logo
2016 election probe: Donald Trump backs Tulsi Gabbard; slams Barack Obama and 'thugs'

2016 election probe: Donald Trump backs Tulsi Gabbard; slams Barack Obama and 'thugs'

Time of India5 days ago
US President on Saturday backed director of national intelligence
for calling out the prosecution of former President
and senior members of his administration, accusing "thugs" of working together to hurt
's win in the 2016 election and damage his presidency afterward.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump praised journalists of Fox News and said that they were fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the 'thugs' over election fraud.
"Great job by young and talented Harrison Fields on FoxNews. The Panel was fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the 'thugs' who have just been unequivocally exposed on highest level Election Fraud. Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard. Keep it coming!!!" Trump said.
Gabbard appeared on "Hannity" Friday night where she asserted that former President Barack Obama's goal with the Russia collusion narrative was to "subvert the American people's will" in the 2016 presidential election.
Gabbard declassified the report on the Obama administration's Russia hoax on Friday, revealing "overwhelming evidence" that demonstrates how, after President Donald Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the years-long Trump–Russia collusion probe.
Earlier, the DNI released a statement, said there is "overwhelming evidence" "overwhelming evidence," showing that following Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton, Obama and his national security team "manufactured and politicised intelligence" to establish groundwork for what she characterised as an extended attempt to remove Trump from office.
"The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue. It is one that concerns every American," Gabbard said.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government."
Gabbard indicated that all associated documentation would be submitted to the department of justice for criminal review. She emphasised that "no matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law".
The statement identifies senior officials, including then-DNI James Clapper, CIA director John Brennan, national security adviser Susan Rice, secretary of state John Kerry, attorney general Loretta Lynch, and FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, who attended a high-level National Security Council meeting on December 9, 2016, at the White House. Gabbard contends this meeting initiated a new Intelligence Community assessment at Obama's request to attribute election interference to Russia.
According to Gabbard, intelligence assessments prior to the election had determined that Russia was "probably not trying ... to influence the election by cyber means". A December 7, 2016 internal memo additionally stated, "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome."
Following the White House meeting, Clapper's executive assistant instructed agencies including the CIA, FBI, NSA and DHS to prepare a new IC assessment regarding Russian interference, noting it was "per the President's request".
Gabbard stated that Obama officials provided "false statements" to outlets such as The Washington Post, incorrectly asserting Russian interference in the election outcome. A January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment reportedly contradicted previous findings spanning several months.
She asserted this revised assessment utilised unreliable or "manufactured" sources, including the subsequently discredited Steele Dossier.
Gabbard indicated this led to various consequences, including the Mueller investigation, Trump's two impeachments, arrests of senior officials, and increased Russian tensions.
"Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic," Gabbard said. "The American people's faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it."
This development occurs amidst increased Republican examination of the Trump-Russia investigation's origins, following recent intelligence record releases through her office.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A day after backing out of Gaza talks, Trump says Hamas didn't ‘want to make a deal' on ceasefire, hostage release
A day after backing out of Gaza talks, Trump says Hamas didn't ‘want to make a deal' on ceasefire, hostage release

Mint

time19 minutes ago

  • Mint

A day after backing out of Gaza talks, Trump says Hamas didn't ‘want to make a deal' on ceasefire, hostage release

Just one day after pulling out of the ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, US President Donald Trump on Friday said that terror group Hamas did not want to make a deal on a ceasefire and hostage release in Gaza. According to a Reuters report, Trump made the comments to reporters at the White House. On Thursday, the president's Middle East peace envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the Trump administration had decided to bring its negotiating team home for consultations following Hamas' latest proposal. The US and Israel pulled their delegations out of the talks in Doha, mediated by Egypt and Qatar. Witkoff said Hamas was to blame for an impasse. Netanyahu said Witkoff had got it right, and that Hamas was the obstacle to a deal, as reported by Reuters. Hamas, which had given its response to a US-backed ceasefire proposal on Thursday, has disputed Witkoff's characterisation of the talks and said the negotiators were making progress. If agreed upon, the proposed ceasefire deal would have lasted 60 days during which additional aid would have been allowed into Gaza. According to the deal, some remaining of the 50 hostages held by Hamas in Gaza would have been freed in return for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

‘India can withstand US hiring curbs through digital self-reliance!' says policy expert
‘India can withstand US hiring curbs through digital self-reliance!' says policy expert

Mint

time19 minutes ago

  • Mint

‘India can withstand US hiring curbs through digital self-reliance!' says policy expert

US President Donald Trump has once again stirred debate in global tech circles by calling on American technology firms to stop hiring from abroad, particularly from India and China and focus on creating jobs for Americans at home. Speaking at a high-level Artificial Intelligence (AI) Summit in Washington on Wednesday, Trump denounced the 'globalist mindset' of tech companies such as Google and Microsoft, accusing them of exploiting American freedoms while building factories overseas and employing foreign workers. 'Under President Trump, those days are over,' he declared, pushing for a renewed sense of 'patriotism and national loyalty' in AI innovation. The speech has drawn sharp reactions across the world, including in India, where a significant portion of the tech workforce is engaged with US companies either directly or through offshore delivery models. To assess the implications, we spoke with Vishwas Dass, a graduate of the Takshashila Institution's Public Policy programme and an expert on technology and international policy. According to Dass, Trump's 'Winning the Race' strategy, which proposes complete localisation of America's AI development pipeline, presents a double-edged sword for global innovation, especially for countries like India. 'If enacted, US companies would face operational and staffing disruptions. Many already rely on skilled workers from India, a country which has built a massive IT export ecosystem,' Dass said. He pointed out that Indian IT firms are responding proactively, by ramping up local hiring in the US, establishing nearshore centres in Canada and Mexico, and expanding into higher-margin, AI-based services within India. While Trump's push could temporarily dent remittance inflows, 36 per cent of India's $111 billion remittance income in 2022 came from countries like the US, UK and Singapore, Dass believes India's strategic moves such as Startup India and Digital India can soften the blow over time. He further noted: 'India's IT sector generated $194 billion in revenue during 2022–23, contributing eight per cent to the GDP and employing over 4.5 million professionals. About 70–75 per cent of this revenue is export-driven. The industry is resilient and increasingly future-ready.' In response to this question,Vishwas Dass explained that Trump's "America First" approach could deepen tech decoupling trends and alter the global AI landscape significantly. 'The Biden-era export restrictions already limit India's access to advanced AI chips like Nvidia's H100. Trump could double down on such policies, further delaying India's AI infrastructure goals, including the IndiaAI mission, which plans to deploy 10,000 GPUs,' Dass said. Citing a report from the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA), Dass warned that chip restrictions could derail crucial data centre projects. He also referenced AI expert Andrew Ng's concerns that over-restriction may backfire by pushing countries like India to build independent compute ecosystems, diluting US dominance in global AI. Yet, Dass highlighted India's countermeasures, including its ₹ 76,000 crore Semicon India Programme and strategic partnerships under the iCET and TRUST frameworks with the US and EU. 'India is laying down the infrastructure for AI and semiconductor self-reliance while hedging against geopolitical risk through diversified alliances,' he added. He further pointed to Google'sAI Opportunity Agenda for India, which estimates that AI adoption could add INR 33.8 lakh crore in economic value by 2030 and help achieve a $1 trillion digital economy by 2028. Commenting on the feasibility of completely cutting ties with Indian and Chinese talent, said such a move would be 'extremely difficult, if not self-defeating,' for US tech firms. He drew insights from The Technopolitik survey by the Takshashila Institution, which found that 21.7 per cent of respondents ranked talent as more critical than infrastructure in driving national power, while 53.4 per cent preferred open migration due to its role in attracting investment. 'India is not just a low-cost service hub anymore, it is a core node in the global AI and digital services value chain,' Dass asserted. 'A sudden decoupling would disrupt global R&D pipelines and severely affect tech diplomacy, especially given that 45.4 per cent of surveyed stakeholders see the US as India's most important technology partner.' That said, Dass acknowledged that 95 per cent of respondents supported India's domestic semiconductor development, indicating a strong desire for self-reliance without completely cutting off international cooperation. Trump's renewed nationalist rhetoric on AI may bolster domestic sentiment, but experts like Dass caution against overlooking the complex interdependence of global tech ecosystems. 'What we are seeing is not just a political speech, it is a flashpoint in an ongoing global realignment of technological power,' Dass concluded. India, with its digital ambitions, demographic dividend, and expanding R&D base, stands at a critical juncture. Whether it chooses to respond with defensive posturing or proactive leadership in AI governance will shape its position in the global tech order for years to come.

TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, says Howard Lutnick
TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, says Howard Lutnick

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, says Howard Lutnick

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday that TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Chinese-owned short video app that is used by some 170 million Americans. Last month, President Donald Trump extended by 90 days to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of TikTok.(representative image/unsplash) Lutnick, speaking on CNBC, also said the United States must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Last month, President Donald Trump extended by 90 days to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by January 19 of this year if there had not been significant progress. "China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm," Lutnick said. "If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon." TikTok did not immediately comment. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm, majority-owned and operated by U.S. investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January. Attorney General Pam Bondi sent letters to Apple, Google and other companies that provide services or host the TikTok app that were made public this month. The letters said the Justice Department was irrevocably relinquishing any claims against the companies for potential violations of the law, citing Trump's determination that an abrupt shutdown would interfere with his overseeing national security and foreign affairs. Some Democratic lawmakers argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and suggest the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store