logo
Taylor Swift subpoenaed in Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni legal battle

Taylor Swift subpoenaed in Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni legal battle

Global News12-05-2025

Taylor Swift could potentially be taking the stand in the legal battle between It Ends With Us co-stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.
Swift, who is close friends with Lively, had been mentioned in connection with the ongoing legal case between the co-stars when text exchanges were revealed that included her name in Baldoni's US$400-million defamation countersuit against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds in January.
On May 9, Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman issued a subpoena to Swift in the lawsuit involving the 2024 film It Ends With Us.
A spokesperson for Swift said the attempt to subpoena the pop star as a witness in the case is 'designed' to use Swift's 'name to draw public interest.'
Swift's team told NBC News she wouldn't have any information relevant to the legal dispute and should not be involved in the case.
Story continues below advertisement
'Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history,' her spokesperson said on May 9.
Swift's team said her only involvement in the film was licensing a song, which was My Tears Ricochet.
'Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case,' the spokesperson said.
Lively's legal team released a statement after news of Swift's potential involvement in the case spread. Her team told CNN that Baldoni and his legal team 'continue to turn a case of sexual harassment and retaliation into entertainment for the tabloids.'
'This is a very serious legal matter, not Barnum & Bailey's Circus,' the spokesperson said. 'The defendants continue to publicly intimidate, bully, shame and attack women's rights and reputations.'
2:28
Blake Lively says past year was 'the highest of highs and the lowest of lows'
Baldoni sued his co-star Lively, 37, and Reynolds, 48, for defamation in January. That lawsuit came the same day that Baldoni sued the New York Times for libel, alleging the paper worked with Lively to smear him.
Story continues below advertisement
In December 2024, Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of the movie as well as a subsequent effort to 'destroy' her reputation in a legal complaint.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
In the complaint, Lively accused Baldoni and the studio of embarking on a 'multi-tiered plan' to damage her reputation following a meeting in which she and Reynolds addressed 'repeated sexual harassment and other disturbing behaviour' by Baldoni and a producer on the movie.
The plan, the complaint said, included a proposal to plant theories on online message boards, engineer a social media campaign and place news stories critical of Lively.
Since the legal battle began, Baldoni's legal team has made text messages from Lively and Reynolds public on a website, titled The Lawsuit Info, created to help defend him.
On the website, published in early February, Baldoni, 41, also shared an amended complaint in his case against Lively, Reynolds, Lively's PR firm and the New York Times, as well as a 168-page document, called 'Timeline of relevant events,' related to the case and the production of the film.
Story continues below advertisement
The timeline includes emails and text messages that were allegedly sent leading up to and during the movie's filming.
Text messages between Lively and Baldoni, where she seemingly alludes to Swift as 'one of her dragons,' were released in February. Swift and Lively have been very close friends since 2015 and the pop star is the godmother of Lively's children.
In the text messages between the pair, Baldoni goes into detail about the rooftop scene in the movie that Lively had allegedly reworked. His lawyers claim that the actor 'felt obliged to text Lively to say that he had liked her pages and hadn't needed Reynolds and her megacelebrity friend to pressure him.'
According to the suit, Lively invited Baldoni to her penthouse in New York, where Reynolds and a 'megacelebrity friend' both praised Lively's version of the rooftop scene.
'Also was working on rooftop scene today, I really love what you did. It really does help a lot,' Baldoni wrote in the text message. 'Makes it so much more fun and interesting. (And I would have felt that way without Ryan and Taylor). You really are a talent across the board. Really excited nd [sic] grateful to do this together.'
In a text from Lively, according to the suit, she calls Reynolds and another person, whose name is redacted, 'absolute titans as writers and storytellers outside of their primary gig.'
Story continues below advertisement
'They also know I'm not always as good at making sure I'm seen and utilized for fear of threatening egos, or fear of affecting the ease of the process. They don't give a sh-t about that. And because of that, everyone listens to them with immense respect and enthusiasm. So I guess I have to stop worrying about people liking me,' Lively allegedly wrote.
Lively goes on to compare herself to Khaleesi, a Game of Thrones character played by Emilia Clarke.
'If you ever get around to watching Game of Thrones, you'll appreciate that I'm Khaleesi, and like her, I happen to have a few dragons. For better or worse, but usually for better. Because my dragons also protect those I fight for. So really we all benefit from those gorgeous monsters of mine. You will too, I can promise you,' Lively wrote.
Story continues below advertisement
Baldoni and Lively's legal trial is set for March 2026 in New York City.
— With files from The Associated Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian Head Rockets honour 75 years with former players
Indian Head Rockets honour 75 years with former players

Global News

time3 hours ago

  • Global News

Indian Head Rockets honour 75 years with former players

In collaboration with Saskatchewan African Canadian Heritage Museum and the Indian Head Museum, a meet and greet was hosted Wednesday for former Indian Head Rockets players Willie Reed and Nat Bates to sign autographs, meet fans and answer questions about their legacy with the Indian Head Rockets. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The meet and greet was in honor of 75 years of the Indian Head Rockets. The players joined the team in 1952. More details in the video above.

Justin Bieber Shares Cryptic Posts as Wife Hailey Bieber Celebrates Billion Dollar Deal
Justin Bieber Shares Cryptic Posts as Wife Hailey Bieber Celebrates Billion Dollar Deal

Global News

time7 hours ago

  • Global News

Justin Bieber Shares Cryptic Posts as Wife Hailey Bieber Celebrates Billion Dollar Deal

Justin Bieber has sparked speculation about his marriage to Hailey Bieber with a series of cryptic social media posts. One post touched on themes of faith and judgment, stating that only God decides what people deserve. In another, he criticized the idea of loyalty as manipulative, emphasizing that love should be a delight, not a duty. Fans quickly interpreted these messages as veiled comments about his relationship with Hailey. Some pointed out the irony, recalling a past Instagram post where Justin admitted to once telling Hailey she'd never be on the cover of Vogue. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The couple's relationship has been under public scrutiny, with some followers seeing his comments as supportive, while others viewed them as disrespectful. Meanwhile, Hailey appears unbothered, recently posting a cheerful photo with friends, captioned with gratitude for their presence. She also celebrated a major professional milestone: her beauty brand, Rhode, was acquired by e.l.f. Beauty for a reported $1 billion. Hailey will remain involved as Chief Creative Officer and Head of Innovation, as well as a strategic advisor. Story continues below advertisement While fans continue to debate the meaning behind Justin's posts, both he and Hailey appear to be navigating their personal and professional lives in very public (and very different) ways.

Harvey Weinstein found guilty of criminal sexual assault in retrial
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of criminal sexual assault in retrial

Global News

time7 hours ago

  • Global News

Harvey Weinstein found guilty of criminal sexual assault in retrial

Former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein was convicted Wednesday of one of the top charges in his sex crimes retrial but acquitted of another, and jurors were as yet unable to reach a verdict on a third charge. The split verdict meted out a measure of vindication to his accusers and prosecutors — but also to Weinstein — after the landmark case was thrown into limbo. Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. This time, a majority-female jury convicted the former studio boss of forcibly subjecting one woman, Miriam Haley, to a criminal sex act in 2006. Story continues below advertisement But jurors acquitted Weinstein of another criminal sex act charge. It related to Kaja Sokola, whose allegations of forcible oral sex date to 2006 but were added to the case last year. And jurors were to continue deliberating Thursday on a charge that he raped another woman, Jessica Mann, in 2013. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the first-degree criminal sex act offence. Weinstein, 73, denies sexually assaulting or raping anyone. Jury deliberations had teetered Wednesday as the foreperson again requested to speak to the judge about 'a situation' he found troubling. The man — who complained Monday that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges — was being questioned in private, at his request. Story continues below advertisement While the jury was in court to hear the answer to an earlier request to re-hear the text of a rape law, the foreperson signalled to Judge Curtis Farber that he wanted to talk. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'He said words to the effect of 'I can't go back in there with the other jurors,'' Farber explained later. The foreperson was sent to wait in a separate room, where he penned a note saying, 'I need to talk to you about a situation.' When briefly brought into court, the foreperson said he wanted to speak in private. He, the judge, prosecutors and Weinstein's lawyers then went behind closed doors. The discussion was closed to the press and public, but Farber later said the foreperson had expressed that he didn't want to change his position — whatever it may be — and was being bullied. 'He did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming,' the judge said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala characterized the foreperson's concerns more severely, saying that the man had said he was concerned for his safety after his fellow panellist talked about meeting him outside and added, 'you don't know me.' 'I don't think the court is protecting this juror. Period,' Aidala said, going on to ask for a mistrial. Story continues below advertisement Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, however, said the foreperson hadn't seemed afraid or apprehensive, just 'stubborn.' 'He said he'd made up his mind, he didn't want to change it, and people were pressuring him to change it. That's what jury deliberations involve,' the prosecutor said. The episode was the latest sign of strain among the jurors. On Friday, one of them asked to be excused because he felt another member of the group was being treated unfairly. Weinstein's lawyers asked unsuccessfully for a mistrial then, and again after the foreperson expressed his concerns Monday. The jury kept deliberating and went through Tuesday without sending any more messages about interpersonal tensions. The seven female and five male jurors started their fifth day of deliberations Wednesday by re-hearing accuser Jessica Mann's testimony that he raped her in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013. The group wrapped up Tuesday's deliberations by asking to revisit that testimony. Story continues below advertisement Some jurors appeared to take fresh notes Wednesday, while others sat impassively as court stenographers read aloud the requested parts of Mann's days-long testimony. The jury had already reheard some of the passages last week. Weinstein, 73, pleaded not guilty to raping Mann and to forcing oral sex on two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. The Oscar-winning producer and former Hollywood powerbroker maintains that he never sexually assaulted or raped anyone, and his lawyers portrayed his accusers as opportunists who accepted his advances because they wanted a leg up in the entertainment world.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store