Hindu nationalism, tribal identity, Pakistan: What DU doesn't want you to study anymore
Jaffrelot, Baviskar among key authors targeted
According to media reports,
Hindu Nationalism: A Reader
by noted French political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot is among the texts slated for removal. The book, currently listed as suggested reading in DU's MA Political Science curriculum, offers a comprehensive analysis of Hindu nationalism from colonial times to contemporary India. Its exploration of issues such as secularism, communal relations, and diaspora politics has drawn criticism from review panelists who reportedly view it as ideologically sensitive.
Also under review is
In the Belly of the River
by sociologist Amita Baviskar, which has been part of the Public Policy in South Asia course. The book delves into the Narmada Bachao Andolan and interrogates the 'Hinduisation' of tribal identities, subjects some faculty members say are being red-flagged for their perceived alignment with anti-majoritarian narratives.
Meanwhile,
Routine Violence
by historian Gyanendra Pandey has already been dropped from the syllabus.
The text critically engages with post-Independence political discourse, examining how dominant Hindu-centric ideologies sidelined minority perspectives. Pandey's critique of figures like VD Savarkar and MS Golwalkar, alongside a reassessment of Gandhi's rural idealism, has reportedly contributed to its exclusion.
Controversial cuts extend to History curriculum
The Political Science department is not the only one witnessing academic realignment. In the MA History programme, several foundational readings are now under scrutiny. Phillip Wagoner's essay
Sultan Among Hindu Kings
, which examines syncretic court practices at Vijayanagara, and Richard Eaton's
The Rise of Islam
and the
Bengal Frontier
, which interprets Islam's spread in Bengal as a product of socio-economic transformation rather than military coercion, are both facing potential elimination.
Critics argue that such removals risk eroding the analytical complexity of historical education and silencing scholarly interpretations that deviate from majoritarian narratives.
Political undercurrents and post-Pahalgam revisions
The latest proposals follow a series of syllabus cuts approved by DU in late June, including entire papers from the PG Political Science programme such as Pakistan and the World, China's Role in the Contemporary World, Islam and International Relations, and Religious Nationalism and Political Violence.
Sources within the university allege that these changes were catalyzed by the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which claimed the lives of Hindu tourists. Following the incident, faculty members were reportedly directed to reconsider content that may be construed as 'sympathetic' to Pakistan or China. The resulting revisions are seen by many as aligning with both national security sentiments and prevailing political ideologies.
Institutional process and ideological overtones
While the Standing Committee of DU is responsible for proposing syllabus revisions, final decisions rest with the Academic and Executive Councils. However, growing concerns remain within the academic community that the restructuring is less about pedagogy and more about ideological conformity. Observers suggest the overhaul is consistent with the broader contours of the National Education Policy (NEP), which has been critiqued for fostering cultural nationalism under the guise of curricular decolonisation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
BAPS Mandir thanks US Congressman for condemning desecration of premises
Last Updated: Greenwood [US], August 12 (ANI): Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) on Tuesday thanked US Congressman Tom Suozzi for condemning the desecration of their demanded people to call out hatred and a post on X, BAPS said, 'Thank you, Tom Suozzi, for speaking out against the desecration of another BAPS Mandir. We are grateful for your continued support of our community." Thank you @RepTomSuozzi for speaking out against the desecration of another @BAPS Mandir. We are grateful for your continued support of our community. — BAPS Public Affairs (@BAPS_PubAffairs) August 12, 2025 Suozzi said, 'This is the third hateful attack on a BAPS Temple. We must prosecute the perpetrators and educate against hate. We must all call out hatred and bigotry when we see it." This is the third hateful attack on a BAPS Temple. We must prosecute the perpetrators and educate against must all call out hatred and bigotry when we see it. — Tom Suozzi (@RepTomSuozzi) August 11, 2025 Earlier on March 9, India condemned the vandalism at a Hindu temple in California in the United Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs, Randhir Jaiswal, termed the attack as 'despicable" and urged local authorities to take stringent action against those responsible. Our response to media queries regarding vandalism at a Hindu Temple in California: view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Canada charts an Express Entry reset for 2026: A ‘leadership and innovation' category to be introduced
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), the immigration agency of the Canadian government, has issued a draft for public consultation focused on the future of the Express Entry system, which is a popular pathway to permanent residency, especially for Indians. As per the discussion draft, the Express Entry system would continue to focus on addressing long-term labour market shortages and bolstering Francophone immigration outside Quebec. The most significant proposal is the introduction of an entirely new stream – the 'Leadership and Innovation' category, which would give preference to senior managers, researchers, and scientists with the potential to drive Canada's competitiveness. Through the Express Entry system, Canada is also eyeing potential talent for its armed forces by facilitating the recruitment of highly skilled military personnel from allied countries. Such a move, IRCC's discussion paper states, would help maintain a 'robust, world-class' defence force. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The state of AI infrastructure: 2025 research report CIO | Google Cloud, AMD Undo Express Entry is Canada's point-based mechanism used to manage immigration applications for skilled workers who want to become permanent residents. Based on various parameters such as age, education, French language proficiency etc, candidates are given a Comprehensive Ranking Score (CRS). Post this, they are placed in the Express Entry pool and ranked relative to each other. Periodical draws (the emphasis is now on category-based draws) are held and those attaining the cut-off CRS score get an invitation to apply for permanent residency. According to Talha Mohani, a regulated Canadian immigration consultant and managing partner at Migration Bureau Canada, the policies should also focus on job creation. 'The 'Leadership and Innovation' category must explicitly include proven entrepreneurs and investor founders. The Express Entry's category mechanism should ideally invite higher-impact business immigrants (senior managers, founders with traction, investor families) into dedicated draws. In parallel, there is a need to introduce a 'temporary business resident pathway' granting temporary status with healthcare and education access to dependents while the entrepreneur meets measurable milestones (based on job creation and/or investments) to achieve permanent residence,' he told TOI. Labour shortages remain a priority: The discussion draft acknowledges Canada's ongoing struggle to fill skilled positions in healthcare, the skilled trades (particularly construction roles critical to boosting housing supply), education, science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields, and agriculture. It adds that tackling these shortages is vital. Through the consultation process, IRCC is seeking input on whether Express Entry should focus more on transitioning skilled temporary residents already in Canada to permanent status, or on recruiting from overseas, especially in sectors such as healthcare and skilled trades. According to Ken Nickel-Lane, a regulated Canadian immigration consultant and founder of an immigration services firm, 'The focus on those already in Canada already continues to make good sense, given issues around housing and healthcare. Category-based selection draws are still fundamentally a good approach to addressing near-term needs for specific skills shortages across the country, but the categories should be reviewed more frequently.' In March 2025, Canada removed the additional Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) points awarded for job offers under the Express Entry system. Prior to this change, job offers could grant candidates either 50 or 200 extra points Nickel-Lane states that'Prioritising the selection of senior managers should not merely translate to creating another category for Express Entry draws for those outside Canada. Rather, points for job offers should be resumed for those already in the country on work permits under the International Mobility Program - these are the people companies need here long term to build on their growth plans.' Francophone immigration targets: The discussion draft reaffirms Canada's commitment to boosting Francophone immigration outside Quebec, which the government sees as a driver of both cultural diversity and economic strength. Manish Kapoor, a regulated Canadian immigration consultant, points out that since the introduction of category-based draws in 2023, the Francophone stream has grown at the fastest pace, recording the highest numbers within category-based selection and accounting for a substantial portion of immigration targets. 'While I do not oppose this focus, I suggest reinstating transport occupations in the category-based draws, as its contributions to the national economy are significant. I believe IRCC should consider adjusting next year's targets to conduct STEM, transport, and trades draws,' he told TOI. The road ahead: IRCC is calling for public feedback on these proposals through September, with final decisions expected in late fall 2025, parallel to the unveiling of the 2026–2028 Immigration Levels Plan. The immigration levels plan at present has set the targets at 3.95 lakh permanent residents in 2025; 3.80 lakh for 2026; and aims to have a further reduced target of 3.65 lakh in 2027. It also supports efforts to reduce temporary resident volumes to 5% of Canada's population by the end of 2026. The number of temporary residents in Canada has grown exponentially over the last few years, from about 437,000 individuals in 2019 alone to about 1.2 million (12 lakhs) in 2023.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US tariffs could knock 50 bps off India's growth, deepen jobless recovery: Former RBI Governor Subbarao
Former Reserve Bank of India Governor DUVVURI SUBBARAO says high tariffs proposed by US President Donald Trump on labour-intensive exports such as textiles and gems will deepen the jobless growth problem since a 50 per cent US tariff threatens exports worth around 2 per cent of GDP. In a conversation with The Indian Express, he says the potential growth hit could be 20-50 basis points in a year, after the extent of diversion and adjustment. Subbarao, who also served as the Finance Secretary of India, warns that for India, 'being labelled a 'dead' economy by a US president carries reputational costs.' Subbarao says Donald Trump may yet find his tariff strategy politically and economically costly, adding that rising geopolitical tension and protectionism increase risk premia, tighten global liquidity and raise the cost of foreign borrowing. Excerpts: Expert estimates suggest that tens of billions of dollars' worth of Indian exports to the US are at risk, so the immediate impact will be sharp. Labour-intensive sectors where we compete on price and scale such as textiles, footwear, gems & jewellery will see margins eroded, orders diverted, jobs lost, and plants downsized. The distributional impact will be regressive, widening income inequality. We must also reckon with China's industrial overcapacity and the possibility of their dumping in our markets to compensate for their own loss of US market share. Further, tariff escalation will impair our China+1 ambition; we were already struggling to break into global value chains because of domestic trade barriers and high costs. Facing higher US tariffs than ASEAN or South Asian competitors will make that integration even harder. What should be the strategy of Indian exporters, especially in the fields of textiles, gems & jewellery, electronics, pharma, etc, if the US continues with the 50 per cent import duty? There are no easy fixes. In the short run, exporters must absorb part of the shock through price renegotiation, market diversification to other markets and make full use of duty-drawback and export credit schemes. In some areas such as solar modules, shrimp, and linen, where the US is the sole or dominant market, such diversion will be much harder. Over the medium to long term, exporters must move up the value chain, produce branded and design-rich goods, tighten compliance and traceability, cut lead times, and deepen domestic linkages to reduce input costs. Investments in automation, skills, and productivity will be critical. On the policy side, we need to accelerate FTAs and market access deals to secure preferential entry into major economies. It's difficult but possible to turn Trump tariffs into an opportunity to make our exports more competitive and robust. Donald Trump recently said that the Indian economy is heading towards being 'dead like Russia's.' What do such comments mean for global investor confidence and how might they impact emerging markets like India? The world has learnt to discount Trump's impulsive, off-the-cuff comments. Even so, for India, being labelled a 'dead' economy by a US president carries reputational costs. It can be read as a signal of our eroding geopolitical and economic leverage. The US remains the pre-eminent economic power and issuer of the reserve currency; its political tone influences global capital flows. Such comments can raise India's risk premium, dent investor sentiment, and prompt portfolio reallocation even absent accompanying policy actions. Do you think India has the flexibility and necessity to open up agriculture and dairy segments to imports from the US and other countries? Agriculture and dairy are protected for compelling reasons: rural livelihoods and food security. A blanket opening is politically untenable and economically risky, and America recognises our red lines here. That said, some selective, calibrated openings could help break deadlocks in trade talks — through targeted tariff cuts, sanitary-phytosanitary alignment, and mutually beneficial supply agreements. Any liberalisation should be phased, product-specific, and paired with farmer safety nets, productivity enhancement, and investments in storage and cold-chain infrastructure. While many economists warned of US inflation due to tariffs, Trump is seen as winning with deals from the EU, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Your view? We are far from the endgame. The stated aim of Trump's tariffs — reshoring manufacturing and creating jobs — is difficult to achieve given the US' loss of competitiveness in labour-intensive industries. Higher import costs will feed into domestic prices; costlier goods will depress consumption, and with weaker demand, job creation will falter. The trade deals mask these tensions. The strain is likely to become visible during the Christmas shopping season, potentially shaping voter sentiment ahead of the mid-terms. Trump may yet find his tariff strategy politically and economically costly. India's GDP growth remains among the fastest globally, but critics argue the growth is uneven and jobless. How do you see the quality of India's current economic growth? Will GDP growth come down due to trade issues? India's headline GDP growth is robust, but employment growth, especially in the formal sector, lags behind. Job creation barely matches labour-force expansion, and informal work remains dominant. Independent economists argue that official unemployment data understate reality. Low employment elasticity means GDP growth is not translating proportionately into jobs. High tariffs on labour-intensive exports like textiles and gems will deepen the jobless growth problem. A 50 per cent US tariff threatens exports worth around 2 per cent of GDP; depending on the extent of diversion and adjustment, the growth hit could be 20-50 basis points in a year. Global risks and uncertainties have increased of late. Will it impact capital flows and funding plans of corporates? Yes. Rising geopolitical tension and protectionism increase risk premia, tighten global liquidity, and raise the cost of foreign borrowing. Corporates dependent on external finance or dollar-linked supply chains will face delayed projects, repriced deals, and higher hurdles for capex. India's deep domestic financial system and growing rupee-denominated bond markets can cushion some of this impact, especially if banks actively finance strategic investments. India is targeting to become a $5 trillion economy. In your view, what are the three biggest obstacles standing in the way — and how can they realistically be tackled? (The) First (obstacle) is education & health deficits: Weak human capital undermines productivity; we need sustained, outcome-driven investment in early education, nutrition, and healthcare. Second is productivity stagnation: Slow reforms, skill gaps, and fragmented supply chains hold back growth; the remedy lies in building industrial clusters, integrating MSMEs, improving logistics, and boosting research and development. The third (obstacle) is rising inequality and weak mass demand: Growth skewed to the top limits consumption. Strengthening lower-income households via formal jobs and social protection can trigger a virtuous cycle of demand, production, and employment. Do you think the trade tariff issues will impact the fiscal and monetary policies? Where are interest rates headed? Likely yes. India's credible path of fiscal consolidation could be disrupted if tariff-hit sectors require short-term support. After last week's policy review, the governor acknowledged that the RBI is watching the impact of tariffs on growth, inflation, and the rupee. If tariffs fuel inflation and pressure the currency, rates may stay high; if growth weakens sharply, there is room to ease. Policy will remain data-dependent and cautious. With global capital becoming more expensive and foreign investors turning cautious, how vulnerable is India's growth story to a potential global slowdown? India's past growth surges have coincided with strong export performance suggesting that exports matter more to our GDP than often acknowledged. A global slowdown and tighter financing will hit exports, FDI, and portfolio flows. Domestic consumption, public capex, and resilience in some sectors offer partial buffers, but export-heavy states and firms reliant on foreign borrowing will be more vulnerable.
