Lord Mayor and Minister for Housing disagree over future funding for scheme to prevent homelessness
Lord Mayor of Dublin
Emma Blain
has said that she and Minister for Housing
James Browne
disagreed on the importance of the tenant-in-situ scheme for Dublin city during a meeting to discuss housing and homelessness in the capital.
The Lord Mayor met Mr Browne on Wednesday for what was described as a 'constructive meeting' by the Department of Housing. It came following an initial refusal by Mr Browne to meet Ms Blain on the issue, despite her writing to him three times requesting a meeting to discuss funding for the scheme.
In a statement issued after the meeting, Mr Browne said that Ms Blain was 'a passionate and articulate advocate for Dublin' and had particularly highlighted the tenant-in-situ scheme.
The statement, however, stopped short of saying that additional funding would be made available for the scheme in 2025.
READ MORE
The scheme has been in operation since 2023 and has helped hundreds of tenants avoid homelessness. Councils have purchased properties at market price with the tenant remaining in place. Dublin City Council spent €117 million on such second-hand acquisitions in 2025.
After his appointment as Minister earlier this year, Mr Browne announced he was reviewing the scheme and it has been in abeyance since then. Over 100 tenants at risk of homelessness have been left in uncertainty over whether or not they can remain in their rental homes pending the outcome of the review.
In comments after the meeting, Ms Blain indicated that she and the Minister did not see eye-to-eye on the tenant-in-situ scheme.
'I sought a commitment from the Minister that he would seek further funds from the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform,' she said.
'Due to changes issued by the Department for the criteria of the scheme, Dublin City Council is still processing 120 applications from last year but are unable to process any new applications for this year. Yet, there are hundreds of people we could prevent from entering homelessness by using this tool.'
[
James Browne broke Dáil rules when refusing to release housing data, Ceann Comhairle finds
Opens in new window
]
In his statement, Mr Browne said he shared the Lord Mayor's concerns that homelessness was a particular problem in the capital.
He emphasised, however, that a 'major and urgent increase' of housing supply was essential for the city, across social, affordable and privately-built. He added that support for immediate homelessness prevention and for exits was also required.
'To that end, the Lord Mayor agreed to work with the Department on increasing the level of local authority own-build social housing,' he said.
Mr Browne noted that, at present, it accounted for 35 units or 4 per cent of all housing delivery in the Dublin City Council Area.
He also referred to the level of vacancy in the city and said Ms Blain had also 'committed to investigating the level of vacancy in the city, as every element that can be looked at should be immediately considered'.
The Lord Mayor, who is a Fine Gael councillor, wrote to Mr Browne, a Fianna Fáil TD for Wexford, three times during March and April on behalf of the Council. Its members had agreed to seek a meeting looking for assurances of future funding for the tenant-in-situ scheme.
Ms Blain received no reply to the first two letters. After the third letter, an official in Mr Browne's office wrote a one-line email to Ms Blain stating: 'The Minister has acknowledged receipt of this letter. Unfortunately, he is unable to facilitate this meeting request.'
Ms Blain wrote to Taoiseach Micheál Martin about the refusal. Mr Browne subsequently agreed to meet her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
42 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Is Conor McGregor really the only person who wants to be President of Ireland?
The election for the next President of Ireland must take place before November 11th. It's June, so where is the list of Áras hopefuls? It's a job with status and prestige, a place in history, a large salary and a list of perks that includes generous expenses and fine accommodation in the Phoenix Park. None of the political parties have put forward a candidate – yet. And some might not bother. The way the system works is that a candidate nominated by a political party goes straight on the ballot paper. For independents, it's more complex. They must present themselves before county councillors, make their case and persuade four local authorities to allow them to run. READ MORE As of now two independents have declared their intention to run, MMA fighter Conor McGregor and former candidate and businessman Peter Casey. They have yet to get local authority approval. So what is the job of President of Ireland and why, with just months to the election, are there no declared candidates from the political parties? When can we expect the race to get going and what qualities make for an ideal president? Harry McGee from the Irish Times political team, explains. Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Suzanne Brennan.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EPA projections require a frank reassessment of Irish climate policies
Judging by the EPA's latest greenhouse gas projections , Ireland's climate policies are in urgent need of an overhaul . The projections issued annually relate to likely carbon emissions across the Irish economy up to 2030, but also for following decades up to 2050. It is clear existing policies are failing to deliver significant emission reductions or are being overtaken by increases in energy demand or economic growth. At best, Ireland might achieve a 16 per cent reduction in agricultural emissions compared with the 51 per cent that is required under law, which is reasonably aligned with our Paris Agreement commitments. This would be with full implementation of measures in the Government's climate action plan. READ MORE But even that 16 per cent is not guaranteed: the EPA reports that emissions under an 'existing measures' scenario might even increase by 2030 above their 2018 levels. That must not be allowed to happen. Why is Ireland failing in climate policy , you might wonder. Don't we have a gold standard climate law? While it's true that our 2021 Climate Act is well designed from a governance point of view, any law – even a good one – is no substitute for political will. That the political will has waned is obvious from a reading of the Programme for Government and the choice of rural independents as coalition partners. But other decisions and non-decisions, delays and prevarications suggest that the Government has little interest or commitment to acting on the recommendations of its climate experts , and prefers to bend to the will of major exporters and a highly self-serving reading of public opinion. Though the policy framework has been considerably improved, it seems to take an age to implement what should be straightforward decisions (and I'm not even speaking of major infrastructure projects). [ Q&A: What should we do about multiple climate risks threatening Ireland? Opens in new window ] The Departments of Finance and Public Expenditure still dictate the pace of investment, and administrative delays in making decisions of any kind are common. Public bodies are notoriously cautious and risk-averse, but that mindset means that we are not getting the decisive actions that the public was promised to clean up our energy system and put Ireland on a path to climate neutrality – ideally, before 2050. The director general of the EPA, Laura Burke, remarked last week at a conference in Dublin Castle that 'additional measures and accelerated implementation' are required if we are to even get close to the 2030 targets. She stated that 'scaling up' efforts will be necessary across the board. But what does that actually mean? For you and me, scaling up our efforts might mean an additional journey by bike or a meat-free dinner once a week, or installing solar panels (if you're privileged enough to own a roof). Worthy actions taken voluntarily make us feel better but they won't put a significant dent in Ireland's emissions. Systemic change requires a different set of levers – the use of regulations, mandates, incentives, subsidies and enforcement. The truth is that our public representatives and policy experts seem unwilling to discuss the big decisions that will be needed to dramatically transform our energy system and land use and prefer to rely on policies and measures that the EPA now acknowledges will not be sufficient. [ The 'foot may be coming off the action pedal': Climate plan fails to build on ambition Opens in new window ] For instance, the Dáil hardly ever debates climate policy though the actual words are mentioned frequently. When the numbers are going in the right direction (eg, chemical nitrogen use) everyone wants to claim the credit (good policy, good farmers, etc). When the numbers are going in the wrong direction (chemical nitrogen figures have increased in 2024 again, which will be confirmed by EPA inventories in coming weeks), no one accepts responsibility. When the pressure mounts to make a decision, policymakers revert to default and recommend another report or a new consultation. And meanwhile we are blowing through the first carbon budget by between 8 and 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, which adds up to the total annual emissions of countries like Armenia or Nicaragua. And whenever a negative news story comes out about emissions or climate science, the Government is quick to report Ireland's stellar progress in renewable electricity, even though this, too, is but a small flicker (excuse the pun) of what we will actually need to deliver by 2050. The kind of bold interventions we now need would restrict the energy consumption of large energy users like data centres , restrict urban private car use, and deploy effective, catchment-based limits on nitrogen, ammonia and greenhouse gas pollution from agricultural sources . [ Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years amid AI growth, UN says Opens in new window ] Imaginative and brave measures to accelerate the roll-out of renewables and to ensure that their environmental impact is properly assessed and mitigated will be essential. We are facing into a global climate emergency , with global temperature increases now heading well north of 1.5 degrees and the prospect of dangerous climate breakdown occurring within our lifetimes. Clearly the newly established Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy doesn't view it as much of an emergency: following lengthy delays in setting up the Oireachtas committees, it has met just twice since the general election in late November 2024, and only to elect a chair and vice chair. Yes, scaling is hard to do, so we had better do what we know already works and what we are good at delivering. If the magic beans (small-scale nuclear reactors, feed additives, biomethane) don't deliver, then we have to consider more radical pruning. Everything should be on the table, including livestock herd reductions, transport hubs in every town and village, mandatory afforestation in suitable areas and urgent State investment in making heat pumps, solar panels, sustainable building materials and shared mobility services affordable and accessible to all as a priority over the demands of incumbent energy, water and land-hungry industries. And no one needs to be left behind. Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher and activist
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Nama chief makes good on Lenihan order not to ‘mess it up'
The late minister for finance Brian Lenihan, who set up the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) in 2009, left five words ringing in the ears of agency chief executive Brendan McDonagh shortly before he passed away 14 years ago this week. 'Brendan, don't mess this up,' Lenihan told McDonagh in their last meeting before he died, the Nama chief recalled to reporters on Wednesday. When Nama took over €72 billion of mainly toxic commercial property loans from five banks for a discounted price of €32 billion, the fear was that it would lose billions. Even when Ireland was at the end of an international bailout programme in 2013, members of the rescue team told Department of Finance officials that Nama would likely end up with a €10 billion shortfall. READ MORE It wasn't helped by Nama overpaying to the tune of €5.4 billion for the loans in the first place – adhering to a long-term economic value method forced upon it by legislation to lessen the holes that Nama transfers would trigger in the domestic banks' balance sheets. Many objectives have been projected on to Nama over the years, such as fixing the housing crisis , by virtue of the swathes of land it controlled; contributing more to the common good; and providing more homes for social housing, even though local authorities ended up accepting only about 2,400 of the almost 7,000 units offered over the years. Nama's remit widened about 13 years ago to deliver thousands of homes and develop land in the Dublin docklands . But Nama's core objective, enshrined in the very Act that set it up, was to obtain the best achievable financial return for the State. It made enemies along the way. Try finding a developer that has much good to say about dealing with Nama officials over the years – even ones that it agreed to work with, while enforcing against others. It's not difficult to find critics, too, in the halls of Leinster House. But it is now on track to deliver a lifetime surplus of €5.05 billion – having upgraded its forecast on Wednesday by €250 million – by the time it is wound down at the end of this year. Adding the €5.4 billion it first needed to recoup to break even on the original overpayment actually brings the total financial gains for the State to more than €11 billion. Lenihan would surely have approved of that outcome.
