Mapping the Israel-Iran conflict: Where key nuclear sites, targets and United States military bases lie
Loading
South of Tehran lies the Natanz nuclear facility, a complex at the heart of Iran's enrichment program that houses facilities including two enrichment plants: the underground Fuel Enrichment Plant and above-ground Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant.
The Fordow enrichment facility is also south of Tehran, and is notably underground, making it harder to successfully hit. Further south, on the outskirts of Isfahan, Iran's second-largest city, is a large nuclear technology centre that includes the Fuel Plate Fabrication Plant and uranium conversion and storage facilities. On the Gulf Coast is the Bushehr nuclear power plant, which is Iran's only operating nuclear power plant and uses Russian fuel that Russia takes back once it is spent.
Further north, in addition to Tehran's nuclear research reactor, is the partially built heavy-water research reactor in Khondab, which Iran previously informed the International Atomic Energy Agency it had planned to start operating in 2026.
Why is Iran's Fordow nuclear base a target?
Dug deep into a mountain near Qom is the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is one of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear sites, built in secrecy and designed for survivability.
Loading
It was exposed through Western intelligence in 2009, and its capacity to enrich uranium levels close to weapons-grade is what alarms the superpowers and makes it critical to Iran's nuclear program. In 2023, according to the IAEA, uranium enriched to a purity of 83.7 per cent was found at Fordow. Nuclear weapons need an enrichment level of 90 per cent.
The fact that Fordow was designed as a fallback facility should other nuclear sites be compromised makes it a key stronghold for Iran, and a prime target for Israel – but it's understood Israel would be hard-pressed to destroy it without help from the US.
Why does Israel need the United States' assistance to target Fordow?
Fordow's underground nuclear facilities are understood to be 80 to 90 metres beneath the mountain's surface. It's impenetrable, even if Israel used the most advanced 'bunker buster' bombs in its arsenal for targeted aerial strikes.
The 13,608-kilogram GBU-57A/B MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) is thought to be the only 'bunker buster' bomb that could reach the core buried below Fordow's surface, though that would still be likely to require multiple strikes.
Loading
Capable of burrowing through 60 metres of steel and rock before detonating, it was developed by the United States and is its largest non-nuclear bomb.
Israel has requested it from the US, and the request has been denied multiple times.
Only a B2 Stealth Bomber could carry the bomb due to its sheer size.
How large is the United States' military presence in the Middle East?
Iran has said it would target the United States' military bases in the Middle East should Trump enter the conflict on Israel's side in earnest.
The United States has a significant military presence in the Middle East, with, per the Council on Foreign Relations, a broad network of sites spanning at least 19 locations, eight of which are permanent.
Loading
The permanent United States sites are understood to be in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
Since October 7, 2023, several attacks purportedly by Iran-backed forces have occurred. Notably, in January 2024, three American soldiers were killed after a drone hit the Tower 22 military base in Jordan, near the Syrian border.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
13 minutes ago
- The Age
Who is Simcha Rothman, the Israeli MP barred from Australia?
What is the Religious Zionist Party? The Religious Zionist party is a far-right nationalist party that advocates for strengthening Jewish religious identity in the region and the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank – actions that Australia and most of the international community oppose because they are illegal under international law. The Times of Israel reported in 2022 that the party had extracted concessions from Netanyahu in an agreement to form a governing coalition, including a vague commitment to annex the West Bank and legalise dozens of unauthorised settlements. 'The Jewish people have the exclusive and indisputable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,' the agreement states. Netanyahu relies on the party to form government, dragging the broader coalition towards a right-wing party position. The party's leader, Bezalel Smotrich, is one of two Israeli politicians under Australian sanctions for his advocacy for settler violence and the destruction of Gaza. In its reasoning for rejecting Rothman's visa, the Home Affairs Department pointed to Smotrich's views, including his opposition to Palestinian statehood and denial of the existence of a Palestinian people. Smotrich announced last week, following international momentum towards recognition of a Palestinian state, a long-delayed settlement that could divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem would be restarted, a move his office said would 'bury' the idea of a Palestinian state. Why did the Australian government cancel Rothman's visa? Rothman had been invited to Australia by the Australian Jewish Association to attend events with Jewish groups and schools this month. His visa was granted on August 8, then cancelled 10 days later, before he had come to Australia. The Department of Home Affairs outlined its decision in a document which referenced public comments from Rothman calling Gazan children 'enemies' of Israel, denying they were being starved, and claiming the idea of a two-state solution had 'poisoned the minds of the entire world' and was the 'first step toward the destruction of the State of Israel'. The AJA said the visit was to foster communication between Israeli lawmakers and the Australian Jewish community. But a department delegate who rescinded the visa said Rothman could use the events in Australia to promote his 'controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community'. 'The use of platforms for inflammatory rhetoric can lead to increased hate crimes, radicalisation of individuals and heightened tensions in communities,' the delegate said in the document. They said Rothman could put at risk the 'good order' of Australian society, specifically in the Islamic population. What does Rothman plan to do now? Rothman said he would not be deterred and would be a 'proud voice of the Jewish people heard wherever I am', labelling the Australian government's decision as antisemitic. The AJA said it would host Rothman on Zoom instead so he could still speak to Jewish Australians. 'The Australian government's decision to deny me the opportunity to come and speak to my people, due to expressing simple and clear positions, is clear and blatant antisemitism that gives a boost to terrorism,' Rothman wrote in Hebrew on X. 'In the decision to deny the visa, the Australian home affairs minister claims that my presence and my words will have a serious impact on peace and the rule of law in Australia, meaning that the Islamist mob calling for the destruction of Israel on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne will not be happy about my presence.' The ABC has reported Rothman insisted he was being blocked from entering Australia only because he said, 'Hamas is bad and Israel is good', and when asked to concede his views were at odds with Australia's foreign policy, said the government was afraid of open discourse about its policies.
Sydney Morning Herald
13 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The territory at the heart of Russia's war in Ukraine
For years, Russian President Vladimir Putin has been trying to change Ukraine's borders, even before Russia's full-scale invasion of the country in February 2022. But one piece of land is the centre of his ambition: Ukraine's Donbas, the industrial region in eastern Ukraine that was seen by some as 'the heart of Russia' during the Soviet era. Here, the land rises to 300 metres above sea level in places, and its ridges and rivers have provided a natural defensive line for beleaguered Ukraine over the past 3½ years, allowing its army to hold back Russian troops from the rest of the country. Putin has managed to capture 88 per cent of Donbas, and now he is reportedly demanding that Ukraine hand over the remainder as his price for peace. US President Donald Trump has said both Ukraine and Russia will have to make concessions under any final peace settlement, saying there could be 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both'. But based on the reported terms of Putin, the trade of territory would be one-sided, heavily favouring Russia, and come with other terms and conditions attached. How much of Ukraine does Russia control? Putin illegally annexed the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea in 2014 after the downfall of Ukraine's pro-Russian former president, Victor Yanukovych, and then fomented an insurgency in the eastern Donbas region, comprising Donetsk and Luhansk provinces, that resulted in them largely coming under the control of pro-Russian separatists. In February 2022, Russian troops rolled into Donetsk and Luhansk and captured about 74 per cent of the southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia provinces as well. After failing to capture Kyiv early in the war, Russia withdrew from northern Ukraine in April 2022 to concentrate on the Donbas. Later that year, Ukraine launched a major counter-offensive, recapturing most of Kharkiv and the city of Kherson, and pushing Russian forces south of the Dnipro River. But after almost four years of fighting, the only Ukrainian region Russia has near-complete control over is Luhansk, and despite making slow progress elsewhere, it hasn't yet gained a decisive advantage. As of mid-August this year, Russia occupied nearly a fifth of Ukraine, with its offensive stretching across a front line of more than 1000 kilometres. Including Crimea, it amounts to some 114,500 square kilometres (19 per cent) of the country, according to open-source conflict maps, including some 46,570 square kilometres of the Donbas – but a large chunk of the region, in Donetsk, remains under Ukrainian control. What does Putin want in return for ending the war? Putin's reported peace terms involve Ukraine giving up the 25 per cent of Donetsk that it still holds, which amounts to some 6500 square kilometres. The battle lines in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia would also be frozen and turned into a new border, with Russia keeping the territory it occupies in both. In exchange, Putin has reportedly offered to withdraw his troops from the small pockets of Sumy, Kharkiv and Mykolaiv regions in north-east Ukraine. The Russian leader has also demanded that the 'root causes' of the war should be tackled; essentially, that Ukraine must become a demilitarised, neutral state and that NATO stop expanding closer to Russia's borders. Why does Putin want the Donbas? The appeal of Donbas to Putin probably lies in his nostalgic desire to redraw Russia's borders and enshrine the legacy of the Soviet Union. Named after the Donets coal basin, it remains Ukraine's coal mining and steelmaking centre, though it has suffered greatly from years of conflict, and many facilities have been destroyed or badly damaged. Despite that, the Donbas still has significant reserves of coal and shale gas, as well as other desirable resources such as lithium, titanium and graphite – although it's unclear how much could be commercially extracted. The fertile farmlands of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, meanwhile, account for some 10 per cent of the wheat, barley, rapeseed and sunflower seed produced in Ukraine from 2016 to 2020, according to the US Department of Agriculture. Controlling Donetsk offers Russia a strategic advantage by providing a land corridor along the coast of the Sea of Azov to Crimea, reducing reliance on the Kerch Bridge. If Ukraine were to surrender all of Donetsk, it would lose its main fortified defensive line against Russian advances deeper into the country, according to the Washington think tank, the Institute for the Study of War. Loading And Luhansk and Donetsk may be broadly Russian-speaking, there are major questions as to what would happen to those inhabitants who did not necessarily want to become actual Russian citizens. A Ukrainian opinion poll in May 2022 suggested that 82 per cent of people in territories seized by Russia had a negative attitude to Moscow. With almost 200,000 Ukrainians living in the cities of Kramatorsk and Slovyansk alone, thousands might need to be relocated. What about Crimea? Putin's 2014 seizure of Crimea – which had been transferred from Russia to Ukraine in 1954 – enabled him to use it as a launchpad for the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The peninsula also offers access to the Black Sea, a critical corridor for transporting grain and other goods. The Kerch Bridge, which opened in 2018 to connect Crimea to the Russian mainland, is a vital logistics route for Russia to supply its frontlines. Ukrainian forces have attacked it several times to try to sever this link. After his meetings with Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the European leaders, Trump told Fox News that it would be 'impossible' for control of the Crimean Peninsula to be returned to Ukraine. The Trump administration previously floated the idea of the US recognising Russian sovereignty of Crimea as part of a peace agreement. What is Ukraine's stance on its Russian-occupied territory? Zelensky has repeatedly said that Ukraine's 1996 constitution states that the country's territory is 'indivisible and inviolable'. It also specifically defines Crimea as an autonomous republic that's an 'inseparable constituent part of Ukraine'. The May 2022 opinion poll found 82 per cent of Ukrainians did not believe Ukraine should give up any of its territory, even if it made the war last longer and threatened the country's independence, according to a poll conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. But by early June of this year, that share had fallen to 52 per cent.
Sydney Morning Herald
13 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Who is Simcha Rothman, the Israeli MP barred from Australia?
What is the Religious Zionist Party? The Religious Zionist party is a far-right nationalist party that advocates for strengthening Jewish religious identity in the region and the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank – actions that Australia and most of the international community oppose because they are illegal under international law. The Times of Israel reported in 2022 that the party had extracted concessions from Netanyahu in an agreement to form a governing coalition, including a vague commitment to annex the West Bank and legalise dozens of unauthorised settlements. 'The Jewish people have the exclusive and indisputable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,' the agreement states. Netanyahu relies on the party to form government, dragging the broader coalition towards a right-wing party position. The party's leader, Bezalel Smotrich, is one of two Israeli politicians under Australian sanctions for his advocacy for settler violence and the destruction of Gaza. In its reasoning for rejecting Rothman's visa, the Home Affairs Department pointed to Smotrich's views, including his opposition to Palestinian statehood and denial of the existence of a Palestinian people. Smotrich announced last week, following international momentum towards recognition of a Palestinian state, a long-delayed settlement that could divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem would be restarted, a move his office said would 'bury' the idea of a Palestinian state. Why did the Australian government cancel Rothman's visa? Rothman had been invited to Australia by the Australian Jewish Association to attend events with Jewish groups and schools this month. His visa was granted on August 8, then cancelled 10 days later, before he had come to Australia. The Department of Home Affairs outlined its decision in a document which referenced public comments from Rothman calling Gazan children 'enemies' of Israel, denying they were being starved, and claiming the idea of a two-state solution had 'poisoned the minds of the entire world' and was the 'first step toward the destruction of the State of Israel'. The AJA said the visit was to foster communication between Israeli lawmakers and the Australian Jewish community. But a department delegate who rescinded the visa said Rothman could use the events in Australia to promote his 'controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community'. 'The use of platforms for inflammatory rhetoric can lead to increased hate crimes, radicalisation of individuals and heightened tensions in communities,' the delegate said in the document. They said Rothman could put at risk the 'good order' of Australian society, specifically in the Islamic population. What does Rothman plan to do now? Rothman said he would not be deterred and would be a 'proud voice of the Jewish people heard wherever I am', labelling the Australian government's decision as antisemitic. The AJA said it would host Rothman on Zoom instead so he could still speak to Jewish Australians. 'The Australian government's decision to deny me the opportunity to come and speak to my people, due to expressing simple and clear positions, is clear and blatant antisemitism that gives a boost to terrorism,' Rothman wrote in Hebrew on X. 'In the decision to deny the visa, the Australian home affairs minister claims that my presence and my words will have a serious impact on peace and the rule of law in Australia, meaning that the Islamist mob calling for the destruction of Israel on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne will not be happy about my presence.' The ABC has reported Rothman insisted he was being blocked from entering Australia only because he said, 'Hamas is bad and Israel is good', and when asked to concede his views were at odds with Australia's foreign policy, said the government was afraid of open discourse about its policies.
