Cornish Ayr Holiday Park owner feels ‘victimised' by government tax changes
ITV News West Country's Grace Pascoe has been speaking to the owner of the holiday park.
The owner of a Cornish holiday park says he feels 'victimised' by the current Labour government due to changes in Business Property Relief and Inheritance Tax.
Andrew Baragwanath, who owns Ayr Holiday Parksays, says the changes could cost him around 1 million pounds in what he calls a 'tax grab' by the government.
The changes have led him to consider holding off on new investment in the business and to not replace employees who leave.
He said: 'We have about 30 employees here at the moment, which we keep on all year round. Due to some of the tax changes, I now would look very carefully at replacing any employee that left.
"Similarly, I'm looking at whether to replace any caravans. Normally I buy new caravans every year, that may not be possible now.
"We've got to look at retaining money in the business or taking out perhaps insurance policies, spending money on legal and accountancy advice, which, frankly, we just see is dead money.
"It's all about looking how to protect the business from what we see as a tax grab. I feel victimised by this government.
"It's almost as though we're the enemy and they don't want family businesses to thrive. And I know we want to fund the NHS and all the other things government has to do, but they also have to take into account there is an unintended consequence".
Andrew still hopes to pass the family run holiday park on to his daughter who is involved in the business but is considering all options.
"The impact of the business property relief and inheritance tax changes is quite massive. Potentially it could put a £1 million tax bill on the business. One exit would be to sell the whole business, but quite likely it could be bought by one of the big groups.
"I think it's a shame because you then lose out on the personal attention and the detail on the park and the care you get from being family-owned rather than being part of a group".
A new report from Family Business UK and CBI Economics reveals that family-owned businesses in the South West are expecting to cut almost 19,000 jobs and reduce investment by more than 16% leading to a drop in economic activity worth almost £1.3bn.
Deborah Walker, Director General of the British Holidays and Home Parks Association wants the government to reverse its decision. She said" 'We're urging the government to take another look at the figures. The government thinks that it's going to raise taxes with this inheritance tax.
"But the figures show that there actually is actually going to cost the Treasury £130 million and what it's also going to do is force much loved family-run businesses to have to sell up or close down and those are exactly the sort of businesses that are driving rural and coastal economies.'
The new rules on Business Property Relief are set to come into effect in April 2026.
In response a HM Treasury spokesperson said: 'Our reforms to Agricultural and Business Property Reliefs will mean three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most estates pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. This is a fair and balanced approach which helps fix the public services we all rely on.
'Capping the rate of corporation tax, reforming planning, establishing a National Wealth Fund and creating pension megafunds is part of our Plan for Change to get Britain building, unlock investment and support business so we can raise living standards and make all parts of the country better off'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'I skipped dinner so my parents could eat my food - child poverty must end'
Growing up Georgia Sullivan would force down food she didn't like – in case there was no food at home. Now the 26-year-old and four other young people are calling on the government to end child poverty. Growing up in poverty has left an indelible trace on Georgia Sullivan. "I grew up with a fear of food, because I wasn't used to eating different things," Georgia, now 26, explains. "I'd be at school eating things I didn't usually eat, and I remember gagging because I needed to eat the meal because we might not have anything to eat at home. That's a core memory for me. As I got older, I'd sometimes not eat in the evening so my parents could eat my food." Georgia from Nottingham, who grew up in North London and Stevenage adds: "Part of poverty is trying to pretend and act like things that are ordinary for other people aren't extraordinary for you. There were times growing up I was told not to open the door because of the bailiffs. All the physical things – like having nits for months because we couldn't afford the treatments – have a real impact. I'm dealing with the lasting consequences every day." On Wednesday, Georgia and four other young people who grew up in poverty will hand deliver a letter to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and Liz Kendall, Work and Pensions Secretary – who co-chair the government's Child Poverty Taskforce. From their own experiences, and as young ambassadors for Action For Children, these five young people know better than anyone that every day a child spends in poverty is one day too long. After 14 years of brutal Tory Austerity, Labour inherited staggering levels of child poverty, affecting around 4.5 million children – yet the government's flagship Child Poverty Strategy has become mired in delays. Spring became summer, and now the strategy has reportedly been delayed until at least the autumn. And while Wednesday's Spending Review saw a return from the Chancellor to core Labour values – full of bold plans for transport, the NHS, infrastructure – there was no mention of lifting the two-child benefit cap or other measures that could dramatically shift the dial on child poverty. As internal rows continue to rage over the two-child limit, and benefit cuts continue down the pipeline, every day more children go hungry and endure health and mental health problems, bullying and indignities that will shape their adult lives. So, Georgia and a group of young people have decided to act to remind Labour of its manifesto commitment to end child poverty. "Dear Bridget Phillipson and Liz Kendall," their letter says. "We know how it feels to grow up in poverty. We've felt the anxiety, shame, and loneliness that poverty causes. We felt it as children, and as adults we still feel it. We worry that we won't be able to keep our own children from it. "Your government has said 'no child should be left hungry, cold or have their future held back' by poverty… Hearing these promises, we feel hopeful - but we're also worried… the two-child limit remains in place, and other benefits are being cut." They urge the cabinet ministers – "Please make the right choices." After the welcome government U-turn on winter fuel, ministers can expect to be deluged by anti-poverty charities over the coming weeks, pushing for action on the two-child benefit cap. Paul Carberry, CEO of Action for Children, welcomes the additional funding for children's social care, social housing, and the expansion of free school meals in the Spending Review. But he adds: "If this government is to succeed in its bold ambition to drive down the UK's shamefully high levels of child poverty, it must go further. The Child Poverty Strategy this autumn must rebuild our inadequate social security system, starting with scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap." Another of the letter's co-authors, Louise Fitt, 24, from West London, says growing up in poverty has deeply affected her adult life. "Childhood poverty affected me in every sense, from not having enough to eat, to coming home and there being no money on the meter to have a hot shower or watch TV," she says. "We didn't have enough money for school uniforms, and we would wear our shoes until they were worn out. Not eating enough affected my concentration at school. We were underweight, malnourished. I couldn't go on school trips with my friends. I didn't know at the time we didn't' really have money, I thought I was being punished." At the age of 11, Louise went into care, and later became a young parent. "I now work full-time as a civil servant but it's still a struggle to make ends meet," she says. "Many care leavers like me lack the support networks that most people take for granted. But when you come from nothing, it makes you more determined. I started with nothing, but I want to leave knowing I have achieved something and leave a legacy for my daughter." Jo Rawle, 26, lives in Bideford, North-Devon. Having lived through childhood poverty, now – as a solo parent living in temporary accommodation – she fears history repeating for her four-year-old son. "My son has autism and complex additional needs," she says. "That means it's difficult for me to work until he starts school. Meanwhile, everything has gone up. Sometimes I run out of money to buy a bottle of milk or nappies or fuel, then I have to borrow money from a friend, which I have to pay back later." Jo's benefits income is not enough to support her and her son. "I've visited food banks before. I make sure my son comes first. I've gone without a meal myself and I wear my clothes until they have holes in them." A Government spokesman said: "We are determined to lift more children out of poverty. We have already expanded free school meals, increased the national minimum wage, rolled out breakfast clubs and introduced a fair repayment rate for universal credit deductions. And this week the spending review allocated £1bn in crisis support, including funding to feed hungry children during the holidays. We are determined to go further and that's why we will publish an ambitious Child Poverty Strategy later this year." The Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has told the Mirror in the past about her family being 'pushed into poverty' when she was a child and has called child poverty "a scar on our society". "I know what it is to grow up on free school meals, to grow up in a household where there isn't enough: when the house is cold, the food runs short, when the choices about which others don't think twice just aren't there," she has said. In Wednesday's Spending Review speech, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that "every young person should have the equal chance to succeed". Young campaigners Georgia, Freya, Aaron, Louise, Holly and 4.5 million children are counting on Labour to make the right decisions.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
West Lothian school transport cost prompts question over free bus pass use
The council pays £1, 245 per pupil to provide 'free' school transport - but with the Scottish Government also providing free bus passes to under 22s, one councillor questioned why pupils were not being asked to use normal buses. Pupils in West Lothian could be asked to use public bus routes to get to school, after questions were raised over the cost of providing special transport. The council pays £1, 245 per pupil to provide 'free' school transport - but with the Scottish Government also providing free bus passes to under 22s, one councillor questioned why pupils were not being asked to use normal buses. And the council has confirmed they are looking at 'crossover' areas where normal public transport may be a suitable alternative. The cost to the council for school transport in the last year was more than £3m - but the 'use the bus pass' option is not the simple answer it might appear. Conservative councillor Alison Adamson, speaking at a recent Environment Policy Development Scrutiny Panel meeting, said: 'I hate using the expression free costs the council £1,245 to take each child to schools. That's not free in anyone's language.' 'I don't understand the Scottish Government saying that anyone up to a certain age gets free transport, but we have to find the money for school children to get to school so my question is. Can we find a way of tapping into free transport budget.? 'Why is that free but councils have to find funding to get children to get to school. I find that very difficult to understand. A lot of people would too? Given how much money it costs I find it very very difficult to swallow.' Chairing the meeting Labour's Tom Conn said 'I think the answer will be that the council is obliged to take pupils to school. We have a responsibility under legislation to support that, but I take your point.' He added that school contract buses 'take children from A to B', directly to schools, whereas commercial networks don't. In East Lothian a proposal in this year's budget by the ruling Labour group to encourage schoolchildren who have nationally funded under-22 free bus passes to stop using school passes was challenged by opposition groups. Under the Education (Scotland) Act 1980, the council has a statutory responsibility to provide school transport for those pupils living over the qualifying distance for home to school transport. Section 42 (4) of the Act clarifies that the statutory walking distance is two miles for any pupil under the age of eight, and three miles for any other pupil where attending their catchment school. The council can discharge this duty through contracted school transport, using council owned vehicles, utilising the commercial bus network or even through mileage payments to parents for self-travel. The council will consider a number of factors when considering which transport option is most appropriate including available resources, the needs of pupils and the suitability and availability of the bus network. The total 2024/25 cost for school buses was £3,194,373. A West Lothian council spokesperson said: 'Although commercial bus routes may exist they may not provide sufficient connection to meet the council's statutory obligations for school transport. 'West Lothian Council has a generous home to school policy which provides transport for secondary pupils living 2 or more miles from their catchment school and 1.5 miles for primary pupils. 'However, work is ongoing to assess the crossover between the school network and the local bus network to identify if there are any opportunities to enhance and supplement the options for transport for school pupils in the future.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Why Israel bombed Iran in its biggest attack since the 1980s
Israeli leaders cast the attack as necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether Iran had actually been planning a strike. Iran maintains its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. READ MORE: Israel warns 'Tehran will burn' if Iran continues firing missiles in retaliation 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but has never acknowledged having such weapons. Why did Israel bomb Iran? Israel's seemingly well-planned attack comes as tensions have escalated over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme, which Israel sees as a threat to its existence. Israel said it targeted nuclear and military facilities, killing Iran's top military and nuclear scientists, adding that the barrage was necessary before its adversary got any closer to building an atomic weapon. The strikes took place despite negotiations between Iran and the United States over the future of Tehran's nuclear programme. READ MORE: I'm an Iranian in the UK. Labour have emboldened Israel to launch attacks on my hom Iran had been censured by the UN's atomic watchdog a day earlier for not complying with obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. Israel had long threatened such a strike, and successive US administrations had sought to prevent it, fearing it would ignite a wider conflict across the Middle East and possibly be ineffective at destroying Iran's dispersed and hardened nuclear programme. What did the IAEA, the UN's atomic watchdog, say about Iran? On Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran had failed to uphold the obligations it had signed on to as part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran rejected the accusation while the IAEA believed was a long history of non-cooperation between Iran and inspectors. However, it did not say that Iran had developed nuclear weapons. Experts and the US government have also assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Has Israel again broken international law by attacking Iran? The short answer is: According to some, yes. Israel has breached dozens of international laws in its onslaught of Gaza. Michael Becker, a professor of international human rights law at Trinity College in Dublin, said: 'Based on publicly available information, Israel's use of force against Iran does not fit within the inherent right of self-defence enshrined in the UN Charter." Protesters hold posters of Mohammad Mahdi Tehranchi (left) and Major-General Hossein Salami of the IRGC (right), who were reported killed earlier today, on June 13 (Image: Getty) 'Self-defence requires Israel's actions to be directed at an ongoing or imminent armed attack by Iran,' added Becker, who has previously worked at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. 'There is no indication that an attack by Iran against Israel was imminent, nor is it sufficient under international law for Israel to justify the attack based on its assessment that Iran will soon have a nuclear capability, especially given the ongoing negotiations between the US and Iran.' Here is a timeline of some significant events between Israel and Iran:
