RFK Jr.'s next target: the federal vaccine court
Kennedy has also claimed, falsely, that the compensation program prevents families from suing vaccine makers in traditional courts. (This is true of the COVID-19 vaccines, however, which are adjudicated in a separate program.)
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
And Kennedy has claimed that the vaccine court punishes and intimidates expert witnesses and petitioners' attorneys.
Advertisement
Experts fear that some of the changes Kennedy has hinted at could lead to an onslaught of lawsuits, jeopardizing the manufacture of vaccines and undermining their use.
'Kennedy can fix this system without burning it down,' said Tony Yang, a health policy expert at George Washington University. But Kennedy sounds 'more like a frustrated lawyer who lost cases than an eager secretary trying to fix things.'
Indeed, allies of the secretary have fared poorly in the vaccine court. Their litigation in traditional courts -- including a 2022 lawsuit in which Kennedy delivered closing arguments -- also has fallen short.
Advertisement
The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
Public health officials in the United States have been tracking vaccine safety for decades and have long said that shots routinely given to children are safe. But all vaccines have at least occasional side effects, and there are rare instances of serious injury.
Congress set up the vaccine court in 1986 after a spate of lawsuits began to drive vaccine makers out of the market. So-called special masters judge claims of injuries from vaccines, weighing the available evidence.
The program covers most routine immunizations given to children and pregnant women, and is funded by a small tax on each shot. The vaccine court has paid $5.4 billion in claims since its inception, awarding compensation in about 42 percent of the roughly 28,000 claims filed.
But in accordance with a great body of scientific evidence, the court's special masters have denied thousands of claims that childhood vaccines are linked to autism. Kennedy, a prominent vaccine skeptic, believes that there is such a link and has long accused government officials of hiding the risks.
Some reforms widely seen as necessary would require Congress to intervene. Among them: more of the special masters who preside as judges over cases.
Kennedy said in an interview last month that he wanted to ensure families seeking compensation 'get it very quickly, and they get it without the kind of adversarial impediments that have now been erected over the past 40 years.'
A new fast-track system for rare injuries that studies have definitively linked to certain vaccines could speed up the process. In the current system, government lawyers sometimes fight families over settled links, said Altom Maglio, an attorney who has represented people in the vaccine court for 25 years.
Advertisement
'Fighting tooth and nail is just not appropriate, and doesn't meet the goals,' he said.
At the same time, special masters sometimes make awards even when the connection between a side effect and vaccine is tenuous, said Dr. Daniel Salmon, director of the Institute for Vaccine Safety at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
'There are a lot of things that are being compensated where there's inadequate evidence,' Salmon said. 'We need more science.'
Kennedy has also suggested that injury claims regarding COVID-19 shots should be moved to the vaccine court. At present, those claims are piling up in a parallel federal system called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.
Of more than 14,000 injury claims filed regarding COVID vaccines, only 69 have been paid out. More than 9,400 are pending, and about 4,800 have been dismissed.
Congress would need to act to move those claims to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. But adding the large COVID backlog to the vaccine court's own poses huge challenges, Yang said: 'You're complaining about your kitchen sink, it's clogged, and then you try to wash your bike in it.'
There are some aspects of the program that Kennedy can change without Congress. That includes altering the official table detailing the injuries presumed to be linked to certain vaccines.
Changing the table to say that certain vaccines cause autism or asthma, months or years after shots, for example, could hobble the system, opening the doors to tens of thousands of new claims that would previously have been dismissed.
Advertisement
'He's talking about opening a can of worms that could result in Americans losing access to some vaccines and huge expenditures in court fees,' said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, a former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Kennedy has said, falsely, that the vaccine court is the 'exclusive remedy' for families seeking compensation. In fact, claimants can sue vaccine makers in traditional courts if the government does not respond to them within 240 days or if they are dissatisfied with its offer of compensation.
But the traditional courts have not been any more generous to Americans who believe they were injured, said Renee Gentry, director of the Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic at George Washington University.
'The idea that going to straight to civil litigation means you're going to win is absurd,' Gentry said. 'These are incredibly difficult cases.' She believes her clients are better off in the vaccine court.
Some experts are concerned that Kennedy may open the door to at least one proposal already pending in Congress -- to abolish the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program altogether.
'I think he's been really clear,' said Richard Hughes IV, a lawyer who represents vaccine makers. 'He would be fine with the total collapse of the program.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
GOP senator on DC carjacking fears: ‘I don't buckle up'
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) on Wednesday expressed his fear of being carjacked in the nation's capital, as the Trump administration ramps up its federal takeover of local law enforcement. 'And by the way, I'm not joking when I say this, I drive around in Washington, D.C., in my Jeep, and yes, I do drive myself, and I don't buckle up. And the reason why I don't buckle up, and people can say whatever they want to, they can raise their eyebrows at me again, is because of carjacking,' Mullin said during an appearance on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'I don't want to be stuck in my vehicle when I need to exit in a hurry, because I got a seatbelt around me and that — and I wear my seatbelt all the time,' he told host Brian Kilmeade, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. 'But in Washington, D.C., I do not, because it is so prevalent of carjacking,' the Oklahoma Republican continued. 'And I don't want the same thing [to] happen to me what's happened to a lot of people that work on the hill.' President Trump announced earlier this week that his administration was taking control of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and deployed hundreds of National Guard soldiers to the area to combat crime and violence in the city. The move, sparked after a former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer was attacked by teenagers during a carjacking — has received heavy blowback from Democrats and local officials. A provision in Washington's ' Home Rule Act ' allows the president to federalize the police force for up to 30 days — but any additional time requires Congressional approval. During a speech Wednesday from the Kennedy Center, Trump said he will seek a 'long-term' extension. 'Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress,' Trump said, when asked about whether he's talked to lawmakers about extending the takeover. He added that he expects meet with Congress 'very quickly' and snag GOP support. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) signaled in a post online Wednesday that he and fellow Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) were working with the Trump administration on a safety package for the district. 'Together, we will try to shepherd the DC Security Fund through Congress to give President Trump the resources he will need to improve the safety and quality of life in our nation's capital,' he wrote on social platform X. 'Every American should be behind this effort to make Washington, DC clean and safe so that it can truly become the shining city on the hill.' For such a move to advance, however, it would likely need support from some Senate Democrats. Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) made clear that his caucus would not back the measure. 'No f‑‑‑ing way,' he told podcast host Aaron Parnas. 'We'll fight him tooth and nail. … He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don't like either.' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has also pushed back on Trump's moves, calling them an 'authoritarian push' as data shows the crime rate declining in the nation's capital. The mayor has also used the national attention as a platform to reup the district's quest to gain statehood.
Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
Fall vaccines: Here's what you need to know about COVID, flu and RSV shots
Amid uncertainty at the federal level, the Globe spoke with experts to guide readers on which vaccines are available, what doctors are recommending, and where to find reliable sources of information. Related : Advertisement COVID-19 Though the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has yet to officially weigh in on the COVID-19 vaccine, Kennedy While the Advertisement The Food and Drug Administration is also weighing whether to revoke its The American Academy of Pediatrics continues to recommend that all children starting at six months receive the COVID vaccine, even if they're healthy, Anders Pring said. According to Anders Pring recommends every child starting at age six months receive the 'primary series,' the two initial doses. For older children, Anders Pring recommends getting an annual booster, just like the flu shot. Naima Joseph, a maternal fetal medicine specialist at Boston Medical Center, recommends pregnant patients also receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Insurance companies are mandated to cover ACIP's recommendations. But since the panel's final recommendation has not been released, insurance companies have promised to accept the guidance from medical societies, Joseph said. 'We are hopeful that given AHIP has stated an intent to continue coverage of vaccines, it won't be a problem,' Joseph said. 'We will continue to partner with clinicians, pharmacists, community health workers to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines.' Advertisement Influenza The CDC still recommends the flu vaccine for everyone six months and older. But, in late June, Kennedy approved the CDC advisory committee's recommendation to Thimerosal, a mercury-based chemical compound, is used like a preservative in multi-dose vials. The ingredient has long been pushed by the anti-vaccine movement as being connected to autism, though that The move should not affect the supply of flu vaccines, doctors said, as thimerosal is used in less than 5 percent of U.S. flu vaccinations. Manufacturers Boston Medical Center is 'proactive in looking at supply chains throughout the year to ensure that we have sufficient stock,' said Cassandra Pierre, an infectious disease physician there. RSV Respiratory syncytial virus, which causes infections of the lungs and respiratory tract, primarily infects young children under 2 years old. It also impacts the elderly, especially those with weakened immune systems and chronic lung conditions. RSV infections are As of Aug. 4, the CDC In June, the federal panel approved a recommendation for Advertisement For pregnant women, the CDC recommends a single dose of the maternal RSV vaccine — in particular, Pfizer's Abrysvo — during weeks 32 through 36 of pregnancy. The RSV vaccine given to mothers allows antibodies to be passed to the baby before birth. Doctors agree that RSV vaccines are recommended for these populations. Pneumonia Pneumonia vaccines are available throughout the year, Pierre said. The It also recommends it for individuals who have underlying health conditions that put them at high risk for severe disease. That includes people with HIV, asthma or significant pulmonary disease, or diabetes, according to Pierre. Where can I find reliable information about vaccines? Pierre said guidance from professional organizations, like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association, are resources to look to. She added state and local boards for public health are 'wonderful unsung gems.' The While such resources exist, doctors ultimately urged patients to consult with their own clinicians. 'From a public health perspective, we as pediatricians love to talk with our patients and work with them,' Anders Pring said. Advertisement Jessica Ma can be reached at
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Federal Deployment Ramps Up in D.C.
President Trump made a show of force in Washington, D.C., this week, exercising his unique powers over the nation's capital to commandeer the city's police force, deploy the National Guard and send hundreds of federal law enforcement agents into the city in what he described as an effort to combat crime. It is the first time a president has used a declared emergency to wrest control of the city's police, a step that its mayor said was 'unsettling' though allowed under the law. Congress and the executive branch have long exerted controls over the city's budget and other decisions. But the president's move may represent the biggest encroachment on the city's autonomy since it was granted home rule 52 years ago. While crime is a concern for many residents, the situation on the ground differs from Mr. Trump's hyperbolic statements in justifying the moves: Official data shows that crime is falling — particularly violent crime, which hit a 30-year low last year — after surging during the pandemic. Mr. Trump, who has stoked fears of violent crimes in America's cities going back more than 35 years, delivered increasingly dire threats after returning to office in January that if he was not satisfied with the city's efforts to combat crime, he would order a federal takeover of Washington — in effect dissolving the local government to rule it directly. Mr. Trump took his first firm steps in that direction last week, after a prominent young administration official was beaten by a mob of young assailants in an attempted carjacking in Washington. Here's what to know. What is Trump doing on law enforcement in Washington? And how is he able to do it? In the span of a week, Mr. Trump rapidly ratcheted up moves going over the heads of D.C. leaders. He has invoked his authority in overseeing federal law enforcement and a 1973 law that gives the president the power to take temporary control of the city's police. He ordered a surge of roughly 500 federal agents into the city beginning last Friday, after the beating of Edward Coristine — an operative of the Department of Government Efficiency — that week. Then on Monday, Mr. Trump used a provision of the D.C. Home Rule Act, the law that established a local government and granted the city limited autonomy, to temporarily take over the Metropolitan Police Department, the city's main police force. A White House official said the current takeover would last 30 days, the maximum outlined in the law before the president must seek an extension of that authority through Congress. Mr. Trump has expressed interest in seeking such an extension. What powers do federal agents have on city patrols? On Tuesday, National Guard troops began to deploy in Washington for the first time since 2020, when Mr. Trump ordered a crackdown on Black Lives Matter protests in the city. Unlike the 50 states, D.C. does not control its National Guard unit and has little ability to push back against a federal deployment, as Gov. Gavin Newsom of California did earlier this year. About a dozen troops were spotted on the National Mall on Tuesday as others gathered at the D.C. Armory, the headquarters of the D.C. National Guard. The initial deployment near the Washington Monument was a far cry from the aggressive policing carried out by the D.C. Guard in 2020. The troops were seen snapping photos of themselves with visitors, and left roughly two hours after they arrived. One complicating factor of using federal agents to patrol Washington is that those agents do not have the same authority as police officers to arrest people for minor criminal offenses. Trump administration officials have suggested that if federal agents see someone commit such a crime, they can stop and detain the person until a local police officer arrives and makes an arrest. City officials have said the National Guard troops would not have the authority to make arrests, as the use of the military for civilian law enforcement is limited by the Constitution. Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington said this week that the president 'has the authority, by virtue of the statute, to request services.' But she said city officials retained the authority to hire and fire people in the Police Department. She added that the police chief would work 'hand in hand with the people that the president has designated.' Could Trump fully take over D.C.? Even before the current crisis, Mr. Trump held a significant amount of control over D.C. The president nominates the city's judges and top prosecutor. Much of the City Council's powers to make laws and plan the annual budget is also subject to congressional oversight. Mr. Trump in effect exercised his presidential powers to set aside some of the city's autonomy, declaring a public safety emergency and temporarily commandeering the city's police force. In theory, Mr. Trump could go further, with the approval of the Republican-controlled Congress. Lawmakers could extend the emergency, keeping the police under Mr. Trump's authority for the duration. Mr. Trump may also be able to keep the National Guard and other federal agents deployed in the city indefinitely. In California, a fraction of the Guard force that Mr. Trump had federalized is still operating under federal control months after being called up. He could also direct federal units to more forcefully police the city, using tear gas, riot gear, armored vehicles, low-flying aircraft and other aggressive tools and tactics. The White House had previously said that federal agents in the city would be 'identified, in marked units, and highly visible,' but those restrictions are not mandated by law, and those units could quickly shift to crack down on city residents. The most extreme — and most unlikely — outcome is that Mr. Trump calls on Congress to repeal the D.C. Home Rule Act. That would dissolve the local government and place the city directly under federal control. The city's 700,000 residents — more than the population of Vermont or Wyoming — would lose the ability to elect their mayor and local council members. Mr. Trump has in recent months expressed support for a federal takeover, and Republicans in both the House and the Senate have introduced legislation to do so. But the chances of those laws passing are still very low. Under current Senate rules, such a law would need 60 votes to advance, and there are only 53 Republicans in the Senate. Has something like this happened before? Mr. Trump is the first president to use a declared emergency to wrest control of D.C.'s police. But federal police and the military have previously been deployed in the city, most recently during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob. Mr. Trump had also deployed the National Guard to Washington in 2020 as part of a crackdown on racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. The D.C. Guard was at the forefront of that deployment, which was widely seen as a debacle at the time. Mr. Trump had also considered a deployment of active-duty military units like the 82nd Airborne, and senior Army leaders warned National Guard officers that Army units would replace them on the ground if they were insufficiently aggressive in controlling the protests. There have been other encroachments on the city's autonomy during home rule. Before this week, the most significant was a financial control board, established by Congress in 1995 to steer the city out of a fiscal crisis.
