
After teal wave of 2022, there was no ‘sophomore surge'. Where to from here for the independents?
As Climate 200 founder Simon Holmes à Court sees it, there are no safe seats or silver medals in politics.
The political fundraising body Climate 200 supported 35 community independents – commonly called teals though some shirk that tag – in this year's federal election. Nine have won, while votes are still being counted in other seats where teals are contenders.
In 2019, the independent Zali Steggall famously ousted Tony Abbott from Warringah, joining a crossbench featuring Helen Haines, Andrew Wilkie and Rebekha Sharkie. But it was in 2022 that the teal wave washed through parliament.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Many have posited that the teal appeal was, at least in part, a response to Scott Morrison's deep unpopularity and his Liberal government's 'women problem'. But Labor and the Greens are not immune.
The vote for independents has gone up from 5.3% in 2022 to more than 7% this year.
In Bean, the independent Jessie Price is a whisker ahead of Labor incumbent David Smith. In Bradfield, a similarly tiny difference puts Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian just in front of Nicolette Boele. In Kooyong, MP Monique Ryan is battling to hold on against the Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer.
Zoe Daniel initially celebrated winning Goldstein, but Liberal candidate Tim Wilson – who lost it to the independent in 2022 – later claimed victory. The independent Kate Julett gave Labor MP Josh Wilson a fright in Fremantle.
The electoral analyst and blogger Ben Raue says typically there's a 'sophomore surge' with independents, where name recognition sees their vote go up at the second election. 'That largely hasn't happened,' he says, but adds 'they've done reasonably well'.
Thanks to the independents creating a three-way competition in some seats, vote counting is more complicated, he says.
'Even where they don't win they're keeping it interesting,' Raue says.
Raue says climate change was not on the agenda as much this year compared with 2022, which could explain the more subdued support for the teals, who campaign on climate action, gender equity and political integrity.
But he says overall the rise of the independents has been a 'transformation'. 'It used to be all about minor parties. There were a few independents in the parliament, but now it's much more of a wave.'
The polling analyst Kevin Bonham makes the same point about the lack of a sophomore surge, and says there is no 'startling pattern' in the results so far.
'The independent vote is up but that's because there were more of them running in more seats,' he says.
'Let's wait and see where they end up in terms of how many seats they win. I guess the worst possible result would be losing a couple, but it's not a greatly different result to what happened last time.'
Holmes à Court, the son of a billionaire, says the independents are 'here to stay'.
'The fact that so many of the independents kept their seats shows that the movement was not a blip,' he says.
'A record number of independents [have come] within striking distance of a win.
'There's no silver medal in politics, but if there were medals, at least 22 community-selected independents would be walking away with a gold or silver.'
There are other, non-teal independents, of course – such as Dai Le, who looks likely to stay on in Fowler. And there are others who managed respectable primary votes and could pose a future threat.
Sign up to Afternoon Update
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The onward march of the independents, though, could be hobbled by electoral funding laws that the two major parties joined together to pass in February.
At the time, the Centre for Public Integrity said the speedy passage of the laws – which went through without the scrutiny of a public inquiry – were an 'affront to our democratic process'.
The new rules will cap political donations and election campaign spending, increase transparency around donations and – from the 2028 election – increase the public funding per vote.
The move was pitched as a way to rein in 'big money' such as that deployed by the mining magnate Clive Palmer, who spends tens of millions of dollars on election campaigns. But crossbenchers described it as a 'stitch-up' that would advantage Labor and the Coalition over the independents and minor parties.
The $50,000 cap on the amount a donor can give to a party or individual can be sidestepped using multiple donations to the various sub-groups that the major parties have, and there's a carve out for peak bodies such as unions and business councils.
There's also a spending cap of $800,000 for each candidate, but the independents argue established parties have plentiful access to resources and staff which they don't. And a boost of about $3 to $5 for each vote for candidates who get at least 4% of first-preference votes will advantage incumbents, they say.
Holmes à Court describes the new laws as a 'financial gerrymander' on the income and the expenditure side.
'It will be tougher, because there's now one rule for independents and another rule for the parties,' he says.
But he adds that independent candidates aren't going to walk away, just because they got silver this time.
'We put out a [documentary] earlier this year called No Safe Seat. I think that's the theme of the election,' he says.
'In the 'class of 2022', all seven won formerly safe seats. The difference between losing a couple of seats and gaining a few is plus or minus 1000 votes in half a dozen seats.
'Politics is brutal.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Who was on board the seized Gaza aid boat with Greta Thunberg?
Climate activist Greta Thunberg is one of a number of people who have been deported from Israel. The 22-year-old was one of 12 people on board the British-flagged yacht Madleen - operated by the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) - which aimed to break Israel's sea blockade and deliver aid to people in Gaza. Israel's foreign ministry confirmed on Monday it had seized the vessel and brought it to shore. A day later, a photo of Thunberg on a plane was shared by the ministry. She also confirmed she was flying to Sweden via France. Two other activists and a journalist agreed to be deported and leave Israel, Adalah, a legal rights group in Israel representing the Madleen passengers, said. Others who refused deportation were being held in detention, Adalah added, and their case was set to be heard by Israeli authorities. 1:01 Who was on board the yacht? A politician, journalist and doctor were among those who joined Thunberg on the Madleen. The 12 passengers - or volunteers as the FCC referred to them as - came from across the globe. Half of them were French, while others were Brazilian, German, Spanish, Turkish and Dutch. It was previously believed that Irish actor Liam Cunningham was going to be one of those on the Madleen, but the Game of Thrones actor was not listed as a passenger. The full list of passengers includes: • Greta Thunberg - Sweden • Rima Hassan - France • Yasemin Acar - Germany • Baptiste Andre - France • Thiago Avila - Brazil • Omar Faiad - France • Pascal Maurieras - France • Yanis Mhamdi - France • Suayb Ordu - Turkey • Sergio Toribio - Spain • Mark van Rennes - Netherlands • Reva Viard - France Who has been deported? Ms Hassan is a French member of the European Parliament who is of Palestinian descent. She has previously been barred from entering Israel because of her opposition to Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. It was not clear whether she was being immediately deported from Israel or detained. French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said that one of the detained French activists signed an expulsion order and will leave Israel on Tuesday. The other five refused. He said all the activists had received consular visits. French President Emmanuel Macron also called for consular protection and the repatriation of the French citizens. Sergio Toribio, a Spanish activist who was deported, slammed Israel's actions after he arrived in Barcelona. "It is unforgivable, it is a violation of our rights. It is a pirate attack in international waters," he told reporters. Mr Faiad is a correspondent for Al Jazeera Mubasher, the first 24-hour Middle Eastern news channel. It is unknown if he is the journalist that has agreed to leave Israel. The move to seize the boat was criticised by human rights organisation Amnesty International. The group said Israel was flouting international law and called on Israel to release the activists immediately and unconditionally. Israel has said its actions were consistent with international law. Is the UK responsible for the yacht? The FFC previously said the UK government had a "legal duty" to protect the yacht and its crew and passengers as it was sailing under the British flag. In a post on X on 6 June, the coalition wrote: "Under international law, the UK must: Prevent genocide, reject Israel's illegal blockade of Gaza, defend its flagged ship from unlawful attacks." After the boat was diverted by Israeli forces, Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on Palestine, also urged the UK government to intervene. Any vessel registered in the UK is defined as a British ship and is allowed to fly the Red Ensign flag - a red flag with the Union Jack in the top left-hand corner. The UK government typically provides support to vessels flying the Red Ensign. On Monday, Downing Street said it wants to see Israel resolve the situation around the detention of the Madleen "safely with restraint, in line with international humanitarian law". The prime minister's official spokesperson told reporters: "We have made clear our position in relation to the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The prime minister has called it appalling and intolerable." They added: "We have made it very clear we must get more aid into Gaza... the unimpeded entry of assistance at scale to meet the enormous needs in Gaza is critical." What happened to the last Freedom Flotilla? Last month, an attempt by the Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza by sea failed after another of the group's vessels was attacked by two drones while sailing in international waters off Malta. The group blamed Israel for the attack, which damaged the front section of the ship. On Sunday, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz ordered the military to prevent the latest mission from reaching Gaza, calling the mission a propaganda effort in support of Hamas. Israel imposed a naval blockade on the coastal enclave after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The blockade has remained in place through multiple conflicts, including the current war, which began after a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on 7 October 2023.


BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Scotland's emission cuts 'too slow' despite fall
Cuts to Scotland's planet-warming greenhouse gases are still "too slow" despite a fall in groups say progress has "stalled" after figures showed a 1.9% year-on-year drop in emissions such as carbon dioxide for 2023. A bounce back in international air travel after the pandemic has largely offset reductions elsewhere, with domestic transport still the single biggest source of Scottish government insists significant actions have been taken over the last two years to bring emissions down further. While many sectors have seen modest falls, emissions from overseas flights grew 19%.It means emissions have now been cut by 51.3% since the baseline year of 1990, although the Scottish government no longer has annual targets against which the figures are measured. The biggest reduction came from the electricity sector which has been shifting to renewables, principally onshore and offshore wind.A big cut in generation from Scotland's only gas-fired power station, at Peterhead, saw the sector's emissions fall by 44%.Emissions from domestic transport are the largest emitting area, responsible for 29% of the first low emission zone began operating in Glasgow half way through the from agriculture are broadly unchanged, although the industry is now only the third most emitting has been replaced in second place by heating in from fuel production and distribution have dropped by 13%.Acting Net-Zero Secretary Gillian Martin said the figures showed that Scotland was leading the rest of the UK in cutting emissions."Net zero offers huge economic opportunities for our country and the changes we need to make will put money into people's pockets, improve health and wellbeing and create better public services as well as protect our planet for future generations," she said. Missed targets WWF Scotland said progress was still "too slow" and that the reductions "are simply not enough."Head of policy Claire Daly said: "Emissions from transport, buildings and agriculture remain largely unchanged and far too high. Every year of inaction makes the path to a safer, fairer future even harder to reach."The concerns are echoed by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) which said progress had fellow Dave Hawkey said: "The parliament's recognition of a climate emergency in 2019 was not matched by a step change in policy. Instead, timid piecemeal initiatives crowded out more ambitious ideas."These figures have historically been an important benchmark for how well Scotland is doing in reducing its impact on climate the Scottish government missed nine of the last 13 targets and eventually decided to scrap means that Scotland is currently without any interim targets for cutting emissions until it legislates to replace them with five-yearly carbon long-term goal, to reach net zero by 2045, remains in zero is the point where no more greenhouse gases are being added to the total in the atmosphere.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Long running ABC program Q+A to be axed after 17 years following a painful decline in ratings
Q+A, one of the ABC's flagship current affairs and news programs will not return to air, after taking a break in May. It was scheduled to return in August, but those familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity say it won't return. The ABC is set to announce the decision to discontinue the show later this week. The show has come under fire over the last few years, after churning through different hosts following the departure of Tony Jones, who left in 2019. Q+A has seen several changes in its hosting lineup, first with Hamish Macdonald, David Speers, Virginia Trioli, Stan Grant and most recently Patricia Karvelas taking over as host. The number of episodes was also cut by ABC staff in 2024, going from 40 episodes a year to just 24. Q+A also was shifted from its usual slot of Monday night, to Thursday night, a move that was eventually reversed by the ABC. The show also has seen its ratings collapse in the last 5 years. From a peak 600,000 viewers in 2020, the Q+A crashed to a record low of just above 200,000 viewers across the five major capital cities in April 2021. In August 2023, during the show's 'Garma Special', Q+A received its lowest ratings ever, with fewer than 84,000 metro viewers. Daily Mail Australia's Political Editor Peter Van Onselen said the program would not be missed if it didn't return to ABC's roster in 2024. In an opinion piece for The Australian, Van Onselen said Q&A - hosted by Patricia Karvelas - had received 203,000 views nationally. 'With numbers this woeful coupled with how out of touch with mainstream Australia the program has become, it really needs to be put out of its misery,' he wrote. 'There have been enough failed reboots to justify finally axing it.' The commentator said cracks started to appear after Tony Jones stopped hosting after a decade in the role from 2008 to 2019. 'It wasn't all that long ago that the program was vibrant and interesting, with discussions well led by former host Tony Jones,' Van Onselen wrote. 'I remember appearing on it at the time. Ratings regularly hit the one million mark, which precipitated the discussion about changing its time slot.' Van Onselen lashed the show for not being informative enough and hosting discussions that were 'one-sided, uninteresting and rarely funny'. He claimed it was the ABC's 'stubbornness' that was saving the show from being axed for good but that a replacement would be welcomed.