Sinn Féin table motion to protect cultural heritage of GPO
Aengus Ó Snodaigh condemned as a "clanger" Government plans to redevelop the site.
He rejected charges that his party's plans would harm commerce in the area.
Mr Ó Snodaigh urged that the "the full heritage and cultural potential is honoured and realised", and he said that the Government's countermotion deleted that phrase from his party's proposal.
"Was it for Starbucks that all the blood was shed?" he asked, noting that the GPO's roof "gave birth to the Republic".
His party colleague Joanna Byrne criticised the Government's response to the motion, saying it was a "dismissive smoke screen", and accused the Coalition of trying to "tear the heart out of the birth place of our Republic".
Sinn Féin TD Louise O'Reilly condemned as "shamfeful" the "breathtaking ignorance of our history" which she accused the Government of displaying.
"Commercialisation of the GPO will not be tolerated," she added.
Christopher O'Sullivan, Minister of State at the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, responded by saying that the GPO is not just "bricks and mortar" but "a witness" to - and "living symbol" of - Ireland's struggle for freedom.
"The bullet holes still etched in its columns are not scars, but scriptures," he said.
He noted that most of the workforce has moved to a new site, and quoted a regeneration report which urged that an ambitious national flagship project be undertaken at the site.
It will remain in public ownership, he said.
He condemned as "completely outrageous" and "completely out of order" accusations made by Sinn Féin against the Government of "betrayal" and "wanton destruction".
"That is why we are strongly opposing this motion," he said, and added that there is already a commercial element at the site.
He urged the party to take advantage of this "opportunity to create something wonderful", insisting that the cultural signifiance of the site would be at the centre of the redevelopment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Parents of Harvey say Simon Harris is reponsible for failed promises, but not their son's death
THE PARENTS OF Harvey Morrison Sherratt, a nine-year-old boy who died on 29 July who had waited years for scoliosis surgery, have said that they do not hold Tánaiste Simon Harris 'directly responsible' for their child's death. In a statement issued last night on social media, Gillian Sherratt and Stephan Morrison said that they hold Harris accountable for his failure to keep the promise he made when he was Health Minister in 2017 that no child would wait more than four years for scoliosis surgery and for his failure to meet them to discuss Harvey's case while their child was alive. Harris is planning to meet the parents soon, and has requested an inter-disciplinary report into Harvey's care to be put together via the Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill. In their statement, Harvey's parents said that anyone who is holding Harris directly responsible for their child's death is doing so 'against our own wishes'. 'Our issue with him is purely political and not personal. For anyone commenting on his posts or Government posts and calling for #JusticeForHarvey, we ask that if you are using Harvey's name that you do so in a respectful way,' they said. People up and down the country have been vocal in their support for the parents of Harvey Morrison Sherrat following his death after the familiy faced years of struggle to access care. Gillian Sherrat Gillian Sherrat Harvey's parents have called for Harris to resign for his failure to keep promises he made in relation to the care of children with scoliosis, and that call has been taken up by Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín. Tóibín has also said that the presidential election will now be a 'referendum on Simon Harris', and said that his party will seek to table a motion of no confidence in the Fine Gael leader. Advertisement A protest will be held in Dublin city this Saturday to 'call on Government to make it so no child or family will ever have to suffer through what [Harvey's parents] and Harvey have suffered through'. On X and other social media platforms, attacks on Harris have become highly personal, with multiple accounts branding the politician a 'child killer'. Harris faced immense backlash for attending an Oasis concert during the weekend as well. Yesterday evening, Harvey's parents said that they want the march on Saturday to be 'peaceful'. 'This is a march to call out systematic failures within Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and to call for change within paediatric healthcare,' they said. The parents have also called for people not to bring signage and flags along to the march in support of other causes, as they do not want their call for urgent paediatric healthcare reform to be diluted. Harvey Morrison Sherratt was born with both spina bifida and scoliosis. His parents have said that not only was his surgery delayed for months, he was also at one point removed from the waiting list unbeknownst to them. More widely, CHI, the HSE and the Government have been widely criticised by advocacy groups and the opposition for their handling of a series of crises involving children's healthcare in Ireland over the last two years. Not only have many children faced delays for surgery with CHI, unnecessary hip surgeries have also been performed on children who didn't need them, a report has found. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Around 200 attend public meeting over drone delivery hub
Around 200 hundred people have attended a public meeting in Dundrum this evening to address local concerns surrounding a planning application for a mobile drone delivery hub in the Dublin suburb. The planning application, from drone-delivery company Manna, attracted around 200 objections. The main concerns raised in the objections were about noise, safety, privacy, and environmental impact. Manna already operates in Dublin 15, where it says it has made deliveries to 42,000 households over the past 18 months. A decision on the application for a new hub in Dundrum was due on 4 August, however, an Coimisiún Pleanála has sought further information from Manna on the planned centre. This opens up a six-month window during which the company will have to provide follow-up information to planners. Local Fianna Fáil TD Shay Brennan hosted the meeting, with Manna Chief Executive Bobby Healy making a presentation to the audience. During a Q&A session afterwards, locals from the Dundrum area - as well as some residents from Dublin 15 (where Manna flies around 100 drone deliveries daily) raised their concerns around noise, privacy, and general disruption and how they might be addressed. The meeting follows the publication earlier of the Government's official guidance for the operation and management of drones in Irish airspace. Fines to be introduced for drone regulation infringements Fines are also set to be introduced for drone regulation infringements around privacy, safety and noise. The Government has published official guidance for the operation and management of drones in Irish airspace. As part of the National Policy Framework for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), a working group on drone geographical zones will be established. This group will look at the safe integration of drones into our airspace as well as their impact on society and the environment, which includes fines. Gardaí and the Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) are responsible for enforcing current EU drone regulations. These two bodies, together with the Data Protection Commission, will continue to work on enhancing investigations of offences related to drone use. Meanwhile, the framework will see a U-space steering group being set up. U-space refers to specific services and procedures to ensure safe and efficient access to airspace for a high volume of drones. Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien said the policy framework, which was included in the Programme for Government, "recognises the importance of collaboration and engagement of a wide range of stakeholders." "It aims to facilitate consideration of how matters such as planning and environmental issues will be addressed by the appropriate authorities, including in the context of the expansion of commercial drone delivery services," he added. The minister also said the "implementation of the policy framework relies on cross-government structures and the continuation of engagement and support from various departments, agencies, the UAS sector and the public. "Given the rapid pace of evolution of the UAS sector internationally, the Policy Framework will be a living document that will have to continue to evolve to keep pace with these developments," he added. Drones are used as daily tools in areas such as inspections (pipeline, rail, wind turbine maintenance), agriculture, mapping, architecture, construction, real estate, energy, environment, meteorological applications, and public safety. In Ireland they are being rolled out across services including emergency response (eg Dublin Fire Brigade for assessing risks and managing responses to risks), dangerous building and site inspections by local authorities (eg, Dublin City Council), environmental monitoring (Environmental Protection Agency) and goods and medical delivery. However, they are also being increasingly used for food delivery in some areas of Dublin. Mr Healy welcomed the Government's National Policy Framework for UAS. He said it is "a pivotal moment by establishing a clear, forward-looking regulatory foundation, the Government has laid the groundwork for a safe, innovative, and globally competitive drone economy. "At Manna, we've long believed that right policy enables real progress. Going forward, this policy signals that Ireland is ready to lead in UAV innovation, attract investment, and foster high-tech job creation - powered by responsible regulation and collective ambition," he added. Drone flight paths to be examined Meanwhile, Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien has said the management of flight paths for drones in Irish airspace will be looked at. "That is not to stifle the sector but it's to look at very specific measures around geographical zones, how they can be managed, how we look at our regulatory framework about how this sector can grow in a sustainable way," he said. The minister said that a national working group on geographical zones will be established, following on from the policy document published today. "We have had 50 submissions to this policy document, many of which from operators, residents and others. It is actually trying to bring all that together to look at how we licence drone usage, which is being done already through the IAA," he said. He said it will be looked at how flight paths for drones can be "managed effectively" and how that can permeate down to local authorities. "There are areas where there is a concentration of drone usage that some welcome, that some don't. This is a sector that is going to be with us well into the future. "We are one of the first European countries to come forward with this comprehensive framework around system usage," he said. Mr O'Brien said there will be penalties and enabling enforcement under the legislation. He said Fixed Charged Offences will be introduced for infringement of the regulations, which is being worked on, with gardaí, the IAA and the Data Protection Commission "continuing to publicise conviction and enforcement actions relating to infringement". "There are certain powers in place already, we have got to look to see how they have been strengthened further without stifling the growth in what is a very important sector that can really help people and business in relation to their normal lives," he said.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules
A US judge has denied the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," Judge Berman wrote. "The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct," the judge said. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. President Trump had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. However, in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Mr Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On 11 August, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Mr Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Mr Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient.
