Police's disposal of miners' strike documents ‘deeply worrying'
Lucy Powell said anyone involved in the strikes 'must retain the records' and come forward with information when asked to, after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns in the Commons.
In its manifesto, the Labour Party pledged to ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, 'that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'.
The violent confrontation in June 1984 outside a coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, led to many miners being injured and arrested, although their trials later collapsed.
Speaking during business questions, Mr Lavery said it was 'extremely disturbing news that Northumbria Police has destroyed all documents relating to the miners' strike, including Orgreave'.
The MP for Blyth and Ashington said: 'It is absolutely alarming.
'The Labour Government have pledged an inquiry through investigation into these events, yet the wanton destruction of this vital and critical evidence has been allowed to happen.
'Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question.
'Who gave the permission to destroy these documents and what's behind it?
'Can we have an urgent debate into how the Government can instruct all police forces, all authorities, everyone that holds any detail on the miners' strike and on Orgreave (to) make sure that they retain and maintain that evidence, for when the Labour Government maintains its pledge for an inquiry into the events that happened in 1984.
'Because justice cannot be served if the evidence is systematically and deliberately destroyed.'
Police escorting picketers away from their position near the Orgreave Coking Plant near Rotherham in 1984 (PA)
Ms Powell replied: 'This sounds like a deeply, deeply worrying development in this case, and I am sure the whole House will be shocked to hear it.
'He has campaigned for justice and for answers in relation to what happened at Orgreave, 41 years ago, raised it with me last week. I will continue to raise that with ministers on his behalf.
'And I would join him in saying to people, anyone involved, that they must retain the records and they must come forward, as they would be expected to do when those questions are asked, with every bit of information they've got on what happened.'
News of the destroyed boxes came to light following a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the Guardian reports.
A Northumbria Police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'DWP disability benefit cuts could become Labour's poll tax moment'
It's with a heavy heart that I write about the Government's proposed Welfare Reform Bill. The planned cuts to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) are already turning the lives of some of the most vulnerable people in Britain into a nightmare of fear and uncertainty. These changes are not the way forward. Moreover, they are certainly not remotely helpful to those who rely on PIP to live with dignity and independence. We cannot claim to be a democratic and inclusive society if we punish people for circumstances beyond their control, while pretending we are levelling the playing field. These cuts do not fix a broken system — they make it worse. In my Bradford East constituency, where half of all children are growing up in poverty, I hear first-hand from constituents who are terrified they may lose their PIP support. The sense of panic is real. And so is the damage. Let's be honest with ourselves: PIP supports people with serious physical or mental health needs — people who often require help to cut their food, to wash, or to go to the toilet. These are not luxuries. They are necessities. And losing that support would strip away the last threads of independence and dignity that people have. The anxiety is palpable. People already feel pushed to the brink. Now, they fear falling off it altogether. These reforms may have been presented with good intentions, but they place us on a road that leads straight back to austerity and failure. They are not guided by a moral compass, but by the cold calculations of a Treasury spreadsheet — the same spreadsheet that failed to anticipate the human impact of scrapping the Winter Fuel Allowance. Let me be absolutely clear: these cuts are not the Labour way. If passed it will lead to extreme poverty for the most vulnerable in its tracks. That's why I have joined more than 100 Labour MPs in signing a reasoned amendment to stop this unjust legislation in its tracks. I urge the Government to heed the warnings of Labour MPs, disability rights campaigners, and charities. If they do not, we risk walking straight into a political disaster — one that could become Labour's poll tax moment. We must learn the lessons of the Winter Fuel U-turn. When it was clear the policy was wrong, we changed course. We must do the same here. Because let's be honest - we all know this is wrong. It is wrong to persecute those most in need. It is wrong to target people with mental health conditions. It is wrong to attack the most vulnerable. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday. That is why I will not vote for this Bill. Because stripping away vital support is not the way to build a fairer society. The Government must rethink these damaging proposals, reject further cuts to disability benefits, and focus instead on raising living standards and protecting those most at risk. There are clear and fair alternatives available. The Government could raise funds through a simple two per cent wealth tax on the super-rich — which could raise £24 billion a year-would put The burden on the broadest shoulders, while protecting those most in need. It could continue to invest in jobs, infrastructure and public services to revitalise the economy after 14 years of Tory decline. Instead, this Bill targets those least able to fight back. It sows fear, breeds injustice, and abandons principle. If we continue down this path, we risk repeating the mistakes of the past — and creating a defining failure of this Government.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer prepares major benefit cut concessions to welfare rebels
Leading rebels told The Mirror 'serious progress' has been made in crisis talks with No10 over the disability benefit cuts impacting hundreds of thousands of people Keir Starmer is preparing to make major concessions to welfare rebels in a bid to swerve a humiliating Commons defeat. Leading rebels told The Mirror"serious progress" has been made in crisis talks with No10 over cuts impacting hundreds of thousands of disabled people. It is understood negotiations are still ongoing with details being thrashed out ahead of Tuesday's crunch vote. On Thursday the number of people signing an amendment to block the plans, which includes tightening the eligibility of a key disability benefit, rose once again to 126. It is more than enough to wipe out Mr Starmer's Commons majority. Writing in The Mirror, the Labour MP Imran Hussain urged No10 to listen to rebels. He warned: "If they do not, we risk walking straight into a political disaster — one that could become Labour's poll tax moment." One rebel - usually loyal to No10 - also told The Mirror that some MPs who have not signed the amendment are planning to either abstain or vote against the welfare bill next week. They said: "Even more I've spoken to haven't signed it [the amendment] who would be very tempted to, or have said to me 'I'm not going to sign this amendment but I'm certainly not voting for it [the welfare bill]". There's a huge amount of people who are unhappy about it. They do want change and they are expressing that view to ministers." They added: 'There's a lot of anger all around. There's a lot of people who feel they are being blamed now, being called disloyal.' Earlier Mr Starmer hinted he was looking at concessions in a Commons statement. He told MPs there was "consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform" of the "broken" welfare system. Mr Starmer said: 'All colleagues want to get this right, and so do I. We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin to make change together on Tuesday.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves also told ITV News: "We will continue to listen, but we want to make sure that we get this right. But we also want to make sure that we get on with the reform that is needed because at the moment, too many people are let down and we're not happy to let that Tory welfare state persist for any longer than it has to." But Labour rebel Rachel Maskell warned: "It is clear that the UC [ Universal Credit ] & [Personal Independence Payment] Bill cannot and must not be saved. Any concessions will still cause harm to disabled people. The only option is to withdraw the Bill, rethink and start to rebuild trust with disabled people." Another Labour rebel, Brian Leishman, said: "There are no 'concessions' that can save this wretched Bill. It should be withdrawn." MP Neil Duncan-Jordan added: "The Government needs to withdraw the Disability Benefit Cuts Bill and redesign the benefits system with disabled people's organisations. No last minute deal to find concessions can deliver the improvements disabled people need. Back to the drawing board!"
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Police's disposal of miners' strike documents ‘deeply worrying'
Information related to the so-called Battle of Orgreave is said to be among the two boxes which were disposed of by the force in April 2024. Lucy Powell said anyone involved in the strikes 'must retain the records' and come forward with information when asked to, after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns in the Commons. In its manifesto, the Labour Party pledged to ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, 'that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'. The violent confrontation in June 1984 outside a coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, led to many miners being injured and arrested, although their trials later collapsed. Speaking during business questions, Mr Lavery said it was 'extremely disturbing news that Northumbria Police has destroyed all documents relating to the miners' strike, including Orgreave'. The MP for Blyth and Ashington said: 'It is absolutely alarming. 'The Labour Government have pledged an inquiry through investigation into these events, yet the wanton destruction of this vital and critical evidence has been allowed to happen. 'Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question. 'Who gave the permission to destroy these documents and what's behind it? 'Can we have an urgent debate into how the Government can instruct all police forces, all authorities, everyone that holds any detail on the miners' strike and on Orgreave (to) make sure that they retain and maintain that evidence, for when the Labour Government maintains its pledge for an inquiry into the events that happened in 1984. 'Because justice cannot be served if the evidence is systematically and deliberately destroyed.' Ms Powell replied: 'This sounds like a deeply, deeply worrying development in this case, and I am sure the whole House will be shocked to hear it. 'He has campaigned for justice and for answers in relation to what happened at Orgreave, 41 years ago, raised it with me last week. I will continue to raise that with ministers on his behalf. 'And I would join him in saying to people, anyone involved, that they must retain the records and they must come forward, as they would be expected to do when those questions are asked, with every bit of information they've got on what happened.' News of the destroyed boxes came to light following a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the Guardian reports. A Northumbria Police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
