Shingles vaccine has unexpected effect on heart health
Beyond protecting against the viral infection and resulting painful rash, the shot has also been linked to a reduced risk of dementia, as Fox News Digital previously reported.
And now, a new study has found that the vaccine could lower the risk of heart disease for up to eight years.
Dementia Risk Could Dip With Common Vaccine, Study Suggests
In the long-running study, researchers analyzed up to 12 years of data for more than 1.2 million people aged 50 or older in South Korea, focusing on shingles vaccination rates and 18 different types of cardiovascular disease.
They found that those who received the shingles vaccine had a 23% lower risk of heart issues, including stroke, heart failure and coronary artery disease.
Read On The Fox News App
The benefits were greater for people under 60 years old, likely because they have a better immune response, according to the researchers.
Blood Pressure And Dementia Risk Share Surprising Link, Study Suggests
The vaccine's heart health benefits were also more prominent among men and those who have unhealthy behaviors, such as being sedentary, drinking alcohol and smoking.
The findings were published in the European Heart Journal on Tuesday.
The primary symptom of shingles is a painful rash that can lead to serious complications, particularly for older adults and those with weak immune systems, according to lead author Professor Dong Keon Yon from the Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Without vaccination, about 30% of people may develop shingles in their lifetime, Yon noted.
"In addition to the rash, shingles has been linked to a higher risk of heart problems, so we wanted to find out if getting vaccinated could lower this risk," he said in a press release.
"Our study suggests that the shingles vaccine may help lower the risk of heart disease, even in people without known risk factors. This means that vaccination could offer health benefits beyond preventing shingles."
The researchers shared several possible reasons for the vaccine's protective effect on heart health.
"A shingles infection can cause blood vessel damage, inflammation and clot formation that can lead to heart disease," Yon said. "By preventing shingles, vaccination may lower these risks."
Dr. Jasdeep Dalawari, a Virginia-based interventional cardiologist and regional chief medical officer at VitalSolution, an Ingenovis Health company, was not involved in the study but offered his comments on the findings.
"This result is notable but requires careful interpretation, especially for the U.S. population," he told Fox News Digital.
"The study used a live vaccine, whereas the U.S. uses Shingrix, a recombinant (non-live) vaccine," Dalawari noted. "It's important to note that Shingrix is over 90% effective against shingles, compared to the live vaccine's 51%."
The live zoster vaccine contains a weakened form of the varicella zoster virus that causes shingles.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
The cardiologist also pointed out that the observational study shows correlation, not causation, and that further research is needed.
"The study included 1.2 million individuals aged 50+, all from one ethnicity," he said. "Expanding the participant pool to include diverse ethnicities would be beneficial in our multi-ethnic society."
Although the study did consider other health conditions, lifestyle factors and socioeconomic status, the researchers agreed that it had some limitations.
"As this study is based on an Asian cohort, the results may not apply to all populations," Yon noted. "While we conducted rigorous analysis, this study does not establish a direct causal relationship, so potential bias from other underlying factors should be considered."
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
The team plans to conduct further research into the heart health benefits of the non-live, recombinant vaccine, which contains a protein from the virus.Original article source: Shingles vaccine has unexpected effect on heart health
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Time is running out for kids with a rare disease, parents say, unless the FDA acts
Gilbert Dryden probably only has enough medication to get him through the end of October, his mother, Madison, figures. Seven-month-old Gilbert has a rare genetic condition called Barth syndrome, one that can have dire consequences, like heart failure, extreme muscle weakness and a dramatically reduced life expectancy. Children who die early often don't see their fifth birthday. Two infant deaths were reported within the past week, according to the Barth Syndrome Foundation. What's been keeping Gilbert alive and functioning relatively well, according to his family, is an experimental drug called elamipretide, made by Stealth BioTherapeutics. Small studies have suggested it's safe and effective in treating the ultra-rare illness. Just 150 people in the U.S. have the condition. 'Our kids are dying. We have seen that this drug works,' said Kate McCurdy, a co-founder of the Barth Syndrome Foundation. 'This drug totally saves the lives of babies.' After a more than decade-long process to bring the drug to market, the treatment's approval has repeatedly hit roadblocks with the Food and Drug Administration. One setback occurred in the spring, when an FDA inspection found problems at a Stealth manufacturing facility. The problems weren't made public, but apparently weren't egregious enough to warrant regulatory action. The company said the issues have been resolved. In late May, after an advisory panel voted earlier (in October 2024) to recommend the therapy, the FDA declined to approve it. The agency didn't reveal why. An ultra-rare disease like Barth syndrome with an ultra-small population of patients who can be tested for clinical efficacy faces barriers for FDA drug approval. There aren't enough patients to do robust, randomized clinical trials, McCurdy said. 'It is virtually impossible to conduct trials that yield data that are conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt. Statistically, you just can't do that,' she said. Weeks later and following a meeting between Needham, Massachusetts-based Stealth and the FDA in late June, the real bombshell came: The company said the agency informed Stealth on Aug. 4 that it would need to resubmit a new drug application — for the third time. It could use a special pathway called 'accelerated approval' in that submission, but the manufacturing issue would extend the timeline to review elamipretide for at least another six months, according to the company. Stealth said that no additional clinical data or safety data was requested. But without any course correction in the process, the private company could run out of money. The delay is devastating to families like the Drydens. 'When we heard this news, we immediately went to the fridge to count how many vials we have left, because that's how long we have this medication. That's the only guarantee we have right now that Gilbert is not going to die,' said Madison Dryden, 35, of Aurora, Colorado. 'It's the highest level of desperation.' On Monday, Stealth announced that it did submit its third application for approval of elamipretide — asking for an accelerated pathway under a significantly tighter timeline than what the agency initially recommended. What is Barth syndrome? Madison Dryden and her husband, Andrew, weren't sure what was wrong with Gilbert in the hours and days after his Christmas Eve birth in 2024. 'His heart function was so low. He was so sick, his body and his feet were purple, his hands were purple,' Dryden said. 'He couldn't eat.' Gilbert was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and received lifesaving care as doctors urgently tried to figure out a diagnosis. Within a matter of days, Dryden said, Gilbert was airlifted to Children's Hospital Colorado with a heart that was struggling to adequately pump blood. The underlying cause was soon revealed: Barth syndrome. The disease impairs cells' mitochondria, which are kind of like tiny batteries that generate energy for cells to function correctly. The chromosomal disorder almost exclusively affects boys. Roughly 85% of early deaths occur before age 5. Those who survive longer are usually given heart medications and may need a heart transplant. Kids with Barth syndrome often rely on drugs like beta blockers and ACE inhibitors to keep their hearts functioning as well as possible. Gilbert was fortunate, at least initially. He found a lifeline through access to the treatment from Stealth. Elamipretide, a daily injection, works by helping to repair the damaged mitochondria. In clinical trials, like the one the Drydens participated in, patients showed a 45% improvement in muscle strength and a 40% improvement in heart function, according to the drugmaker. Most participants have safely remained on the drug for over eight years. In October 2024, an advisory committee to the FDA voted 10-6 in support of the therapy, paving the way for the agency to clear the first drug to treat Barth syndrome. The FDA isn't required to follow the advisory committee's guidance, but it almost always does. A spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the FDA, wrote in an email that the 'FDA did carefully consider the advice of the advisory committee members, including their rationale for their vote. While there is often a high rate of agreement between FDA and advisory committee recommendations,' the spokesman said, 'there is not always concordance.' 'Compelling medical need' for approval After the advisory committee's recommendation, the FDA's rejection was unexpected. 'It is a small sample size,' said a former FDA official who was involved in the drug approval process. The person asked not to be identified in order to speak freely. But the former official was quick to point out that given the advisory committee recommendation for approval, the 'incredibly compelling medical need' of those living with Barth syndrome and the small sample of individuals who seemed to have benefited from the treatment, it certainly appeared that elamipretide was going to make it across the finish line. A lack of continuity in leadership, however, may have added to the already difficult challenge of guiding the treatment through the final hurdles, the former official said. The FDA has seen many top officials leave the agency in recent months. 'Those who have taken over are not as familiar, or perhaps it'd be more appropriate to say they're inexperienced with how one does drug approvals, how one drives things forward, and they're also somewhat fearful of the current environment,' the former official said. 'And I think that's led to an adverse outcome for some of these rare disease products.' The HHS spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request Monday for comment about the agency's rejection of the drug or leadership issues. A Wall Street Journal Op-Ed recently offered a scathing evaluation of what's happening at the FDA, questioning whether the agency and Commissioner Marty Makary's stated goal of accelerating lifesaving drugs is matching the reality of their actions. The Journal said that there were averages of 52 annual drug approvals under the first Trump administration and 48 under President Joe Biden, but 'there have been only 22 in the first seven months of this year,' projecting to just 38 for the year. Elamipretide was cited in the Journal piece as a casualty of the current environment. The former FDA official pointed out that the treatment hit stumbling blocks under the previous administration, as well, but it was headed in the right direction. 'Now it feels like a hot potato that's been just thrown around,' the former official said. 'And this is just not right. It's just not right.' Families left with few alternatives The Drydens say the FDA decision pulled the rug out from underneath them — and many other families. Dr. Kathryn Chatfield, Gilbert's doctor and a specialist in pediatric cardiology and genetics at Children's Hospital Colorado, said the FDA's inaction leaves families with few alternatives. 'We just don't know what's going to happen,' Chatfield said. 'We're going to have to watch them really closely because they're at risk for recurrence of heart failure and rehospitalization and potentially decompensation to the point where they have to live in the hospital until they could get a heart transplant.' A transplant addresses the heart problem but doesn't alleviate ongoing muscular and skeletal problems. 'I can't be OK with sacrificing my child's life for a bureaucratic process,' Madison Dryden said. The latest hurdle to approval has Barth syndrome families and advocates alike, including some members of Congress, looking for more information and answers. 'Time is of the essence here, and we need to get these drugs to these patients as soon as possible,' said Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., a member of the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health. Carter spoke to NBC News days before the FDA requested a resubmission in early August and said he'd sent a letter to the agency asking for 'clarity' on elamipretide. 'There aren't that many options out there,' he said. 'In fact, for Barth Syndrome, this elamipretide is really the only drug that we know of that works.' Carter said that there are six families in Georgia alone he's been in contact with who have a loved one with the rare disease. He's hopeful that an 'accelerated pathway' request might prove a viable option for the families and for the company to continue its research. After the recent FDA decision, Carter told NBC News in a statement that he's 'disappointed' with the recommendation 'now that all issues appear to be resolved.' Carter said he's continuing to put pressure on the FDA and that 'patients will suffer with further delays.' He also acknowledged that the economics of a private company, like Stealth, attempting to continue developing a drug for such a small population of patients would be exceedingly difficult without FDA backing. He said he feels deeply for the families in the middle of a terrifying ordeal. 'I'd be calling everybody I could (too), making sure that my child or my grandchild had this medication,' he said in an interview. Madison Dryden and her husband are left with what they call a 'giant unknown' in the absence of approval, struggling for an explanation for their 7- and 3-year-old daughters as families are in a race against time to keep loved ones alive. 'They know that somebody is not giving permission for Gilbert to have his medicine, and that they keep saying no, and they're our kids — like they can't lose … we can't have them lose their baby brother to this,' she said.


New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Ancient Egyptian desert inscriptions may reveal oldest known reference to Moses, researcher says
A researcher may have uncovered the oldest written references to Moses, dating back 3,800 years and hidden in an Egyptian desert. The two etchings were found at Serabit el-Khadim, an ancient turquoise mining site in the Sinai Desert where Semitic laborers once worked during the Middle Bronze Age. Advertisement The Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions date back between 1800 and 1600 B.C. They were etched centuries before the earliest parts of the Bible were written, between the 10th and 7th centuries B.C. The two inscriptions, among many at the site, were first discovered in the early 1900s – but they're now being reanalyzed by an American-Israeli epigraphist named Michael S. Bar-Ron. The expert, who's also a graduate student at Ariel University, spoke with Fox News Digital about the discovery. Bar-Ron posits that the inscriptions read 'Zot M'Moshe' and 'Ne'um Moshe.' Advertisement The phrases may mean 'This is from Moses' and 'Declaration of Moses,' respectively. If verified, the inscriptions are the earliest written mention of Moses outside the Bible. The inscriptions also reference El, a deity associated with the Abrahamic God, while censuring the ancient pagan goddess Ba`alat. 4 The two etchings were found at Serabit el-Khadim, an ancient turquoise mining site in the Sinai Desert where Semitic laborers once worked during the Middle Bronze Age. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron Advertisement Speaking to Fox News Digital, Bar-Ron noted that the Serabit el-Khadim site once housed a temple to Ba`alat. Some of the etchings, Bar-Ron says, seem to reflect resistance to the goddess's worship from Semitic workers. 'Rather than lauding Ba`alat … [the] readings curse out the Ba`alat cult, with words of warning and rebuke to its followers,' Bar-Ron said. He added, 'They include the terms 'BŠ' – 'for shame' or 'this is shameful' – and 'nimosh,' [which means] 'let us leave' [or] 'remove ourselves.'' Advertisement 4 The two inscriptions, among many at the site, were first discovered in the early 1900s – but they're now being reanalyzed by an American-Israeli epigraphist named Michael S. Bar-Ron. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron The Herculean task of translating the ancient etchings took nearly a decade, Bar-Ron said. 'I spent eight years actively involved in the painstaking, oft-frustrating reconstruction of some 23 wordy Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions,' the epigraphist noted. 'That is, based on the principles of the foremost greats in the field, and informed by the work of my distinguished colleagues in the field.' He also believes the 'Moses' inscriptions may have a common author, pointing to certain 'stylistic points' such as word usage. Bar-Ron's larger graduate thesis explores 'a Mosaic-type leadership' in the region at the time. He described the latest revelations about the inscriptions as 'nonessential icing on the cake.' Advertisement 4 Some of the etchings, Bar-Ron says, seem to reflect resistance to the goddess's worship from Semitic workers. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron 'The finding 'Zot M'Moshe' and 'Ne'um Moshe' were really last-minute discoveries and nonessential to that subpoint (possible Mosaic authorship), within a much more serious thesis,' he said. Bar-Ron also noted that his findings will be peer-reviewed in the future; his research has already been edited over 100 times. 'If we were drawing such conclusions on the basis of one or two inscriptions, it would be weak,' he observed. 'Rather, they are based on what is understood across the full set found at Serabit el-Khadim.' Advertisement 4 The phrases may mean 'This is from Moses' and 'Declaration of Moses,' respectively, according to reports. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron 'I cannot emphasize enough how important it is for educated readers to actually read the proto-thesis itself.' Excavators have long searched for archaeological evidence of Moses, mostly without success. Advertisement Last summer, an ancient sword from the era of the Book of Exodus was uncovered in Egypt. More recently, a French expert identified ancient 'propaganda' praising Ramesses II, the Egyptian leader who may have challenged Moses.


Business of Fashion
12 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
GLP-1 Pills Will Be Priced Similarly to Injections, Wall Street Predicts
US prices for obesity-treatment pills that Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk aim to launch next year likely will be on par with their weight-loss injections, analysts and investors say, in a departure from the usual practice of charging more for new medicines despite pressure to cut prices. Neither drugmaker has disclosed pricing plans for their new daily oral medications. With regulatory approvals and launches still months away, pricing plans could change. Denmark-based Novo expects approval later this year and to launch soon after, while Indianapolis-based Lilly expects to launch by August 2026. Novo's Wegovy and Lilly's Zepbound, administered as weekly injections, are the only highly effective weight-loss drugs targeting the GLP-1 hormone, and the United States is their biggest market. US list prices are about $1,000 per month or more, with both companies offering a monthly supply for $499 to customers paying cash rather than using health insurance. Both companies have said they developed oral weight-loss drugs to meet patient needs and widen access to the market, mindful that some people are averse to injections. ADVERTISEMENT The pills, however, are not more effective than the injections. Lilly said this month its pill orforglipron cut weight by 12.4 percent after 72 weeks in a trial. That compares with weight loss of 15 percent for Novo's daily oral semaglutide. Both trail Lilly's injection at up to 21 percent. UBS analyst Trung Huynh said that will cap Lilly's pricing. The price is 'probably going to come on par with the current drugs today or slightly lower,' Huynh said. TD Cowen analyst Michael Nedelcovych said he expects Novo's pill to debut near Wegovy's price, citing the precedent of its diabetes pill Rybelsus being priced at parity with injection Ozempic, the diabetes-treatment version of Wegovy. Novo executives told analysts this month they were not in a hurry for discount pricing for the new pill. Oral GLP-1 drugs will fill a niche rather than displace injections, according to analysts. TD Cowen estimates that pills will account for a percentage share of the global obesity drug market in the mid-teens by 2030, which could reach $150 billion by then. Growing Cash Pay US doctors, patients and insurers are pressing for lower prices to make the weight-loss drugs more affordable for the 40 percent of Americans who are obese. Typically, drugmakers launch new drugs at higher prices, citing scientific advances. President Donald Trump and lawmakers from both parties have urged the companies to reduce US prices. Novo declined to comment on pricing, pointing to Aug. 6 comments by David Moore, its US operations head, saying that the company may tap customers paying cash directly via its new NovoCare pharmacy, which was launched this year to sell Wegovy outside of insurance. A Lilly spokesperson called it premature to comment on pricing and launch plans for its pill because the company has not yet submitted data for regulatory approval. Peak annual sales forecasts for Lilly's orforglipron fell to as low as $10 billion after its trial data from earlier estimates of up to $30 billion, according to a Reuters review of analyst estimates. HSBC forecasts $15 billion in peak annual sales for Novo's pill, while Barclays expects only $1 billion. ADVERTISEMENT Manufacturing Volume A key question is how much supply will be available at the time of launch. Shortages of injectable GLP-1s in 2023 and 2024 opened the US market to cheaper compounded versions as the manufacturers failed to anticipate the huge demand. 'It's all about scale and pricing,' said Kevin Gade, portfolio manager at Bahl & Gaynor, which owns Lilly shares. Gade pointed to Novo's manufacturing challenge. The pill form requires about 75 times more active ingredient than the highest-dose Wegovy injection, two analysts told Reuters. Lilly has said it already has $808.5 million in orforglipron inventory for next year's expected launch. Novo has said it will launch its pill without supply constraints after billions of dollars in investment to expand semaglutide production. Despite the high production needs, Novo is unlikely to debut its pill at a higher price than Wegovy, said Karen Andersen, healthcare strategist at Morningstar. 'Particularly in the growing cash-pay market, I doubt it can risk a launch at a premium to Wegovy,' Andersen added. By Maggie Fick and Bhanvi Satija; Editors: Caroline Humer and Will Dunham Sign up to The Business of Beauty newsletter, your complimentary, must-read source for the day's most important beauty and wellness news and analysis.