ACS secures baggage handling monopoly as court dismisses ACSA appeal
The fallout between ACS and Acsa stems from the airport manager's decision in 2023 to terminate ACS' longstanding role in providing baggage screening services with the intention of taking over these services directly.
Banele Ginidza
The Aviation Co-Ordination Services (ACS) has celebrated its hold on the over multi-billion rand baggage handling monopoly after the Gauteng Division of the High Court dismissed the Airports Company of South Africa's (Acsa) appeal against an order that stopped it from procuring baggage screening equipment.
In a statement on Friday, ACS welcomed the high court decision, saying it said confirmed that the critical replacement of aged Hold Baggage Screening (HBS) equipment may proceed at key international airports, which is crucial to ensure public safety and airport efficiency.
The ruling upholds the High Court's mandamus order of 5 November 2024, requiring Acsa and the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) to allow ACS to replace the relevant equipment at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports while a main review case is still before the courts.
The fallout between ACS and Acsa stems from the airport manager's decision in 2023 to terminate ACS' longstanding role in providing baggage screening services with the intention of taking over these services directly.
The ACS said Acsa went ahead with this even though it is the airlines, and not Acsa as the aerodrome operator, that is responsible for providing HBS services at airports (with ACS legally mandated by the airlines to operate and manage HBS).
ACS said it had provided uninterrupted, efficient and cost-effective HBS operations at Acsa airports for more than 20 years – with its operations commended as an example of global best practice.
In response, ACS approached the courts to review and set aside Acsa's decision to insource HBS services including issuing a R3.15 billion tender for HBS equipment.
The company said to avoid service disruption while this main matter is under review by the courts, ACS applied for urgent relief to ensure that it could continue upgrading aging HBS equipment at OR Tambo and King Shaka airports.
The High Court granted this request in November 2024, stipulating that ACS is permitted to replace four Level 3 back-up HBS units at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports and that SACAA must approve the replacement and allow the process to be completed within ten days of the order being made.
ACS said Acsa and SACAA had sought to suspend these directives through an appeal, arguing that they should not be enforced while broader legal proceedings, mainly the review of Acsa's plan to insource HBS services, are ongoing.
However, the High Court judgment has dismissed this appeal, affirming that these orders remain operational and enforceable during the review process.
'The replacement of these units is essential to maintaining uninterrupted, internationally compliant baggage screening services at South Africa's major airports,' said Duke Phahla, CEO of ACS.
'We are pleased that the Court has recognised the urgency and importance of this work, and that we can now move forward in the interests of all airline passengers.'
BUSINESS REPORT
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Court ruling secures baggage screening units for passengers at OR Tambo and King Shaka
Airline passengers can thank the courts for the replacement of four critical Hold Baggage Screening (HBS) units at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports. Image: Supplied Airline passengers can thank the courts for the replacement of four critical Hold Baggage Screening (HBS) units at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports. This is as a protracted legal dispute continues involving - the Aviation Co-ordination Services (ACS), Airports Company South Africa (Acsa) and the South African Civil Aviation Authority (Sacaa) - over who holds the mandate to provide check-in hold baggage screening (HBS) services at South African airports. The ACS said it had launched the legal action given the risk of service breakdown due to ageing screening infrastructure and manufacturer support withdrawal, which compelled it to seek urgent court relief in 2024 to allow it to replace four back-up Level 3 HBS units at OR Tambo and King Shaka. ACS in November obtained an order barring Acsa from implementing its insourcing decision or awarding any contracts under its tender that directed Acsa to allow ACS to replace the equipment; and ordered Sacaa to approve the replacement within five days. ACS CEO Duke Phahla said, 'We commend Sacaa's recognition of the urgency in replacing aged HBS equipment to ensure uninterrupted security operations at airports. We have always maintained that passenger safety and continuity must come first, and this step reflects that shared concern.' The matter stems from May 2023 when Acsa announced its intention to terminate ACS's long-standing role as the provider of HBS services and to insource the function and subsequently issued a R3.15 billion tender for the procurement of new baggage screening equipment opening the floodgate of legal suits amongst the parties. Following the Gauteng High Court granting for the replacement, Acsa said it contested the ACS's handling of baggage as it was in contravention of the Constitution (which states that all organs of state must engage in procurement that is fair and transparent), the ACSA Act, the Public Finance Management Act, which requires that all airport charges levied to passengers must be approved by a Regulating Committee. Acsa's manager for Communications, Sisa Majola, said in response to enquiries, "The charges currently being levied by ACS are not regulated. The next development in the proceedings will be the hearing of the appeal against the court's order to interdict Acsa from implementing its insourcing of Hold Baggage Screening and the procurement of the screening." Majola said it was crucial that the ACS has challenged Acsa's decision to insource/perform Hold Baggage Screening Services, and a court of law has not heard this matter, nor has ACS been confirmed as the entity entitled to render Hold Baggage Screening Services. Acsa confirmed it would comply with the back-up replacement court order and continue with the appeal, as it was granted leave to appeal by the High Court and would continue to defend the review proceedings. ACS's Phala said, 'While the legal process runs its course, our focus remains on ensuring uninterrupted, world-class baggage screening services for passengers and airlines. We remain committed to working co-operatively with Acsa, Sacaa and all stakeholders to safeguard operational integrity and uphold aviation security standards." In its response, Sacaa said there are no ongoing discussions between the Sacaa and ACS and that further determinations would have to be from court pronouncements.
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Creecy intervenes in Acsa baggage screening services dispute
The dispute has resulted in multiple review applications, interdictory proceedings, and related appeal proceedings in the High Court. ACS provides baggage services on behalf of airlines operating at Acsa-managed airports. Picture: iStock Transport Minister Barbara Creecy has directed the Airports Company South Africa (Acsa) board to enter mediation with the firm responsible for baggage handling services at its airports. This comes after Acsa and the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) suffered a legal blow last month in their battle with Aviation Co-ordination Services (ACS) to take control of hold baggage control screening (HBS). Legal battles The Gauteng High Court dismissed the urgent appeal by Acsa and SACAA, which barred it from bidding for or purchasing baggage screening equipment. The court judgment upholds the High Court's order of 5 November 2024, requiring Acsa and SACAA to allow ACS to replace the relevant equipment at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports while a main review case is still before the courts. It confirmed that the critical replacement of old hold baggage screening (HBS) equipment may proceed at the international airports, which is needed to ensure public safety and airport efficiency. The dispute has resulted in multiple review applications, interdictory proceedings, and related appeal proceedings in the High Court. Creecy's ministerial orders issued on Thursday empower the minister to take necessary steps to safeguard national security where a risk to critical infrastructure, public safety, or the national interest has been identified. ALSO READ: Acsa loses appeal for control of baggage screening services at major airports 'Negative impact' The minister said she is concerned about the 'negative impact' the protracted litigation could have on the integrity and reliability of HBS as the first line of defence against threats in the aviation system at Acsa's airports. 'In this regard, I am satisfied that intervention is necessary to prevent potential disruption, compromise of national security, and reputational harm. 'As such, my engagements with the Acsa board have, in the main, related to finding a solution to resolve the dispute amicably and timeously to obviate any destabilisation of an essential national security function,' said Creecy. ALSO READ: Acsa interdicted from adjudicating and awarding R3bn tender Terms of reference Creecy ordered the board to finalise and execute a mediation agreement which contains the following terms of reference: The implementation of interim measures relating to the maintenance regime and whether ACS / ACSA can or should install any HBS maintenance-related equipment, including the back-up HBS units. The dispute pertaining to ACS, which is responsible for the provision of the HBS and interrelated services, will be addressed at the mediation. The provision of service of HBS and its maintenance, compliance with the applicable regulatory frameworks, budgetary and fiscal constraints, the safety of passengers who use ACSA's airports, potential revision of agreements, and the commercial relations between the parties. Negotiate, during the mediation proceedings, must be in good faith as the legal prescripts require that parties to the mediation act in the best interests of national security. Prepare and submit a comprehensive report within two weeks, setting out the total costs incurred in relation to the dispute to date. This report must include a detailed breakdown of all the legal fees, disbursements, and any other associated expenses borne by the State. Mediation ACS CEO Duke Phahla welcomed the ministerial order announced by Creecy 'We strongly believe that the current challenges can be resolved without further delay or public expenditure through the courts. Our priority is, and always has been, the safe, secure, and compliant screening of baggage on behalf of our airline clients and their passengers. 'We enter this process in the spirit of collaboration and transparency. We look forward to engaging with Acsa and the Department of Transport to find an outcome that protects the integrity of South Africa's aviation security systems,' said Phahla. ACS was established by the airline industry to provide HBS services on behalf of airlines operating at ACSA-managed airports. NOW READ: Acsa wants a look over in fight over baggage screening services
The Citizen
5 days ago
- The Citizen
‘Intention is to break us': Magashule says Free State asbestos trial delay disrupts 2026 election plans
The former Free State premier maintained that the case was politically motivated. Former Free State premier Ace Magashule appears in the Bloemfontein High Court on 15 April 2024. Picture: Gallo Images/Mlungisi Louw Former ANC secretary-general Ace Magashule has voiced his frustration over further delays in his R255 million Free State asbestos corruption trial. The Free State High Court in Bloemfontein has postponed the case to next year, citing scheduling conflicts involving Judge Philip Loubser and members of the defence team. When proceedings resume on 26 January 2026, Magashule will be tried alongside 16 others, excluding his former personal assistant, Moroadi Cholota. Loubser ruled on Tuesday that the court lacked jurisdiction to prosecute Cholota on corruption charges due to her unlawful extradition from the United States (US). Her removal from the case will stand unless the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) successfully overturns the judgment on appeal. Magashule reacts to Free State asbestos trial delay Speaking to the media afterwards, Magashule criticised the state for contributing to repeated delays. 'We want to show that we are innocent. We want to show that we have cooperated with the state. So they can't always come here and waste our time and postpone.' He maintained that there was no legitimate case against him or his co-accused. 'They are trying to cook, but we will ultimately expose them, that's what I know, and that's why we are ready.' Magashule also pointed out the financial burden of the prolonged legal battle, which has persisted since his arrest in 2020. 'It's costly for us.' ALSO READ: NPA 'taken aback' over Moroadi Cholota extradition ruling, hints at appeal He added that the ongoing trial conflicts with his political commitments, especially with the 2026 local government elections approaching. 'Next year is election year; campaigns must actually start.' Magashule reiterated his belief that the charges are politically driven. 'The intention is to break us. The intention is to demoralise people about us. The intention was to deal with our political careers. The intention is to disrupt us all the time, and unfortunately, we are standing resolute. 'We have fought against apartheid; we will continue fighting against injustices. And we are ready to do so. They can't break us, we are not going to be cowards.' NPA to appeal Moroadi Cholota ruling Commenting on Cholota's removal from the case, Magashule questioned why he was still facing prosecution. 'I don't know why I am still in this box,' he said, adding that anyone who testified at the State Capture Commission should appear in the witness stand during the trial. 'It is their time to come here and prove that I am corrupt and received money from whoever. I deny all those things because this case was political.' Magashule also warned that the trial would backfire on the state. 'The state is playing games here. It is playing games. They know that they don't have a case, and they are still going to be embarrassed. They are going to be embarrassed. You will see.' READ MORE: 'Nothing I can do about it,' Judge tells Magashule as Free State asbestos trial postponed again NPA spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga said the state intends to appeal the Cholota judgment, describing it as a case with 'far-reaching implications'. 'The state believes that there is evidence that implicates Ms Cholota and therefore would want to see her stand trial. 'Unfortunately, the judge is yet to provide us with a full written judgment upon which a decisive determination will be made on the grounds of appeal and a final decision will be made whether to apply for leave to appeal.' The appeal is scheduled to be heard on Friday, 13 June. In addition, the Democratic Alliance (DA) intends to call on the Department of Justice and the NPA to appear before Parliament to explain what it describes as 'yet another unacceptable failure in prosecuting state capture cases'. Magashule's co-accused in Free State asbestos trial Alongside Magashule, the accused include businessman Edwin Sodi, former Mangaung mayor Olly Mlamleli, former national Department of Human Settlements director-general Thabane Zulu, former Free State Human Settlements head Nthimotse Mokhesi, and the department's former supply chain director Mahlomola Matlakala. They face a range of charges, including fraud, corruption, money laundering, and violations of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). The charges relate to a 2014 R255 million asbestos removal tender awarded to the joint venture between Diamond Hill Trading and Blackhead Consulting by the Free State Department of Human Settlements, during Magashule's tenure as premier. It is alleged that R27 million in bribes were paid to government officials in connection with the contract. Cholota was accused of facilitating illicit financial transactions on Magashule's behalf. NOW READ: Free State asbestos trial: Sodi challenges state capture evidence as Magashule complains about witness list
