost one month later, and after significant effort had been put in the investigation, said the prosecutor.
In mitigation, defence lawyer Kanagavijayan Nadarajan noted his client's early plea of guilt.
Mr Kanagavijayan added that Liew subsequently cooperated with the police and helped the authorities recover two cars owned by Su Bingwang – a blue Rolls-Royce and a white McLaren.
For giving false information to a public servant, an offender can be jailed for up to two years, fined, or both.
Nadine Chua is a crime and court journalist at The Straits Times.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
6 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran
Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Source: Straits Times Article Date: 29 Jul 2025 Author: Christine Tan Billionaire Ong Beng Seng was charged on Oct 4, 2024, with allegedly abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and abetting the obstruction of justice. Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng is scheduled to plead guilty on Aug 4 to offences in a case linked to former transport minister S. Iswaran. This comes after a pre-trial conference on July 28 before District Judge Lee Lit Cheng. Ong is currently out on $800,000 bail. Ong, 79, was first set to plead guilty on April 2, but this was postponed after his lawyers asked for an extension to obtain his medical reports. He was then slated to plead guilty on July 3, but this was rescheduled one day before the hearing as the prosecution and defence needed more time to file further submissions on sentencing. The case then went through several pre-trial conferences. The billionaire was charged on Oct 4, 2024, with abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and abetting the obstruction of justice. According to court documents, Ong had in December 2022 allegedly arranged for Mr Iswaran to fly on his private plane from Singapore to Doha. The flight was valued at US$7,700 (S$10,400). The businessman also allegedly arranged for Mr Iswaran a one-night stay at Four Seasons Hotel Doha, valued at $4,737.63, and a business-class flight from Doha to Singapore, valued at $5,700. Court documents showed Ong allegedly told Mr Iswaran that the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau had seized the flight manifest for the December 2022 trip. It prompted Mr Iswaran to ask the tycoon to bill him for the flight to avoid investigations. For this alleged offence, Ong was charged with abetment of obstruction of justice. Hotel Properties Limited, where Ong was managing director, said in an announcement on the Singapore Exchange in February that he intends to plead guilty to the obstruction charge and consents to having the other charge taken into consideration for sentencing. The businessman is known as the man who brought Formula One (F1) to Singapore in 2008 – the first night race in the sport's history. Mr Iswaran was chairman of the F1 steering committee and the Government's chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters related to the race. The two men had worked in the mid-2000s to convince then Formula One Group chief executive Bernie Ecclestone to make Singapore the venue for that first night race. Mr Iswaran was handed a 12-month jail term on Oct 3, 2024, for, among other things, accepting a number of valuable items from Ong. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Singapore Law Watch
6 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Man exposed daughter's identity despite court order after she was removed from his care
Man exposed daughter's identity despite court order after she was removed from his care Source: Straits Times Article Date: 29 Jul 2025 Author: Selina Lum A Youth Court judge said the girl should not be returned to the man's care until he is sufficiently fit to care for her. A man exposed the identity of his teenage daughter despite court orders not to do so, after she was placed in the care of her grandparents to prevent him from emotionally abusing her. He also disclosed her identity when he sent e-mails to various foreign embassies to seek political asylum, saying that he wanted to relocate out of Asean and the Commonwealth to return to his 'Ural-Altaic' roots, seemingly referring to a language grouping largely rejected by modern linguists. In a written judgment published on July 26, a Youth Court judge said the girl, who is now 16 years old, should not be returned to the man's care until he is sufficiently fit to care for her. District Judge Wendy Yu considered the man's breaches of court orders, such as by disclosing her identity to others, and his refusal to accept professional attempts to help ease the girl back to living with him. The judge said: 'The father's recent act of disclosing the child's identity... by copying the multiple foreign embassies also persuaded me that the father still does not seem to have insight currently as to how his conduct would compromise the well-being of the child.' Nevertheless, the judge said attempts should be made to heal the father-daughter relationship. She extended the girl's stay with her grandparents by six months to offer some stability as she is taking her O-level examinations at the end of 2025, and to give the professionals a chance to help reintegrate her back to living with her father. 'If the father still refuses the therapeutic sessions to work on helping the child feel safe at the prospect of living with him, it is to his own detriment and will only delay the reintegration process. The ball is in his court.' According to the judgment, the father has care and control of the girl. No details were given on the custody arrangement between him and her mother. In May 2022, the Child Protective Service (CPS) recommended that the child be put in the care of her paternal grandparents for a year, with a review after six months. In applying to the court for a care and protection order, CPS said the girl was at risk of being ill-treated by the father and that she behaved in a manner that was harmful to herself. But the father was unwilling to take remedial steps. CPS added that she was likely to suffer from emotional harm owing to emotional or psychological abuse by the father. At the review hearing in December 2022, CPS recommended that she stay with her grandparents for a year. The man contested the recommendations. In August 2023, after speaking to the girl, who was then 14 years old, the judge ordered the child to be placed under her grandparents' care for a year. In August 2024, CPS recommended for the order to be extended for another year. The father objected to this, while the mother agreed. CPS submitted that he had subjected the child to 'persistent acts of rejection or degradation' that are harmful to her well-being or sense of self-worth. The court was told that the man was confrontational during access sessions between the child and him. He had also persistently revealed her identity online. In particular, he recorded six access sessions between January and March 2024 without permission and uploaded them on YouTube and his website. He also uploaded a copy of an affidavit that contained references to the child's name. He was given a two-year conditional warning by the police for recording and uploading photos of his access sessions on social media platforms. According to CPS, the girl's 'emotions became very unstable' after she learnt of the uploading of the videos. In November 2024, the man alleged that he had 'discovered corrupt practices' and that CPS wanted to extend the order 'for as long as possible to generate fraudulent counselling fees'. He also told the court that he did not intend to remove the online content. Subsequently, CPS told the court that, between May 6 and 21, the man sent multiple e-mails to foreign embassies, which resulted in the disclosure of the girl's identity. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Straits Times
13 hours ago
- Straits Times
ICA inspector obtained bribes in the form of sex acts from 6 foreign men in exchange for his help
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Kannan Morice Rajagopal Jayaram, who committed the offences between 2022 and 2023, pleaded guilty on July 28 to three corruption charges. SINGAPORE – An Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) inspector obtained bribes in the form of sex acts from six men in exchange for helping them with their short-term visit pass (STVP) applications so that they could remain in Singapore. Kannan Morice Rajagopal Jayaram, 55, who committed the offences between 2022 and 2023, pleaded guilty on July 28 to three corruption charges, each involving an Indian national. The three men were between 25 and 30 years old at the time. Three other similar charges involving three other men will be considered during the Singaporean's sentencing. In a statement in 2023, ICA said that Kannan has been suspended from service since April that year. The Straits Times has reached out to the agency to find out if he is still working for it. Deputy public prosecutors Bryan Wong and Benjamin Low stated in court documents that Kannan joined ICA in 1996 and became a team leader at ICA's Visit Pass Unit in 2018. He rose through the ranks and became an inspector in 2021. As a team leader, he was responsible for overseeing a team of around 10 ICA officers who reported to him. Among other things, these officers were tasked with processing foreigners' applications to extend their STVPs. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thirty dead, over 80,000 evacuated, following heavy rain in Beijing Asia Thai army accuses Cambodia of violating truce World Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres Business Crypto's comeback: Should Bitcoin and other digital assets be in your portfolio now? Sport World Cup winner Fabio Cannavaro among list of top names for Singapore football coach Business BYD tops Singapore car sales in first half of 2025 with almost one-fifth of the market Asia Giant algal bloom off South Australia devastates marine life, threatens seafood exports Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far While there were ICA guidelines, Kannan's subordinates also had the discretion to grant or reject STVP extensions if there were sufficient reasons to do so. However, they would usually consult him whenever they encountered difficulties with such applications. In turn, Kannan had the discretion to grant any STVP extension applications that his team handled. There were also times when he manned walk-in counters at the ICA headquarters, the court heard. One of the men he targeted was a 26-year-old Indian national, referred to as V3 in court documents. V3 had arrived in Singapore in March 2022 as he wanted to study hospitality management here. He was issued with a student pass (STP) in mid-2022, but it was only valid until September that year. As such, he had to repeatedly apply for STVP extensions at the ICA's headquarters until he could obtain a fresh STP. On Nov 16, 2022, he went to the headquarters and Kannan attended to him. The pair exchanged contact details and Kannan later contacted him via WhatsApp, asking to meet up. However, V3 declined to do so as he was in school at the time. He later received an official e-mail from ICA on Dec 24 that year, informing him that his STVP extension application had been rejected. As his STVP was due to expire two days later, he panicked and called Kannan to ask for his help with the extension. Kannan then told V3 to bring his immigration documents and meet him at the void deck of a Housing Board block of flats near Kallang MRT station that day. V3 did as he was told and followed Kannan home. While there, Kannan instructed V3 to submit an STVP extension application via the ICA website. After that, Kannan submitted V3's passport number to his ICA subordinate. He also instructed the subordinate to approve V3's latest STVP extension application and grant the younger man an STVP for a duration of two weeks. The officer did as she was told and at around noon that day, V3 received an official e-mail from ICA informing him that his latest STVP extension application had been approved. The prosecutors said: 'He thanked the accused for his the accused requested that V3 kiss him, to which V3 declined as he was not sexually attracted to the accused. 'The accused persisted in his demands for sexual acts from V3, to which the latter eventually acceded to as he was grateful to the accused for his help in granting his STVP extension application.' V3 was also afraid that Kannan would cancel his STVP if he turned down his advances. The two men then went to Kannan's bedroom and the older man performed sexual acts on V3. The court heard that Kannan also committed similar offences involving five other foreign men. Court documents did not state how his crimes came to light, but he was later charged in court in 2023. His mitigation and sentencing are expected to take place on Aug 18.
