Appeals court allows Trump to continue collecting tariffs
A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump to continue collecting tariffs under an emergency powers law for now, as his administration appeals an order striking down the bulk of his signature set of economic policies.
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted an emergency motion from the Trump administration arguing that a halt is 'critical for the country's national security".
The appeals court temporarily halted the order from a federal trade court issued a day before.
Trump is facing several lawsuits arguing Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs exceeded his authority and left the country's trade policy dependent on his whims.
Earlier
ADVERTISEMENT
Earlier a federal court in New York handed Trump a big setback, blocking his audacious plan to impose massive taxes on imports from almost every country in the world.
A three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade ruled that Trump overstepped his authority when he invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare a national emergency and justify the sweeping tariffs.
The tariffs overturned decades of US trade policy, disrupted global commerce, rattled financial markets and raised the risk of higher prices and recession in the United States and around the world.
The US Court of International Trade has jurisdiction over civil cases involving trade. Its decisions can be appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington and ultimately to the Supreme Court, where the legal challenges to Trump' tariffs are widely expected to end up.
Which tariffs did the court block?
The US president's tariff regime has been paused - except for imports from China - after upheaval in the markets. (Source: 1News)
The court's decision blocks the tariffs Trump slapped last month on almost all US trading partners and levies he imposed before that on China, Mexico and Canada.
ADVERTISEMENT
On April 2, Trump imposed so-called reciprocal tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States runs a trade deficit and 10% baseline tariffs on almost everybody else. He later suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries time to agree to reduce barriers to US exports. But he kept the baseline tariffs in place. Claiming extraordinary power to act without congressional approval, he justified the taxes under IEEPA by declaring the United States' longstanding trade deficits 'a national emergency'.
In February, he'd invoked the law to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, saying that the illegal flow of immigrants and drugs across the US border amounted to a national emergency and that the three countries needed to do more to stop it.
The US Constitution gives Congress the power to set taxes, including tariffs. But lawmakers have gradually let presidents assume more power over tariffs — and Trump has made the most of it.
The tariffs are being challenged in at least seven lawsuits. In the ruling yesterday, the trade court combined two of the cases — one brought by five small businesses and another by 12 US states.
The ruling does leave in place other Trump tariffs, including those on foreign steel, aluminium and autos. But those levies were invoked under a different law that required a Commerce Department investigation and could not be imposed at the president's own discretion.
Why did the court rule against the president?
Generic NZ court photo
ADVERTISEMENT
The administration had argued that courts had approved then-President Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in a 1971 economic and financial crisis that arose when the United States suddenly devalued the dollar by ending a policy that linked the US currency to the price of gold. The Nixon administration successfully cited its authority under the 1917 Trading With Enemy Act, which preceded and supplied some of the legal language later used in IEPPA.
The court disagreed, deciding that Trump's sweeping tariffs exceeded his authority to regulate imports under IEEPA. It also said the tariffs did nothing to deal with problems they were supposed to address. In their case, the states noted that America's trade deficits hardly amount of a sudden emergency. The United States has racked them up for 49 straight years in good times and bad.
So where does this leave Trump's trade agenda?
File photo. (Source: Associated Press)
Wendy Cutler, a former US trade official who is now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, says the court's decision "throws the president's trade policy into turmoil'.
'Partners negotiating hard during the 90-day day tariff pause period may be tempted to hold off making further concessions to the US until there is more legal clarity," she said.
Likewise, companies will have to reassess the way they run their supply chains, perhaps speeding up shipments to the United States to offset the risk that the tariffs will be reinstated on appeal.
The trade court noted that Trump retains more limited power to impose tariffs to address trade deficits under another statute, the Trade Act of 1974. But that law restricts tariffs to 15% and only for 150 days with countries with which the United States runs big trade deficits.
For now, the trade court's ruling 'destroys the Trump administration's rationale for using federal emergency powers to impose tariffs, which oversteps congressional authority and contravenes any notion of due process,' said Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University. "The ruling makes it clear that the broad tariffs imposed unilaterally by Trump represent an overreach of executive power.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Business Review
2 hours ago
- National Business Review
Between the posts: How to set goals in business
Some world leaders and chief executives might envy US President Donald Trump's ability to sign dozens of executive orders without impunity. They are issued, and sometimes retracted, at a speed that wrongly suggests they are a form of chaos rather than a carefully executed plan. The Economist magazine forewarned its readers back in July 15, 2023, 'How MAGA Republicans plan to make Donald Trump's second term count' outlined what victory in 2024 would mean: '… a team of practised demolition experts would prime their explosive ideas. The deconstruction of the administrative state could begin. The vain and tyrannical whims of an emperor-president would emerge from the rubble.' The plan, as we now know, meant sacking 50,000 top civil servants and replacing them with America Firsters whose personal loyalty to Trump was beyond question. The aim, according to The Economist, was to prevent the 'unelected bureaucracy from stymying the programme of an elected president'. In the US, the public service has no protection from the checks and balances in the constitutional design of the three branches of government it enshrines. Trump and his acolytes had learned their lesson from his first term, which could be accurately described as chaotic in its inability to make appointments and prevent the many legal actions that followed his defeat in 2020. In its prescient article, The Economist correctly predicted that if the Republicans won both houses of Congress, 'nobody in the executive or the legislature will be in a position to stop Mr Trump'. It then warned: 'If these carefully laid plans were enacted, America would follow Hungary and Poland down the path of illiberal democracy.' One might hesitate to say it has reached that point, but it does reflect the theme of this week's column: goal-setting, courtesy of a new local self-improvement book for managers and executives. Deb Bailey in her 20s at World's View, Zimbabwe. Leadership coach Navigate Your Impact: How to achieve goals that really matter is the second book that has been self-published by Deb Bailey, a leadership coach. (Her first was Inside Out: Why leadership starts with you, which was a Covid-era response to leaders who felt lost amid the lockdowns.) Bailey had six years of OE in her 20s, qualifying in human resources management while working in London. On the trip home, she visited World's View on the Nyanga Downs plateau in Zimbabwe. It inspired her to spend 22 years at Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (FPH), New Zealand's most valuable company and one of the few of any scale based on technology. This week, it reported a record revenue of $20.2 billion for the year to March and a 43% increase in net profit to $377.2 million – by far the best performance of any New Zealand corporate. Bailey left FPH in 2016 and completed an MBA, 15 years after Fisher & Paykel Industries split into its appliance and healthcare operations. In 2010, the latter established a manufacturing base in Mexico that supplied about half of the humidifier and sleep apnea products it sold in the US. In her role, Bailey annually interviewed most of the country's top graduates in engineering, given the company's scale and recruitment demands. 'I always noticed a vast difference between those genuinely interested in an engineering career and those who weren't. Genuinely interested candidates were curious from the start. They were eager to engage with the products we showed them during the interview process.' Those who showed little interest often had parents who were engineers themselves, prompting Bailey to observe that these 'amazing young people [were] living someone else's version of their life'. This led to a more fundamental question: 'Who is this goal for?' Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's Mexico headquarters. Life stages The book lays out how this can be answered at various stages of one's life. In her words, '[This] will help you identify and plan your goals, diagnose where you are getting stuck and show you how to move forward for the greatest possibility of achievement and success.' Bailey says many of the principles she practices today were part of the leadership approach at FPH. 'They aligned well with the culture then – particularly a strong 'leaders as coaches' mindset. Clear expectations, timely feedback and genuine support weren't treated as separate events; they were part of everyday interactions.' That has since changed at both the company and in Bailey's own career. She completed an MBA and became immersed in the theoretical side of coaching, by writing or designing leadership programmes. She whittles down her core beliefs into two principles: leadership tools should be simple and feel natural, not forced; and the way forward begins with clarity about the problem to be solved. The book has three parts: the decision-making process, which involves planning and identifying; putting those decisions into action; and finally, the concepts of goal-setting, using neuroscience and research into psychology and personal development. Some of this is controversial, such as neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), which emerged in the 1980s as a 'new age' practice that has since fallen out of favour. The largely negative Wikipedia entry was last updated in 2015, and the most recent primary source is 2001. 'Three brains' NLP has been replaced by a new field of leadership development known as mBit (multiple brain integration techniques). In the words of its two leading proponents, Grant Soosalu and Marvin Oka, this 'provides leaders with practical methods for aligning and integrating their head, heart, and gut brains for increased levels of emergent wisdom in their decision-making, and for developing an expanded core identity as an authentic leader'. They claim recent neuroscientific findings have uncovered complex and functional neural networks that give scientific credence to the growing body of leadership literature showing how the world's best companies are guided by leaders who can tap into the intelligence of their head, heart, and guts. Deb Bailey Bailey distils this 'three brains' concept in chapters on logical thinking, emotional values, and gut instinct, along with more conventional ways people identify and set goals. She recalls how difficult it could be at FPH for leaders to have coaching conversations when a team member lacked clarity about their aspirations. 'In many cases, no-one had ever asked them what they wanted to do next, and leaders needed the tools to tackle those conversations. Without that clarity, talent development and succession planning could stall.' I am not qualified to judge the effectiveness of these techniques. But Bailey explains them with examples from her own experience, including such life-changing personal ones as balancing a family with a career, going through a divorce, and the launch of her own business. Out of curiosity, I asked about her experience with self-publishing, as that seems to be the only way New Zealand business authors can reach their reading public. (The last one I reviewed was former Z Energy boss Mike Bennetts' guide for Kiwi CEOs, Being Extraordinary, published in 2023.) Bailey said self-publishing was an 'enjoyable and eye-opening journey. When I wrote Inside Out, I had no idea what I was getting into.' But with the help of an editor, designer, typesetter, printer, distributor, and publicist, she achieved a goal many aspire to but, on the results so far, few achieve. Navigate Your Impact: How to achieve goals that really matter, by Deb Bailey. Available from June 9 from Nevil Gibson is a former editor at large for NBR. He has contributed film and book reviews to various publications. This is supplied content and not paid for by NBR.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ's Budget For Austerity And War
Article – Socialist Equality Group The money for war comes at the direct expense of the working class. Notably, the govt expects to save $12.8 billion over four years by cancelling 33 separate pay equity negotiations, which were to increase pay for hundreds of thousands of … The budget announced by New Zealand's right-wing coalition government on May 22 represents a major escalation in the assault on workers' wages, living standards and public services, in order to fund tax breaks for the rich and to build up the military in preparation for war. Finance Minister Nicola Willis asserted that the budget was 'not austerity—far from it,' saying that it contained 'much-needed investments' in health and education. This flies in the face of reality. The government slashed the budget's operating allowance (total increase in spending) to $1.3 billion—the lowest figure in a decade. Over the next four years it intends to reduce total spending from 32.9 to 30.9 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The government cited deepening economic turmoil as a result of the Trump administration's tariffs, which come on top of last year's recession in New Zealand. The country's economy shrank by 0.5 percent in 2024, and unemployment rose from 4 to 5.1 percent, with tens of thousands of workers sacked across the public sector and by private companies. There is a stark social crisis, with soaring living costs, an estimated 500,000 people (one in ten) relying on food banks and one in five children living in poverty—all of which will get worse as a result of the budget changes. The most significant new spending is on the military, in line with demands from the US, Australia and the NATO imperialist powers. The defence budget will rise from 1 to 2 percent of GDP over the next eight years, starting with an investment of nearly $13 billion over four years. Far-right ACT Party leader and government minister David Seymour warned in parliament that the 'the chances are higher than ever' that New Zealand will need to use its military. The increased spending, he said, 'allows us to be part of a network of like-minded democratic societies committed to defending our freedoms in an uncertain world.' In fact, as was made clear in last month's Defence Capability Plan, the aim is to integrate New Zealand into aggressive US-led military preparations targeting China. As a minor imperialist power, New Zealand is already contributing to the brutal war in Ukraine and the bombing of Yemen, which are part of the imperialist countries' efforts to solve their economic crisis by violently redividing the world. The opposition Labour Party supports this agenda: its leader Chris Hipkins did not mention the vast military spending boost in his response to the budget. His ally, Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick stated that the government 'think it's harder to feed the poor [than] to arm up for somebody else's war.' The Greens' alternative budget, however, is silent on the rearmament program. As part of the last Labour-led coalition government from 2017 to 2023, the Greens supported increased military spending and the decision to send troops to Britain to assist in training Ukrainian conscripts for war against Russia. The party has recently adopted the militarist slogan of making NZ 'a country worth fighting for.' The money for war comes at the direct expense of the working class. Notably, the government expects to 'save' $12.8 billion over four years by cancelling 33 separate pay equity negotiations, which were to increase pay for hundreds of thousands of workers in female-dominated roles, including teachers. Other attacks include: Reduced government contributions to KiwiSaver, a retirement savings scheme covering most workers. Currently, members of the scheme can get $521 a year from the state, but this has been halved to $260.72 in order to save the government $2.46 billion over four years. Around 9,000 unemployed 18- and 19-year-olds will be kicked off unemployment benefits 'if it is determined that their parents or caregivers can support them.' The move is particularly brutal given that 13.2 percent of under-25-year-olds are not employed or in education—more than double the overall unemployment rate. The Best Start tax credit, given to parents in the first year of their child's life, will be income-tested, which will lead to 'a reduction in income' for around 61,000 families, according to government officials. $1 billion will be cut over five years to emergency housing for the homeless, under conditions where 2.3 percent of the population is severely housing deprived. None of these cuts will be offset by the pitifully small 'relief' touted by the government, consisting of a $7-a-week increase in tax credits for some working families. The government's rhetoric about increased investment in health and education is likewise a sham. Total annual health spending has increased by just 4.77 percent ($1.37 billion)—not enough to address the crisis of unmet need and understaffing of public hospitals and medical centres. With inflation at 2.5 percent and annual population growth of 1.5 to 2 percent, Auckland University health policy professor Tim Tenbensel wrote in the Conversation that a 4–5 percent funding increase 'amounts to merely standing still.' Doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers have held strikes over the past year-and-a-half to protest below-inflation pay offers and a hiring freeze in public hospitals. Funding for public education is being cut in real terms. Radio NZ reports that school operations grants have received an increase of just 1.5 percent. Meanwhile government subsidies for private schools, including several elite institutions, will rise by 11 percent. The budget will increase subsidies for university tuition by 3 percent or 4.75 percent, depending on the subject. Tertiary education providers, which have had their funding slashed by successive governments, will be permitted to increase fees by 6 percent, driving up student debt, which reached a total of $15.6 billion at the end of 2024. The government anticipates that its austerity measures will fuel social opposition and conflict and is therefore strengthening the repressive arms of the state. There is $472 million over four years to expand prisons and hire 580 more Corrections staff, in addition to 685 funded in last year's budget. Some $33 million over four years is allocated to expand military-style boot camps for young offenders. Labour Party leader Hipkins denounced several cuts in the budget, as well as $200 million in subsidies for fossil fuels development at gas fields. 'More people are homeless, more children are going hungry and women are going to be paid less. That's what Nicola Willis and [Prime Minister] Christopher Luxon will be remembered for,' Hipkins said. Such statements are typical of Labour's blatant hypocrisy. The National-led coalition government is, in fact, building upon the attacks of the last Labour government. Labour lost the 2023 election in a landslide defeat, fuelled by mass anger over soaring living costs, the crisis in the health system, increased child poverty and homelessness, as well as Labour's support for Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza. The Public Service Association's Fleur Fitzsimons similarly denounced the budget as 'wage theft on a national scale against New Zealand women.' The PSA, the biggest union, has enforced thousands of job cuts across the public sector, while also openly supporting the multi-billion dollar increase in military spending. The budget's austerity and warmongering will accelerate the movement to the left by workers and young people, who will come into conflict not only with the government, but with the opposition parties and the pro-capitalist union apparatus. The crucial task facing the working class is to establish its political independence from all these organisations and to consciously take up the fight for the socialist reorganisation of society. This means joining and fighting to build the world Trotskyist movement, which in New Zealand is represented by the Socialist Equality Group. 26 May 2025
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
Trump gives Elon Musk an Oval Office sendoff
President Donald Trump bid farewell to Elon Musk in the Oval Office on Saturday, providing a cordial conclusion to a tumultuous tenure for the billionaire entrepreneur. Musk is leaving his position spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency, and he'll be rededicating himself to running his businesses, including electric automaker Tesla, rocket company SpaceX and social media platform X. Trump credited Musk with 'a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington" and said some of his staff would remain in the administration. Musk, who wore all black, including a T-shirt that said 'The Dogefather', nodded along as the president listed contracts that had been cut under his watch. 'I think the DOGE team is doing an incredible job," Musk said after accepting a ceremonial key from the president. "They're going to continue to be doing an incredible job.' He left a searing mark on the federal bureaucracy, including thousands of employees who were fired or pushed out. Some government functions were eviscerated, such as the US Agency for International Development, which had provided a lifeline for impoverished people around the world. Boston University researchers estimate that hundreds of thousands of people have already died as a result of the USAID cuts. ADVERTISEMENT Despite the upheaval, Musk also fell far short of his goals. After promising to cut $1 trillion (NZ$1.6 trillion) or even US$2 trillion (NZ$3.3 trillion) in federal spending, he lowered expectations to only US$150 billion (NZ$251 billion) in the current fiscal year. It's unclear whether that target has been hit. The DOGE website tallies US$175 billion (NZ$293 billion) in savings, but its information has been riddled with errors and embellishments. Trump said Musk had led the 'most sweeping and consequential government reform effort in generations". He suggested that Musk is 'really not leaving' and 'he's going to be back and forth' to keep tabs on what's happening in the administration. Musk, the world's richest person, recently said he would reduce his political donations. He was Trump's top donor in last year's presidential campaign. Trump appeared eager to end Musk's service on a high note. 'This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way," Trump wrote on social media on Friday. "Elon is terrific!" As a special government employee, Musk's position was designed to be temporary. However, he had speculated about staying 'indefinitely', working part-time for the administration, if Trump still wanted his help. Musk has brushed off questions about how DOGE would continue without him, even suggesting it could 'gain momentum' in the future. 'DOGE is a way of life,' he told reporters recently. 'Like Buddhism.'
