University of Edinburgh lecturers to walk out over planned £140m cuts
Lecturers at the University of Edinburgh are set to walk out in a dispute over the university's refusal to rule out 'unacceptable' compulsory redundancies as part of plans to save £140 million.
The action will see members of the University and College Union (UCU) strike during an open day on June 20, followed by a further five-day walkout in September to coincide with the university's 'welcome week' for new students.
Union members are also set to take part in action short of a strike, including working to contract, not covering for absent colleagues, and a 'possible marking and assessment boycott'.
The UCU announced the action following a ballot which saw a 60% turnout, with 84% backing strikes and 93% voting in favour of action short of a strike.
The news came on the same day university principal Professor Sir Peter Mathieson appeared before a Holyrood committee, where he defended his six-figure salary and acknowledged the university is not in deficit.
Sophia Woodman, UCU Edinburgh University branch president, said it is 'not too late' for the strike to be averted, and she called on senior management to rule out compulsory redundancies.
'Staff want a sustainable future for the university as much as anybody and we want to work with senior management to end this dispute,' she said.
'But we're clear that the use of compulsory redundancies is unacceptable.
'With the resources and reserves held by the university it can easily afford to rule out sacking staff.
'The decision to let the strike continue, with all the disruption to students that it entails and a possible marking and assessment boycott, is a matter of choice for Peter Mathieson and the university senior management.
'The union's door is open to talks and I'd appeal to them to heed this final warning, rule out compulsory redundancies and end this unnecessary dispute.'
The union claimed the proposed £140 million of cuts would be the 'largest ever' made by a university in Scotland, and said management have failed to make a case for cuts of this size while at the same time planning 'record' investment in buildings and infrastructure.
It added that research and teaching staff are the 'backbone' of the university, and cutting them rather than buildings is a 'false economy'.
Jo Grady, UCU general secretary, said: 'UCU members at Edinburgh University are ready and willing to strike to save jobs and save this university, but disruption can still be avoided.
'Edinburgh University is a wealthy university with, at the last count, over £3 billion in its reserves.
'The Scottish Government should follow the lead of ministers in Wales and call on universities to use their reserves to avoid job losses.'
The union said walkouts will take place on June 20 and September 8-12, with action short of a strike beginning on June 20.
Responding to the announcement, Sir Peter said: 'We have been transparent about the savings urgently needed to secure our financial footing, with forecasts showing that we will be in deficit from the next financial year should we not act now.
'Failure to take preventative steps would leave us in an unsustainable situation, requiring deeper savings.
'We respect colleagues' right to take part in industrial action, and will do all we can to minimise disruption to students should this take place.
'We will also continue to work with our joint trade unions as plans develop to deliver these savings.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years
Of course, by now you already know the result, so you'll know which of the following scenarios and their consequences are the most accurate. But let me start with what the national polls tell us ought to have happened, by-election peculiarities – which I'll come to – notwithstanding. The SNP should have won with around 33% of the vote, down significantly on the 46.2% it won in 2021, with Labour in a narrow second on around 28% of the vote. Reform should have come third with just under 20% of the vote, while the Conservatives should have collapsed to under 10% of the vote. The rest of the vote, around 10%, will have been split among the Greens, Liberal Democrats, and myriad minor parties and independents. But by-elections rarely work out this way, even when the national polls are accurate. Firstly, voters are more likely to have voted in protest than they are at national elections, which may well help Reform in this case. As Jamie, a service engineer from Hamilton, told a focus group run by More in Common, it's 'time to give someone else a chance,' even if he thinks Nigel Farage is an 'a***hole'. Read more by Mark McGeoghegan Secondly, turnout will likely have collapsed. In the Hamilton and Rutherglen West by-election in October 2023, turnout fell by 43% compared to the 2019 General Election. A similar decline here would see around 15,600 voters who would otherwise turn out in a national election stay at home instead. Given that voters turning out to vote Reform as a protest against both the SNP and Labour governments are likely to be more motivated than SNP and Labour voters, this may also advantage Reform. In fact, assuming predictions based on national polling would otherwise have been accurate, Reform's vote will only have to have been marginally more resilient for it to finish ahead of Labour and narrowly behind the SNP. Factor in that first peculiarity of by-election campaigns, and such a scenario is hardly far-fetched. On the eve of the by-election, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused the First Minister, John Swinney, and journalists of manufacturing Reform's competitiveness in the seat. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a Reform underperformance yesterday will have been more surprising than it coming second. It has demonstrated its strength in a succession of local by-elections, the latest of which saw it beat Labour to come second behind the SNP. Whether or not Reform came second yesterday, its performance will shape the narrative in Scottish politics going into next year's elections in conjunction with its UK-wide polling lead (it has led in 25 consecutive polls going back to the beginning of May) and strong results in recent local elections and Parliamentary by-elections in England. Ultimately, regardless of yesterday's result, the spectre of Nigel Farage looms over Scottish politics. There are three broad scenarios. Firstly, that Reform performed to its Scotland-wide polling, confirming that it is on course to win between 15 and 20 seats in next year's Scottish Parliament election. Secondly, that it did overperform, perhaps coming second, leading to the next 11 months to being dominated by the SNP seeking to present next year's elections as a choice between the SNP and Nigel Farage, and a bitter fight between Reform and Labour for status as the main challengers to the SNP. Thirdly, that it underperformed, in which case the SNP will be quick to emphasise divergence between Scottish and English politics. In any case, the SNP will use the prospect of a Reform government at Westminster to try to increase the salience of the constitutional question, attempting to return independence to the heart of the Scottish political agenda ahead of next year's elections and the following UK general election. It knows that that is its best bet for winning back pro-independence voters who have swung to Labour in recent years. Replacing Humza Yousaf with John Swinney may have stabilised the SNP's support, but the party not really recovered in any meaningful way. The longer Reform leads in UK-wide polls, the more likely that narrative will be to gain purchase among the independence-supporting electorate. Strong Reform showings in Scotland will reinforce the sense that they could win power in 2029; weak performances will emphasise the ways in which Scottish and English politics may be diverging. Both provide hooks for the SNP. The spectre of Nigel Farage looms large over Scottish politics (Image: PA) The bigger question is whether this leads to a change in the constitutional deadlock. Some recent polling suggests that support for independence may have edged up. Norstat recently recorded its first Yes leads in three years, finding Yes ahead by seven points in the wake of Reform's strong showing in the English local elections. Survation still has No ahead by two or three points, down from leads of seven or eight points a year ago. The data is not conclusive, and we should be cautious of hypotheticals around whether developments will change voters' minds – we had enough such polls around Brexit and Boris Johnson becoming Prime Minister that never bore out. But the prominence of Reform UK and Nigel Farage in UK politics is a gift to the SNP and the independence movement, regardless of how they performed yesterday or how they perform north of the Border in the coming year. If Anas Sarwar is frustrated with his opponents' and the media's "obsession" with Reform UK, he should get used to that feeling – they'll be at the heart of Scottish political debate for years to come. Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Hamilton byelection win is vindication of Scottish Labour's doorstep strategy
Labour's victory in Hamilton is both a surprise and a vindication – a demonstration that in a byelection, shocks can take different forms. It is a surprise to those of us in the outside world who felt certain of a Scottish National party victory, who saw Labour support plummet in the Scottish opinion polls, and the same polls showing Reform's steeply rising. The question became: would Labour scrape home in second, behind an experienced and personable SNP candidate, or even endure the humiliation of coming third behind a resurgent Reform. After all, it seemed Scottish Labour's candidate, Davy Graham, was ill-equipped, so much so his party refused to put him up for a live television debate. But for Scottish Labour's strategists this is vindication. In a very clear way, this demonstrates the differences between what some call the 'air war' – the contest taking place on social media and the airwaves, of rows over 'racist' adverts and defeats in other contests, and the 'ground war', the dull and relentless grind of sending out activists to doorsteps, of leaflet delivering and face-to-face engagement. While Reform was ploughing a record sum, up to £15,000, into a single advert wrongly and unjustifiably accusing Anas Sarwar, Scottish Labour's leader, of prioritising Pakistanis, Labour canvassers were going door to door, or forensically using their social media advertising spend to target voters on YouTube and Facebook. In the final phase of the campaign last week, Labour strategists were quietly insisting their canvassing told a different story. While their data showed more people were voting Reform than ever before, with their vote boosted by the Runcorn byelection victory in May, most of those came from Conservatives, they argued. The Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection, called after the untimely death of the popular SNP MSP Christine McKelvie, was certainly a three-horse race, said one senior Labour figure. 'People are annoyed with us', they acknowledged. 'But I genuinely don't believe that the Reform vote is the size that people are speculating about.' Scottish Labour believed it had begun the contest in April at about 20% – a figure close to the party's national polling. Last week, Labour doorstep returns were putting its support at nearer 35%. 'I'm walking around quite happy,' the source said. 'People have written us off and people have made a mistake. But it's conditional on getting people out to vote.' Some voters have been visited four times by Labour canvassers and politicians: Labour MPs and MSPs flooded the constituency – in part because the UK party, from Keir Starmer downwards, knew they could not afford further humiliation at the hands of Reform. It seemed in the final days of the campaign that Reform's 'air war' was seriously wounding Labour's campaign: Farage revealed on Monday that a Scottish Labour councillor, a young man who had previously been chair of Glasgow University's Labour students group, had defected to Reform. That did shock the party. But in the event, the ground war won – to the great relief of a UK party that has just been pummelled by Reform in Runcorn and England's recent council elections. 'I think we have the better field operation and we've been around people's doors,' the strategist said. 'We're hungry for the votes and people see that.' This victory has sent a significant signal for Scotland's political parties with less than a year to go before next May's Holyrood elections. While the national polls repeatedly put Scottish Labour at 19%, with Reform only one point behind, and the SNP in the mid-30s, election campaigns are different. Labour's electoral machine – the machine that won a landslide on a 34% share of the vote in last year's general election, remains formidable. For John Swinney, the SNP's leader and first minister, this result has demonstrated his party has now to reequip itself by greatly improving its campaign machinery, its data-gathering and its strategies. The SNP was once the UK's most formidable electoral machine but, based on this byelection result, that seems no longer to be the case.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer hails Labour victory after surprise win in Hamilton byelection for Scottish parliament
Update: Date: 2025-06-06T07:40:06.000Z Title: Keir Starmer Content: Good morning. Assuming he was not still up at 1.36am, woke to good news this morning – Labour winning the byelection in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse for the Scottish parliament. It has gained the seat with a 7.4% swing from the SNP. This is a surprise. A week ago the SNP were press releasing a Norstat poll for the Times suggesting they were ahead by 33%, with Labour on 19% and Reform on 18%. And the bookies had the SNP in the lead too. Yesterday one firm had the SNP as firm favourites, followed by Reform, with odds of 11/1 available to anyone prepared to bet on Labour. Perhaps someone has made some good money. For the rest of us, this is a welcome reminder that opinion polls, and bookies' odds, are not always a good guide to results, particularly in byelections. Starmer was criticisised for not campaigning in Hamilton. But he did announce a big U-turn on the winter fuel payments while the campaign was taking place, and that may have helped get his candidate, Davy Russell, over the line. This morning Starmer posted this message on social media. Congratulations to @DavyRussell4HLS and the team on a fantastic victory. People in Scotland have once again voted for change. Next year there is a chance to turbo charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. I look forward to working with you. A win is a win, and this is good news for Labour. But, as the leading psephologist John Curtice has been telling the BBC this morning, the Reform UK vote is significant too. They came from nowhere to a strong third place, with 26% of the vote. The Conservatives, on 6%, only just avoided losing their deposit. Here is our overnight story by Libby Brooks, Rachel Keenan and Severin Carrell I will be posting more reaction to the result, and analysis, shortly. Here is the agenda for the day. 11am: Kemi Badenoch gives a speech where she will say she is 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw from European convention on human rights. 11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
