Taoiseach calls on global powers to de-escalate conflict in the Middle East
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has called on global powers to work together in a bid to de escalate the conflict in the Middle East.
Speaking in Cork on Saturday, Mr Martin expressed concern about violence between Israel and Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. He said that there was an urgent need for a return to a rules based international order.
Advertisement
'It is deeply concerning that we have so much conflict in the Middle East.
"It is dangerous in terms of its impact on civilian populations in the first instance. We see the horrors of Gaza - Syria is coming out of the embers of a horrible civil war.
"A new Government is installed there endeavouring to find and create some stability - we have instability and war in Lebanon, a new Government there trying to create stability and sustainable life for people in Lebanon."
We have the appalling settlements in the West Bank."
Advertisement
"Iran should have engaged a long time ago on its nuclear programme and to dismantling it."
"But there has to be a return to a rules-based international order. At the moment it is receding before our very eyes. It is being eroded.
Mr Martin said that the influence of the United Nations had been eroded and undermined.
'That is a matter of deep concern to us."
Advertisement
"We want to see a peaceful resolution to the conflict - we believe in dialogue and we believe in diplomacy. So we would say - to the world powers in particular - to use their influence and stop the hostilities to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of all hostages.
"And to get a huge surge in humanitarian aid into Gaza."
"Also to bring about a cessation (of violence) and to de-escalate between Iran and Israel." He also called on Iran to de escalate the crisis in the Middle East by continuing to engage internationally in relation to its nuclear programme.
"It is important that (Iran) they would continue to engage but the context now may make that very difficult."
Advertisement
"They should have engaged, in my view, far more proactively in the past."
"The International Atomic Energy Agency called it out during the week - but equally they said the bombing of nuclear installations is hugely concerning. There is the risk of widespread potential death and destruction."
"The only sustainable way of ensuring peace is through dialogue and diplomacy, ultimately."
Meanwhile, the Taoiseach said he was pleased to see the release of People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy and other Irish citizens from custody in Egypt.
Advertisement
Deputy Murphy had travelled to the country with a number of other Irish people to participate in a Gaza peace march.
Mr Murphy said he was among a group of 65 people, including Irish British and French citizens, who were detained yesterday by authorities in Egypt.
Mr Martin said that the situation is 'very fraught out there.'
Ireland
TD Paul Murphy among Irish people released from de...
Read More
'Tensions are very high in Egypt and very high in Jordan. We believe people have an entitlement to peaceful protest and to engage in that.
"How realistic it was to try to go through Rafah is another question? Let's all be honest and realistic about that - it was never going to happen."
"I have been to Rafah myself - but when I was there as a Government minister there was a complex and a compound. That is all destroyed subsequently by the Israeli invasion."
"People are entitled to peaceful protest and I am glad they have been released and we want their safe return - peaceful, legitimate protest is something that should always be facilitated by Governments."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The mountain fortress Israel must destroy to topple Iran's nuclear programme
The events of the past few days appear to have proved that Israel has near-total air superiority over Iran. Iranian armed forces have been powerless to counter the Israeli airstrikes that have destroyed critical buildings and wiped out swathes of the Islamic Republic's military leadership. At least 14 Iranian nuclear scientists have also been killed by the unilateral operation, codenamed Rising Lion, which appears aimed at decapitating the country's nuclear programme. One key site remains unscathed, however: the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant. Located 20 miles from the ancient, central city of Qom, and about 100 miles south of Tehran, Fordow is one of two nuclear enrichment sites in the country. The other, in Natanz, was reportedly partially destroyed in the attacks. Hidden in the mountains, its key buildings buried deep underground, Fordow is an altogether more challenging target. Ringed by anti-air defences, it has become a symbol of Iranian defiance as well as its technological ingenuity. If Israel is truly to dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities, it must disable Fordow. That's because here, uranium is enriched in centrifuges at up to 60 per cent, a shade under the purity needed to build a nuclear weapon. 'The entire operation… really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordow,' the Israeli ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, told reporters on Friday. A day later, Iranian sources reported that Fordow had been attacked, but with limited damage. 'The be-all and end-all of Iran's nuclear operation' Analysts have described the mountainous fortress, which sits within an Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps base, as 'the be-all and end-all of Iran's nuclear operation'. 'If you don't get Fordow,' said Brett McGurk, who has worked as Middle East coordinator for several American presidents, 'you haven't eliminated their ability to produce weapons-grade material.' The problem for Israel is that it seems to lack the weapons to do the job. It is thought that Fordow's heavily fortified facilities could only be destroyed with so-called 'bunker busters', enormous bombs designed especially to penetrate buildings below ground. Israel is not believed to have such munitions, nor the heavy bombers needed to deliver them. The US, its key ally, has both positioned within striking distance of Iran. But Washington has been clear about its intent not to get directly involved in the current conflict. The result is what Peter Wildeford, a respected commentator and forecaster, calls 'The Fordow Paradox'. In an article on Saturday he wrote: 'The US possesses the military capability to destroy Fordow but lacks the political will, while Israel has the will but not the capability.' 'This fundamental misalignment between America's power and Israel's urgency explains why we're watching not just another round of strikes, but potentially the first act in nuclear proliferation's next wave.' Israel will keep looking for ways to destroy Fordow, in other words, while Iran will keep enriching uranium. 'Inconsistent with a peaceful nuclear programme' The Islamic Republic, which has long denied seeking to develop nuclear weapons, began enriching uranium at Fordow in September 2011. The site's existence had been revealed two years earlier, when declassified British, French and US intelligence reports detailed a secret facility 'inconsistent with a peaceful [nuclear] programme.' The news was so shocking that it provoked censure from China and Russia, which usually support Iran, and meant Fordow became a central point of focus in attempts to curtail the country's nuclear programme. At first, Iranian officials said the Islamic Republic would enrich uranium to 20 per cent purity for medical purposes. (The silvery-grey, radioactive metal is a critical component in the making of isotopes used in imaging and radiotherapy.) Under the terms of the landmark JCPOA nuclear deal brokered by Barack Obama in 2015, Fordow was to stop enriching uranium for 15 years and Tehran agreed to keep its level of uranium enrichment more widely at 3.67 per cent – a level considered suitable for civilian nuclear power and research purposes, but not nuclear weapons – in return for sanctions relief. By 2018, however, and the US's withdrawal from the JCPOA at Donald Trump's direction, the facility was reported to be producing enriched uranium once again. In March 2023, the UN's atomic watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), confirmed reports that 83.7 per cent, near weapons-grade U-235, had been found at Fordow. Last week, in its latest quarterly report, the IAEA said that Iran had produced enough 60 per cent purity uranium – capable of being further enriched in a matter of days to 90 per cent weapons grade material – to potentially manufacture nine nuclear bombs. It was a 'matter of serious concern', it concluded. The rise of the bunker buster Evidently, Israeli leaders agreed. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Operation Rising Lion is aimed at rolling back 'the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival', adding the operation will 'continue for as many days as it takes to remove the spread'. Meanwhile, satellite images have shown extensive damage to the nuclear facilities at Natanz and another site, Isfahan. The IAEA confirmed that critical buildings at the latter facility had been damaged. Experts believe Israel could have used bunker-busting munitions in these attacks, albeit smaller ones than those which would be needed for a meaningful strike on Fordow. Justin Bronk, of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), told the BBC that the pattern of explosions 'would fit with penetrating bombs being used', such as 'GBU-31(V)3s or even possibly more specialised penetrating GBU-28s'. Modern bunker busters were developed after the first Gulf War in 1990, when coalition forces came across Iraqi fortifications too strong and deeply buried for conventional munitions to damage them. The new weapons had a heavily hardened nose, initially made from an artillery barrel, and a delayed fuse, meaning they would not explode until after they had penetrated their target, rather than on initial impact. While the bombs the Israelis already possess are effective through up to six metres of reinforced concrete, the American GBU-57A/B is thought to be the only munition that could deal a serious blow to Fordow. Also known as MOP, or Massive Ordnance Penetrator, the GBU-57 is more than six metres long and weighs 14,000kg, with a 2,400kg warhead and a GPS guidance system. It can reportedly penetrate through up to 61 metres of concrete. The only plane capable of delivering it is the B-2 stealth bomber, which can carry two at a time. Another plant even more deeply fortified is under construction Still, Israel has other methods at its disposal. Some have suggested that conventional munitions, if repeatedly dropped on the same target, might be able to damage Fordow. Or it could use special forces on the ground to try to destroy the facility from inside. In April 2021, Israeli reports claimed Mossad was involved in an explosion that caused a blackout at the Natanz facility. In 2010, the Stuxnet cyber virus damaged several nuclear centrifuges. Such operations are risky, however, especially now that Iran will be on its highest alert. And even were they to successfully target Fordow, it would not represent the end of Iranian nuclear ambition. Another facility is under construction a few miles south of Natanz, at Kūh-e Kolang Gaz Lā, nicknamed Pickaxe mountain. It will be even more deeply fortified than Fordow. Without a dramatic change in US policy, or more ingenuity, then, the Fordow Paradox is unlikely to be resolved any time soon. Iran's nuclear mountain will continue to loom large in Israeli thinking.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Israeli spies smuggled munitions into Iran in suitcases
Israel spent months smuggling drone parts, munitions and precision equipment in suitcases, shipping containers and lorries into Iran in preparation for Friday's surprise attacks. Similar to Ukraine's recent covert operation in which agents launched kamikaze drones hidden in trucks at Russian bombers, Israel's spy agency had laid the groundwork to launch the bombings from inside Iran, people familiar with the operation told the Wall Street Journal. Mossad smuggled explosive-rigged quadcopter drones and other precision-guided equipment over sea and land to cripple Iran's anti-aircraft missiles before the strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Citing former Mossad intelligence officers, Israeli military sources and unnamed persons familiar with the operation, the Wall Street Journal reported that small teams already in position near strategic sites took out a number of Iran's air-defence systems. They targeted dozens of missile launchers after they had emerged from shelters and were preparing to fire on the more than 200 Israeli warplanes racing across Iran's skies. F-35 jet fighters would eventually drop more than 330 munitions on over 100 targets, killing top military leaders and scientists in a strike Israel claimed was pre-emptive in order to damage the Islamic Republic's nuclear capacities. On Saturday, Israel released footage purporting to show its agents on Iranian soil deploying the attack systems that it said managed to severely limit Iran's immediate response. The exact date or location of the videos could not be independently verified. 'This is the deepest distance that we have operated so far in Iran,' Effie Defrin, Israeli military spokesman, told the Wall Street Journal. 'We created aerial freedom of action.' Mossad teams reportedly began preparing for the current drone operation years ago, using commercial trade to smuggle munitions and equipment into Iran, often without the knowledge of businesses whose cargo was being used as cover. A secret drone base was set up near Tehran, and Mossad commando team leaders trained in third countries were then returned to Iran where they prepared with small teams on the ground in central Iran at various strategic anti-aircraft sites when Israel's attack began. Iran has many more missiles than it does trucks to transport them, a battlefield bottleneck that Mossad took advantage of by hitting the surface-to-surface missile launchers while on trucks, or in the phase of being set up for launch.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
British Army troops could be deployed to bolster RAF base near Israel as Middle East conflict explodes and Iran threatens UK
Military chiefs could send Army troops to bolster a Royal Air Force base near Israel as tensions in the region escalate. The potential move appears increasing likely tonight as Israel steps up its bombardment of Iran and assassinates two of the country's intelligence chiefs. Iran and its proxy group in the Lebanon, Hezbollah, have threatened to escalate the conflict to include any countries offering support to Israel. And Chancellor Rachel Reeves today opened the door to potential military action in support of Israel. 'We're sending in assets to protect ourselves and also potentially support our allies,' she said. The Typhoon fleet at the UK's RAF Akrotiri on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, just over 250 miles from Israel, has been bolstered in recent days. Senior officers are considering whether the base and the surrounding airspace require additional protection, particularly if the conflict continues to escalate. In that scenario, military sources suggested troops from Royal Artillery units specialising in air defence would be readied for deployment. 16 Regiment (RA), which includes radar, surveillance and guided weapons specialists, is among those being considered, the Mail understands. The regiment, which is part of the UK's 7 Air Defence Group, is equipped with LEAPP surveillance technology which identifies all friendly and hostile aircraft over a range of 75 miles. It also has 'Giraffe' 360-degree radars which have 'vision' over the same range. Any incoming Iranian or Hezbollah ordnance could be eliminated using Sky Sabre, a surface-to-air defensive weapon system. Sky Sabre can fire up to 24 missiles simultaneously, effective against ballistic missiles and drones. According to the British Army, Sky Sabre could direct missiles to home in on a target as small as a tennis ball travelling at twice the speed of sound. The additional RAF Typhoon aircraft deploying to Cyprus would be used in a defensive capacity, specifically to intercept incoming enemy ordnance. The jets could protect UK assets in the region, including RAF Akrotiri itself, or be part of Israel's panoply of defensive assets. Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future. 'But so far, we haven't been involved... I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage. It's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation. But we don't want to see escalation.' Since the conflict between Israel and Iran began on Friday, there has been no indication from Jerusalem that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to include the UK in any coalition against Iran. Relations between the UK and Israel have soured in recent months after Britain joined the likes of France, Canada and Australia in condemning the country's continuing siege of Gaza. While Israel informed the United States ahead of its strikes on Iran on Friday, and countries such as Germany, the UK did not receive prior warning. Any sustained RAF campaign in the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean could have a knock-on effect on the itinerary of the UK's Carrier Strike Group, including the aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales. The CSG requires support from RAF Voyager refuelling aircraft. These are essential for extending the range of the F-35B fighter jets operating from the carrier. Should the Voyagers be required to support RAF missions in support of Israel, or to protect UK assets in the region, this would compromise the CSG, which in recent days has been exercising with the Indian Navy as part of Operation Highmast. Iran has fired more than 200 ballistic missiles towards Israel since Friday. Many have penetrated the country's renowned Iron Dome defensive shield (pictured intercepting missiles fired from Iran over Tel Aviv, Israel, today) Iran has fired more than 200 ballistic missiles towards Israel since Friday. Many have penetrated the country's renowned Iron Dome defensive shield. This has led to at least 13 civilian deaths. So, Israel may be required to call on allies to protect its citizens. According to military sources, the United States is likely to plug these gaps.
