
R&D Tax Credit Boost Shows Texas Is Not Resting On Low-Tax Laurels
Texas state capitol building in Austin getty
Thanks to a flurry of legislative activity that took place in April, Tax Day could be less burdensome in the future for residents of a number of states. On April 28, Montana Governor Greg Gianforte (R) signed into law the largest income tax cut in his state's history. Just over a week later on May 6, the South Carolina House passed a bill that would put the state on track to having a flat 1.99% income tax rate, down from a 6.2% top rate today. That move in South Carolina came three weeks after the North Carolina Senate passed a budget that would cut the state's 4.25% flat tax to 1.99% in the coming years if revenue triggers are met. Three days before the North Carolina Senate passed that income tax-cutting budget, the Oklahoma Senate gave final approval to legislation that will gradually phase out the state income tax.
In this era of heightened state tax competition, lawmakers in Texas recognize it's unwise for even a no-income-tax state to rest on its laurels. They demonstrated as much last week with the Texas Senate's unanimous passage of Senate Bill 2206, legislation that would both extend and strengthen the state's research & development tax credit. Senator Paul Bettencourt (R), sponsor of SB 2206, calls it a 'huge win for innovation.'
'We're increasing the R&D franchise tax credit from 5% up to 8.722% — and even higher to 10.903% for R&D with Texas universities and colleges,' Senator Bettencourt posted to X following the Texas Senate's 31-0 vote in favor of SB 2206. The bill now awaits consideration in the Texas House. Representative Charlie Geren (R) is sponsor of HB 4393, the House companion to SB 2206.
'For every $1 in R&D incentive, Texas gains $12.47 in Gross State Product over 20 years,' Senator Bettencourt added. 'This bill creates 6,662 new jobs annually, $445M in labor income, and $748M in GSP growth every year. SB 2206 ensures Texas remains a national leader in research, innovation, and job creation — making sure our economy keeps pace with the demands of the 21st-century.'
'Research and development (R&D) activities of private businesses, universities and the government are important for increasing innovation,' noted John Diamond, the director of the Center for Public Finance at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, in a 2024 paper. 'Sustained increases in economic growth and the standard of living will be primarily driven by technological innovation in the near future, making it imperative that Texas act to increase R&D investments.' Diamond points out that one way to do this is by 'extending and increasing the R&D tax credit,' which is what will happen if the Texas House passes HB 4393.
'R&D is so important to a healthy economy,' Jennifer Rabb, president of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, told the Austin American-Statesman . 'And without an extension of the credit, companies are going to choose to go elsewhere for those projects.'
'Texas' credit is on the low end of the spectrum for R&D tax incentives, with countries like China offering a 'super deduction' of 200% and states like California offering a 15% tax credit on qualified research expenditures and an extra 24% of research payments to public universities and their affiliate hospitals or cancer research centers,' the Statesman reported after the April 10 Senate Finance Committee hearing on SB 2206. 'Many other states, like Michigan and Arizona, offer 10%.'
'For those businesses, small entrepreneurial businesses that are startups that don't have income coming in, they would be able to take a credit off of their sales tax expenditures to use it or carry forward the credit to a time when they have profits coming in,' Glen Hammer, CEO of Texas Association of Business, told the Statesman , adding 'it's something that's available to all innovative companies in the state of Texas, regardless of their size.'
The push to extend and boost the R&D tax credit in Texas coincides with the effort on Capitol Hill to reinstate full year one business expensing for R&D costs. The enactment of SB 2206/HB 4393 in Texas 'needs to be complemented with Congress ending the tax code's bias against research spending,' says Ryan Ellis, president of the Center for a Free Economy.
'For the whole history of the tax code, research expenses (which consist mostly of the wages paid to researchers) were deductible,' adds Ellis, an IRS-enrolled agent who also runs a tax preparation firm. 'As of 2023, research expenses incurred in one year must be slowly deducted. Congress is working as we speak to restore full research expensing, the neutral and correct tax policy which is also very pro-growth.'
'The United States treats research and development poorly compared to the rest of the world,' the Tax Foundation noted in an October 2024 paper. 'Historically, the US allowed companies to fully deduct R&D costs, but since 2022, companies must deduct R&D expenses across 5 years or 15 years. In real terms, the delay means companies only deduct around 89 percent of R&D costs, creating a tax penalty.'
Researchers at the Tax Foundation, as illustrated by the below chart, have concluded that improving the tax treatment of R&D, in particular restoring full expensing of R&D costs, is among the most effective ways to promote economic growth.
Percentage Change in the level of Long-Run GDP per Billion of Annual Conventional Revenue Cost Tax Foundation
Congressional leaders are aiming to send a bill to the President's desk by this summer that would prevent the personal income tax cuts enacted in 2017 from expiring, while restoring full expensing of R&D, along with full expensing of other business costs. The Texas House Ways & Means Committee, meanwhile, will take up HB 4393 during a hearing on May 12. This eighty-ninth regular session of the Texas Legislature will conclude on June 2.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
29 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Justice Department drops lawsuit against Trump adviser Peter Navarro
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department is dropping a lawsuit that it filed against White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, a case in which he was accused of using an unofficial email account for government work and wrongfully retaining presidential records during the first Trump administration, according to a Tuesday court filing. The joint filing by the Justice Department and an attorney for Navarro doesn't explain why they are abandoning a case that was filed in 2022, during President Joe Biden's term in office. The one-page filing says each side will bear their own fees and costs. The lawsuit accused Navarro of using at least one 'non-official' email account — a ProtonMail account — to send and receive emails. The legal action comes just weeks after Navarro was indicted on criminal charges after refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Navarro served a four-month prison sentence after being found guilty of misdemeanor charges. The civil cases alleges that by using the unofficial email account, Navarro failed to turn over presidential records to the National Archives and Records Administration. The government notified the court of the lawsuit's dismissal a day before U.S. Magistrate G. Michael Harvey was scheduled to preside over a status conference for the case. A Justice Department spokesperson and a lawyer for Navarro didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment. Navarro served as a trade adviser during President Donald Trump's first term. A longtime critic of trade arrangements with China, he has been named senior counselor for trade and manufacturing for Trump's second administration.


Associated Press
29 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Fed lifts restrictions placed on Wells Fargo in 2018 because of its fake-accounts scandal
NEW YORK (AP) — The Federal Reserve said Tuesday that Wells Fargo is no longer subject to the restraints the Fed placed on the bank in 2018 for having a toxic sales and banking culture. It's a win for Wells Fargo, which has spent nearly a decade trying to convince the public and policymakers that it had changed its ways. 'We are a different and far stronger company today because of the work we've done,' said Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf in a statement. Scharf also announced that each of the 215,000 employees at Wells Fargo would receive a $2,000 award for turning the bank around. Wells Fargo used to have a corporate culture where it placed unreasonable sales goals on its branch employees, which resulted in employees opening up millions of fake accounts in order to meet those goals. Wells' top executives called its branches 'stores' and employees were expected to cross-sell customers into as many banking products as possible, even if the customer did not want or need them. After an investigation by The Los Angeles Times, Wells Fargo shut down its sales culture and fired much of its leadership and board of directors. The fake accounts scandal cost Wells Fargo billions of dollars in fines and lost business, and permanently tarnished its reputation, particularly because the scandal broke only a few years after the Great Recession and financial crisis. It was later revealed that Wells Fargo opened up roughly 3.5 million accounts that were not wanted or needed by customers. In order to push Wells to fix itself, the Federal Reserve took the unusual step of placing Wells Fargo in a program where the bank could grow no larger than it was in 2018. No bank had previously been placed into such a program, known as an asset cap. Since taking over in 2019, Scharf's goal has been to convince the Federal Reserve that Wells Fargo had fixed its toxic banking practices.


Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
SCOOP: House GOP circles wagons on Trump tax-and-spend bill as Senate seeks changes
The House GOP is quietly mounting a pressure campaign on the Senate to accept its version of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" even as lawmakers in the upper chamber signal they'll be making changes. Tensions are simmering between Republicans in the two chambers as they work to pass a massive tax, immigration and energy bill via the budget reconciliation process. The House Budget Committee held a staff-level communications briefing on Monday, two sources told Fox News Digital, the same day the Senate returned from the Memorial Day week recess to begin consideration of the massive bill. Senate Republicans have vowed to tweak the House's offering to varying degrees, with some wanting to tackle even deeper spending cuts and others wanting to soften the blows to Medicaid and green energy subsidies. While lawmakers in the upper chamber are still working out the kinks of their approach, they agree the bill will be different. Both sources interpreted the meeting as a way to get ahead of Senate Republicans' criticism of certain aspects of the bill. Documents viewed by Fox News Digital that were handed to House Republican aides show specific talking points about the bill's taxpayer savings, Medicaid provisions and green energy subsidy rollbacks, among other topics. The document pushed back on the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate that the bill would add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over a decade. "The cost of the bill ($4.12 trillion) is surpassed by the savings ($4.29 trillion) associated with mandatory spending reforms ($1.7 trillion) and economic growth ($2.6 trillion)," the document said. It suggested House Republicans assume 2.6% economic growth over 10 years rather than the CBO's unprecedentedly low 1.8%. "House Budget is desperately circling the wagons with staff and members to make sure they do not forget the fight is not over on messaging why their bill is better than their Senate rivals," one House GOP aide told Fox News Digital. "They got jammed with the Senate version in the blueprint round and are using every tool at their disposal to make sure it doesn't happen again." A senior House GOP aide also told Fox News Digital, "The Senate should heed President Trump's wishes to get [the bill] to his desk before July 4th." The House passed its version of the legislation late last month after a marathon all-night session full of debate and Democrat procedural motions to delay. The mammoth bill is aimed at permanently extending Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act while also including new tax relief for senior citizens and eliminating taxes on tipped and overtime wages. It would also send new funding to the U.S.-Mexico border and to enhance Immigrations and Customs Enforcement while rolling back a significant portion of the green energy subsidies from the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). To save money and cut down on what Republicans see as waste, fraud and abuse of government safety nets, the bill would introduce Medicaid work requirements for certain able-bodied recipients beginning in December 2026. It would penalize states that allowed illegal immigrants into the Affordable Care Act-expanded Medicaid population while rewarding states that did not. Both the IRA subsidies and Medicaid reforms are emerging as pain points for the Senate GOP's three-seat majority. The document obtained by Fox News Digital appears to target specific senators' concerns. For example, one portion of the Q&A specifically said, "No," the bill does not put rural hospitals at risk. "The bill reinvests funds to reopen rural emergency hospitals and ensure cost-effective care access," the messaging guidance said. On the rescinded IRA funds, it said, "The bill targets unused or duplicative funds from programs such as the Neighborhood Access and Equity Grants and sustainable jet fuel. These projects aligned more with ideological goals than infrastructure priorities." Another note mentioned the electric vehicle (EV) credit rollback, arguing it would "ensure all vehicles contribute to the Highway Trust Fund." "EVs cause more wear and tear due to their higher weight but pay no fuel taxes. The bill imposes modest user fees starting no later than the end of FY 2026 and terminates in FY 2035, indexed to inflation," it said. But it's not clear that senators with those concerns will heed the House's arguments right now. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told reporters Tuesday, "It's going to hurt rural hospitals in my state." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged to reporters on Tuesday that while there was discontent over "individual pieces" of the bill, Republicans must agree on something that will pass the chamber. "Failure is not an option. We've got to get to 51, so we'll figure out the path forward to do that over the next couple of weeks," Thune said. Other senators, meanwhile, have argued they want to make deeper cuts than what the House came up with. "The House bill, they're not even scratching the surface. It's not even the tip of the iceberg in terms of what we need to do to return to a reasonable, pre-pandemic-level spending," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said on Fox Business last week. When reached for comment, the House Budget Committee referred Fox News Digital to recent comments by Chair Jodey Arrington, R-Texas. "Some senators will say we went too far on entitlement reform and health care and welfare, and then you'll have ... [f]olks like [Sens.] Rick Scott, Ron Johnson, who are dear friends of mine, all well-intentioned, will say we don't cut enough spending," Arrington said on Fox News last week. "Well, the fact is, you can only cut as much as you can get the vote to pass it out of your chamber. And we cut almost $1.7 trillion in spending, which is the largest spending cuts in American history by twofold." "There's always room for improvement, and I welcome that, especially on the fiscal reform side, but we've got to get the votes."