Is the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF a Buy Now?
There are plenty of avenues for investors to gain exposure to a wide variety of stocks, but if you want to benefit from small-cap companies, which are typically worth between $300 million to $2 billion, then one of your best options is the Russell 2000 index, which is a collection of -- you guessed it -- about 2,000 small publicly traded domestic companies.
Buying the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF (NASDAQ: VTWO) can be a great way to diversify your investment across many different companies, but lately, the index hasn't performed as well as the S&P 500. The Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF is up about 25% over the past three years, while the S&P 500 has gained 66%.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
So, is it worth buying this Russell 2000 ETF? I think it's best not to put your money into this popular ETF right now for two reasons.
The fund isn't tapping into one of the largest tech trends
One of the biggest downsides for the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF right now is that it has limited exposure to artificial intelligence. Even if you don't think of yourself as a tech investor, the lack of AI companies in the index is notable because much of the recent gains (and potential future gains) are being driven by AI.
For example, the S&P 500 has benefited from big AI players like Nvidia, whose share price has skyrocketed more than 800% over the past three years, while the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF has lost out on those gains because it doesn't have many large AI tech companies.
What's more, some of the small-cap AI companies that are in the index, including BigBear.ai, are far smaller players in artificial intelligence and, in my opinion, a speculative investment. While small-cap stocks can sometimes outperform larger ones, this hasn't always been the case with AI. With artificial intelligence estimated to become a nearly $16 trillion industry over the next five years, it's not exactly something you want to miss out on as an investor.
There's already a lot of volatility in the market
Let me say first that share price volatility is normal, and stock price swings can't be avoided, no matter where you put your money. However, small-cap stocks tend to be more volatile than the broader market and are usually a riskier place to put your money.
There's nothing wrong with that extra risk most of the time, but right now, the market has already experienced some very significant swings. For example, both the S&P 500 and the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF were rising at the beginning of the year as some investors were optimistic about President Trump's business-friendly administration. But those gains were wiped out when Trump announced a slew of global tariffs.
Both the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 rebounded from the initial tariff shock, but the S&P 500 is up more than 2% year to date while the Russell 2000 is still down about 5%.
While many economists have recently backed away from some of their most severe recession predictions, J.P. Morgan still puts the chances at 40% (down from 60% earlier this year) for one to occur this year. There's no telling whether it will happen or not, but the bank's prediction factors in the negative impact of tariffs as a potential catalyst.
Small-cap stocks tend to fall harder and faster when a downturn comes along. So, if tough economic times are ahead, then it follows that the Vanguard's Russell 2000 Index ETF could see a more significant drop, at least initially, than the broader market if a recession occurs.
Verdict: Now might be a good time to look elsewhere
I don't think the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF is a bad place to put your money. Some investors may benefit from having more exposure to small-cap companies than they do now. Still, I think the fact that the ETF is missing out on the AI boom is a pretty big downside.
AI could end up being like the internet in terms of transforming the technology industry and how many people work, so having limited exposure to that just doesn't make sense for most investors. Instead, you might want to consider other Vanguard ETFs, some of which lean heavily into tech or track the S&P 500, as a good way to both diversify your investments and still tap into this fast-growing trend.
Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $676,023!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,692!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is793% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
11 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold Netflix Stock in 2025?
As of June 20, the S&P 500 index has generated a total return of 2% in 2025. After a difficult start to the year, the market has rallied in remarkable fashion to get in positive territory. A fresh all-time high could be achieved in the near future. While the broad index is in the green this year, Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) has climbed at a much better clip. The streaming stock is up an impressive 38% in 2025. Trade negotiations, economic uncertainty, and geopolitical tensions continue to happen in the background, but seemingly have no effect on this business and its shareholders. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Should you buy, sell, or hold Netflix stock in 2025? Why you should buy and/or hold Netflix stock Netflix is the leader in the streaming arena, having established a powerful position in the global media and entertainment industry. It brought in $10.5 billion in revenue in the first quarter. As of year-end 2024, it had 302 million subscribers. And according to data from Nielsen, 7.5% of all daily TV viewing time in the U.S. went to Netflix. Management never rests on its laurels. It's always appearing to be playing offense. The company is finding new ways to bring on subscribers, whether that means cracking down on those who share passwords, launching a very successful ad-supported tier, or getting into live sports and events. Netflix has tremendous brand strength, and the leadership team thinks there are hundreds of millions of people who can still become members. Investors should buy this stock today is if they believe Netflix will keep generating strong financial results -- and that's not a reach. According to Wall Street consensus analyst estimates, the company's revenue and earnings per share (EPS) are projected to increase at compound annual rates of 12.3% and 23.4%, respectively, between 2024 and 2027. The same reasoning applies to existing shareholders, particularly those sitting on huge gains thanks to their Netflix positions. If you have conviction that the business will continue to perform well over the next five years and beyond, then there is no reason to sell the stock. But that's if you don't believe the current valuation is a stretch (more on this below). A richer valuation doesn't automatically mean it's time to dump your holding, especially if the company is in tremendous shape. Why it's time to sell The case to sell Netflix stock also makes complete sense. I see nothing wrong with shareholders taking some profits off the table. This might mean it's time to lower the position size Netflix commands in your portfolio to something that's a bit more comfortable. That's an even smarter move if there are other, more attractive opportunities to allocate capital to. Another obvious reason to sell is the valuation. Netflix trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 58.2 right now. That's a 147% premium to the S&P 500 index. To be clear, this is an elite business we're dealing with here. But it's a stretch in my mind to think that it commands that type of elevated valuation. There's a much greater likelihood that the P/E multiple will be much lower five years from now than that it will stay the same or go higher. The market has kept rewarding Netflix with each impressive quarterly financial report, even though the valuation has looked steep. I just think there is absolutely no margin of safety left, and it might be time to switch gears. Unsurprisingly, I personally would not be a buyer of Netflix stock at the current valuation. Between holding and selling, I lean toward the latter. For those who care less about valuation and more about owning a top-notch enterprise, I can understand why they would have a different perspective. Should you invest $1,000 in Netflix right now? Before you buy stock in Netflix, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Netflix wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $676,023!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,692!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is793% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Globe and Mail
11 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Fed's Powell heads to Senate panel for second day of testimony
U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell resumes two days of Congressional testimony on Wednesday when he appears before the Senate Banking committee after scrutiny before a House panel the day before that focused on the Fed's concerns the Trump administration's tariff plans will raise inflation. The Senate session begins at 10 a.m. with Powell expected to deliver the same message he presented to the House Financial Services Committee that even with recent inflation more moderate than expected, the central bank expects rising import taxes will lead to higher inflation beginning this summer. He is also expected to reiterate that the Fed won't be comfortable cutting interest rates until it sees if prices do begin to rise and whether that process shows signs of becoming more persistent. 'We should start to see this over the summer, in the June number and the July we don't we are perfectly open to the idea that the pass-through (to consumers) will be less than we think, and if we do that will matter for policy,' Powell said on Tuesday. 'I think if it turns out that inflation pressures remain contained we will get to a place where we cut rates sooner than later...I do not want to point to a particular meeting. I don't think we need to be in any rush,' particularly given a still-strong labor market and so much uncertainty about the impact of the still-unresolved tariff debate. U.S. Federal Reserve should consider cutting rates as soon as July, governor says Tariffs have already risen on some goods, but there is a coming July 9 deadline for higher levies on a broad set of countries – with no certainty about whether the Trump administration will back down to a 10 per cent baseline tariff that analysts are using as a minimum, or impose something more aggressive. The Fed has held its benchmark interest rate steady in the 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent range since December, despite demands by President Donald Trump for immediate, and deep, rate cuts. Economic projections released by the Fed last week showed policymakers at the median do anticipate reducing the benchmark overnight rate half a percentage point by the end of the year. But within those projections is a clear divide between officials who take the inflation risk more seriously – seven of 19 policy makers see no rate cuts at all this year – and those who feel any tariff price shock will be less severe or quickly fade. Ten of the 19 see two or more rate reductions. Investors currently expect the Fed to cut rates at its September and December meetings, but hold rates steady at its next meeting on July 29-30.
Globe and Mail
14 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Billionaire David Tepper Doubled His Stake In This Unstoppable Growth Stock
Though some might think recent market volatility warrants staying away from equities for a while, plenty of investors disagree, including some famous names on Wall Street. Take David Tepper, billionaire founder and CEO of Appaloosa Management, a hedge fund. The successful money manager and his team decreased or closed their positions in several stocks during the first quarter. However, Tepper also made some notable buy decisions, including for Uber Technologies (NYSE: UBER). The hedge fund more than doubled its stake in the ride-hailing leader during the first period. Should investors follow Tepper's lead? Uber has officially turned the page Uber's stock is up 38% this year for a good reason. The company's business transformation continues, and it's showing up in its financial results. The ride-sharing leader has dealt with various issues in the past, including regulatory problems and persistent net losses, but things are now looking brighter than ever. Consider Uber's first-quarter results, during which its revenue jumped by 14% year over year to $11.5 billion. Trips and gross bookings increased by healthy amounts, and the company is now showing a profit on the bottom line. Net income was $1.8 billion, compared to a net loss of $654 million reported in the year-ago period. Free cash flow is also trending up; it soared by 66% in the period to $2.3 billion. Although Tepper didn't see these numbers before increasing his stake in the company by 113% during the first quarter, Uber has been delivering excellent results for some time now. His move looks smart in that broader context, and it seems even more so when we focus on the company's prospects. Attractive long-term prospects Some investors worried for a while whether Uber's model, which relies heavily on freelancers, could ever be profitable. The company has proved that it can, but can it sustain it for a while? In my view, it is still looking at huge growth opportunities, given the convenience of its services, significant demographic shifts, relatively low penetration rates, and its competitive edge. Let's address each point in turn. First, the company has disrupted the taxi industry because of its convenience. Getting a ride somewhere has never been easier. The company's food delivery option, Uber Eats, has the same selling points. That's why they are increasingly popular. Second, the data shows that younger generations, particularly Gen Z, are getting driver's licenses at lower rates than older generations did. So, they are less likely to own cars and drive. While there are likely many reasons for this -- it's hard to attribute this shift to Uber -- it still means there should be continued growth for the services it offers. Even people without cars need to go places, after all. Third, the company has surprisingly low penetration even in its most mature markets. As of the end of 2023, a little under 20% of people aged 18 and up took at least one trip per month in Australia. That percentage was lower in the U.K. and even lower in the U.S. Perhaps it won't reach 100%, but as management points out, modest growth in relatively advanced markets like the U.S. would lead to a significant increase in its annual gross bookings. Lastly, the business benefits from a network effect. The more drivers who are in its system, the more value the platform offers riders. The same dynamic applies to Uber Eats and the number of restaurants that are plugged into it. The network effect grants the company a strong moat. However, it has risks, which include stiff competition and the rise of self-driving vehicles. Management should be able to handle both, though. Having a moat is one of the keys to performing well despite competition. And even though it looks like self-driving cars will eat the company's lunch, we're still some way off from the significant adoption of that technology. Furthermore, Uber has partnered with major companies in this field and is already adapting to this shift -- one more reason its long-term prospects are attractive. Interested investors should follow Tepper's lead and purchase shares. Should you invest $1,000 in Uber Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Uber Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Uber Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $689,813!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $906,556!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is809% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to175%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
