Full sugar content cut in Pepsi, Mountain Dew soft drinks in Australia as PepsiCo confirms artificial sweetener added
PepsiCo has reduced the amount of sugar in its Pepsi and Mountain Dew brands - with each now containing about 35 and 40 per cent less sugar.
The sugar content has been replaced with artificial sweeteners instead.
Popular Aussie food influencer Russ Eats first noticed the change on Pepsi's packaging after its health star rating went from 0.5 stars to 1.5 stars and shared the news on his social media page.
He said the packaging still looked the same, with the only notable difference being the nutritional ranking.
'Full sugar Pepsi and Mountain Dew are gone,' he said in a TikTok.
'Now the packaging looks the same, that's what's so sneaky, but the health star went up, and guess what?
'They've taken out some of the sugar and added … sweetener.
'Have a look at the Mountain Dew, there was sugar now there's sweetener.'
PepsiCo have been contacted for comment but in a statement confirmed they reduced the sugar content in Pepsi and Mountain Dew in response to consumers who were looking for products with less sugar.
'The new formulas contain low-calorie sweeteners and a lower sugar content,' a spokesman told 9honey Kitchen.
'We've also undertaken extensive sensory research to ensure we're still delivering the same great taste consumers know and love.'
The news has outraged some social media users, who quickly shared their disappointment online.
'Daughter is a type 1 diabetic. Mountain Dew literally saved her life a number of times,' one commented.
Another said her friend relied on the sugar content in Pepsi as she was allergic to sweeteners, while another said the company needed to put out a warning the new product was 'dangerous for diabetics'.
A third said: 'I'm outraged! I'd get angry and riot but my energy levels have dropped.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
36 minutes ago
- ABC News
Bupa customers voice frustrations over denied health insurance claims
Health insurer Bupa has been accused of ongoing unscrupulous behaviour towards its customers amid legal action by the competition watchdog. ABC News has been contacted by patients and medical practices from around the country concerned legitimate claims were denied. Concerns were also raised about poor communication with patients, problematic billing practices, and lack of education among Bupa staff. Earlier this week, the health insurer was fined $35 million by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission for unlawfully rejecting thousands of claims between May 2018 and August 2023. Bupa rejected claims in full when only part of a procedure was not covered. The insurer admitted to engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. But Brisbane woman Tara Manning says she believes poor conduct has not stopped after she experienced difficulty with a claim in April 2025 — about 18 months after the period dealt with by the ACCC. She said Bupa tried to reject a claim for laparoscopic surgery to investigate possible ovarian cancer when she went through the pre-surgery eligibility check. The mother-of-two had bronze-level cover that included cover for gynaecological surgery. But because one part of the procedure was deemed "digestive" by the insurer and the government, the claim was initially rejected in full. Facing a $14,000 bill, Ms Manning spent weeks calling and messaging BUPA ahead of her surgery and only had her claim approved hours after she submitted a complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman. "It was an incredibly stressful time trying to get a hold of Bupa with wait times on the phone over an hour," she said. "I was told very mixed opinions throughout the whole process. Bupa said it could not comment on individual cases. It said the ACCC case related to errors that occurred because of inaccurate or unclear instructions, training or guidance which meant Bupa did not always make correct assessments of these claims and eligibility checks or act quickly enough to fix these issues. "We are deeply sorry for our failure to get this right in these instances. We know this isn't good enough and we're committed to doing better." Plastic surgery clinics also said their bronze cover patients were repeatedly having problems with Bupa when it came to skin cancer removals. When patients needed a cancer surgically removed, they sometimes required a small skin graft or flap to cover the wound which Bupa deemed to be plastic surgery. Plastic surgery was only covered under silver policies, leaving patients with out-of-pocket expenses of up to $4,500. Jane Griffiths, chief executive officer of peak group Day Hospitals Australia, said private health legislation stated that plastic surgery related to skin surgery was, in fact, covered at bronze level. She said their members regularly experienced this from Bupa. "You can't leave a patient without a closed skin lesion," she said. Do you have a story to share? Email Bupa said this was an industry-wide problem to do with automated billing and patients needed manual overrides. It was raised with the federal government in 2021 but recommendations for reform were yet to be implemented. In response, medical practices told ABC News other insurers had better processes to override the problem, whereas poorly trained Bupa staff would meet requests for overrides with "a blanket no" and the inability to escalate the issue. Many patients were also unaware of the issue and simply paid the gap, the medical practices said. "We are working with hospitals and medical practices to make this process smoother," a Bupa spokesperson said. Bupa also refused to cover more than one surgical billing item a day, while other insurers would cover two or three, Ms Griffiths said. This could be a problem for several types of procedures, including ophthalmology and chemotherapy which involved more than one element, and especially for skin cancers. "If the patient needs to be covered for [multiple cancers], you would have to keep bringing the patient in multiple times which of course is not desirable for the patient or for the surgeon," Ms Griffiths said. Bupa said different health insurers took different approaches to funding same-day procedures. Bupa is Australia's second largest private health insurer. Figures from the Commonwealth Ombudsman show 2024 complaint numbers were largely in proportion to its market share. Queensland man David Anderson said he was left with a $48,000 bill for triple bypass heart surgery in 2022 after Bupa denied his claim. He said the insurer delved into his medical records and discovered what it deemed a "sign" of heart disease and claimed it was a pre-existing condition. That was despite three of his treating doctors signing statutory declarations that he was symptom-free prior to taking out the policy. "I had climbed a mountain in Canada two months prior to diagnosis," he said. Bupa declined to comment on individual cases but said under law those with pre-existing conditions were not covered even if it was discovered after a policy was taken out and the patient was symptom-free. "What private health insurers can cover is limited by private health insurance legislation." Bupa's market power makes it hard for small operators Ms Griffiths said day hospital operators had a lot of difficulties with Bupa compared to other insurers and "to some extent" they were abusing their market power. She said Bupa was difficult to deal with in negotiations for their contracts with private hospitals. "From the feedback I've had from members, a lot of them have difficulty — particularly very small, specialised units," she said. "They have difficulty negotiating a reasonable indexation at the end of each contract." Bupa said its main aim was a sustainable network across Australia. "Bupa has an extensive private hospital network, and our relationships and commercial arrangements with hospital operators are both fair and equitable. "Bupa is working closely with our hospital provider partners reach agreements that balance the needs of hospitals, while keeping health insurance affordable for our customers." The company said it processed about six million hospital and medical claims each year and the overwhelming majority are assessed and paid without issue.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Mothers in Victoria write to health minister amid confusion about RSV vaccination
A group of Victorian mothers have written to the health minister after struggling to get their children vaccinated as part of the state's free RSV vaccination program. When Alissa Holder took her six-month-old baby to get a routine vaccination in April, she had no idea the ordeal she and her child was about to endure. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a highly infectious illness that infects up to 90 per cent of children in their first two years. It is one of the most common causes of hospitalisation of infants in Australia. This year the Victorian government introduced a program to provide free RSV vaccines to eligible women and infants until late September 2025. Ms Holder saw seven doctors and five nurses in an effort to get her baby vaccinated against RSV, but said she was repeatedly denied the vaccine despite being eligible. A nurse from one clinic later confirmed her baby was eligible but that the clinic did not offer the vaccine. She was advised to "doctor shop". On June 7, Ms Holder called triple-0 because her baby was coughing and struggling to breathe. Five days later, Ms Holder's baby tested positive for RSV. Ms Holder is now part of a group of 10 Ballarat parents with similarly confounding experiences that have written to Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas about "the inequitable, confusing and ultimately dangerous … roll-out of the vaccine program in [the Ballarat] area". Amy Fuller contributed to the letter to Ms Thomas, detailing her month-long "stressful" process to get her newborn vaccinated. "We were originally told by the maternal child health nurse when we went for our normal vaccinations that we weren't eligible." Ms Fuller was later told by a GP that her baby was eligible, but that the clinic didn't have any of the vaccine. "We rang around Ballarat looking for vaccines and most places didn't have them," she said. Ms Fuller eventually found two clinics that offered the vaccine but was denied access because they weren't "regular patients" at those clinics. She only recently got her child vaccinated at a clinic but said there was still confusion. "They weren't entirely sure [about the vaccine]," Ms Fuller said. "One of them told us it was a live vaccine, one told us it wasn't, and they weren't sure if we had to wait 15 minutes or not [afterwards]." In the letter to the health minister, one mother said their doctors advised them the RSV vaccine "did not exist" and other parents said that some clinics could only order one dose per week or per month. Ms Thomas's office did not respond to a request for comment for this article, instead referring the ABC to the Department of Health. The Department of Health recommends RSV vaccines for certain population groups, including: The ABC understands the Department of Health is aware of the confusion about the RSV vaccine within Victorian clinics, and has since redistributed information and literature about the vaccine. "There is no shortage of nirsevimab [the vaccine] in Victoria," a department spokesperson said. "Providers have been advised to order only what they need for scheduled appointments to ensure fair and efficient distribution. "Order limits have been relaxed as the respiratory illness season has progressed." The department said it had proactively sought to support immunisation providers with additional information and guidance, including direct engagement with GP clinic staff. It said 46,000 doses of maternal RSV vaccine (Abrysvo) and more than 23,000 doses of nirsevimab had been distributed in Victoria. Ramya Raman, a practising GP and the Royal Australian College of GPs vice-president, said her patients had voiced confusion about the RSV vaccine. "The rate at which the public policy has been rolled out has been a little bit staggered and different between the states, and that's probably contributed a little bit to the confusion," Dr Raman said. She advised against doctor shopping. "It's important to have a regular GP because it means that that doctor will know exactly the family history, the mum's history, and will be able to advise appropriately whether they are eligible or not eligible," Dr Raman said. The day after her baby tested positive for RSV, Ms Holder got a call from the first nurse she met with, who apologised. The nurse went on to say that her baby was in fact eligible for RSV vaccination and she had since begun vaccinating other infants as a result of multiple parents asking questions. "When it comes to health care, it's important [governing bodies] don't leave any room for misinterpretation… because it can lead to illness and potentially death," Ms Holder said. "Make it really clear and simple and in plain English so that anyone can understand it."
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘He told me straight up I had cancer': Sunshine Coast Turf Club's legendary racing doctor Bernie Spilsbury retires
Legendary jockey Chris Munce credits him with being the first person to detect his potentially-deadly throat cancer. Dr Bernie Spilsbury has helped countless other jockeys and trainers and been there for some of racing's magic and also most tragic moments since starting as the Sunshine Coast Turf Club doctor almost four decades ago. The retiring doctor, who has also been a long-time Sunshine Coast Turf Club board member, will get a fitting farewell with the Dr Bernie Spilsbury 3YO Handicap (1000m) named in his honour on Caloundra Cup day on Saturday. Munce, the champion jockey who is now a two-time Group 1 winning trainer, fears what might have been if Spilsbury had not intervened when Munce's 'tonsils were swollen up like golf balls' not long after he rode All Too Hard to be runner-up in Ocean Park's 2012 Cox Plate. 'I rode that horse in the Cox Plate and two weeks later I was brushing my teeth and I saw one of my tonsils was like a golf ball in the back of my mouth,' Munce recalls. 'I went to the doctor and they just gave me antibiotics, I then went back a week later when it hadn't improved so they put me on a stronger dose and it still didn't improve. 'I was at Caloundra races one Sunday and I asked Dr Bernie to have a look. 'Within one second he told me, straight up, that I had cancer. 'It was a lot for me to digest in one afternoon, so I went home in a bit of shock I didn't tell (wife) Cathy or anyone. 'The next morning, Dr Bernie rang my house number and Cathy picked up the phone and it all went from there. 'Thank goodness that Dr Bernie spotted it, because it would have just kept spreading through my lymph nodes and God knows how far it would have got to.' • Guineas bid nod and Winx to Tighe's mighty mare Munce successfully beat cancer and Sunshine Coast club officials say Dr Spilsbury has been instrumental in warning other jockeys about some unusual symptoms that later turned out to be cancer. Sadly, Dr Spilsbury was also there at the scene of a heartbreaking tragedy when jockey Desiree Gill died following a race fall at a twilight meeting at the Sunshine Coast in 2013. 'It was shocking,' Dr Spilsbury recalls. 'I was there and she came down head first. 'I am sure she was dead the moment she hit the ground, but I went to try to work on her to see if she could be saved. 'But in my own heart I knew she had passed away.' Dr Spilsbury has long loved the racing game, breeding horses himself as he followed in the racing footsteps of his father and his grandfather. He is looking forward to heading to Caloundra Cup day on Saturday and hopes he can turn a small betting profit in the race named after him. 'My mantra is, you bet small and you lose small,' Dr Spilsbury said. 'A $6 boxed trifecta is my go and that's what I will be doing on Saturday. 'I am a very low key person, but it is a humbling honour to have a race named after me.' Sunshine Coast Turf Club chairman Peter Boyce hailed Dr Spilsbury's contribution to the club as both a medical professional and a board member. 'He will be missed by us, as he is the most kind and compassionate man I know,' Boyce said. 'His care for fellow human beings is second to none and all done a very low key and unassuming way.'
