logo
Police can freeze accounts under anti-scam law taking effect on 1 July 2025 in Singapore

Police can freeze accounts under anti-scam law taking effect on 1 July 2025 in Singapore

SINGAPORE: The Protection from Scams Act 2025, passed by Parliament on 7 January 2025, will come into force on 1 July 2025, according to a statement from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).
The legislation grants new powers to police and commercial affairs officers under Section 64 of the Police Force Act.
Officers may now issue restriction orders (ROs) to banks to limit the banking and credit activities of individuals suspected of being scam targets.
These measures are described as a 'last resort' and will be used only when other efforts to dissuade potential scam victims have failed.
Restriction orders will block banking activities to prevent scam-related losses
According to the MHA, restriction orders can be issued when an officer has 'reasonable belief' that an individual may transfer funds to a scammer, withdraw cash for that purpose, or use a credit facility to benefit a scammer.
Officers will assess each case based on the available facts, including input from individuals and their family members.
An RO may also be issued if it is deemed 'necessary' to protect an individual from harm.
Once an RO is in place, affected individuals will face immediate restrictions. These include blocked transfers via online and mobile banking, PayNow, and over-the-counter services.
ATM access and all credit facilities – such as credit card transactions and personal loan access – will also be frozen.
systemically important banks: DBS, OCBC, UOB, Citibank, Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Malayan Banking and Standard Chartered.
However, the MHA clarified that ROs can also be issued to other banks if there is 'reasonable suspicion' that funds may be channelled from those institutions to scammers.
Affected individuals may apply to access their funds for legitimate purposes, such as daily expenses or bill payments.
Such applications will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the police.
Duration, appeal process, and accountability of restriction orders
ROs will initially be valid for up to 30 days and may be extended by additional 30-day increments, up to a maximum of five times.
After 180 days, the order will lapse, even if the individual is still considered at risk of being scammed.
Nonetheless, an RO may be cancelled before the end of the 30-day period if the police determine that the individual is no longer vulnerable to scams.
An appeal mechanism is in place.
Individuals subject to ROs, or joint account holders of affected accounts, may appeal to the Commissioner of Police.
The order will remain active while the appeal is pending, and the Commissioner's decision will be final, the MHA said.
Scam losses hit record high as authorities seek stronger protection
The implementation of the Act follows a marked increase in scam cases in Singapore.
According to the Singapore Police Force's annual scam report released on 25 February 2025, total scam losses in 2024 reached S$1.1 billion.
This figure represents a 70% jump from the S$651.8 million lost in 2023. Police also recorded a new high of 51,501 scam cases in 2024, up from 46,563 the previous year.
While most of the cases (over 70%) involved losses of under S$5,000, the median loss per case stood at approximately S$1,300.
The sharp rise in scams and financial losses has prompted the government to enhance preventive powers through legislation.
The new law aims to provide timely intervention to prevent irreversible financial harm to potential victims.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police can freeze accounts under anti-scam law taking effect on 1 July 2025 in Singapore
Police can freeze accounts under anti-scam law taking effect on 1 July 2025 in Singapore

Online Citizen​

time6 hours ago

  • Online Citizen​

Police can freeze accounts under anti-scam law taking effect on 1 July 2025 in Singapore

SINGAPORE: The Protection from Scams Act 2025, passed by Parliament on 7 January 2025, will come into force on 1 July 2025, according to a statement from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). The legislation grants new powers to police and commercial affairs officers under Section 64 of the Police Force Act. Officers may now issue restriction orders (ROs) to banks to limit the banking and credit activities of individuals suspected of being scam targets. These measures are described as a 'last resort' and will be used only when other efforts to dissuade potential scam victims have failed. Restriction orders will block banking activities to prevent scam-related losses According to the MHA, restriction orders can be issued when an officer has 'reasonable belief' that an individual may transfer funds to a scammer, withdraw cash for that purpose, or use a credit facility to benefit a scammer. Officers will assess each case based on the available facts, including input from individuals and their family members. An RO may also be issued if it is deemed 'necessary' to protect an individual from harm. Once an RO is in place, affected individuals will face immediate restrictions. These include blocked transfers via online and mobile banking, PayNow, and over-the-counter services. ATM access and all credit facilities – such as credit card transactions and personal loan access – will also be frozen. systemically important banks: DBS, OCBC, UOB, Citibank, Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Malayan Banking and Standard Chartered. However, the MHA clarified that ROs can also be issued to other banks if there is 'reasonable suspicion' that funds may be channelled from those institutions to scammers. Affected individuals may apply to access their funds for legitimate purposes, such as daily expenses or bill payments. Such applications will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the police. Duration, appeal process, and accountability of restriction orders ROs will initially be valid for up to 30 days and may be extended by additional 30-day increments, up to a maximum of five times. After 180 days, the order will lapse, even if the individual is still considered at risk of being scammed. Nonetheless, an RO may be cancelled before the end of the 30-day period if the police determine that the individual is no longer vulnerable to scams. An appeal mechanism is in place. Individuals subject to ROs, or joint account holders of affected accounts, may appeal to the Commissioner of Police. The order will remain active while the appeal is pending, and the Commissioner's decision will be final, the MHA said. Scam losses hit record high as authorities seek stronger protection The implementation of the Act follows a marked increase in scam cases in Singapore. According to the Singapore Police Force's annual scam report released on 25 February 2025, total scam losses in 2024 reached S$1.1 billion. This figure represents a 70% jump from the S$651.8 million lost in 2023. Police also recorded a new high of 51,501 scam cases in 2024, up from 46,563 the previous year. While most of the cases (over 70%) involved losses of under S$5,000, the median loss per case stood at approximately S$1,300. The sharp rise in scams and financial losses has prompted the government to enhance preventive powers through legislation. The new law aims to provide timely intervention to prevent irreversible financial harm to potential victims.

Daily Debrief: What Happened Today (Jun 30)
Daily Debrief: What Happened Today (Jun 30)

Business Times

time9 hours ago

  • Business Times

Daily Debrief: What Happened Today (Jun 30)

Stories you might have missed First train for JB-Singapore Rapid Transit System unveiled; service to start by December 2026 First China-made train for the cross-border rail system to be tested in Singapore, ahead of preparation for passenger service. Anti-scam law that lets police freeze potential victims' bank accounts to kick in on Jul 1: MHA Officers may order banks to restrict a potential scam target's banking activities as a 'last resort' once other options have been exhausted. Tighten en bloc rules, encourage reuse so more private housing blocks stand for over 50 years BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Apply lessons from Golden Mile Singapore project. Singtel CEO Yuen Kuan Moon's pay up 16.8% at S$8.2 million; S$2.8 billion cash holdings to help group navigate challenges It sees IT services company NCS and data centre Nxera as key growth engines. Singapore electricity, gas prices to fall for July to September on lower fuel costs electricity tariffs before goods and service tax (GST) for households will fall by 2.3 per cent or 0.65 cent per kilowatt-hour (kWh) from the prior quarter amid lower energy costs.

Anti-scam law that lets police freeze potential victims' bank accounts to kick in on Jul 1: MHA
Anti-scam law that lets police freeze potential victims' bank accounts to kick in on Jul 1: MHA

Business Times

time11 hours ago

  • Business Times

Anti-scam law that lets police freeze potential victims' bank accounts to kick in on Jul 1: MHA

[SINGAPORE] Singapore police will soon be able to restrict bank transfers of individuals suspected of being scam targets to better protect them, said the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). This comes as an anti-scam law passed in Parliament on Jan 7 will come into force on Tuesday (Jul 1). Once the Protection from Scams Act 2025 takes effect, police officers and commercial affairs officers appointed under Section 64 of the Police Force Act may be able to issue restriction orders to banks to restrict the banking and credit facilities of potential scam victims as a 'last resort', the MHA said. The officers will decide on whether to issue a restriction order after assessing the facts and circumstances of each case, including relevant facts provided by an individual or his family members, the MHA said. An officer may issue an order to a bank if there is 'reasonable belief' that an individual will transfer money to a scammer, withdraw money with the intent of giving it to a scammer, or apply for or draw down on a credit facility with the intent of benefitting a scammer. Such orders may also be issued if it is deemed 'necessary' to protect an individual, but they will only be used as 'a last report, after other options to convince the individual have been exhausted', the ministry said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Individuals who receive a restriction order may expect money transfers from their bank accounts into other accounts to be restricted. These include transfers via online banking, mobile banking, PayNow and in person over the counter services. ATM services and all credit facilities – including credit card transactions and access to personal loan facilities – will also be restricted, the MHA said. The restriction orders will be issued to seven domestic systemically important banks by default. This refers to major retail banks that manage most of the consumer deposits in Singapore. The banks are: DBS, OCBC, UOB, Citibank, Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Malayan Banking and Standard Chartered. Restriction orders may also be issued to other banks beyond this list if there is 'reasonable suspicion' that an individual will be transferring money from an account under such a bank to a scammer. Individuals who are issued restriction orders may access their monies for legitimate reasons – such as for daily expenses or paying bills – by applying to the police to request to do so. Such requests will be assessed on a case-by-case basis, the MHA said. Restriction orders will be effective for no more than 30 days at a time and can be extended for up to 30 days each time, with a maximum of five extensions. Subsequently, they will lapse even if an individual remains set on transferring money to a scammer. They may be cancelled ahead of the 30-day period if the police assess the individual to be no longer at risk of being scammed. Individuals who receive restriction orders or joint account holders of bank accounts subject to restriction orders may lodge an appeal to the Commissioner of Police against the decision. The restriction order will remain active until the outcome of the appeal is decided and the decision of the Commissioner of Police will be final, the MHA said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store