Lawrence O'Donnell Spots 'Profoundly Ignorant' Way Trump Made History After D.C. Plane Crash
MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell on Thursday knocked President Donald Trump's 'completely indiscriminate' act of throwing around accusations at a press briefing tied to the deadly plane crash in Washington, D.C.
'It is the first time in history that a president in the United States has assigned blame for an aviation accident on his own, immediately, based entirely on his own profoundly, ignorant, prejudiced guess,' said O'Donnell of Trump, who blamed diversity, equity and inclusion efforts for the midair collision.
O'Donnell stacked Trump's move up against Democrats who didn't blame Ronald Reagan for Air Florida Flight 90 crashing into a D.C. bridge and falling into an icy Potomac River below in 1982. The crash left 78 people dead.
The crash occurred just months after the then-president made what the MSNBC host called 'the single stupidest, tough guy move' on domestic policy in the '80s when he fired thousands of air traffic controllers amid a labor dispute.
O'Donnell then went after Trump for thinking he knew the 'answers' to Wednesday's crash despite an investigation just getting underway.
'Every previous president in reacting to such events, such tragedies, has always begun with sympathy including the only president who could have been blamed for an accidental plane crash and wasn't,' he declared before playing a 1982 clip of Reagan remarking on Lenny Skutnik, a bystander to the Air Florida crash.
Skutnik, a Congressional Budget Office employee at the time of the crash, dived into the Potomac River and pulled Priscilla Tirado out of the Potomac River.
Reagan would later invite Skutnik to his State of the Union address less than two weeks later.
'Lenny Skutnik was the worst thing you can be in Donald Trump's Washington,' said O'Donnell of the federal worker who became 'an American hero' and served the government for decades before his retirement in 2010.
O'Donnell turned to a 1982 article published seven months after the crash in The New York Times where Skutnik was asked if he'd do the rescue again.
'I separate it into two parts,' Skutnik told the Times. 'The rescue, I'd do again in a minute. But all the stuff that came after, the fame and all that, I could do without. If it ever happened again, I wish the cameras weren't there. The whole thing has been kind of blown out of proportion.'
O'Donnell weighed in on Skutnik's quote, 'There's nothing about Lenny Skutnik — not his humility, not his heroism, nothing about him that Donald Trump could ever understand.'
Marco Rubio Reveals Just How Serious Trump Is About Buying Greenland
Ex-Prosecutor Thinks Trump Is Accidentally Creating The Very Thing He Fears
'Irony Is Dead': Lara Trump Slammed After Clueless Complaint About 'Competence'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Insurrection Act not off the table for LA protests, Trump says
The Brief Speaking to reporters Sunday, Trump did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act in response to the Los Angeles ICE protests. "We're not going to let them get away with it. We're going to have troops everywhere," Trump said. President Donald Trump said he won't rule out invoking the Insurrection Act as violent protests against federal immigration officers continue in Los Angeles for a third day. National Guard troops clashed with protesters Sunday, firing tear gas at crowds as protesters moved onto the freeways surrounding downtown and blocked traffic. Police said two LAPD officers were injured after they were hit by motorcyclists who tried to breach a skirmish line. Trump deployed hundreds of National Guard troops to California after confrontations between federal immigration officers and protesters who tried to stop them from carrying out immigration sweeps. THE LATEST: LA ICE protests, Day 3: National Guard arrives, as directed by Trump The backstory The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails requires the president to request that the participants disperse. Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice, told The Associated Press it's an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement. "It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn't exist anymore," he added. READ MORE: Torrance 9-year-old detained by ICE faces potential deportation to Honduras It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes. What they're saying Speaking to reporters Sunday, Trump did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act in response to the Los Angeles ICE protests. "Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection," Trump said. "We're not going to let them get away with it. We're going to have troops everywhere, we're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart." Trump said he did not believe the protests constituted an insurrection as of Sunday afternoon, but he said, "you have violent people, and we're not going to let them get away with that." Dig deeper Presidents have issued a total of 40 proclamations invoking the law, some of those done multiple times for the same crisis, Nunn said. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times — in Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — in response to the unrest in cities after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968. During the Civil Rights era, Presidents Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower used the law to protect activists and students desegregating schools. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state's governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out. George H.W. Bush was the last president to use the Insurrection Act, a response to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the white police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King in an incident that was videotaped. The Source This report includes information from President Donald Trump's comments to reporters Sunday and previous reporting from FOX TV Stations. FOX's Catherine Stoddard contributed.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Los Angeles unrest: The projectiles flying in both directions
() — Some protesters in the increasingly violent clashes with law enforcement in Los Angeles have thrown rocks and launched water bottles, fireworks and other projectiles at officers, while police have fired foam and rubber bullets, tear gas and 'flash bangs' to try to disperse crowds. Sunday marked the third straight day that demonstrators took to the streets of L.A. or neighboring communities in response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in southern California. The escalating physical threats faced by police officers undercut claims that most or all protesters are simply trying to voice their anger about the Trump administration's immigration policies, observers said. Anti-ICE protests intensify in Los Angeles on third day of unrest 'This is a very dangerous activity for law enforcement to get involved in because the crowd is so large,' retired FBI special agent Bobby Chacone told 'NewsNation Prime' Sunday. 'You can get surrounded. You can get separated. (Police) have to keep those lines strong, and they have to take people into custody, particularly if you know who the ringleaders are.' Some observers fault Feds for chaos in LA County Sunday's confrontations arguably were the most disruptive yet, as protesters set fire to several autonomous vehicles and briefly took over part of the 101 Freeway. As police officers lined up on the other side of the median, some members of a crowd on the overpass above rained projectiles on them, independent journalist Anthony Cabassa said. 'There's a lot of anarchists, a lot of bad-faith actors, that come to these protests and take advantage of the situation. They vandalize, they break up bricks and throw them at police, and they kind of get the crowd going,' he said. Cabassa said there is an 'online network of people' who frown on reporters like him who document these violent tactics. 'They're not happy that it's being reported because it kind of debunks the idea of this being a mostly peaceful or wholly peaceful protest,' he said. NewsNation national correspondent Mills Hayes was on the scene in L.A. In one live report on Sunday, she held up pieces of rock that protesters had thrown at police, as well as non-lethal 40 mm foam and rubber bullets fired by officers. Police also have fired canisters of tear gas and flash bangs throughout the weekend. National Guard members deployed by President Trump over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom were stationed in the downtown area. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What are Canada's governing Liberals going to do about AI?
Fresh off his election victory, Prime Minister Mark Carney has been focused on standing up to Donald Trump's claims on Canada as the 51st state and American tariffs. But while that political drama unfolds, one topic that seems to have quietly slipped under the radar is the rise of artificial intelligence. Despite its transformative impact on everything from jobs to national security, AI received surprisingly little attention during the campaign and in the first weeks following Carney's victory. The consequences of that lack of attention are already starting to show, as emissions and electricity costs continue unabated without a clear vision of where AI fits in. Read more: Although Carney has appointed former journalist Evan Solomon as Canada's first-ever AI minister, it's not yet clear what action the Liberal government plans to take on AI. The Liberals' 'Canada Strong' plan outlining the prime minister's proposals is scarce on details. Still, it provides some clues on how the Liberals see AI and what they believe it offers to the Canadian economy — and also what they seem to have misunderstood. First, the plan includes some robust initiatives for improving Canada's digital infrastructure, which lags behind other leading countries, especially in terms of rural broadband and reliable cell service. To accomplish these goals, the Liberals say they'll incentivize investment by 'introducing flow-through shares to our Canadian startup ecosystem…to raise money faster' for AI and other technologies. In other words, they will reuse the model of mining and oil companies whereby investors can claim a tax deduction for the same amount as their investment. A major question is whether Canada's investment ecosystem has enough big players willing to take these risks. The plan gets less promising as it comes to the implementation of AI within 'the economy of tomorrow.' The Liberals say they plan to build more data centres, improve computing capacity and create digital supply chain solutions 'to improve efficiency and reduce costs for Canadians.' All that that sounds OK — so far. But how will they do this? The Liberals plan to establish the Bureau of Research, Engineering and Advanced Leadership in Science (BOREALIS), linking AI development directly to the Canadian Armed Forces and the Communications Security Establishment Canada, which provides the federal government with information technology security and foreign signals intelligence. This approach to AI is focused on what it offers to Canada's defence, whether by manufacturing semiconductors or improving intelligence gathering, so that it can rely less on the U.S. Similarly, Canadian defence tech firms will access funding to help reduce dependence on American suppliers and networks. The Liberals are pledging sovereignty and autonomy for Canada's defence and security, all enabled by 'the construction and development of AI infrastructure.' What goes unsaid is the intense power needs of data centres, and the consequences for emissions and climate action of 'building the next generation of data centres' in Canada. New data centres cannot be built without also constructing more renewable energy infrastructure, and none of this addresses emissions or climate change. If the centres crop up in big numbers as planned, Canadians could also see their electricity costs go up or become less reliable. That's because finding space within the existing grid is not as easy as it may sound when AI data centres require over 100 megawatts (MW) of electricity demand versus five to 10 MW for a regular centre. With the rapidly evolving market for AI-based data centres, Canadian policymakers need to provide clear guidance to utilities in terms of their current decisions on competing industrial-scale demands. As the Canadian Climate Institute points out: 'Anything less risks higher rates, increased emissions, missed economic opportunities — or all of the above.' So far, the Liberal plan fails to address any of these concerns. What else does the 'economy of tomorrow' hold? Apparently, it means more efficient government. According to the Liberal plan, AI 'is how government improves service delivery, it is how government keeps up with the speed of business, and it is how government maximizes efficiency and reduces cost.' Despite otherwise clashing with the Trump administration, this language is reminiscent of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has also centred its use of AI. Read more: The Liberals will open an Office of Digital Transformation, which aims to get rid of red tape and 'reduce barriers for businesses to operate in Canada.' They don't seem to really know what this would actually look like, however. They say: 'This could mean using AI to address government service backlogs and improve service delivery times, so that Canadians get better services, faster.' Their fiscal plan points out that this frame of thinking applies to every single expenditure: 'We will look at every new dollar being spent through the lens of how AI and technology can improve service and reduce costs.' The economy will also benefit, the government argues, from AI commercialization, with $46 million pegged over the next four years to connect AI researchers with businesses. This would work alongside a tax credit for small and medium-sized businesses to 'leverage AI to boost their bottom lines, create jobs, and support existing employees.' But a new report by Orgvue, the organizational design and planning software platform, shows that over half of businesses that rushed to impose AI just ended up making their employees redundant without clear gains in productivity. Creating a tax credit for smaller companies to introduce AI seems like a recipe for repeating the same mistake. Much of the Liberal plan seems to involve taking risks. There's a shortsightedness on this rapidly advancing technology that requires significant guardrails. The government seem to view AI as a solutions machine, buying into the hype around it without taking the time to understand it. As policy is properly hashed out in the weeks and months to come, the Liberals' feet will have to be held to the fire on the issue of AI. Canadians must benefit from its limited uses and be protected from its abuses. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organisation bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jake Pitre, Concordia University Read more: Canada has a chance to lead on AI policy and data governance at the 2025 G7 Leaders' Summit Artificial intelligence should not be allowed to adjudicate cases in Canada's Federal Court AI and criminal justice: How AI can support — not undermine — justice Jake Pitre does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
